The Next-Gen Consoles and Power Consumption
Ant writes "This HardCOREware review reports that the current video game console war takes an interesting twist as the power consumption levels of each of the three new consoles (Nintendo Wii, Sony Playstation 3 (PS3), and Microsoft Xbox 360) were explored. Video game playback, DVD playback, and other console functions were tested. One of the most interesting stats were the console idle power usage: 'Wii - 1.3 watts, Wii (Connect 24 On) - 9.6 watts, Xbox 360 - 2.5 watts, PlayStation 3 - 1.9 watts. Nothing significant here; you're looking at spending about $0.20 USD a month to keep the PS3 plugged in, which isn't much. The Wii requires 10 Watts to run Connect24 (which will connect to Nintendo's online service and notify you of system updates) racking up a cost of about $1 a month which is nothing too significant, but still about 5X more than if it were just turned off. Turn Connect24 off, and it's back down to normal.'"
Odd summary... You point out the part that admits it's not nearly as interesting as usage stats... Wii: 18 Watts XBox 360: 185 Watts PS3: 193 Watts PC: 198 Watts Who wants to take bets on which console Gore is backing!
There are two things that consumers need to be aware of about these items:
1. The Wii's power usage when turned on is only a few watts more. So if you play your consoles, the cost of using WiiConnect24 is going to be significantly less than the cost of regularly using your PS3.
2. If you really don't want the Wii to standby, you can do a full shutdown at any time by holding down the power button. If you hold it down for long enough, the light should turn red. That means that the Wii is full off. This also works for the rare circumstances in which the Wii crashes. (Most commonly seen in the beta of the Opera Web Browser.)
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
I'm guessing for wireless.
So much bloody power? 10 watts is nothing. It's the power usage of some incandescent night lights. So take your pick: Leave the Wii on, or keep the bad monsters away.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
Assuming that's true, I wish they'd bothered to checked with the official wired adapter. I went ahead and bought it because my linksys is crap and locks up all the time if you are foolish enough to actually USE it. -sigh-
Not that the stats would change how I turn off my Wii, but it would be nice to know.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
How much of the Xbox idle power consumption is keeping the USB ports powered to charge Play&Charge wireless controllers? Could you reduce the power by unplugging the USB cable of your controllers when done, or would that have no impact? Anybody know?
Comment of the year
well, I guess your right on that one. I will however be doing my part in destroying the atmosphere while playing Resistance: Fall of man. When you go up against that Goliath, that system fans kick up, thats got to be a few minutes off the projected inhabitable atmosphere expectancy.
My backup chemistry thesis stored on Data Storing Bacteria mutated; granting me a degree in forensic anthropology. v4sw7
My Xbox 360 consumes:
~2 watts while turned off
~130 watts while idle at the xbox live dashboard
~165 watts while playing Gears of War
These meter readings do not include the display device (obviously)
I guess the Wii gets power from command shaking :-P
Aren't those consoles (Wii, PS3, 360) the current-gen consoles.
If they are the next-gen consoles, wouldn't we be calling the next iteration of consoles the next-next-gen?
Abaddon: An Xbox 360 Indie game
Power companies are reporting that PS3 usage accounts for only 0.1% of total power consumed, while usage of Wii's and XBox360's account for 5% of power consumed.
Disclaimer: Figures are total baloney.
I'm going to go out on a limb here, and guess that it may have something to do with the Wii using a wireless to stay connected (or whatever it does)? Maybe? Maybe not.
According to the math/cost/etc in this article, keeping a PC on full time for cost about $20 a month. Given that my power bill is only about a $50 a month including heat, frig, tv, etc, this would mean that about 40% of my power usage is keeping a computer on. Perhaps I should go home during lunch today and turn it off.
5,000,000 Wiis * 10W = 50 megawatts
From this link (sorry, the only one I could find for power output rather than watt/hour consumption):
By those estimates, 50 megawatts is only 0.0015% of the national power output. (And I'm counting consoles that aren't in the United States.) If we assume that the Wii will become as popular as the PS2 was (37.1 million units in the United States alone), we come up with 371 Megawatts, or about 0.011% of national power capacity.
Now let me throw some other figures back at you. The PS2 slurps about 45W to play games and DVDs (x37.1 million), the GameCube drinks about 40 watts (x12.7 million), and the XBox is estimated to gulp about 100 watts to play (x24 million). Standby power* for the XBox is 6 watts, 2 watts for the PS2, and 0.4 watts for the GameCube. During gameplay, the last generation of consoles were using: during playtime, and: If you were to take the average gameplay and DVD watching time of each console and work out the figures, do you think that replacing all of the existing consoles with Wiis would increase the overall power usage, or decrease the overall power usage? Some back-of-the-envelope figures of my own suggest that using nothing but Wiis would save power over the current situation. So I repeat, 10 watts is nothing.
* Based on web searches. Actual values may vary.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
Sorry, that second calc is supposed to have a "during standby" after it. So 223.28 megawatts for standby.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
Why has Nintendo made it MANDATORY to keep wiiconnect24 turned on if you want to use features like the news or weather channel? Is it so hard for them to let you download the data immediately when you access it?
And why does wiiconnect24 have to draw so much power? The thing will connect to the internet every 3 minutes or so! Why can't it just check for updates about once an hour, then go into full standby the rest of the time?
It looks like the Wii is shaping up to be the most popular console of this generation. It's a shame that there will be so many millions of Wiis constantly sucking down about 10x as much power as they really need to. I think it's great and all that it uses such low power when in actual use, but the amount used on standby is inexcusable in my opinion.
To answer your seriously proposed question:
;)
do you think that replacing all of the existing consoles with Wiis would increase the overall power usage, or decrease the overall power usage?
Screw you, I want to play Panzer Dragoon Orta!
Comment of the year
I wrote up an editorial on the specific details of the Xbox 360's power consumption. You can check it out here: http://www.planetxbox360.com/index.php/articledeta ils/show/1288
I'm always a bit dubious about power requirements. I think the PC requirements given are a little on the high side.I have measured several of my own systems(with a plug in watt meter!) all of widely differing specs and get:
1GHZ Mini ITX board based firewall with 2.5" drive 25-29W
3GHZ Seperon Board with 2GB of RAM and 2xHDD and DVD 77-109W
Athlon 3200 with 4GB RAM and 17xHDDs !!! 255-289W continuous 480W startup peak
19" LCD 35W
Either I have magically frugal computers or people's measurements come from reading off the rating of the PSU
Yes, but PS3's are the most efficient overall since the ones sitting on store shelves consume NO POWER.
Consoles use power while idle? Even more power if they are connecting to the internet?? OH MY GOD stop the presses! What the hell is the point of this? This just in! Sky = blue.
Though it uses a paltry amount of power anyway, (even in full use) I would be interested to know if the Wii does use less (or more) power by using the LAN adapter.
If 10 Watts keeps your room warm, then you must live in a thermos no larger than a cubic foot in volume.
everything in moderation
Mr. G has continues to donate amazing amounts of money to very worth causes, clearly he has a very active social conscience... So why doesn't he just ask his own engineers to make an effort to cut down on electricity consumption? Quickly looking at the numbers:
120 watts unnecessary power consumption in DVD mode (at least)
*
2 hours of duration for the average DVD (including menus and bathroom, and extras)
=
240 watt hours
*
24 the average number of DVDs watched a year (at least)
*
4 years average service life per console
*
500000 XBox360 consoles that will bought and used regularly
=
11,520,000,000 watt hours
11.5 giga watt hours?! WTF?! Admittedly the numbers are pulled out of my butt, however I think you'll agree that the real figures must be much higher. And I'm just looking at DVD use, nevermind the people who'll keep their console on when it's not being used. Why on earth would Billy let that much unnecessary carbon get pumped into the atmosphere when (if?) he's so concerned about the planet??? This is one example of where a tiny amount of effort would have resulted in a significant practical difference.