Slashdot Mirror


Ramanujian's Deathbed Problem Cracked

Jake's Mom sends word of the serendipitous solution to a decades-old mathematical mystery. Researchers from the University of Wisconsin have unraveled a major number theory puzzle left at the death of one of the twentieth century's greatest mathematicians, Srinivasa Ramanujan. From the press release: "Mathematicians have finally laid to rest the legendary mystery surrounding an elusive group of numerical expressions known as the 'mock theta functions.' Number theorists have struggled to understand the functions ever since... Ramanujan first alluded to them in a letter written [to G. H. Hardy] on his deathbed, in 1920. Now, using mathematical techniques that emerged well after Ramanujan's death, two number theorists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison have pieced together an explanatory framework that for the first time illustrates what mock theta functions are, and exactly how to derive them."

12 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Curiously enough by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, using mathematical techniques that emerged well after Ramanujan's death, two number theorists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison have pieced together an explanatory framework that for the first time illustrates what mock theta functions are, and exactly how to derive them.

    There's gotta be a Scientology joke in there somewhere
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  2. Re:Spelling error by boingo82 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But...but....with the "i" it almost anagrams to "marijuana"!

    --
    As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
  3. Re:Spelling error by Tilzs · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you imagined the "i"

  4. Re:Good job! by Slooze · · Score: 5, Funny

    Heheh...no kidding. When I saw "Ramanujian" in the header, my first thought was, "An Armenian created a math problem?!"

  5. Re:Good job! by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    This does seem like good work, but realistically we won't know how important it is until it appears as a deus ex machina device on NUMB3RS.

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  6. Re:Lack of information by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean there was even MORE math after "Integration by Parts"? Sheesh you guys need to get a life :P

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  7. Re:How to solve a mathematical mystery by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    How will I intellectually masturbate?

          Simple. Redefine the universe's parameters such that intellectual masturbation is no longer necessary, and place yourself in the appropriate set. You're a mathematician. You can do ANYTHING. Duh!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Re:Disappointing by Nicky+G · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sex scandal? Uh, yeah... don't hold your breath.

  9. Re:Spelling error by gsn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ramanujan was already a complex guy.
    Trying to Wick rotate him would be a pretty negative thing to do.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  10. Re:Disappointing by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would have to be imaginary, or complex. But that's a bit of a tangent from the point. The TFA is obtuse, cos() it doesn't exp()lain anything much. It would seem that the Slashdot crowd are caught on it Hooke, line and sinker, though. Of course, any maths problem is as easy as Pi, if you use sufficiently advanced techniques. However, if the problem cannot be differentiated meaningfully, can it be integral?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. you left math too early by ^Z · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are smooth operators that act on imaginary numbers right by the corner. Then it gets really kinky. Consider improper integrals, strip functions, etc.

    --

    Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes