Avoiding the Word "Evolution"

jakosc tips us to a disturbing article in PloS Biology on the avoidance of the word "Evolution" in scientific papers and grants. From the paper: "In spite of the importance of antimicrobial resistance, we show that the actual word 'evolution' is rarely used in the papers describing this research. Instead, antimicrobial resistance is said to 'emerge,' 'arise,' or 'spread' rather than 'evolve.' Moreover, we show that the failure to use the word 'evolution' by the scientific community may have a direct impact on the public perception of the importance of evolutionary biology in our everyday lives... It has been repeatedly rumored (and reiterated by one of the reviewers of this article) that both the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have in the past actively discouraged the use of the word 'evolution' in titles or abstracts of proposals so as to avoid controversy."

Comments

Re:It IS disturbing...

[Anonymous Coward]

Read the truth here: -

http://www.darwinism-watch.com/
and
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/focus_12.php
or
http://www.harunyahya.com/

There are many scientists who strongly appose the current evolutionary model. Sadly too many hide their views so as not to be ridiculed by secularists and atheists.

Oh boy

[ScrewMaster]

... the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have in the past actively discouraged the use of the word 'evolution' in titles or abstracts of proposals so as to avoid controversy.

Now that's bad. If you are unwilling to accept controversy as a consequence of good science, odds are that you no longer have good science.

Re:What do you expect?

[gr8dude]

In SOVIET Russia flying spaghetti monster trust YOU!!