Slashdot Mirror


Windows Genuine Advantage Gets More Lenient

Troglodyte writes in with word that Microsoft is revamping its Windows Genuine Advantage program so that it labels fewer users pirates. WGA now has a third category besides "genuine and "not genuine," called "not sure." Quoting: "[I]t's quite obvious what is going on here: Microsoft has added 'not sure' as a way of cutting down on the number of false positives associated with WGA. As many as one in five PCs were failing WGA checks, but this new setting should both reduce this and give Microsoft the chance to investigate further the kinds of things that are landing folks in the 'not sure' category."

46 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this a genuine first post?

    1. Re:First Post by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are making a joke. Cancel/Allow?

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
  2. Not sure? by Sneakernets · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not sure I want them to change anything else after being told my genuine copy was pirated.

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Not sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure I want them to change anything else after being told my pirated copy was genuine.

    2. Re:Not sure? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure I want them to change anything else after being told my genuine pirate was copied.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. Matey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Me thinks I need ta be labeled 'genuine pirate'. Aaaarrrrrrrr!

  4. So by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I guess the new categories are:
    1. Not a pirate
    2. Pirate
    3. Ninja

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or...

      #4 - A windows Volume license install that then had the WGA patched plus the install key changed to a regular Pro key that was keygened and thus passes the WGA test perfectly. Even Windows Media player 11 is happy with it.

      WGA is so incredibly easy to get past it's not funny. set the patched WGA dll to read only and updates cant overwrite it.

    2. Re:So by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So like I said... ninja.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    3. Re:So by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the new categories are: 1. Guilty 2. Innocent 3. Guilty unless proven innocent

      --
      That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
    4. Re:So by brian.gunderson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gotta love WGA. My computer tells me that I 'am a victim of software piracy'. If I'm the victim, then what does that make Microsoft?? Funny, I didn't realize I was being victimized. I guess it would sound funny if it popped up saying 'You may be benefiting from software piracy.'

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    5. Re:So by proxy318 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't be silly. No one can detect ninjas.

      --
      Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  5. I got a better idea by gasmonso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just do away with all this crap and stop bothering paying customers. Hackers will always find a way around whatever scheme MS or any other company devises. It's just a fact of life. If humans make it, humans can break it. Vista is already hacked and it will always continue. HDDVD has met the same fate.

    gasmonso http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:I got a better idea by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hackers will always find a way around whatever scheme MS or any other company devises.

      Very true, but in the 90s, companies pirating mass quanities of MS software was a major concern. Not only did it kill MS revenue, but it screwed consumers as they thought the copies they were buying were legitimate.

      From working in the OEM world at that time, even our trusted vendors would often have workers that would offer 'discounted' OEM copies of MS software from another company all the time. It was so bad that our company had to put in place buying policies to ensure only geniune copies were ever purchased. And even with that policy in place, we had several hundred fake copies of MS software slip through OEM distributors that themselves didn't realize the copies were fake.

      This is where all this crap started, but in the process MS lost sight of the goal of ensuring consumers didn't get screwed.

      People in MS honestly think the Activation and Keys and WGA were good things to help the consumers to ensure they didn't get worthless copies.

      MS just needs a real wakeup call that there are alternatives to dealing with mass production piracy that DO NOT harm or even bother the consumers.

      Digital distribution could actually be a real solution as the control of licensing and purchasing could potentially be more easily controlled than relying on Keys and WGA to ensure copies weren't obtained from shady companies.

      I don't agree with MS on this, although I do have understanding of where and why all this protection crap started.

    2. Re:I got a better idea by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If WGA is to help a customer ensure that their copy of Windows is genuine and not to thwart pirates then make it a tool that the customer can run when they choose not a constant bother. Make WGA help not hinder.

    3. Re:I got a better idea by jcr · · Score: 5, Funny

      If humans make it, humans can break it.

      That's why the next version is being coded by SHARKS! Sharks with frickin' "lasers" on their heads.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  6. Well... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems even MS is willing to admit a major screw up and is willing to give consumers the benefit of the doubt once again.

    Do you think people inside MS are starting to finally stop listening to Ballmer and his business/money only mentality?

    It could be quite earth shaking for MS to start caring about consumers more than $$ again.

  7. Not sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a Mac
    I'm a PC
    I'm not sure

  8. Oh please by Kaitnieks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, how hard can it be? The key either is valid or it isn't. Compare the key for validity using the same algorithm that Windows installation uses and compare it against the database of invalidated keys and that's it. No other software products have no problems with validating keys, why is this causing so much problems for Microsoft?

    1. Re:Oh please by peragrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is a good question. I wonder Why MSFT can't do the simple things right but can complete the complex ones. maintaining Windows codebase, Extremely complex. Building WinFS so that it works across intranets, With Leopard, OS X will introduce that functionality into spotlight.

        Though My first thought was that they wanted to cut down on customers getting the invalid key. Out of every million, 200,000 people where being told that their once valid copies were no longer valid. So in order to cut down on False Postives they added another point. So out of a million customers you have 150,000 peopling calling to say WTF fix this, and 50,000 pirates.

      Their numbers still add up but the PR dept doesn't have to work so hard.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Oh please by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok, the boxed product I buy from the store has a key.
      That key is a single use single instance key - one consumer can have it.
      However, 2 people register with Microsoft for it - one of them is a pirate, the other isn't (or both are..)

      How can you tell?

      Then, take one volume licensing key which was purchased for a company to do 20000 installations worldwide.
      That key gets used 20001 times, which is the pirate?

      Turn off the wrong machine and you just lost that entire customer of thousands of machines ('cos the boss is pissed off with MS for making him look like a pirate).

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Oh please by dave562 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Then, take one volume licensing key which was purchased for a company to do 20000 installations worldwide. That key gets used 20001 times, which is the pirate?

      It doesn't work that way. VLKs are basically on the honor system.

    4. Re:Oh please by Tadrith · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is not that there are fake keys lying around, it's that there are real keys lying around.

      For quite some time, the key algorithm for the Volume License copies of XP has been cracked. They're perfectly valid keys, they simply haven't actually been sold to anyone. That's why they can't use the same algorithm, and why they have to keep this magic database of "actually sold" keys to compare against. I have no idea how this database was generated, but I'm willing to bet it was cobbled together, and that Microsoft had no real easy way of knowing which keys were sold and which were not, which resulted in a highly error prone database.

    5. Re:Oh please by Zarel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean, how hard can it be? The key either is valid or it isn't. Compare the key for validity using the same algorithm that Windows installation uses and compare it against the database of invalidated keys and that's it. No other software products have no problems with validating keys, why is this causing so much problems for Microsoft? Well, considering I've gotten WGA "not genuine" notices while using a perfectly valid key, and I'm not alone - simply installing the wrong program can cause "not genuine" notices, I'd say Microsoft's system is slightly more complicated than "see if key is valid".
      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
  9. Wow I was right by Anon-Admin · · Score: 3, Informative


    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=218426&cid=177 29478

    I hate to say it but "I told you so!"

    Ok, I enjoy saying it :)

  10. So it's safe to upgrade my computer now? by fade-in · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After this change takes place, can I please upgrade my CPU without having to grovel on the phone to some tech support bozo for a new key?

    --
    This sig is inappropriate in a post-9/11 world.
    1. Re:So it's safe to upgrade my computer now? by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Funny

      no. also, that's Mr. Indian Tech Support Bozo to you.

  11. Now how about activation by spyrochaete · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is all well and good, but what about activation? I own a student edition of WinXP Pro and every time I install the OS the internet activation fails. I'm prompted (forced) to call a 1-800 number to activate manually within 30 days. When I do so I must key in or speak a 48-digit activation key which also fails every time. I'm then forwarded to a human being (in India, I'm quite positive) who asks me to repeat part of that 48-digit key, has the audacity to ask me WHY I'M INSTALLING WINDOWS, and then reads back a corresponding 48-digit key which always works.

    I have never had trouble using pirated editions of Windows. Regardless of this softened WGA check, Microsoft punishes their legitimate customers. Period.

    1. Re:Now how about activation by 3t3rn4l · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, so next time you have to reinstall it and they ask you "WHY ARE YOU RE-INSTALLING WINDOWS?", simply respond, "WHY, I GUESS I DON'T KNOW!?!?! THE THOUGHT NEVER OCCURRED TO ME UNTIL JUST NOW TO INSTALL ANYTHING ELSE!" and then hang up. Re-activate it if you must! :)

      --
      Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt. (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will
  12. magic by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon the options will be:
            * Signs point to yes.
            * Yes.
            * Most likely.
            * Without a doubt.
            * Yes - definitely.
            * As I see it, yes.
            * You may rely on it.
            * Chances are good.
            * It is certain.
            * It is decidedly so.
            * Reply hazy, try again.
            * Better not tell you now.
            * Ask again later.
            * Concentrate and ask again.
            * Cannot predict now.
            * My sources say no.
            * Very doubtful.
            * My reply is no.
            * Chances not so good.
            * Don't count on it.

    1. Re:magic by Stanistani · · Score: 2, Funny

      I once wrote a routine which applied the principle of Schrödinger's Cat to a dialog box:
      It prompted - "You won't know what happens when you select this until afterwards" and displayed - ?

      My instructor told me, "Now you're just being a jerk."

  13. I can't believe it by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You forgot the best one of all!

    * Outlook not so good.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  14. Re:Actually by dave562 · · Score: 2, Informative
    If my CPU cooks or I want to switch to a better LAN card, I'd just as soon not have to argue with Microsoft *or* pay another $200+.

    Have YOU ever had to argue with Microsoft to get another activation code? Has anyone you know (in real life, not on the net) had to argue with Microsoft to get a code? Every single time I have needed a new code I've called up the number that appears on the screen, told them that the motherboard failed and I replaced it, and then they gave me a new code.

    Having to "argue" with Microsoft (if you are a legit owner of a non-OEM copy of Windows) is nothing but pure FUD. Now trying to get another activation code out of an OEM... I'd be willing to believe that is a headache.

  15. "Piracy" HELPED Microsoft in the 90's. by khasim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Novell would have each NetWare server broadcast its license on the network. If two boxes used the same license, both boxes would shut down.

    And Novell tracked each license number by company. You could transfer your license to a different company by sending Novell a letter on your company's letterhead.

    Microsoft couldn't distinguish between the serial number for a mouse and the serial number for NT server. Microsoft didn't keep a record of what licenses you had registered. They couldn't even tell you if you HAD registered any licenses.

    So you could get one license code for NT server and install 1,000 "pirated" servers.

    And Microsoft liked it like that. That gave them the edge over Novell.

    Now that Microsoft's competition is practically dead, Microsoft is looking for ways to increase their revenue by making sure that every single license is paid for. Just like Novell was doing in the 90's.

  16. Most of you must not remember win95/98 by Nightspirit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...because in those days 1 copy of windows would supply dozens of people (family, friends, their family, etc). I'm sure it was an even bigger problem for schools and businesses. Now, I'm sure some of you believe that all software should be free or open source, however, I can also see MS's view of wanting to actually get money for their OS. I don't believe WGA is necessarily the best way of doing this, but MS will never go back to "free copies for everyone win98" days.

  17. Microsoft is not making any sense. by tkrotchko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the United States, it's pretty difficult to buy a pre-made PC without a license for Microsoft Windows. Yes, I've heard about the Dell "N" series, yes, I know you can build your own. But go to CompUSA, BestBuy, Costco, Dell direct, and these machines all have licenses for Windows.

    So ask yourself this... in the current situation, why is microsoft investing so heavily in WGA? Surely, there are no more licenses to be sold.

    But apparently there is. Microsoft has so narrowly defined the definition of a "legal copy of windows" that you really can't be sure.

    If my Dell is smoked, and I replace the motherboard, apparently, I don't have a valid license? Or maybe I do. MS will let me know when they decide.

    If I've changed too many things too many times in my PC (RAM, HD, Memory, etc), apparently, I am a software pirate. Go figure.

    Going back to my original point. If MS is saying 1 of 5 PC's fail this test, they're saying 20% of all PC's don't have a license for Windows. If I assume that 2% of new PC's are sold in the U.S. without a Windows license, then what happened to those other 18% of licenses?

    It doesn't add up.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  18. Re:Actually by Kyle_Katarn-(ISF) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now trying to get another activation code out of an OEM... I'd be willing to believe that is a headache.
    No, actually, in my experience it's not a problem. I work on systems for folks on the side, and it's fairly often that I have to replace an OEM mainboard with a retail one. Every time I've done so (I can remember at least 5 times), I've called Microsoft and after answering yes to "Is this the only computer this key is used on?", received an activation code.

  19. Windows Freebooter by fyoder · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have never had trouble using pirated editions of Windows.

    Are you listening Microsoft? Here is an opportunity to make some money. Package and sell the pirated version as 'Windows Freebooter', perhaps for a $50 premium over regular price. Seriously, I'll bet there's a market for it.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  20. Re:"Piracy" HELPED Microsoft in the 90's. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And now we (hopefully) will have Linux/BSD, which you can legally and in perpetuity install onto as many servers as you want, and not have to worry about the cycle repeating.

  21. Re:"Piracy" HELPED Microsoft in the 90's. by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Now that Microsoft's competition is practically dead, Microsoft is looking for ways to increase their revenue by making sure that every single license is paid for. Just like Novell was doing in the 90's.

    Good, because ultimately it will be Microsoft's undoing. Small shops that were 100% Microsoft but were able to do so only by paying for what they cord afford and pirating what they couldn't will now be forced to dump Microsoft or stick with older versions of Microsoft software because the new versions are so locked down they can no longer engage in the casual copying they used to engage in to upgrade those PC's that they otherwise couldn't afford to upgrade. They'll then focus on finding less expensive or free alternatives that can integrate with the existing Microsoft software that they are running. Standards suddenly become important to these shops and they are now open to and aware of alternatives they were not open to or aware of before. Suddenly paying the Microsoft tax seems more and more ridiculous.

  22. Re:"Piracy" HELPED Microsoft in the 90's. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Informative

    If two boxes used the same license, both boxes would shut down.
    Pretty sure if Microsoft did this people would be taking down a network of computers easily (just have to claim you're using everyone's key).
    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  23. MS automated licensing by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Funny

    ID Processing Computer: "Please repeat your license key as it occurs on your M$ identity card. Document number G24L8"
    Joe: "Well, I'm not sure if--"
    ID Processing Computer: "You have entered the license status of 'Not Sure'. Is this correct, Not sure?"
    Joe: "No, it is not correct."
    ID Processing Computer: "Thank you. 'Not' is correct. Is 'Sure' correct?
    Joe: No, it's not. My license key is rm233-"
    ID Processing Computer: "You've already confirmed that your license key starts with 'Not'."
    ID Processing Computer: "Please confirm the last part of your key, 'Sure'."
    Joe: "My ke-- The last part of my key is not sure. No."
    ID Processing Computer: "Thank you. Your pirating status has been entered as Not Sure."
    Joe: "What I mean is my status is legi--"
    ID Processing Computer: "Confirmation is complete. Please wait while I tattoo your pirate status on all your word documents and email correspondences."
    Joe: "Tattoo, wait what?!?"

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  24. Re:Actually by Spril · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I personally had to argue with Microsoft to get an activation code for Windows XP. The hard drive on my IBM Thinkpad failed, and I replaced it under warranty. Windows refused to authenticate using the product key printed on the bottom of my computer, saying the key was invalid. (I had bought the computer directly from IBM, which I expect eliminates the possibility this was a bogus key.) I called the Microsoft authentication hotline, which had an automated voice that insisted that I read out loud the 54-digit code that Windows provided. I tried typing it in, but it ignored me. When I read it out loud, the Hotline told me that number was invalid and hung up on me.

    I called back. This time, I didn't try to read it the 54 digits again. When I was silent, it hung up on me. So I called back again. This time, I made random noises at it. After five minutes of random noises (which was quite amusing to those working nearby), I finally got hold of a person.

    It took 20 minutes to convince the person at the other end of the phone that my license was legitimate. They gave me a new key to enter. Windows said the key was valid, and everything seemed ok.

    Then I rebooted, and Windows again said I had an invalid key. I had to call back again, make random noises for five minutes--my coworkers were laughing hysterically--and get a new key. I told them to wait until my machine rebooted, and they said they couldn't. I asked for a way to reach them directly without making noises at their stupid voicemail, and she said there wasn't a way. While I rebooted, I said I wanted to speak to a supervisor. She waited a moment and then said there was a supervisor there--but I couldn't speak to him. She would relay what he said. (Yeah, right, Microsoft.) The "supervisor" told me I should type the "0" key on the phone when I got the first voicemail prompt, which would connect me back to a human operator. I said I didn't believe that would work (since I had tried typing the number already, when it insisted I read it). She laughed and said the "supervisor" had told her to tell me that, and she hung up on me. At least my stalling tactic worked--she stayed on the line until the machine rebooted so I could confirm it wasn't useless key.

    I have lived through Microsoft's reactivation hell, personally. It's not FUD.

  25. Re:Actually by bluemonq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had the exact same situation, with Windows not accepting the product key on the bottom of my ThinkPad during activation after I wiped the hard drive clean... maybe there's something going on there? Anyways, I called them up, failed the automated service, and automatically got switched to a human. She gave me some sort of alternate code, waited until it finished rebooting, and that was that. Personally, I think that Microsoft has an average percentage of bad reps; it's just that since they have so many more customers, and that people tend to report bad (and not good) service that it seems like MS CSRs are so much worse.

  26. you are a pirate ... arrrr by garlicbready · · Score: 3, Funny

    my guess is it will probably force you to play this on every single bootup
    forcing this incredibly annoying song to go through your head all day
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEBbu-wkKrs&mode=re lated&search=

    if that isn't a deterrent, I don't know what is

  27. Re:Actually by Jarnis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Working as designed.

    Little known fact: Keys from major OEMs printed on stickers on your box / under your laptop are DUMMY KEYS. You can install the OS with them, but it will NOT activate.

    If you use manufacturer's recommended recovery method (Recovery CD, recovery partition), the key is never asked. If you use some other media, the key is accepted, but it _will not activate_. If you call MS and actually get a human, they usually give you a new key when you explain the situation, but the sticker key not working is WORKING AS DESIGNED.

    The sticker keys used to work, but then people stole them by writing them down from PCs (shocking!), so the MS answer was to make them essentially duds.