Is Vista a Trap?
logube writes "BBC has up an article about the trap of installing Vista in your existing desktop. Written by Tim Weber, a self-confessed 'sucker for technology,' this article is a good introduction to the pain and extra money required to get going with the newest version of Windows. See how you can spend an extra 130 british pounds, and still have no working webcam! Says Weber, 'It took me one day to get online. The detail is tedious and highly technical: reinstalling drivers and router firmware didn't work, but after many trial and error tweaks to Vista's TCP/IP settings, I had internet access. Once online, Creative's website told me that my sound card was a write-off. No Vista support would be forthcoming.'"
Anyone using this malware? Does it have anything we need?
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
What's with all these anti-vista posts?
... etc.
No one forces you to use it.
You can stay with that ol' linux box that doesn't have a single decent image-browser, dc++ client, office suite,
Not to mention decent looking fonts (anti-aliasing in linux is light-years away from cleartype - seen the major distros, xorg 7.1 w/latest kde - it's still crap)
I don't mind paying for good 3rd party apps. just that they don't exist for linux.
Sigs are for the weak.
The usual coercion and strong-arm tactics should do the trick.
I don't care why you're posting AC