Slashdot Mirror


The Pentagon Wants a 'TiVo' to Watch You

An anonymous reader writes "Danger Room, a Wired blog, today cites a study of future electronic snooping technologies from Reuters, written by the Pentagon's Defense Science Board. More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillance system that would put Big Brother to shame, and they're looking at the commercial sector to provide it. 'The ability to record terabyte and larger databases will provide an omnipresent knowledge of the present and the past that can be used to rewind battle space observations in TiVo-like fashion and to run recorded time backwards to help identify and locate even low-level enemy forces. For example, after a car bomb detonates, one would have the ability to play high-resolution data backward in time to follows the vehicle back to the source, and then use that knowledge to focus collection and gain additional information by organizing and searching through archived data.'"

6 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Neoconned alert! by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    will provide an omnipresent knowledge of the present and the past

    Does the mindset of whoever wrote this creep you out too? It isn't about being religeous - it's about being Gods themselves and making you worship them.

  2. Re:I for one... by couchslug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "For example, after a car bomb detonates, one would have the ability to play high-resolution data backward in time to follows the vehicle back to the source, and then use that knowledge to focus collection and gain additional information by organizing and searching through archived data."

    No more "Hooveristic" than a camera at the local Quickie Mart. An action is filmed, the data trail is followed backwards until something useful is found.

    "We all know that people are unpredictable. You can't apply scientific rationale to people."

    This is not about predicting them, it is about recording what is done in public space and using it to trace activities back to source.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  3. Um, sensationalism anyone? by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The title of this article is totally off. This is nothing more than a way to analyze battlefield intel better. It's got nothing to do with any kind of surveillance programs or anything other than being able to better catagorize threats and analyze data after a conflict.

    This gives a whole new meaning to 'knee jerk reaction'.

  4. Re:And the FDA make food eat you! by daeg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, the citizens hate America. The government must protect America from its anti-American citizens.

  5. Re:The only reason I'm not scared.. by Kisil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think you're partly right - there will likely not be a workable system.

    Unfortunately, there will very likely be a system that partly works. Massive amounts of data will be collected, but processing will not be intelligent enough to translate this into real results in crime-fighting. Any data mining will result in many more false positives than actual results and waste government agents' time, which could otherwise be spent actually tracking down criminals (or terrorists.) Meanwhile, no thought will be given to privacy issues, resulting in tons of priviledged information being easily available to all the wrong people.

    In a nice worst-case scenario, security failures could allow outsiders to change the govenment's record of the past.

    I really do wish your remark were fully correct.

  6. Re:Wouldn't It Be Easier Just To... by BalanceOfJudgement · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No doctor on earth would hold back a cure for cancer or diabetes if such a thing existed.
    It may say something about the state of my cynicism that I do not believe that to be true.

    It is not so much the doctors themselves I believe capable of this treachery, since doctors actually interact with the patients they'd be forcing to suffer, and few humans are capable of purposefully inflicting pain on a known victim for the sake of profit; rather, the pharmaceutical companies that have everything to gain from never-ending poor health.

    When you never have to see the face of those you cause to suffer, it is easy to write off their suffering as unimportant.
    --

    We are the fire that lights our world.. and we are the fire that consumes it.