MyEclipse 5.1.1 GA Supports Eclipse 3.2.2 & Vi
RobK writes "The GA release of MyEclipse 5.1.1 is now available for immediate download and is compatible with Eclipse 3.2.2, Windows Vista. The release also includes an enhanced and professionally supported version of Eclipse WTP 1.5.3 with many MyEclipse improvements and bug fixes, as well as Fully I18N enabled. "
...and why wasn't emacs mentioned you bastards! :p
PS: presumably it should be "Vista"...?
Is it me, is is this an ad for someone trying to sell Eclipse?
http://www.eclipse.org/ Eclipse is an Open Source development framework. Or are you commenting on the format of the link?
MyEclipse is something that you have to pay for, this is seperate to the generic Eclipse. The fact that this is a link to a pay for product where a major feature being that it works on Vista (I would wonder how many of the Slashdot care if it works on Vista, let alone acquire it when they can put together Eclipse themselves). So he would be commenting on the actual product being linked to if your read the slashvertisement/article/press release. IMHO its an ad.
I always wondered where this setting was...
Everyone knows that ed is the standard text editor.
A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
What does the commercial MyEclipse have, that the open source Eclipse hasn't?
Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
Yes, this is a typical example of a slashvertisement. Nothing to see, move along.
I use Eclipse, and I don't even have any idea what this article is about. What is MyEclipse? What is a GA release? What does it have to do with Vi? What is Eclipse WTP? Why should I care if it's "fully I18n enabled"? Could you please explain anything about what you're talking about?
Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
He was referring to the fact that some company has taken Eclipse, slapped it on a box and charged a yearly "membership" fee as well as rebranding it "MyEclipse".
.. free? If I'm paying for it then I think its really "YourEclipse" that I'm just renting. Or maybe the My just refers to them in the first place.
The names a bit confusing to me. Isn't it more "MyEcplise" when its
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
Maybe the problem is they think it's TheirEclipse.
Developers: We can use your help.
MyEclipse is an extension of Eclipse with a bunch proprietary J2EE build tools. There are similar free tools available as well, like Netbeans 5.5.
When I came into my new job I was given MyEclipse as my dev environment. At first I was a little wary, cause I asked all the same questions everyone else seems to be asking now. Whats the big deal, why am I using this thing when Eclipse is free and I can do everything this does?
After some time using it though, I realize there are some very useful features. For example, you can easily add struts, springs, and hibernate support to your application. There is a very handy GUI based struts config tools, as well as a way to generate hibernate mappings and all your POJOs automatically using a connection to your DB.
On the other hand, these features have their draw backs. For example, some average Jon who really doesn't know how the stuff is supposed to work can come in a slap all this stuff together to make one horribly constructed and poorly designed application. People will use the technologies, and may even claim they now how to, on a resume, for example, but really not know.
Having these automated tools, is a nice and handy time saver, but its no excuse for actually knowing how to do things by hand.
Hmmm, this just looks like a commercially supported version of Eclipse. I suppose if one wants professional support, it could be something useful. But I'm pretty cheap/poor, so I'll have to pass and keep using the free Eclipse.
To the making of books there is no end, so let's get started
What a poor choice for a product name. As someone who spends most of their day cleaning spyware and crap out of computers for people, I have to say that anything with "My" in the name is sure sign of malware. (notwithstanding "my computer" and "my documents" on windows, which are just badly named in the first place).
In short,
At 10:53 AM EST, you were an Eclipse user
By 11:31 AM EST, you are no longer an Eclipse user
What happened in those 40 minutes that made you switch?
MySql. But, in retrospect, it would make more sense to name it something else. like SQLicious, SQLator, SQLphin ( SQL + Dolphin).
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
It is interesting that this anonymous comment was modded as Redundant although it is the only one that mentions the price tag and according to the time stamps, it was posted half an hour before the other comment saying that MyEclipse is a commercial version of Eclipse.
I've been begging for someone to integrate vi into eclipse. For years. viPlugin sucks. There are a couple other projects, one that integrates gvim via the eclipse modular editor framework stuff, but it is also useless. Anyone know of a good way to get vi stuff working in eclipse?
So what happened to OurEclipse? Oh wait, I guess it's still alive and well :)
I didnt see a free edition, so ya, id say this is an ad.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
I don't use MyEclipse myself, but what I saw when I tried it is that it bundles a lot of free plugins. Sure you can download them all for free, but for 30$, it can saves you a lot of time. If you're payed 60$ an hour, after half an hour you're beginning to save money...
If I really need to pay for an IDE, then I would buy IntelliJ IDEA [http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/], Eclipse is good as a free tool, it is fantastic as a free tool, but I scarcely see it giving a run for IntelliJ IDEA as far as usability and features are concerned. Of course there is a plugin for everything in Eclipse, but that in my opinion just makes it that much complicated.... Even in free tools I see NetBeans getting far ahead in the long run against Eclipse. A recent Eclipse user.. and IDEA convert
It doesn't strike me as redundant to point out that this story is slashvertising. It is not tagged as such, so a having highly visible post saying so would be nicer than burying the post.
I don't therefore I'm not.