Slashdot Mirror


MyEclipse 5.1.1 GA Supports Eclipse 3.2.2 & Vi

RobK writes "The GA release of MyEclipse 5.1.1 is now available for immediate download and is compatible with Eclipse 3.2.2, Windows Vista. The release also includes an enhanced and professionally supported version of Eclipse WTP 1.5.3 with many MyEclipse improvements and bug fixes, as well as Fully I18N enabled. "

56 comments

  1. What does this have to do with Vi? by bad_fx · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and why wasn't emacs mentioned you bastards! :p

    PS: presumably it should be "Vista"...?

    1. Re:What does this have to do with Vi? by joschm0 · · Score: 0

      You mean VI-sta?

      --
      01/20/09
    2. Re:What does this have to do with Vi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually read the article in the hope that it would be some Eclipse/vi hybrid environment. Finally a java editor where the autocompletion is faster than typing by hand.
      No such luck, I guess.

    3. Re:What does this have to do with Vi? by kusanagi374 · · Score: 1

      But I use nano you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:What does this have to do with Vi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, just yesterday I was praying for VI key bindings for eclipse. The headline got me excited. Does anyone know if there actually exists a vi plugin for eclipse?

    5. Re:What does this have to do with Vi? by IAN · · Score: 1

      Actually, just yesterday I was praying for VI key bindings for eclipse.

      There is a quite decent vi plugin for Eclipse (payware, but worth it if you don't want to fight your muscle memory.)

    6. Re:What does this have to do with Vi? by dfries · · Score: 1

      I'll just stick to vim, it's a better vi than vi ever was. Multilevel undo alone makes it worth it.

  2. Is is an Ad? I can't tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it me, is is this an ad for someone trying to sell Eclipse?

  3. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by Radice+Utente · · Score: 1

    http://www.eclipse.org/ Eclipse is an Open Source development framework. Or are you commenting on the format of the link?

  4. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by pasamio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MyEclipse is something that you have to pay for, this is seperate to the generic Eclipse. The fact that this is a link to a pay for product where a major feature being that it works on Vista (I would wonder how many of the Slashdot care if it works on Vista, let alone acquire it when they can put together Eclipse themselves). So he would be commenting on the actual product being linked to if your read the slashvertisement/article/press release. IMHO its an ad.

    --
    I always wondered where this setting was...
  5. vi? bah by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that ed is the standard text editor.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:vi? bah by TaGGarT · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly Lord Ender, everyone knows that cat along with it's sidekick ^d are the preferred editor of champions. :)

      --
      University politics are vicious precisely because the stakes are so small. -- Henry Kissinger
  6. Why? by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What does the commercial MyEclipse have, that the open source Eclipse hasn't?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Why? by MythMoth · · Score: 1

      Not a great deal.

      Last time I used it, it had a few plugins (Spring for example) and wizards included automatically, but nothing for which there weren't adequate or superior alternatives.

      On the whole I prefered Eclipse with the Web Tools Platform and any other plugins specific to the tasks I was actually involved in. Unless it's advanced a great deal, don't bother.

      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What does the commercial MyEclipse have, that the open source Eclipse hasn't?

      It's not a buggy piece of shit like WTP is. Granted, MyEclipse actually uses components of WTP, just not the buggy ones (app server support for example, which is very important).

    3. Re:Why? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      WTP was the reason I switched from Eclipse to Netbeans 5.5.
      WTP is a complete mess.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  7. You must be new here by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Yes, this is a typical example of a slashvertisement. Nothing to see, move along.

    1. Re:You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see YOU didn't move on.

  8. What? by Yosho · · Score: 3, Funny

    I use Eclipse, and I don't even have any idea what this article is about. What is MyEclipse? What is a GA release? What does it have to do with Vi? What is Eclipse WTP? Why should I care if it's "fully I18n enabled"? Could you please explain anything about what you're talking about?

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    1. Re:What? by g051051 · · Score: 5, Informative

      MyEclipse is an add on that enhances the base Eclipse package. www.myeclipseide.org for more info.

      GA Release means General Availabiliy (a full release as opposed to a M releae, or milestone)

      Vi looks like a typo, they meant Vista, I think.

      Eclipse WTP is the Eclipse Web Tools Project.

      I18n is shorthand for "internationalization".

      All of which you would already have know if you actually used Eclipse like you said.

    2. Re:What? by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      I use Eclipse, and I don't even have any idea what this article is about. What is MyEclipse? What is a GA release? What does it have to do with Vi? What is Eclipse WTP? Why should I care if it's "fully I18n enabled"? Could you please explain anything about what you're talking about?

      You must be new here!

    3. Re:What? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      That comment of yours doesn't even make sense; you're inferring that I said I used Eclipse but I don't, and that using it somehow bestows knowledge of third-party extensions upon the user. What would be the point of lying about that? Are you just trying to start a fight?

      I don't do web development, anyway, so I'm not at all familiar with the WTP. And I know what "I18n" means -- the question is, why do I care? How is it relevant to the rest of the summary?

      Besides that, my post was intended as less of an inquiry and more of a comment on how horribly written the summary is.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:What? by g051051 · · Score: 1

      You said in your original post: "I use Eclipse, and I don't even have any idea what this article is about". Now you say "you're inferring that I said I used Eclipse but I don't". Which is it?

    5. Re:What? by Phoe6 · · Score: 1

      >>Vi looks like a typo, they meant Vista, I think.

      I thought much needed full vim support. Vista.. No. I already have an operating system.

      --
      Senthil
    6. Re:What? by roscivs · · Score: 1

      Vi looks like a typo, they meant Vista, I think.

      I was so excited, too. I've wanted vi support in Eclipse for ages now. I even started a plugin (http://viclipse.sourceforge.net/) that didn't get very far.
      --
      ~ roscivs
    7. Re:What? by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1
      Vi looks like a typo, they meant Vista, I think.

      I really hope you're joking.

    8. Re:What? by robthebob · · Score: 1

      He says he uses Eclipse, and you are inferring that he although he said he does, in actual fact he doesn't.

    9. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that clears it up

    10. Re:What? by g051051 · · Score: 1

      I guess I misunderstood because of how horribly written the original question was.

    11. Re:What? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Don't be so hard on him. I use Eclipse, and I do know what MyEclipse is, and have used it, but I have never called release software "GA", and have never use "l18n" as shorthand for "internationalization". Furthermore, I am not familiar with this Web Tools Project, though it sounds like something I better look up, since that's what I do -- use Eclipse to build web stuff. (Hey, I use whatever tool my boss tells me to use, but maybe he missed a good one.)

      Anyway, the mods were right, you were +5 Informative, if maybe -1 Haughty.

    12. Re:What? by g051051 · · Score: 1

      Only a -1 Haughty? I must be losing my touch.

    13. Re:What? by Zutroy+Of+Earth · · Score: 1

      > All of which you would already have know if you actually used Eclipse like you said.

      That's funny, I use Eclipse and I had no idea what MyEclipse, GA, M and WTP meant! I must have forgotten to install the InstantKnowledge(tm) plugin :p

      Btw, Eclipse has many plugins, some of which have nothing to do with web development or java ...

      Z.

    14. Re:What? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Ok, I think you need to go and review your grade school punctuation classes. I said this:
      "you're inferring that I said I used Eclipse but I don't"
      not this:
      "you're inferring that I said I used Eclipse, but I don't"

      Can you tell what the difference between those is? I'll give you a hint: you think I meant the second.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    15. Re:What? by g051051 · · Score: 1

      I guess I misunderstood because of how horribly written your original question was.

    16. Re:What? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      All of which you would already have know if you actually used Eclipse like you said.

      What a load of complete and utter bullshit. If I had the mod points buddy......

      I read the crap summary and had no idea what MyEclipse is, what GA or WTP stands for or that Vi is supposed to be Vista. I've been using Eclipse for four or five years now, just not with commercial extensions or plugins that I don't need.

      That you were not modded troll to oblivion is amazing. Bullshit disguised as superiority is far more repulsive than the ordinary kind.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
  9. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He was referring to the fact that some company has taken Eclipse, slapped it on a box and charged a yearly "membership" fee as well as rebranding it "MyEclipse".

    The names a bit confusing to me. Isn't it more "MyEcplise" when its .. free? If I'm paying for it then I think its really "YourEclipse" that I'm just renting. Or maybe the My just refers to them in the first place.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  10. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    Maybe the problem is they think it's TheirEclipse.

  11. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by Azarael · · Score: 1

    MyEclipse is an extension of Eclipse with a bunch proprietary J2EE build tools. There are similar free tools available as well, like Netbeans 5.5.

  12. I've used it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I came into my new job I was given MyEclipse as my dev environment. At first I was a little wary, cause I asked all the same questions everyone else seems to be asking now. Whats the big deal, why am I using this thing when Eclipse is free and I can do everything this does?

    After some time using it though, I realize there are some very useful features. For example, you can easily add struts, springs, and hibernate support to your application. There is a very handy GUI based struts config tools, as well as a way to generate hibernate mappings and all your POJOs automatically using a connection to your DB.

    On the other hand, these features have their draw backs. For example, some average Jon who really doesn't know how the stuff is supposed to work can come in a slap all this stuff together to make one horribly constructed and poorly designed application. People will use the technologies, and may even claim they now how to, on a resume, for example, but really not know.

    Having these automated tools, is a nice and handy time saver, but its no excuse for actually knowing how to do things by hand.

    1. Re:I've used it.... by chochos · · Score: 1

      I use SpringIDE pluging on Eclipse 3.2 and it works great for spring beans. There are several plugins to work with Hibernate, which can generate POJOs based on the mappings file, or viceversa. I don't use Struts, but I bet there are many plugins for that too. I use JBoss and the JBossIDE is pretty good. I can also test DB connections from Eclipse. So what am I missing here?

    2. Re:I've used it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely nothing. Because on top of that I quickly found after a little searching a struts GUI config plugin.

      I don't really enjoy using it, it basically just gives you all these plugins pre-plugged in for you, and personally, I've always been an advocate of a little elbow grease to save some money. But, alas, I did not make the choice, and since its already been paid for I might as well take advantage.

  13. Just A Commercial Eclipse by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm, this just looks like a commercially supported version of Eclipse. I suppose if one wants professional support, it could be something useful. But I'm pretty cheap/poor, so I'll have to pass and keep using the free Eclipse.

    1. Re:Just A Commercial Eclipse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      MyEclipse is a set of J2EE plugins for Eclipse, so if you only work with "Hello World!" apps, you'll be fine with Eclipse. I use MyEclipse 4.0.0 on a daily basis and I really like it. It is a cheap alternative ($50/yr) to IBM J2EE toolset that can cost 1000's of dollars. MyEclipse is indeed a poor man's WSAD (WebSphere Application Developer). Thumbs up for MyEclipse and the whole Eclipse initiative.

  14. Never trust anything with "My" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a poor choice for a product name. As someone who spends most of their day cleaning spyware and crap out of computers for people, I have to say that anything with "My" in the name is sure sign of malware. (notwithstanding "my computer" and "my documents" on windows, which are just badly named in the first place).

  15. Amnesia much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    you're inferring that I said I used Eclipse but I don't

    What?
    (Score:3, Funny)
    by Yosho (135835) Alter Relationship on 10:53 AM March 6th, 2007 (#18250188)
    I use Eclipse, and I don't even have any idea what this article is about.

    In short,

    At 10:53 AM EST, you were an Eclipse user

    By 11:31 AM EST, you are no longer an Eclipse user

    What happened in those 40 minutes that made you switch?

    1. Re:Amnesia much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reading comprehension is amazing.
      Let me reword it for GP:
      you're inferring that I said I used Eclipse but I don't
      ... turns into:
      you're inferring that: I said I used Eclipse without actually using it. That is a wrong assumption as GP already confirmed using it.

  16. Exception that proves the rule by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    MySql. But, in retrospect, it would make more sense to name it something else. like SQLicious, SQLator, SQLphin ( SQL + Dolphin).

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Exception that proves the rule by anokun7 · · Score: 1

      If I really need to pay for an IDE, then I would buy IntelliJ IDEA [http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/], Eclipse is good as a free tool, it is fantastic as a free tool, but I scarcely see it giving a run for IntelliJ IDEA as far as usability, performance and features are concerned. Of course there is a plugin for everything in Eclipse, but that in my opinion just makes it that much complicated....

      Even in free tools, I see Sun's Netbeans making huge strides in usability that Eclipse is almost playing catch-up (ruby (RoR), idm integration etc)

      A recent Eclipse user... and IDEA convert.

  17. Re:slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is interesting that this anonymous comment was modded as Redundant although it is the only one that mentions the price tag and according to the time stamps, it was posted half an hour before the other comment saying that MyEclipse is a commercial version of Eclipse.

  18. DAMN... you're right... no vi support by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

    I've been begging for someone to integrate vi into eclipse. For years. viPlugin sucks. There are a couple other projects, one that integrates gvim via the eclipse modular editor framework stuff, but it is also useless. Anyone know of a good way to get vi stuff working in eclipse?

  19. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by HvitRavn · · Score: 1

    So what happened to OurEclipse? Oh wait, I guess it's still alive and well :)

  20. Re:Is is an Ad? I can't tell by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I didnt see a free edition, so ya, id say this is an ad.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  21. Saves a lot of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use MyEclipse myself, but what I saw when I tried it is that it bundles a lot of free plugins. Sure you can download them all for free, but for 30$, it can saves you a lot of time. If you're payed 60$ an hour, after half an hour you're beginning to save money...

  22. Has Eclipse got any better?? by anokun7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I really need to pay for an IDE, then I would buy IntelliJ IDEA [http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/], Eclipse is good as a free tool, it is fantastic as a free tool, but I scarcely see it giving a run for IntelliJ IDEA as far as usability and features are concerned. Of course there is a plugin for everything in Eclipse, but that in my opinion just makes it that much complicated.... Even in free tools I see NetBeans getting far ahead in the long run against Eclipse. A recent Eclipse user.. and IDEA convert

  23. Mod Parent up by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

    It doesn't strike me as redundant to point out that this story is slashvertising. It is not tagged as such, so a having highly visible post saying so would be nicer than burying the post.

    --
    I don't therefore I'm not.