Slashdot Mirror


Archive.org Sued By Colorado Woman

An anonymous reader writes "The Internet Archive is being sued by a Colorado woman for spidering her site. Suzanne Shell posted a notice on her site saying she wasn't allowing it to be crawled. When it was, she sued for civil theft, breach of contract, and violations of the Racketeering Influence and Corrupt Organizations act and the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act. A court ruling last month granted the Internet Archive's motion to dismiss the charges, except for the breach of contract claim. If Shell prevails on that count, sites like Google will have to get online publishers to 'opt in' before they can be crawled, radically changing the nature of Web search."

17 of 797 comments (clear)

  1. By reading this post... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...you agree not to mod me down for being First Post!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:By reading this post... by raynet · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...you agree not to mod me down for being First Post!

      Okey then, modding you down for a bad joke. Oh, dang. Can't mod after posting.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
  2. Maybe I'm new here... by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe I'm new here, as you can see from my slashdotid.

    But *WHY* in hell would someone want to have their site excluded from search engines, and archive.org?

    It's not like she's being deprived.

    And even if they did, why the fuck didn't she use a ROBOTS.TXT file? Isn't that what it's for?

    Stupid bitch.

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
  3. Re:Posted notice? by ZakuSage · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't read this post.

  4. Re:Posted notice? by jokestress · · Score: 2, Funny

    FYI, the Susanne Shell website Profane Justice. It's got that crazy Time Cube type font usage, indicating a high kook factor.

    --
    Evil sig is livE.
  5. Re:Posted notice? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  6. Re:Posted notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ol ernqvat guvf lbh nterr gb abg nggrzcg nal qrpelcgvba bs guvf cbfg.

  7. Re:Posted notice? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is a link to the copyright notice, but it has a clickthrough which requires you to agree to the copyright terms before allowing you to see them.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  8. A more relevant link by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Check out her current robots.txt file.

  9. Re:Posted notice? by chaosite · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fnord.

  10. Re:The site in question? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, and Ms. Shell, 1996 called. They want their website design back.

    No, they don't.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  11. Disclaimer: IANAL / Use it against them. by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Funny

    By reading this post or having it copied into your browser's cache, you agree to give me a permanent, irrevocable, fully paid-up license, at my option, to revoke, amend, terminate, or waive any breach of any contract of adhesion, EULA, click-through license, or any other such license or contract which does not bear my physical (i.e. the non-electronic kind made with a pen) signature or the physical signature of a designated agent you have entered with me, or to take that action on your behalf. In the event of any disagreement pertaining to, arising under, or relating to this license, you give me the choice of law and venue and agree not to oppose any changes of venue, motions for removal to or from federal court, or objections to standing that I request and that you give me the right to waive any objections on your behalf. In the event of any breech, you agree to pay all of my court costs and attorney's fees.

    If you do not agree to this, you must get my signature in pen and ink stating that whatever license or contract you propose is not subject to this agreement. After all, if you don't think this is valid, just why the HELL do you think some stupid thing you put on your web page is!?

    -----

    There, put that bugger on your website, and let them weasel out of that :] Honestly, I hope this'll get thrown out soon, the judge just might not be able to do that at this stage in the litigation. I mean, hell, how long as SCO vs. IBM been going on now?

  12. [DISCLAIMER] for her site should be by freaker_TuC · · Score: 2, Funny
    By visiting this site you can get narcoleptic, get heavy glaucoma or any eye vision impared disease. If you feel nausia, tense chest pains, major headaches, need to vomit or having muscle cramps; CONSULT A PHYSICIAN IMMEDIATELY! DO NOT WAIT!

    This product may cause major disfunctional, anxiety and major electron discombulation inside your brains; DO NOT EXPOSE YOURSELF FOR OVER 5 MINUTES! needless to say this product is disabled of any print and if you are having problems viewing this product it is because we did not get any clue in

    W E E BBB D E S I G NN

    BECAUSE READI NG

    IS

    NOT IMPORTANT

    FOR YOU^H^H^HUS!

    We don't even have a robots.txt online, so you cannot copy it ! HAH!!!

    For any reference, please only look to this website if you are a family member in need of an eye physician soon and in heavy despair of reading through our reading protection then enjoy your stay at our site! (*) I cannot believe I posted this under my account ;) soon she will sue me! lady, get a new web interiour designer because ... damn!
    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  13. What we should really be worried about.... by ThelpDealio · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it validate w3? The answer is no ;) Seriously however, robots.txt could have solved this issue. Oddly enough the site says I am not able to save/copy/print on their "help" page. I tried all the above on the main page and it worked. Shoddy protection to say the least.

  14. You've obviously all missed by peepleperson · · Score: 2, Funny
    the part in her copyright page - http://www.profane-justice.org/html/copyright_.htm l - where she states:

    When we receive payment for copyright infringement or obtain a court judgment and collect on it, you will earn 5% of the amount which is collected as actual damages. In the event of multiple identical submissions, the first one received by AFAC will receive the reward. The reward is paid only for the actual pages for which we receive payment or collect on a judgment. In our most recent infringement claim, the total actual damages for copyright infringement is $600,000 - which meant you would have earned $30,000!
    I'm reporting all of you for cacheing her site in your browsers.

    Rich at last! Muwahahahahahaha.
  15. Slashdotted by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can someone please republish this site on a mirror?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  16. Re:Posted notice? by PeelBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like a virus to me. You just had to copy and paste it here, didn't you? Thanks now we're all screwed.