Slashdot Mirror


Slobs Found To Be More Productive Than Neatniks

writertype writes "Are you a slob? Do you pile papers on top of folders on top of game boxes? Here's the thing that those anal neat people can't even conceive of: you're more productive than they are. That's the conclusion of "A Perfect Mess: The Hidden Benefits of Disorder," by Eric Abrahamson and David Freedman, a new book that argues neatness is overrated, costs money, wastes time and quashes creativity."

20 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Indeed? by wframe9109 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news: People with Anorexia found to be more productive than normal eaters.

    "It's quite ingenious!" exclaimed one researcher, "it seems that because Anorexics do not need to take time to eat, they are far more productive!"

    When asked whether health implications or possible mortality ensuing from Anorexia could negatively affect productivity, the researcher seemed angered, and left the interview.

    On a serious note. One can get a lot done when they don't have to deal with cleaning shit up. But there is a certain point at which the stench, impossibility of finding important items, and spousal/co-worker nagging will counter any increased productivity.

    1. Re:Indeed? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now say it slowly with me, (correlation != causation) != (correlation = !causation).

      By the way, people who say "now say it slowly with me" are really annoying. I suppose I only have evidence for that being a correlation, but I'm fairly certain a patronizing attitude is a causation of annoyance. Perhaps we should do some experiments to find out.

    2. Re:Indeed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Per your 'period' interjection - I've been typing two spaces after every sentence for 24 years now. I learned to type on a typewriter; you aren't going to get me to stop now. :P

    3. Re:Indeed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      a friend of mine who breeds small animals for use as bedding

      Now THIS is an idea whose time has come! Imagine laying down at night in a nice fluffy bed of badgers.

    4. Re:Indeed? by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 2, Funny

      everyone knows that stuff goes in a pile underneath the coffee table.

  2. Attention Slashdotters by timias1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article is about clutter not hygiene.

  3. Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My guess -- this article was written by a slob.

  4. I knew it! by Noryungi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which is the perfect excuse to ask for a raise!

    "But, boss, you really have to admit that MY desk is much more messier than everyone else in this company! I demand more money! See here? We are talking about a freaking 3 DAYS OLD PIZZA, buried under papers and backup tapes for chrissake!!"

    I hasten to say that I already got a raise. I am just rehearsing for the end of the year review... ;-)

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  5. I would reply to this but... by macurmudgeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm just to busy being productive and I can't remember which stack of papers my keyboard is under.

    1. Re:I would reply to this but... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 5, Funny

      You call yourself a geek? I'm looking for my paper under a stack of keyboards!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  6. Re:Well yeah... by rockhome · · Score: 3, Funny

    Take solace in the fact that your roommate's toothbrush is now used only to clean his teeth.

  7. It's not a cluttered mess. by Canthros · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's just an efficient hashing algorithm.

    --
    Canthros
  8. NAPO? by GBC · · Score: 2, Funny
    Who knew there was a National Association of Professional Organizers ("The Organizing Authority® Since 1985")? [www.napo.net]

    Don't bother to RTFA. That was the only interesting thing in what is an incredibly lame piece of writing (presumably with a worse book to come).

    So, now that I have saved you some time, clean your desk!

  9. Re:Cleaning can be costly by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 4, Funny

    No. In our cleanup, we actually found $12000 worth of stuff that we needed for our current project and a missing employee.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
  10. Messy me, tidy wife by pubjames · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet I'm not the only one with a significant other that drives them nuts by tidying up all the time. A typical conversation might go something like this:

    Me [settling down to watch a movie]: Where is the HMDI lead?

    Her Wherever you last left it.

    Me I left it on the floor behind the TV.

    Her Well I haven't touched it.

    Me You must have, it can't have moved itself.

    Her I definately haven't moved it. You're always loosing things.

    Me Do you even know what it is?

    Her What is it?

    Me It's a black cable. It was on the floor behind the TV.

    Her Oh, I might have put it in one of the boxes in the shed.

    Me [angry] So now I've got to put my shoes on and go out into the cold to look through all the boxes in the shed!

    Her Don't blame me! You're the untidy one that is always loosing things...

  11. Re:This is nonsense. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Again, I submit an example from personal experience

    Say it with me: "The plural of anecdote is not data."

  12. Re:Absolutes are almost never correct by icydog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now for the priority queue, when I'm a little messy, the important stuff floats to the top. As the mess gets higher and deeper, after a while the stuff on the bottom becomes unimportant, and can then be cleaned up (similar to garbage collection).

    ---

    The problem is that if you let the mess grow too large, it *WILL* impact your ability to operate efficiently. So every once in a while you need to do a house cleaning of your different paper stacks, your email, your desktop files, and whatever other info you use on a regular basis.

    So, if you let it become too cluttered, your priority queue degrades into a bubble sort?
  13. Re:Flawed refutation: neatness != organization by digitig · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember the johnson report you created three weeks ago? I WANT THAT ON MY DESK IN 5 MINUTES OR YOU ARE FIRED BECAUSE WE WILL BE SUED!

    "But it already is on your desk, under the pile of unread finance magazines and your coffee mug, between the leaving card for the guy who left last month that you've not signed yet and all those unpaid invoices!"

    But I do believe that a really tidy desk is a sure sign that the owner doesn't have enough to do.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  14. Re:Most Recently Used policy by Synchis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds sorta like a caching algorithm. As items are used, they are left on top. Temporal locality says that all the important items will be on top of the other items.

    But then we get a garbage collection algorithm, too. Every so often, the short-lived objects which are no longer important are removed in your tidying process.
    Oh to see the world from a programmers eyes. :-D
    --
    Thomas A. Knight
    Author of The Time Weaver
  15. Re:Most Recently Used policy by castanaveras · · Score: 2, Funny

    And doing a Garbage Collection sweep slows down your productivity, just like in Java, but at least you're getting to control when GC happens, rather than having it happen randomly when you're at your most busy.