IT and A National Security Letter Gag Order
fstyke writes "An article in the Washington Post (anonymous for obvious reasons) describes the trauma the president of a small US IT company faces after receiving a National Security Letter. This is sent by the FBI demanding information (140000+ have been sent between 2003/2005 according to the article). Makes for an interesting read of the side effects of receiving such a letter and its requirements for the recipient to remain silent about even the fact he/she has received it.'The letter ordered me to provide sensitive information about one of my clients. There was no indication that a judge had reviewed or approved the letter, and it turned out that none had. The letter came with a gag provision that prohibited me from telling anyone, including my client, that the FBI was seeking this information. Based on the context of the demand -- a context that the FBI still won't let me discuss publicly -- I suspected that the FBI was abusing its power and that the letter sought information to which the FBI was not entitled.'"
before the Patriot Act!
posted anonymously for obvious reasons!
Oh yes, sorry, it's true you have the "liberal" meaning reversed over there ... I think I just meant the opposite you think I meant with this word.
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
John 8:32(King James Version)
People can't bitch about the poor intelligence sharing/processing lapses leading up to 9/11, and also bitch about the piece of legislation that fixes the problem
There were FBI agents reporting suspicious activity by the 9/11 hijackers. There were US citizens reporting suspicious activity by the 9/11 hijackers. The FBI chose to ignore it. They had all the power they needed to stop the hijackings and the top brass weren't interested.
You, sir, are a troll or a dick.