Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Researchers Spin Out Smaller Electronics Than Ever

Posted by Zonk on from the can-i-borrow-your-illustrated-primer dept.

schliz writes "Scientists have found a more efficient way to harness the spin of an electron to store and process information. The new technology, dubbed 'spintronics', has potentials in the development of nanoscale devices that are much more energy efficient than current charge-based electronic devices. Researchers expect the new technology to be incorporated in computing circuitry within the next decade."

45 comments

  1. Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People, these headlines have to stop! It's scientifically proven that horrible puns make a news story measurably worse.

  2. Spintronics is scary by stox · · Score: 3, Funny

    What happens if a manufacturer sells devices to the public, and all the complementary ( ie. opposite spin ) devices to the government? The spooks will really have a windfall then.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Spintronics is scary by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      What happens if a manufacturer sells devices to the public, and all the complementary ( ie. opposite spin ) devices to the government?

      Ok, I'm going to assume you are talking about quantum entanglement and that you are suggesting that the devices sold to consumers are entangled with another device, which is then sold/given to the government to monitor what the user does? I'm no quantum physicist but I'm pretty sure the tech for that is a bit more complicated than spintronics, also it would be infeasible for the government to have complementary devices for every device sold to anyone.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:Spintronics is scary by Proofof.+Chaos · · Score: 1

      Notice the "funny" mod?

    3. Re:Spintronics is scary by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      The spooks will really have a windfall then. Ah, that's all just conspiracy theory spin! ;)
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    4. Re:Spintronics is scary by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your sense of humor called. It misses you and wants to get back together. I really hope you two can work it out this time.

    5. Re:Spintronics is scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just spindoctoring his remark to throw off the public!

  3. Correct Link by soloport · · Score: 1

    Link corrected.

    1. Re:Correct Link by Heembo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even better, a clean article-only, non-advertising version of the article here: http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;86278 6408;fp;;fpid;;pf;1

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  4. Fundamentals... by BrianKHud · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To save you the time -

    Here's one I haven't heard before?

    ...Current day electronics are predominantly charge-based; that is, electrons are given more or less electric charge...

    Millikan says otherwise if I recall...

    Another strong point. . .

    ...does not require any physical movement of the electron and is achieved simply by changing its orientation


    Last I checked, only politicians could change orientation without physically moving. . .

    Currently, spintronics-based memory chips are being used in memory marketed by Texas-based Freescale Semiconductors, as well as data retrieval devices like those in Apple's iPods. The technology has not yet been incorporated in computing circuitry in any major way;


    Sorry, now I just have to ask who reviewed this article for sanity...
    --
    He who controls the past, commands the future... He who controls the future conquers the past.
    1. Re:Fundamentals... by inasra · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, now I just have to ask who reviewed this article for sanity... Didn't you get the memo? Slashdot uses a new technology called spin-a-yarn which auto magically chooses the best stories out of all the submitted ones. Unfortunately it sometimes spins so fast that it goes back in time and reposts a few stories now and then. But most of the time it spins so slowly that it always ends up posting current stories in the future.
      --
      Life is a mystery. There is no point having a mystery if you are not curious.
    2. Re:Fundamentals... by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last I checked, only politicians could change orientation without physically moving. . . No, politicians are the only ones who can appear to have their nose to the grindstone while straddling the fence and keeping both ears to the ground.
      --
      My rantings, only longer and with better spelling..
    3. Re:Fundamentals... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, only politicians could change orientation without physically moving. . .

      The quote you posted sounds bad, out of context, but the article was quite clear they meant it takes far less energy to rotate an electron, rather than move it any appreciable distance (ie. down a wire).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Fundamentals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quoting from http://www.mdronline.com/watch/watch_Issue.asp?Vol name=Issue+%23022007&on=1
      Freescale wins an MPR Analysts' Choice Award for MRAM (magnetic random-access memory). Freescale's MR2A16A is the first commercially available memory chip based on spintronics technology. (See MPR 2/20/07-04, "MPR Innovation Award: MRAM.")

        I'd say a few people, if http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardwa re/story/0,10801,83987,00.html is considered sane.

      It's not a new technology, but from the article, they seem to have made some improvements. Maybe you should try reading it?

    5. Re:Fundamentals... by bh_doc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Last I checked, only politicians could change orientation without physically moving. . .
      "Electron spin" is a misnomer. The electron is not really spinning. This is just a name for the particular quantum mechanical property that causes the electron to deflect one way or another when travelling through a magnetic field.

      So, besides being wrong or misleading in other areas, the article is actually right about the electron not physically moving in order to change it's spin orientation. As has been pointed out, it does require energy, however. Supposedly this is less than the typically required voltage change.
    6. Re:Fundamentals... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Electron spin" is a misnomer. The electron is not really spinning. This is just a name for the particular quantum mechanical property that causes the electron to deflect one way or another when travelling through a magnetic field.

      Well, that particular quantum-mechanical property is called 'spin' by pretty much all physicists, so I wouldn't call it a misnomer. It was originally thought to be actual rotation, since its behaviour mimics that of a charged rotating sphere in some ways. Now we know it isn't really spinning, but the name 'spin' has stuck since we don't have any better name for it.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    7. Re:Fundamentals... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would explain why Hillary Clinton wears so much makeup.

    8. Re:Fundamentals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, only politicians could change orientation without physically moving. . .

      Don't forget Anne Heche.

    9. Re:Fundamentals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you just defined "misnomer" for him. You're very helpful.

    10. Re:Fundamentals... by cuantar · · Score: 2, Informative

      But it's not about rotating an electron at all. We're talking about spin angular momentum, which is a quantum mechanical property of particles like electrons and cannot really be related back to any sort of classical quantity. The only reason we call it 'spin' is because it's what gives the electron angular momentum. As far as we (physicists) know, electrons lack any sort of high-level structure, so it doesn't even make sense to talk about rotating them.

      The idea is that instead of moving charges around, it would be much more efficient to harness intrinsic properties of 'stationary' particles -- spin up and spin down, instead of plus and minus charges. If we can figure out some way to easily flip the spin on an electron, then it could conceivably be used as a bit to store information.

      --
      Legalize it.
    11. Re:Fundamentals... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is just a name for the particular quantum mechanical property that causes the electron to deflect one way or another when travelling through a magnetic field.
      Bzzzt! You are referring to the Stern-Gerlach effect, I believe. Firstly, electrons have electric charge, which means that they will deflect when traveling through a magnetic field anyway, even if they were spin-0 particles. Secondly, the Stern-Gerlach effect requires not just any magnetic field, but an inhomogeneous one. That is, a magnetic field which is pointing perpendicularly to the direction of electron travel, and varies in strength along the direction the magnetic field is pointing. Then you get splitting based on spin (up or down).

      But, spin is far more and far more important than just the Stern-Gerlach effect. Above all, spin is angular momentum, just as any rotating object has angular momentum (hence the name spin). Now, we know that even if electrons and other (we think) fundamental particles have some kind of non-infinitesimal structure (in which case they are quite likely not fundamental), that structure is so small that in order to produce the measured angular momentum, the outermost portions of the electron would have to be moving faster than the speed of light. So, unless we've gotten something wrong, you are correct that the electron is not really spinning. But nonetheless, spin is angular momentum, a locally conserved quantity.

      Spin also plays a very important role in both chemistry and nuclear physics (in similar ways). The spin of a particle determines whether it is a fermion or a boson, and thus how it plays with other particles like itself. You can't have more than one electron in any given quantum state, because the electron is a fermion. Since spin is part of the quantum state, you can have two electrons in one energy state, so long as they have opposite spins. If spin didn't exist, chemistry would be considerably different. Nuclear physics is a little bit like chemistry of the nuclei (protons and neutrons instead of electrons), and without spin, which elements are stable or not would be quite different.

      Finally (not the last that spin is important for, just the last I'm going to talk about), spin is important in solid state physics, and thus in everyday life. That chair you're sitting in? Wouldn't be solid if it weren't for spin. Because electrons are fermions, and can't be in the same state as other electrons, solids don't collapse. Collapsing would require moving electrons down to a lower energy state, and at some point, all lower states are filled. So there is an outward pressure due to the fact that electrons are fermions. The difference between fermions and bosons? Spin. If there were no spin, everything would have to be a boson (or all distinguishable particles), and we wouldn't really get any solids. </gross oversimplifications>
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    12. Re:Fundamentals... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      ...does not require any physical movement of the electron and is achieved simply by changing its orientation
      Last I checked, only politicians could change orientation without physically moving. . . Well, them and disgraced fundamentalist preachers.

      It's almost accurate though if you only count translations as movement. I know, it's a stretch...
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  5. Quote by jsantos · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!

    --Slashdot's a="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?thresho ld=3&mode=nested&commentsort=3&sid=227971&op=Reply "> Post Comment page.

    ;-)

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank
  6. Quantum Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be approaching the realm of quantum computing...

    1. Re:Quantum Computer by bh_doc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really. This is just a different representation of the same information, like voltage in electronics, lans and pits on CDs, punched holes in paper (which I'm too young to know much about). These guys are just using an electron's spin: +z to represent 1 and -z to represent 0 (or something along those lines, the actual definition is irrelevant).

      Quantum computing, on the other hand, uses all values in between. Including complex ones. Quantum computing is not binary, but (for certain protocols) can only be measured in binary states. So you're quantum computer can process these complex values (which could well be encoded in electron spin - it is a quantum mechanical property after all) in really tricky ways, just so long as you don't measure intermediate results (that would destroy the coherence - think of it a bit like a quantum computer's Oops). This is what affords quantum computers such massive advantages at certain problems, like searching and factorising.

  7. Turn! Turn! Turn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I guess to everything there is a season. Processing is going to The Byrds!

    *with apologies to The Byrds

  8. "Spin Out Smaller Electronics" by masterzora · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haha, I get it! Electrons spin! Get it? Get it?

    --
    Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
  9. hmm by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can get more efficient solar panels out of this, now that would be a disruptive technology.

    --
    Libertarian Leaning Political Discussion Forum.
    1. Re:hmm by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Well...
      http://www.originenergy.com.au/news/news_detail.ph p?pageid=82&newsid=233

    2. Re:hmm by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      This was on TV recently in Australia, seems the guy who played a large part in the discovery got extremely disheartened by the univerties apathy towards commercialization. He decided to start making panels himself in China and is now that countries richest man, his "Suntech" company is worth $6B. Ironically he is not able to use the discovery he made because it is patented.

      The transcript in the link makes for interesting reading but they fail to mention who paid for the research? Was it the taxpayer or did Origin cough up the $25M?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. Obligatory... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    at least these Spin researchers are not in the medical profession...

    1. Re:Obligatory... by StarfishOne · · Score: 0, Redundant

      and hopefully they are spin reseachers and not spin doctors.. :P

  11. What about? by edwardpickman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the devises work in the southern hemisphere? If everything spines in the opposite direction down under will there have to be southern hemisphere versions? Will both versions work on the equator? Most important how much beer does one have to consume for this to be a legitimate topic of conversation?

    1. Re:What about? by bh_doc · · Score: 1

      I believe you to be speaking tongue in cheek. :P

      Nevertheless, in order to avoid confusion for anyone else: The spin of an electron is defined relative to an external magnetic field, always. A spin up electron is only spin up within the field in which it was set. Change the external field and you will no longer have spin up. Remove the field and you won't have any spin (because you can't measure it without that field).

      So, those of us in the southern hemisphere will define our spins according to whereever our external field points, and the rest of you guys can do whatever the hell you like. :)

      (In reality, the field itself will probably be defined with respect to the orientation of the product's enclosure.)

    2. Re:What about? by Proofof.+Chaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most important how much beer does one have to consume for this to be a legitimate topic of conversation? [goes to fridge, gets another]
      5 bottles, apparently.
    3. Re:What about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most important how much beer does one have to consume for this to be a legitimate topic of conversation?


      Dunno mate, come shout schooners an' maybe we not get too pissed. Flaffel or become a hoon an' we let ya stay ina dunny.

      *apologies to the Aussies, been too long since I set on EFnet chatting with friends from OZ and watching Telstra set lag records. Anyway, my comment above probably won't be mistaken for Strine by any true blue, but felt like having a little fun with the parent comment. NO Foster's!
  12. Thermal Relaxation by bh_doc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is completely ignored in TFA is the effect of thermal relaxation. After a while the effect of heat "leaks" into the spin causing it to revert back to a random (mixed) state. To avoid the effect altogether would require 0 K temperature, i.e. it's impossible.

    There are possibly ways to mitigate the effect, though. I'd like to know what the company pushing this memory tech has come up with to this end (and whether or not it actually works). Anyone know?

    1. Re:Thermal Relaxation by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I guess you could use a refresh system combined with ECC.

      I hadn't thought of this before, but the problem with spin is that it is a truly digital attribute. With dynamic RAM the capacitors that make it up are either more than half full, or less than half full. So, intermediate states can be refreshed to the endpoint states to keep the memory intact. With spin you're at one state and instantly flip to the other, so the only way to know that this has happened is to store redundant information and then refresh bits by making them line up with the majority. It will certainly waste quite a bit of space, but if you can store one bit per electron you'll have lots of room to do so...

    2. Re:Thermal Relaxation by 10053r · · Score: 1

      If this is the same breakthrough that was also featured on digg, then they claim to have achieved a ratio of about 1000000 to 1 in terms of the relaxation time to clock cycles. With a million clock cycles to play with, it seems likely that they would be able to read the spin state somewhere around clock cycle 900000 and refresh it with plenty of time to spare, similar to the way DRAM requires periodic input energy to retain data.

  13. Spin on the whole thing by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 2, Informative
    "The new technology, dubbed 'spintronics'"..."new" technology: technology that's almost seven years old*. Now THAT'S spin!

    *see references at bottom of page spintronics

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  14. Electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't trust micro-electronics, nano-machines or any of these other freak creations that these insane bureaucrats they call 'scientists' are brewing up for the rich and the elite of America. It's not that I'm a socialist or anything, but creations like these spell possible abuse for us all. But hey, don't blame me when the party takes over.

  15. Spin us a tale of a dupe... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

    Duplicate story as far as I can tell: http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/0 8/0041200

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert