Slashdot Mirror


Take Two's Board Ousted by Shareholders

Some would view it as vaguely ironic that, on the same day that the GTA IV trailer makes its debut, the Take-Two board is finally ousted in the culmination of a nasty inter-corporate feud. CNN's Chris Morris reports on the latest development in the company's saga: "The accounting and ethical quagmires that have bogged down the company for the past few years are likely to disappear. And Take-Two will almost certainly become a leaner company, shedding divisions and canceling games ... The arrival of a new board may also ratchet down the public scrutiny of the company a few notches - but that respite from the spotlight's glare might not last as long as they would like. You see, the thing that makes this game maker different from the rest of the industry is its rebellious streak. It's something that drives opponents insane and causes mass migraines in the boardroom, but without it, Take-Two wouldn't be the force it is today."

32 comments

  1. Jack Thompson by faloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How long before we get a /. post about Jack Thompson taking personal credit for ousting the board in the form of some long-winded self righteous diatribe?

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am taking personal credit for ousting the board in the form of some long-winded self righteous diatribe.

      -Jack Thompson

    2. Re:Jack Thompson by neoform · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he'll pat himself on the back and somehow delude himself into believing he somehow had a part in this.

      He'll be in the news real soon saying what a great victory this is for him.. etc.. etc.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:Jack Thompson by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was my first thought. Especially since he told Ars Technica that he was going to see to it that somehting big was going to happen at the Take-Two meeting.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Jack Thompson by nuzak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to see to it that the sun rises in the east tomorrow. Mark my words.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    5. Re:Jack Thompson by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm going to see to it that the sun rises in the east tomorrow. Mark my words.

      Pssshaw. Anyone can make the sun rise; It is a big ol' ball o' hydrogen after all, and everyone knows that hydrogen rises, but only I can make it set. You just watch. Tonight it fall out of the sky to the West.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    6. Re:Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Especially since he told Ars Technica that he was going to see to it that somehting big was going to happen

      Well not exactly. I think he implied that the Lord Thy God was going to make something happen -- that He would looseth his terrible judgment and smiteth them down in His righteous fury.

    7. Re:Jack Thompson by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How long before we get a /. post about Jack Thompson taking personal credit for ousting the board in the form of some long-winded self righteous diatribe?

      I think that was pre-emptively done last week or so ... seems he was prognosticaing their imminent demise and already saying he was the one who would be causing it.

      You can probably count on some smug public statement from him real soon now. :-P

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. How fitting by Moggyboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "... the new board roared through the windows of the corporate bathroom in a beaten up Chevrolet, burst out of its doors brandishing crowbars and chainsaws, and yelled 'Crunch time, bitches!' before laying waste to the existing board of directors. After the bloodbath, the new executives fired some rocket launchers at observing SWAT helicopters before brushing themselves off and giving their first press release."

    --
    Work smarter, not harder.
    1. Re:How fitting by jimstapleton · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Since there is no such mod, I'll just pretend that I gave you this one:

      +1 Appropriate

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:How fitting by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      After the bloodbath, the new executives fired some rocket launchers at observing SWAT helicopters before brushing themselves off and giving their first press release.

      Without even stopping at the Pay N' Spray to get the SWAT team off their backs? Talk about brass balls!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:How fitting by intrico · · Score: 1

      Hilarious.

    4. Re:How fitting by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      As long as you stay on the roof, the helicopters are all you need worry about.

    5. Re:How fitting by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      After the bloodbath, the new executives fired some rocket launchers at observing SWAT helicopters before brushing themselves off and giving their first press release.

      Without even stopping at the Pay N' Spray to get the SWAT team off their backs? Talk about brass balls! They had to have used a cheat code. LeaveMeAlone!
      --
      Bearded Dragon
  3. Inter vs. Intra by richdun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since it happened within the company, and not between two or more companies, shouldn't that be "intra-corporate?"

    1. Re:Inter vs. Intra by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Explain this one since we're on the topic... When a man and woman are having sex, why do they call "intercourse"? :P

    2. Re:Inter vs. Intra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious is that Onanism should be renamed intracourse and the various methods of sexual impalement whilst alone would thus be neatly contained.

    3. Re:Inter vs. Intra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The think the "inter-corporate" part refers to the fact that OppenheimerFunds, which if I'm remembering correctly owns something like 46% of TT's stock, hatched the plot to replace the Board. The new Board then immediately fired several executives.

    4. Re:Inter vs. Intra by Gertlex · · Score: 1

      Explain this one since we're on the topic... When a man and woman are having sex, why do they call "intercourse"? :P Because intracourse is when you play with yourself.
  4. Please, let's not even bring him up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He may seek the publicity, but we have no reason to give it to him for free.

  5. Thank GOD for Jack Thompson by oni · · Score: 1

    Thanks to Jack Thompson, the board at Take Two has been ousted and that horrible murder simulator, Grand Theft Auto IV will *never* be sold... wait, what? It will be released as planned? This has absolutely nothing to do with GTA??

    well god damnit.

  6. Rebellious? by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look, I'm generally very anti-authority as can be proved by sheer volume of criticism I have written that is critical of our government. However a game that glorifies criminality the way that Grand Theft Auto games do is not rebellious in the "good way," it's rebellious in a sociopathic sort of way. You have to be detached from reality to believe that it is healthy catharsis to play a game where you commit wanton crime against your fellow man; it's not the sort of violent catharsis you get in most first person shooters.

    1. Re:Rebellious? by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look, I'm generally very anti-authority as can be proved by sheer volume of criticism I have written that is critical of our government. However a movie that glorifies criminality the way that crime movies do is not rebellious in the "good way," it's rebellious in a sociopathic sort of way. You have to be detached from reality to believe that it is healthy catharsis to watch a movie where you see wanton crime against your fellow man; it's not the sort of violent catharsis you get in most comedies.

      Look, I'm generally very anti-authority as can be proved by sheer volume of criticism I have written that is critical of our government. However a novel that glorifies criminality the way that crime novels do is not rebellious in the "good way," it's rebellious in a sociopathic sort of way. You have to be detached from reality to believe that it is healthy catharsis to read a
      novel about wanton crime against your fellow man; it's not the sort of violent catharsis you get in most technical manuals.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Rebellious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually took the time to play (and pay attention to) GTA, instead of being yet another clueless talking head, you would know that the characters in GTA -- including the "innocent" citizenry -- are a bunch of bastards. The game worlds of GTA are dystopian so when you talk about your "fellow man" in GTA you apparently don't realize that those men are crime lords, gangbangers and other varieties of thugs and lowlifes.

      I know of no scene in any GTA game where you walk into a family diner full of honest men, soccer moms and their kids and start shooting them up. If you do, please tell.

    3. Re:Rebellious? by amuro98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But shows like The Sopranos and Prison Break are OK because they don't glofify crimes or violence against an otherwise law-abiding society?

      Not to mention our continual worship of and fascination with real-life, violent criminals ranging from Billy The Kid to Al Capone.

      The most normal, law-abiding citizen is going to ocassionally fantasize about being "evil", or taking a baseball bat to their neighbor's face after he played movies on his surround sound system so loudly, that your floor was vibrating until 3am. The difference is that the normal, mature adult will put aside these impulses and deal with the problem in a more constructive manner.

      Even writers admit that they enjoy writing for the villian more than for the hero as it gives them an opportunity to explore those dark impulses in a harmless and constructive fashion.

      So long as such dalliances into the darker side of human nature remain fantasy, there's no harm. In fact, I'd say they're a healthy way to channel your aggressions and stress from accumulated from day-to-day living. After all, you really can't go around smashing things up in real-life, but in a video game? Feel free to go nuts! Bad drive home? Pop in some Burnout, go looking for that #*!)%# blue car that cut you off today so you can send him flying into the path of that oncoming semi-truck.

    4. Re:Rebellious? by nefarity · · Score: 0

      You have to be detached from reality to not be able to tell the difference between proper interaction with real human beings and a video game.

    5. Re:Rebellious? by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then don't buy it.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Rebellious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you've never heard of a satire.

  7. DNF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH, NO! That means Duke Nukem Forever might get canceled!!!!

    Seriously, Take two has the publishing rights, and the article seems to mention cutting some projects. Ooops :)

  8. Why Rockstar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some would view it as vaguely ironic that, on the same day that the GTA IV trailer makes its debut, the Take-Two board is finally ousted in the culmination of a nasty inter-corporate feud.

    Why, what does Rockstar have to do with Take-Two?

  9. Bye Bye R* Leeds? by British · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    IIRC R* Leeds made GTA: Vice City Stories. Of all the GTA games, this one is the most disappointing. The port to PS2(from the PSP) was sorely lacking in features that we've grown used to. The graphics seem a lot glitchier, and I've twice run into a situation where I had to reboot the console. All the other GTA games I've played have been much more stable.

    Why do game companies have other companies(er, divisions in this case) do a sequel, only to disappoint? The same thing happened with Carmageddon TDR, which was just awful compared to the first 2.

  10. Strawman's response by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    blah blah something about video games being worse the movies/books/etc because they're 'immersive' blah blah blah

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?