Google 'Toilet ISP' Gag Not Without Precedent
1sockchuck writes "Yesterday, Google's annual April Fools' joke featured Google TiSP, a free home wireless broadband service that connected via a 'commode-based router' and runs fiber cabling through the sewer system. This is actually not without precedent. Back in the dot-com boom, delivering broadband through sewers was the focus of CityNet Telecom, which raised $375 million in funding from major VC and private equity firms in 2000 and 2001. The company used remote-controlled robots to lay fiber through sewer lines and actually created sewer-based networks in Albuquerque and Indianapolis before merging with Universal Access in 2003."
Fuck.. have fun maintaining that..
Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
I live in Indy and wondered why my DSL was shitty a few years ago. Now I know.
Google TiSP, a free home wireless broadband service that connected via a 'commode-based router' and runs fiber cabling through the sewer system.
This april fool's gag is not a truck. It's a series of tubes.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
delivering broadband through sewers was the focus of CityNet Telecom, which raised $375 million in funding from major VC
Surely you meant "from major WC"...
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
They had a bunch of old buildings spread out over the city and their phone system was deployed as huge bundles of copper pairs in a 6" UPVC pipe. Some time in the nineties they replaced their network with a single fibre connecting each outlying building to their main datacenter. Of course the pipes were still buried under the roads and still ended in their main wire closet where the new optical equipment had been housed.
Cue some major refurbishment, and the plumbing crew enter the building and find a conveient 6" waste pipe in the basement to connect the shiny new toilets too.
The SA at the time began the descriptive email with "I'd like to start by apologizing for the sh*tty network performance..."
...as long as I don't have to look at the logs.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?