A Look at the Compiz and Beryl Merger
invisibastard writes to mention that Linux Tech Daily has an editorial on the merger between Compiz and Beryl. "This state of affairs was a shame. Something that was finally getting the general public excited about Linux, the 3D desktop, was wasting time with duplication of effort and fighting. There were concerns about the long term viability of Beryl. The perception in the community overall was, Compiz = old and stale, Beryl = fresh and exciting. This despite the feeling in the Compiz community that the "real work" was being done by David Reveman and Compiz, and there were exciting things with Compiz core (like input redirection, etc...) on the horizon."
Error 500 - Internal server error
Server committed seppuku rather than face a slashdotting.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
I believe it is a pretty generally accepted theory of Computer Science that humble programmers aren't much good on a project. So why would they discuss the inflated egos of programmers on these projects as though it was a bad thing?
For future reference, the formula is:
(BIG EGO == GREAT CODER)
(HUMBLE == BAD BAD BAD CODER)
Are we all clear on this now?
Yes. Merger will be hugely successful and attract a lot of users.
I use the desktop cube in Beryl
I haven't used Beryl, but I'm curious. Don't you end up with a desktop that's upside-down once in a while?
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
OK - we'll settle and give you the title of 'Great Java Programmer'.
Hey, at least I didn't say J#.
*DUCKS*
If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.
You keep using this word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Can you fork yourself if you suck? Don't you need to remove a rib for that?
;)
Ignore me... posting as AC to not incur the karma hit
There's a fairly well-known mechanism for that sort of thing in biology, but most Slashdotters are unfamiliar with it.
> We've got the source, so stuff can be rebuilt every time backward compatibility breaks. But that's definitely *not* a good thing
MOD PARENT UP! Agreed! I for one *hate* having source code. It makes no sense to me - especially when written in some crazy out-dated language like C++. I'd much rather just get the binary, or if it has to be source, then I want it in something that doesn't need to be compiled like Python or Unlambda.
I'll probably be modded down for this...