EU Rejects Microsoft Royalty Proposal
pallmall1 writes "According to MSNBC, The Financial Times has reported that the EU is going to drastically reduce or even eliminate Microsoft's proposed royalties on interoperability information required to be released by the EU's antitrust ruling issued three years ago. According to a confidential EU document, "Microsoft will be forced to hand over to rivals what the group claims is sensitive and valuable technical information about its Windows operating system for next to no compensation...". Even Neil Barrett, the expert picked by both Microsoft and the EU to oversee Microsoft's compliance with the 2004 ruling, says a zero percent royalty would be 'better.'"
>whether we like it or not, windows is currently the
>standard and if someone wants to compete (which lets that
>whole "free market" thing work), they need to be compatible
>with windows and with microsoft's formats (.doc, etc.)
Now, let me get this straight - simply taking a companies' intellectual property with next-to-no compensation is being argued on "free market" grounds? Mind-boggling.
Brett
From the sound of it, it's exactly the opposite of that. The EU is basically demanding MS to hand over their IP for free. This is much like someone going to a bank and demanding that they hand over the money for free, for sake that they are not willing to work for the money instead. There simply isn't an excuse for this blatant attempted robbery in the name of socialism; production without compenstation is not something that should ever be forced onto anyone.
Reduce, reuse, cycle
You must be American...
Only an American is stupid enough to say what you did.
If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!