Slashdot Mirror


Thailand Bans YouTube

An anonymous reader writes "The new government of Thailand that forced its way into power last year has banned the website YouTube after a 44 second clip was found of someone spray painting on a picture of Thailand's king. When Google refused to remove the 'offending' clip the website was redirected to a different page. This comes days after a Swiss man was jailed 10 years for spray painting on pictures of the king while drunk, and is the same government that earlier this year slammed open source software for being useless and buggy."

53 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Now if only... by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They put half of that outrage into their domestic problems with child prostitution and pornography creation/distribution. Why, Thailand might make real progress on an issue that actually has a moral component to it.

    1. Re:Now if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A lot of people seem to be unaware of how medeival Thailand is when it comes to morality. Why, just recently a beautiful Thai college student and actress got in a lot of trouble because the dress she wore was too revealing! (obligatory hot pix here)

    2. Re:Now if only... by xerxesVII · · Score: 2, Funny

      w00t! That dress IS an outrage. She'd look even better without it.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Now if only... by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having just returned from Thailand and spending time with one of the American ambassadors down there, I think I have a unique viewpoint on these 'domestic problems' you refer to. Prostitution is illegal and it is enforced quite heavily. The problem lay with the police force that can be bought off of charges. I sure as hell wouldn't want to spend any time in a Thai jail. Child prostitution doesn't really happen to the extent that us farangs think, and for the amount of time I spent there, the only boobies I saw were the European tourists on the beach. (And I suppose my wifes)

      --
      "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)
    4. Re:Now if only... by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thailand isn't "medieval" when it comes to morality - it is thai. Why do you think it is proper to judge a foreign country in terms of our history? They have a different morale, yeah. Now lets hear your objective definition of what makes "better" morales.

      According to Thai standards, that dress is considerably worse than that superbowl nipple flash you americans got. And if you read the page you linked to, you'd have seen that the punishment wasn't a hundred million bucks, but reading to blind children for a few days. For me, I consider that a lot more enlightened than a few millions because the chiiiildren will be soooo damaged by seing a picture of something they sucked on a few years ago.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:Now if only... by bckrispi · · Score: 2, Funny

      They tax kiddie prostitution, don't they?

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    6. Re:Now if only... by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thailand isn't "medieval" when it comes to morality - it is thai.

      Whatever you want to call it, "Ass-Backwards" looks the same in any culture.

    7. Re:Now if only... by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any moral system that condones 10 years of prison for spray-painting a picture of a person is B-R-O-K-E-N.

      Probably.

      Then again, the US legal system condones punishments for modifying your own hardware in defiance of the DMCA that exceed what you'd get for assault or auto theft. That same system recently had the potential to lock some guy in prison for 55 years for the crime of 'computer intrusion' -- making it a crime on par with murder.

      More telling perhaps, a big chunk of the US is constantly trying to pass legislation to make burning a particular piece of cloth illegal. Is that any less absurd than a law against spray-painting a picture?

      I'm not saying I think the Thai law is sensible, but you don't have to go to Thailand to see "ass-backwards".

    8. Re:Now if only... by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're about 10 years behind what's happening in the real world. Thailand even extradites convicted pedophiles to their home country now.

      --
      "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)
    9. Re:Now if only... by curecollector · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Alright, this is a day when I wish I had some mod points kicking around. Insightful + 1.

      If there's one thing that always drive me up a wall, it's all of this relativism when it comes to matters of culture. At least in America. For some strange reason, it's become taboo to flat out say, "in my eyes, this culture is fucking insane".

      I mean, think about it: there are parts of the world where they believe that the grain that America gives them is giving them AIDS. There are parts of the world where people believe that raping a virgin (babies included) can cure AIDS. There are parts of the world where they execute/impose life sentences on drug dealers (of those who they believe to be drug dealers), yet child prostitution runs rampant, in a semi-open manner. The list goes on. I'll be honest, as far as I'm concerned, it's all fucking backwards.

      (PS - I'm not saying America is above reproach, either. Not for a second. Hell, the rest of the world has no problem pointing out what they perceive to be our flaws. Why is it that we can never point out theirs?)

    10. Re:Now if only... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > Why do you think it is proper to judge a foreign country in terms of our history?

      Because that's the nature of making a judgement. If my neighbour thinks it's fine to have sex with children and I don't I'll judge them by my standards. You don't give up making ethical judgements about someone simply because they have different standards. Similarly it seems entirely reasonable to me for people of one culture to critique the ethics of another. And it seems entirely reasonable for people of a culture to use convenient landmarks in their own history to express those critiques.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    11. Re:Now if only... by arevos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thailand isn't "medieval" when it comes to morality - it is thai. Why do you think it is proper to judge a foreign country in terms of our history? They have a different morale, yeah. Now lets hear your objective definition of what makes "better" morales. Hold on. The grandparent post didn't say Thai morality was any worse; he said it was medieval. Are you saying that medieval morality is worse than modern western morality? Why do you think it is proper to judge a past time in terms of our modern sensibilities?

      Hypocrisy aside, posts like these are a real source of irritation to me. If the grandparent poster has no right to judge the Thai government on morality, what right does the Thai government have to judge others, even those within its own borders?
    12. Re:Now if only... by Tom · · Score: 2

      Weird, there are several cultures on this planet that consider american culture "ass-backwards". How do you parse that?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    13. Re:Now if only... by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you spot the difference? If you say "in my eyes", that changes your statement. It leaves room for other opinions. If you say - like someone else in this thread - "any system that does this is BROKEN" - that's a statement of a different quality. Yeah, call it semantics, but semantics is important (see Whorf, Korzybski, et al).

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    14. Re:Now if only... by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. Heaven forbid that some child may see a nipple. Hopefully all those innocent children were given a bottle of formula as soon as they came out of the womb.

    15. Re:Now if only... by Mo+Bedda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We cannot impose our rules of conduct over other people.

      Were you aiming for irony?

    16. Re:Now if only... by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is not as simple as you think, even though every single one of your examples happens to be universally valid and not related to what I am about to say:

      Using materialism/utilitarianism to judge what "backwards" means in terms of moral code is nonsense. We in the West have become habituated to certain phenomenae that were simply unthinkable to us before, and which, after years of religion losing its meaning, are perfectly acceptable to us now. I have Eastern-European friends who have lived in the middle east for a while as I have, and some of them are still not able to settle back home. They just can't come to grips with the gothic, sex - centered culture certain places have developed. Fathers watch T.V downstairs while their daughters get nailed by 14 year old boyfriends in the room directly above. People engage in sexual acts in public. Women are advertised/sold in glass windows, subsidized by government...

      I am of the opinion that most of morality is relative/nurture-based, although some dogmatic moral systems (notably monotheist ones) have extremely high correlations with evolved psychological response. Take the marriage thing, for instance: it's not by accident that relationships between "settled" couples are heavily encouraged in so many cultures whereas wild sex is frowned upon to the degree of criminalization - it makes sense that the couples who are formally "together" can provide and care for their offspring better than participants in a one-night-stand, who might jeapordize the well being of the larger familial group as a whole. Just because we have developed a tolerance for this activity does not mean the people who despise it are "ass-backward", from *whatever* point of view you're coming from. In other words, we have become habituated to things that are instinctive as well as required by religious doctrine, all in the name of "fun", and our advanced "humanism" has done the opposite by creating issues that were never before problematic (PETA lives off this).

      Anyway I again stress that this has nothing to do with the blatant hypocrisy that you talked about. I agree with you. The indifference to child prostitution..etc has nothing to do with nature (which we should understand) and nurture (which we should at least respect).

    17. Re:Now if only... by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. Not really.

      The government should serve its people, not the other way around. The king is hugely popular, AFAIK. If this action offends the people of the country, then the law should reflect this accordingly.

      That said, I am also quite shocked by this specific lack of a basic freedom of expression.

      But, again, it's their country and their law. If they don't like the way they are, they could try to change that. Countries do it from time to time. I think that's why US citizens have the right to bear firearms - to remind their government of what can happen if they forget who serves who.

  2. ..and... by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ministry of Information of Thailand was effectively slashdotted. Half of me says that was a plan.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  3. Lots slam OSS for being useless and buggy by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That really isn't related to this story, is it? It's just there to agitate the average /.'er into blindly raging against Thailand.

    In my day, we called that kind of stuff flamebait.

    You know, like how Apple sucks and everyone who owns a Mac is a faggot.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Lots slam OSS for being useless and buggy by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my day, we called that kind of stuff flamebait

      Does this mean that Zonk is going to lose some karma over this?

      Seriously, I agree with you. To include that Thailand (or whomever) is not real OSS friendly on an article about YouTube makes about as much sense as including a budget revision for the VA on a gun ban bill.

      Opps! Did I say that out loud?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Lots slam OSS for being useless and buggy by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely. The /. community reaction to Thailand issues:
      child prostitution: yeah, yeah, so what?
      free speech restrictions: yawn...
      censorship: zzzzzzz...
      Thailand says OSS is "useless and buggy": WHAT!!!! Those sons of bitches!!

    3. Re:Lots slam OSS for being useless and buggy by NayDizz · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's exactly what I thought. I was half expecting it to be followed up with "Oh by the way, they said your mom is fat."

  4. Respect and Freedom? by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, how much respect for other cultures do you have? How much freedom do you grant others - to define their own morality?

    I've been to Thailand. It's a great place where the king is held in very high esteem. This isn't a tyranny cracking down on opposition, almost all Thais would be very shocked to see a spray-painted picture of the king. Try a stunt like that and you'll be lucky if the police gets you before the enraged mob does.

    Now let's wait for the trolls to swarm in and claim that any culture that doesn't share their own values of "First Amendment" and "Freedom of Expression" must be evil and bad. Newsflash: The "total freedom or none at all" attitude only applies to western culture. Asian cultures have more than a thousand years of experience in moderation and non-binary thinking.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Respect and Freedom? by BDPrime · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is a good question. Should I respect a culture with a different morality than my own? Should I respect cultures that, for example, circumcise women as a regular practice and have been doing it for "a thousand years?" I tend to think this is a case-by-case basis.

      I realize that female circumcision is much different than banning YouTube, but I don't consider people "trolls" if they disagree with the Thai government's decision to try to control the public arena, just as I wouldn't consider people "trolls" if they criticized the current U.S. administration for practices they found offensive.

    2. Re:Respect and Freedom? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Try a stunt like that and you'll be lucky if the police gets you before the enraged mob does.

      Any people that would beat or kill you for insulting someone are not enlightened, cultural superiors. They simple zealous lunatics.

      The real test would be their reaction to some Danish cartoons.

    3. Re:Respect and Freedom? by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This isn't a tyranny cracking down on opposition,

      Depends how you view it - I'd argue that the cult of personality he has built around himself is totally fucking crazy, and not at all healthy for the nation. The military coup of the elected leader was headed by the head of the king's private council, while the coup happened it replaced television and radio broadcasting with images and pro-monarchy messages. Later, the king pledged his support to the military coup.

      Also it's hard to support a guy who has made himself one of the richest men in the entire world, with all of his money coming off the resources of a rather impoverished, rather small 3rd world nation. Thai's sparse money could be used in better ways than filming 6 hour films about heroic Thai princesses, and a tradition of hefty jail sentences for insulting the king by innuendo is not doing the cause of democracy any great favors.

      Citizens of North Korea supposedly love the Dear Leader just as strongly.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:Respect and Freedom? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an offtopic aside, "Female Circumcision" is a misnomer. That is actually a name for the operation of removing the clitoral hood, which is done in certain cases for valid medical reasons. The term for removal of the clitoris is "clitoridectomy" (although even THAT term is sometimes used for removal of only the hood.) There are also other types of female genital mutilation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Respect and Freedom? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much freedom do you grant others - to define their own morality?

      You might have missed the news, but Thailand was overtaken by a military coup last year and is now being run as a military dictatorship. "Their own morality" is irrelevent, particularly when the dictator is a Muslim.

      Now let's wait for the trolls to swarm in and claim that any culture that doesn't share their own values of "First Amendment" and "Freedom of Expression" must be evil and bad. Newsflash: The "total freedom or none at all" attitude only applies to western culture. Asian cultures have more than a thousand years of experience in moderation and non-binary thinking.

      We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that among these rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absoltue despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

      There, go argue your bullshit with Jefferson, he'll kick you around the room.

    6. Re:Respect and Freedom? by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Morality doesn't change with government. You know precious little about history if you think that.

      And yes, we hold those things to be self-evident. That doesn't mean others have to as well, does it? Is there a place for diversity in your world of freedom and pursuit of happiness? Or can I only be free and pursue my happiness as long as I follow your code of ethics?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    7. Re:Respect and Freedom? by Wildclaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you allow the sexual mutilation of male infants because of a minor increase in risk of infection, which can be prevented by good hygenic practice. Circumcision itself isn't a risk free procedure and can cause medical problems, upto and including death, so arguing for medical merits is grasping at strawmen at best. If someone wants to circumcise themselves for any reasons, they can decide to do so by themselves when they are 18. Doing an irreversible medical procedure to an infant, when there is nothing wrong with him/her, is child abuse, simple as that. Legal infant male circumcision is nothing more than hypocrisy of the western societies.

      As for smegma. It looks like you havn't looked it up very well. Smegma itself is hygenic. It is the accumulation of smegma by not washing it away at regular intervals that can cause problems. If males aren't learning how to wash their penises correctly, something is seriously wrong with their eduction, and replacing it with a medical procedure is bullshit.

      Finally, you claim that uncircumcised penises look goofy? If anything it is circumcised penises that have an unnatural look. Besides, arguing for a medical procedure based on the looks of an organ that is mostly hidden is laughable.

  5. This just in... by insanemime · · Score: 2, Funny

    The new Thiland government is quoted as saying because of all the bugs in open source software they will be installing Vista on all crucial government machines.

  6. Mod Parent Up! (-1, Flamebait) by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who needs shades of grey? With Thailand, you can put pimps pushing 8-year olds, oppressive military dictatorships, and anti-open source people together! Finally, something to hate for everyone!

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  7. Touchy by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

    So am I going to get /. banned from Thailand? If I say "Hey Thailand! Your king is a doody-head!"? Will that do it?

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  8. Breaking News.. by madsheep · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WHO CARES?

    Ok so it's censorship and we should all care as we are "free." However, that wasn't really my point. This is hardly news. What do you expect from countries like this. For a place like Thailand banning YouTube is hardly their worst crime. Let's take an example from a week ago that was in the news. Main Jailed for 10 Years for Insulting King -- ok and we care about them blocking YouTube? I think there's a tons of worse things they do. Blocking YouTube is probably making them more productive if anything. Not saying it's not wrong or outrageous.. but in comparison to other things that go on there.. it most certainly is.

  9. Fucking monarchies by i_should_be_working · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here are assorted images of Thailand's king. Here's Thailand's government website. (english)

    Let's show them what we and the Gimp think of them throwing people in prison for 10 years for vandalism.

  10. Re:But is the under-age sex still available? by modecx · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean, that's why people go there, right? Well the food too, but it's really the lady-boys. I hear it's a hot spot for various radio personalities.

    Lady boys... But mostly perverts who like the child sex slaves.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  11. Ministry of Truth??? by dasunst3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    For some reason, Ministry of Information seems 1984-ish, so answer me this: In Thailand, do browsers also keep tabs on you too?

  12. Why the archived version? by jginspace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Story links to an archived version of the Wikipedia page. What's going on there? Here is the current version

    "When Google refused to remove the 'offending' clip the website was redirected to a different page"

    Oh by the way I'm in Thailand right now and YouTube isn't redirecting anywhere - it's just failing. (ISP is TTTMaxnet.)

    1. Re:Why the archived version? by cianduffy · · Score: 4, Informative

      anti-vandalism measure - if you link to a specific revision, theres no way your readers will click through on to a page with an image of autofellatio...

  13. Thais take this very seriously by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anyone who has been to Thailand can tell you that Thais are some of the most friendly, inviting people on the planet. The country is often dubbed the "Land of Smiles" and isn't even a reference to the sex trade, for which they are also famous. Thailand is called the Land of Smiles because people are always smiling at each other. They could be in the middle of an intense negotiation or even an argument, but they are always smiling.

    However, there is an exception. In Thailand, you do not insult the King. I repeat, you do not insult the King.

    If you do insult the King (yes, spraypainting a mustache on him is insulting), those always-smiling Thais will stop smiling, gouge your eyes out, rip you limb from limb, slit your throat from ear to ear, and rip out all of your internal organs. When the police arrive, they will help the mob, and everyone from the police to the ambulance driver to the attending physician to the coroner to the undertaker will all swear that you died of a sudden heart attack.

    I am not kidding about this. Thais take their King very seriously.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Thais take this very seriously by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I found their predilection for smiling the most annoying habit of Thais in general. I don't want you to smile and nod and pretend that you understood what I just said when in fact you're going to walk away muttering something about stupid farangs, I want you to ask questions to show that you DO understand.

      --
      "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)
  14. Forced it's way into power by zoomshorts · · Score: 4, Informative

    I lived in Bangkok , Thailand for 4 years a long time ago.
    Thailand is a Constitutional Monarchy, but it is ruled by
    a Military group. There have been dozens of bloodless coups
    over the years.

    There IS NO FORCING THEIR WAY TO POWER, the various Military
    people take TURNS running the government. Hence the bloodless
    coups. Pull your head out of your asses and learn about what
    you speak about.

    Thailand is always taking the 'conservative' position to help
    impress other countries. Such is life in the real world.

  15. It's Like Calling Your Sister a Slut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here in the US, it's hard for most of us to relate to why the Thai government would take this step. Their king is universally beloved by the people. Here in the West, we're used to the skewering of our political leaders and celebreties in print and on TV, but in Thailand you'd be better off insulting a man's wife than the king or queen! Just because we've arrived at the point where we respect no one and find few things worth fighting for doesn't mean that everyone else has to follow our lead.

    Should a governmental body have the right to censor material that a large majority of its population finds offensive? Should Germany be allowed to block Nazi hate sites? Should China be allowed to block porn sites? Should any country be able to block material that depicts or encourages actions illegal in that country?

    I lived in Thailand for a year and though I have never seen or met the king, I helped teach English at a school he funded and have been on the palace grounds where he lived many times. I can attest that the pride and admiration they have for the king runs deep and this action by the government is the equivalent of punching the guy who called your sister a slut. It may be that the whole episode is forgotten in a few days or it may create a lifelong grudge, but action to defend honor must be taken. And if you don't think defending honor is worth punching someone in the face, you're not going to understand this move by the Thai government.

    1. Re:It's Like Calling Your Sister a Slut... by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because we've arrived at the point where we respect no one and find few things worth fighting for doesn't mean that everyone else has to follow our lead. If everyone did we'd have avoided at least one massive war the last century as there'd be no nationalism to fuel certain movements.

      Also just because not everyone in the US blindly respects the same person doesn't mean that each individual doesn't have respect for some figure or another.
    2. Re:It's Like Calling Your Sister a Slut... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Should a governmental body have the right to censor material that a large majority of its population finds offensive?

      No.

      Should Germany be allowed to block Nazi hate sites?

      No.

      Should China be allowed to block porn sites?

      No.

      Should any country be able to block material that depicts or encourages actions illegal in that country?

      No.

      If you need any more clarifications of the concept of self-evident freedoms, just shout out.

      but action to defend honor must be taken.

      Remember that when someone punches *you* in the face.

      Maybe a person's "honor" shouldn't be so fragile, or dependent on the opinion of a drunken man with a can of paint.

      And if you don't think defending honor is worth punching someone in the face

      I guess I don't. I guess I live in the 21st century. But you just keep banging those rocks together, Ugg.

      And your sister is a slut. :)

  16. They Do Take It Seriously by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2, Informative

    They put half of that outrage into their domestic problems with child prostitution and pornography creation/distribution.
    Actually, Thailand does take child prostitution seriously. They turn a blind eye to adult prostitution, and Thai women look much younger than they actually are, so I could see why someone might think that they also turn a blind eye to child prostitution.

    If you read the papers there, you will see that they regularly do bust child sex tourists. These folks are spending a long time in Thai jail.

    You can go to Thailand and pay to have sex with as many Thai prostitutes who look like they're 12 but are really 25 as you want. However, it is a really bad idea to try to engage in actual child prostitution there. Thai jail is someplace that you really, really do not want to be.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  17. A little perspective from an Ex-Pat by johnnywheeze · · Score: 4, Informative

    I lived in Thailand for seven years, and I'm trying to come up with an analogy for the slashdot crowd, (because that's how slashdotters communicate).

    It's kind of like that a-hole Phelps character with his god-hates-fags rallies at soldier's funerals. Insulting the King in Thailand is that inflammatory. I told my (Thai) wife about this yesterday, and she couldn't sleep that night, and was trying to find this clip on YouTube in a righteous rage. (couldn't find it). It's hard for westerners to grasp the concept of a powerful person who is universally beloved, without cynicism.

    I feel absolutely no sympathy with that Swiss idiot who spray-painted the King's picture. He's 50 years old, lived in Thailand for 10 years. He knew what he was doing. He got drunk, and decided to be 16 again. Imagine if a drunk vandal went around spraypainting the grave stone of your Grandfather.

    In the end this will be a tempest in a tea-pot, as the king will most assuredly pardon the man, and he'll be kicked out of the country to go to back home. The king has publicly come out and said what a silly law the lesse-majesty law is, and how he is not above criticism, and how he welcomes people to tell him what they think.

    However the law stands, because the Thai's they love them some King.

    1. Re:A little perspective from an Ex-Pat by johnnywheeze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for your reply.

      How is it absurd? They are both physical representations of a human being. Vandalizing the grave stone, is not going to hurt your grandfather, but it will piss off your family. You just have to understand that in Thailand, they feel the King is everyone's grandfather.

      Second of all, you suggest the correct thing to do: appeal to the law to punish the vandal. That's exactly what they're doing here, appealing to the law to punish the vandal. It just so happens that this law punishes a more severe crime in Thai eyes than vandalism. They caught him on tape, he confessed to the crime, they put him through the court, he had a lawyer, he pled guilty, the judge gave him a severely reduced sentence, and the king will most likely pardon him in the end. Sounds to me like justice was carried out.

      The Swiss government actually took what I feel to be a very classy stance. Essentially they said, you have one of our citizens, he broke your law, we know how important that particular law is to you. We'll be there to see that there's a fair trial, but whatever you decide, that's your right. Contrast that with how the USA handled that kid who got caned in Singapore.

  18. Video appears to be removed. by ak3ldama · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to The Register the video's poster pulled the video. An interesting quote from the article: Sitthichai bemoaned: "We have told them [Google] how deeply offended Thais were by the clip, but they said there was much worse ridicule of President Bush on the site and they kept that there. I don't think they really care how we feel. Thailand is only a tiny market for them."

    --
    "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
  19. You suppose? by mkcmkc · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I suppose my wife's

    Okay, now we're curious:

    • Does your wife have an identical twin?
    • Was she wearing a bag over her head at the time?
    • Do you even know what your wife looks like?

    Enquiring minds must know! :-)

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    1. Re:You suppose? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      One thing about the boobies in Thailand, plastic surgery is incredibly cheap so the boobs tend to be of the California variety, and not the home-grown.

      Bah! /me closes the travelocity.com tab opened two posts ago

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  20. Re:Good question by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the most part, you don't do the soliciting. They approach you, get you to buy them a drink, get you to drink a lot, and then suggest that you go to a hotel (which is likely owned by their family). At which point you're 1) too drunk to care or 2) too horny to care how much you're paying for the hotel room, which is likely inflated for your stay.

    As the American Embassy says to all staff visiting Thailand for the first time: If you find yourself in a bar chatting up a girl who is WAY out of your league, chances are it's a man.

    --
    "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)