Slashdot Mirror


New Tools Help Create Cellphone-Friendly Web Sites

David Kesmodel from WSJ writes "New low-cost tools are making it easier for companies to register and build Web sites designed for cellphones, the Wall Street Journal reports. Domain-name registrars such as GoDaddy and Network Solutions are starting to roll out all-inclusive packages to target the mobile Web. And mobile-content specialists such as the U.K.'s Bango Ltd. offer their own mobile kits that help companies set up a basic mobile Web presence. Even so, the wireless Internet is still a long way from attracting a critical mass of users."

13 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. Rediscovered by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The value of concise plain text. Maybe they'll patent the CSS for "plain text" before the end of the year.

    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  2. A novel alternative by symes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I'm out and about and need to look something up on the web I no longer try and use my mobo... call me lazy if you want, but I ring someone up who is most likely sat in front of a machine and kindly as them to do it for me. I don't know if it's me, my eyesight or what (ok, enough of the porn gags) but I just find it really hard to anything useful on such a small screen. Particularly as I usually carry a tablet and can usually find a wireless network. Surfing the net on my phone is a neat idea, I just can't see anyone using it a great deal. Am I alone here?

    1. Re:A novel alternative by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't think you are alone, but I did use the net recently on my phone with good results. I bought tickets online using Fandango mobile. It was fast, easy, and I didn't have to raise my voice in a crowded restuarant! (dinner date wanted to make SURE we had tickets)

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    2. Re:A novel alternative by dubiousmike · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am suspicious of your comment as Slashdotters don't have dinner dates. Unless, of course, you meant your mother.

    3. Re:A novel alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of my mobile internet use is in 'dead time', such as on the train. I can read my email, BBC News, Slashdot (not meaning to suck up, but http://www.slashdot.org/palm is a textbook study in how to adapt your content for mobile) etc on my way to work rather than waste time when I get there. It's not a device to do serious work, but it's a nice way to make the journey pass more pleasantly.

    4. Re:A novel alternative by dwater · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of Nokia phones have a full featured browser too, with the somewhat recent release of their new web browser. It's reportedly based off the same code as Safari, so I would expect it to behave similarly. I've used it on my 3250 and an N95, and it's really pretty and gives a reasonable experience on small screens (the 'back' feature is really cool, and the overview that you get when moving around a page is neat too).

      Also, you can get opera, of course.

      Frankly, I don't see what advantage Apple has in this area (web browsing), apart from size (there are other phones of similar size), which is as much an advantage for web browsing as it is a disadvantage for portability.

      --
      Max.
  3. man html2moto by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Can you parse me, now?"

  4. Re:Can't Wait by mdboyd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look at the bright side: You'll be able to surf the web with your mobile phone to get the number for 91--err... nevermind.

  5. No users -- no point by shalunov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The success story that the article talks about is about getting one lead a day only. If 5% of these convert into visitors who actually come and stay at the inn, that's 1 or 2 new visitors per month. Unlikely to be worth any trouble with the website. The inn owner would have been better off spending that money on Google AdWords. He's effectively attracting callers with what must be tens of dollars per call cost. If that's the success story, what's the typical outcome?

  6. posting this from my cellphone... by RedElf · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because it's so much better than using the computer I'm sitting next to.

    --
    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
  7. Re:They need special tools by nthomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They need special tools to make simple text websites?

    I have found that you don't need to have specialized tools or make special websites for mobile devices as long as you follow the standards and generally accepted web design principles.

    Case in point: I was able to surf on Google on my BlackBerry just fine, even before they added a special mobile section. Google more or less used sane HTML+CSS and I really didn't have any major issues with them.

    Other sites however, were doing funky things with JavaScript and Flash and other non-standard or ill-conceived technologies (e.g. by making their site completely useless unless you were running MSIE 6.x at exactly 1024x768 with ActiveX enabled) so I was never able to visit them at all.

    No special tool can compensate for lack of common sense

    Thomas

  8. This is bassackwards by Rix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't it make *much* more sense to standardize on mobi.domain.tld? I don't see any reason for a separate tld for this, other than to make registrars money?

    -1 Spam.

  9. The "old" tools are fine, thanks. by Onan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steps for creating a phone-friendly website:

    1) Use well-written, flexible html to suggest general formatting. Do not attempt pixel-precise layout.

    2) Do not rely on ecmascript, flash, css, or any other superfluous nonsense. If you do choose to add such boondoggles to your site, make sure that things function properly without them.

    3) Keep in mind that not all clients will display all attributes in the same way. "Strong" may not always mean bold, meanginful alt tags should be used for clients that don't display images, and so on.

    You may notice that these are the same steps that are required for creating any civilized website. If you've done things right in the first place, you should not need to know or care whether your clients are 30" displays, text readers, cellphones, search engines, or whatever new context will be popular next year.