By that logic, Donald Trump has an obligation to report to a police station in any or all of the jurisdictions he's violated hate speech laws in, because he's been broadcasted into those jurisdictions.
If you'll never use the passcode, there is no reason to have it. Asking for it is, ipso facto, reason not to trust you with it. The best solution is for the child to lie to you about the passcode. If you can be trusted, you will never find out about the lie. If you ever do find out they lied, you've proven they were justified.
There are alternatives available now. There's no excuse to be expanding, or even maintaining, coal fired plants. Put that money into building alternatives.
It's that thing that is dangerous, not the drones. Drones are never going to get any more expensive than they are now. They're only going to get cheaper, more disposable, and harder to trace back to their pilot.
People are going to do whatever they please with them. If some other activity isn't compatible, then it's that activity we'll have to restrict.
Which, of course, it is not, that still leaves the entirely reasonable objection that they have the data for any reason at all. Why should they be trusted with it?
There's not much you can do about Jobs, Balmer, or Cook being assholes, but we probably can force Mozilla to kick Eich to the curb.
Now, assholes don't much care about being assholes, but this will make at least some of them think of the future implications of supporting something assholish like Prop 8.
Slashdot Mirror
Chip and pin is still around in Canada, but the vast majority of the time we just tap the card.
Almost all top managers at Walmart HQ started in Walmart stores. How many top managers at Amazon started in the fulfillment centers?
Maybe that's why Walmart is losing.
Is that really your name?
By that logic, Donald Trump has an obligation to report to a police station in any or all of the jurisdictions he's violated hate speech laws in, because he's been broadcasted into those jurisdictions.
If the hacks were sponsored by Russia, and occured on Russian soil, then how is it illegal?
The law disagrees with you.
If you'll never use the passcode, there is no reason to have it. Asking for it is, ipso facto, reason not to trust you with it. The best solution is for the child to lie to you about the passcode. If you can be trusted, you will never find out about the lie. If you ever do find out they lied, you've proven they were justified.
There are alternatives available now. There's no excuse to be expanding, or even maintaining, coal fired plants. Put that money into building alternatives.
Why should they make any profit whatsoever? They're an anachronistic middle man.
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair
People give churches billions of dollars a year, too. That doesn't mean prayer works.
And the first time a bank gets hacked, everyone's fingerprints are public.
Not to mention that detecting a live finger is meaningless if you're depending on remote systems not to lie to you.
But services aren't taxed (I'm not saying they should or shouldn't, i'm just stating a fact).
Yes they are. Most sales taxes are in fact Goods and Services Taxes.
You don't get to decide things you don't pay for. The people that pay for things gets to decide them.
If you ever feel the need to install an ad blocker, you're doing it wrong.
Hence why CNN doesn't get to decide whether their ads display on the computer I paid for or not.
What I want doesn't matter one whit. Every asshole is going to have that freedom because there's nothing that can be done about it.
It's that thing that is dangerous, not the drones. Drones are never going to get any more expensive than they are now. They're only going to get cheaper, more disposable, and harder to trace back to their pilot.
People are going to do whatever they please with them. If some other activity isn't compatible, then it's that activity we'll have to restrict.
Amazon isn't forcing DRM on the publishers. They would be quite happy to let them sell ebooks without it.
That and the publishers "share" of profits is exactly zero. Anything above that is a market inefficiency.
We should be sending samples there, to try to find one that can thrive. Once we do, spread it liberally over the surface.
So that's not going to be an improvement.
Which, of course, it is not, that still leaves the entirely reasonable objection that they have the data for any reason at all. Why should they be trusted with it?
The proper comparison would be that if you don't like gay marriage, don't marry someone of the same sex.
There's not much you can do about Jobs, Balmer, or Cook being assholes, but we probably can force Mozilla to kick Eich to the curb.
Now, assholes don't much care about being assholes, but this will make at least some of them think of the future implications of supporting something assholish like Prop 8.
And I did not say we could. I simply said we could stop using that oil.
But I'll be choosing something else now. Fuck the bioconservatives.
I really doubt there are many people in dorms with 5 digit /. UIDs.
Again, that oil specifically isn't necessary.