Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Mulling Portable Data Centers

1sockchuck writes "An architect of the Windows Live team has published a presentation advocating portable container-based data centers as the future of data center infrastructure. James Hamilton, who previously was GM of Microsoft Exchange Hosted Services, contends that a distributed network of unmanned modular units 'transforms data centers from static and costly behemoths into inexpensive and portable lightweights. ... Multiple smaller data centers, regionally located, could prove to be a competitive advantage.' Both Sun and Rackable have rolled out prototypes of container-based 'data center in a box' products, and Hamilton notes that large generators are also available in trailers."

137 comments

  1. What about maintenance and fixes? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do they plan on making that easy on an OS that needs regular attention? This isnt a Linux, OS/2, Sparc, AIX, BSD machine that you can dump in a closet (or container) for months at a time...

    1. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      HEY! Don't forget Netware.

      yeesh...

    2. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by JordanL · · Score: 1

      What about Sarbanes-Oxley requirements for data security and integrity? Call me crazy, but being portable is somewhat at odds with the text of this law.

    3. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Not really.
      But, rather than maintaining 3 or 4 big-ass DC's or even moderate DCs you can maintain one central DC that mirrors and backs up stuff, while the satellite units can provide local access to reduce latency, and branch center operations.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by figleaf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thats a Myth. Microsoft is averaging 10 employees per 50000 machines for Live.

    5. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      well strictly speaking you can leave a windows box unattended for that long, provided you have a trustworthy third party management tool installed.

      Not that this matters. This is just Microsoft trying to find another way to stay ahead by taking other peoples ideas. I suspect it'll fail. Why? Cost, if nothing else, they always end up more expensive.

    6. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by statemachine · · Score: 1

      How do they plan on making that easy on an OS that needs regular attention?
      There are remotely managed power strips for the rackmounts. Also, a blade chassis has this capability on its own. With PXE and storage arrays, it becomes a matter of hardware just dying -- which can happen to any OS.

    7. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
      Net....what?

      Is that anything like NetBEUI?

      (as /me ducks and runzlakhell from the gathering mob of angry CNA/CNE's...)

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    8. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by bendodge · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      A properly configured and firewalled XP Pro machine that isn't used for email or downloading anything will sit for a long, long time.

      I do not download from untrusted sources, use a Kaspersky-based anti-virus, a hardware firewall and Windows Defender, and I have never had a virus on my XP Pro machine (I manually check logs and the registry to be sure.)

      I think most of the Windows "security holes" people complain about stem from porn downloads and shady websites (esp on admin accounts), where malware is to be expected, but people think they shouldn't have problems anyway.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    9. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by revengance · · Score: 1

      That's sounds like a lot of security measures you had and you could have done with much less. I think a hardware firewall is sufficient in most cases (if you are using your computer as a client machine). As for people encountering "security" problems, I think it is a lack of understanding of computer systems and security as a whole.

    10. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A properly configured and firewalled XP Pro machine that isn't used for email or downloading anything will sit for a long, long time. Are you sure??

      I used to run a game server (AVP2) at uni.
      When i went home i'd leave it running. (and nothing else)
      It couldn't run for more than 1 weekend wid out crashing.

      OK, so you could argue it was the AVP2 server that crashed and not windows.

      But any half good OS would not let an AS application crash the whole OS -- a la Linux.

      I download porn and look at shady websites all the time.
      I have NO virus software at all.
      I run linux -- and have never at 1 virus.

      Ha ha -- a real OS
      That does the job properly.

      You would have thought that M$ and all there money they are throughing at vist would be able to make a virus imune OS, but obviously not.

      Where linux does it without spending a penny.

      You gotta laugh at those boys at M$. What are they thinking?

      Cheers

    11. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have the right hardware, you don't need to be on-site. Serious servers come with something called lights out management. This utilizes a self-contained ROM-based system that's always running, even when the main system is shut down (or displaying a BSOD). As long as the system is getting power and there's an Ethernet cable connected to its management port, a remote user can do anything that an onsite user can do, provided it doesn't require opening the cover of the system. You can even re-install the operating system, used remote ISO and floppy images.

      I'm the documentation lead for a server with a LOM that's very fancy indeed. There's a graphic terminal service that supports things like interacting with the BIOS, or logging into the server's GUI. There's a LOM command line you can access using a serial connection or over SSH. The LOM also supports IPMI, which is kind of a basic necessity when you have a lot of servers, even if they're all down the hall.

      This server is certified for Windows 2003 (and I understand a lot of our customers buy it for that fell purpose), so it would be ideal for Microsoft's container. However, we have a our own competing container product.

      And yes, the company I work for is Sun, and yes, we're selling Windows-based systems now. Shocking, isn't it?

    12. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It will certainly make it easier to hijack someone's "web browsing experience" - just hook a semi up to the trailer and drive away with it.

      Adds a whole new take to "never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of backup tapes."

    13. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You would have thought that M$ and all there money they are throughing at vist would be able to make a virus imune OS, but obviously not."

      Its not to their economic advantage to do so. How many "unvalidated" copies would they miss if users didn't have to continually patch, update, and reinstall?

      Remember - "Follow the money." Its always about either money or power - or in this case, both.

    14. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Sillygates · · Score: 1

      remotely managed power strips?

      I think IPMI is more industry standard:

      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    15. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says who? Oh.

    16. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mother sucks cocks in hell. She's waiting for you.

      - Satan

    17. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now, I'm a month out or so from my CNE.... *sniff sniff*

    18. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by kjart · · Score: 1

      How do they plan on making that easy on an OS that needs regular attention? This isnt a Linux, OS/2, Sparc, AIX, BSD machine that you can dump in a closet (or container) for months at a time...

      As a member of the NOC for a network of hundreds of Linux servers I can say that you are likely exaggerating on both counts (and based on experience, very much so on the latter).

    19. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by tinkertim · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about Sarbanes-Oxley requirements for data security and integrity? Call me crazy, but being portable is somewhat at odds with the text of this law.


      I got the same weird vision of a bunch of sea containers on wheels, too. So , the 'meet-me' room would be in the back of the Semi's cab where the driver sleeps? or will that be put in the passenger seat, instead?

      # ping domain.com
      PING domain.com (x.x.x.x) 56(84) bytes of data.
      Reply From y.y.y.y : datacenter got a flat tire en route
      Reply From z.z.z.z : driver alcohol content exceeded

    20. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by madcow_bg · · Score: 1

      Thats a Myth. Microsoft is averaging 10 employees per 50000 machines for Live. Link, please?
    21. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      And yes, the company I work for is Sun, and yes, we're selling Windows-based systems now. Shocking, isn't it? Not really, it's simply economics. Oh, and the beginning of the end for the company. In 5 years, Sun will be just another Intel box shifter.

      --
      Deleted
    22. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Well, the Linux world of servers I do not have that much experience in. But, AIX and OS/2 I do (measured in over a decade each) and have seen servers of both varieties on stable hardware (RS/6000s and Netfinitys respectively) go years without any intervention or maintenance. The numerous years old (ie: 5 to 12 years) RS/6000s where I work never have any *needed* human interaction - the company though, chose to do both off-site automated backup and on-site tape backup. The only human interaction with the machine is hitting the eject button, pulling out the current tape and pushing in a new tape - only so we have onsite redundancy, and only because the machines are rather old and the company wont invest the money in a larger, more automated solution (larger tape backup, disk backup to a storage array, etc). The stores dont maintain those machines, our corporate office does, and they havent been called to look at one of them in years. The OS/2 servers we manage are also as low maintenance. We "dust" them inside and out every 6 months (I know we can eliminate that "maintenance", but we have to make at least that appearance; our clients, former Win2003 Server users cant understand why we arent there every month installing (or testing the auto installed) latest hotfix, update, etc, or removing whatever virus has slipped past the AV program).

    23. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by statemachine · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen IPMI yet on HP server hardware. They use iLO. And iLO can lock up too. BTW, iLO isn't scriptable via a terminal session, and it didn't look like IPMI provides this either when I skimmed the website. Don't knock a remotely managed power strip until you try it.

      As far as IPMI becoming an industry standard, I haven't seen IPMI on Sun or IBM either.

    24. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If it were simple economics, it would have happened 10 years ago. There was (and is) a lot of resistance to admitting that Windows is an OS you have to support. This is true both inside and outside Sun. It's particularly true on Slashdot!

      Also, building systems based on commodity chip is not the same thing as being an "Intel box shifter". (Or in this case, an AMD box shifter.) There's a lot more to designing a high-end server than picking the CPU!

    25. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by bendodge · · Score: 1

      That's just plain hooey. MS could simply force validation, as they are doing with Vista. It's just that patches provided a good excuse.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    26. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Patches allow them to do another check on copies that passed previous validation checks. They "caught" a lot of people that way, so yes, they ARE using patches as an excuse to revalidate.

      However, you missed my point - I said it wasn't in Microsofts' financial interest to make their OS virus-proof. How many people are dumping 2 and 3-year-old computers because they're full of viruses? And what about Microsoft's hope of selling OneCare subscriptions? That also goes bye-bye if there are no viruses.

      Without viruses, most people would continue to run the same OS their computer came with, and only upgrade when they needed to, not when their box is full of malware.

      So again, its not in Microsofts' financial interest to produce a decent OS when people are willing to put up with crack^H^Hp.

    27. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by bendodge · · Score: 1

      But if they did create a "virus-proof" OS, they would market it as such and people would then upgrade to it. That might create a long-term problem, but they don't always seem to think long-term.

      But it isn't something to waste time talking about, because computers are used by fallible humans, and therefore cannot be virus-proof.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    28. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it ... which is why succeeding generations continually get sucked in by empty promises from Microsoft.

      But if they did create a "virus-proof" OS, they would market it as such and people would then upgrade to it. That might create a long-term problem, but they don't always seem to think long-term.

      1. Microsoft claimed that Windows would be virus-free. There would be no Windows-specific viruses - just DOS viruses. That piece of bs died a quick death when faced with reality ...
      2. Then Microsoft claimed that Windows95 would be the end of viruses, because they wouldn't be able to run on a 32-bit protected mode OS ... hahahahah. Oops - that didn't work.
      3. Microsoft claimed that XP, being based on NT, would be so much more secure. Awwwwww.... 20 seconds from the time you jack into the net to he time you're infected ... priceless ...

      Now they just keep their mouths shut, because those of us who have been through it all before are quick to point out how quickly their previous claims became road kill. Microsoft promotional claims are like lawyers and politicians - you can tell they're lying because their lips are moving.

    29. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Please pardon my asking, but does that have to do with anything I said? I'm genuinely confused.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    30. Re:What about maintenance and fixes? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You said:

      But if they did create a "virus-proof" OS, they would market it as such

      I pointed out that they have already falsely marketed Windows 3.0, Windws 95, and Windows NT. as "virus-proof", and used that as a driver for sales. Their marketing lies - but they always have.

      It doesn't matter - there's no real need for most people to run Windows anymore. A lot of applications run fine under Wine, and linux native apps are getting better all the time.

      As proof of that, I'm writing this on a box that nether XP nor Win2k3 server would install properly on, because of the dual video cards ... but SuSE 10.3 alpha 2 installed without a hitch, configured both cards öut of the box", along wth 8 gigs of applications.

      I haven't used Windows in years, and I don't miss it. I don't miss needing special software and drivers, to connect to my cell phone via usb, or looking for a printer driver or video driver or sound driver, or a virus scanner.

  2. Google? by jkonrad · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Hasn't Google already been doing this for a couple years now?

    1. Re:Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so, that's probably what gave M$ the idea. They've been ripping of other companies lately - i.e. zune=ipod, vista jizz=apple quartz, xpox=ps2, etc. Just another sign that the manager of Fudd's computers in Tuscon has more brains than Steve 'Idiot' Ballmer.

    2. Re:Google? by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 4, Funny

      I recall reading something about enormous Borg like Google cubes requiring cities to build nuclear fusion reactors to power them, competing with Fermilab and LLNL for Most Brownouts Caused by Powerup, and being airlifted into remote regions of the world to hide classified data.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    3. Re:Google? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Hasn't Google already been doing this for a couple years now?

      You're probably thinking of the I, Cringely entry that revealed Google's data center in a shipping container implementation back in November of 2005.

      Really, these stores about various Microsoft talking heads ruminating about something or other are so bloody cheap. No one cares what Microsoft thinks, as their history of talk that vastly exceeds their reach has gotten tiring.

      "Bob Blow, Microsoft's Executive VP of Random Blather, today surprized crowds by announcing that `we've been thinking of doing what everyone else is doing....only better! Infinity+1 better!'."

      Dear Microsoft - your credibility is completely shot. Don't talk about anything because no one believes a word you say. DO.
  3. ummmm... by sulphurlad · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Didn't I read about a year or so ago, google doing this, part of the whole dark-fiber-purchase-thingy....

    1. Re:ummmm... by navtal · · Score: 1

      Yep your right google is already doing this.....kinda like the new vista widgets....and a windows based GUI.....

  4. Small decentralized datacenters by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Hmmm... didn't Microsoft once propose small, decentralized computing clients only to come back to more centralized computing via Windows Terminal Server?

    It's deja vu all over again.

  5. Re:not feasible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, the new goatse? Lol been a while since I got caught like that. Guess I better watch out for tinyurl links.

  6. Borg by jeevesbond · · Score: 4, Funny

    This takes Microsoft one step closer to becoming the Borg. Just wait until one of these mobile data-centre 'cubes' appears outside a rival software company, the voice of Ballmer comes booming out of a loudspeaker: 'We are Microsoft. Open your doors and surrender your intellectual property. We will take your technological innovation and call it our own. Your culture will adapt to service ours. Resistance is futile.'

    In fact, didn't I see one parked-up outside Novell HQ recently?

    --
    I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    1. Re:Borg by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that if there was ever a story needing the tag itsatrap....

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    2. Re:Borg by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mobile data centers are nothing new for Microsoft. I know a guy who drove a Luxury Car (forget what kind) and this car was sooooo wonderful it needed an operating system: Windows CE.

      It didn't broadcast Bill Gates speeches on the road, but it had the same problem as all Microsoft software- features you didn't ask for, that don't work, that can't easily be removed or disabled. He would park this thing in his garage, and once a month some process would turn on at 3 AM to condition the battery or something silly. It would crash midway through and he kept waking up in the morning to a BSOD and a dead battery powering the dim blue glow of the pixels with its last gasp.

      He kept having to take his car to the shop for patches. We loved hearing about this stuff at work, because the car always crashed for something different, but he was getting sick of it, like everyone else at the dealership. Finally one day it screwed something up again- left his windshield washer pump going all night or something- and he took it in for the last patch. The ride home was Linux powered and the fun stories came to an end.

    3. Re:Borg by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Well WTF do you want from me? It's what the guy told me. He was just repeating what they told him at the garage.

      He also said the car used to blue screen occasionally while he was driving it but it didn't affect the driving.

    4. Re:Borg by chebucto · · Score: 1
      there's only one pedal. If I want to brake, I have to hold the control key on the steering wheel while I step on the gas.

      that was actually really funny. mods can be such killjoys...

      also, you forgot to mention some other aspects of the iCar:

      • Designed in California, manufactured in China
      • It's a plain, regular car underneath all the gloss (specifically, a VW Golf)
      • You can get it in black, but that costs 10% more
      • You have to drive it on iCar-only roads for all the features to work
      • Efforts to market a truck version of the iCar - the xCar - failed, with sales limited to hobby-ranch owners
      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    5. Re:Borg by celkin · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! If SlashDot headlines didn't keep appearing on my Google sidebar, I'd stop going here. Wired is SO much better. You can submit comments without an official account, and NO MODDING!:) Post whatever crap you want and wait for the world to flame back at ya. I love it! Everyone here should go to Wired blogs right now...

      --
      "Oh c'mon, I wumbo, you wumbo, he/she/me...wumbo, wumboed, womboing...wombology? The study of wumbo? It's first grade,
  7. whoa, slow down there! by hxnwix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Portable data centers? They can't even get portable music players right!

    1. Re:whoa, slow down there! by adamruck · · Score: 0, Troll

      Honestly, I would imagine that portal music players are a hell of lot harder to get "right", than portable data centers.

      --
      Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
  8. i seen a photo of Sun's by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sun had a shipping container that was painted black, i work for a construction company that has dozens of those shipping containers and they get hot as hell inside during the summer, who ever implements these things in a shipping container (especially black ones) better get a badass air-conditioner to keep those things cool...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sun had a shipping container that was painted black, i work for a construction company that has dozens of those shipping containers and they get hot as hell inside during the summer, who ever implements these things in a shipping container (especially black ones) better get a badass air-conditioner to keep those things cool...

      The first job I had was building a portable data centre for the Australian air force. When operating in a remote area they needed a way to analyse all the engineering data from their aircraft.

      Now for me, that made sense. The shipping container is a bad environment to work in but the military know how to cope with problems like that, and they have a genuine need for mobility.

      These days for civilian applications it should almost always be easier to get a fast line to your site and use a fixed data centre somewhere, or a combination of systems.

    2. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by ihavnoid · · Score: 1

      In an article that I can't remember where it's from, I saw that it's black simply for marketing 'coolness'.
      The actual products that will be delivered to customers will be white.

    3. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I took some decent shots of the event, here:

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works/sets/7215 7594333338018/

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by adamruck · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that having your data centers in physical locations with:

      a) cheap energy
      b) cheap land
      c) cheap connections

      is *REALLY* important to running a successful business. So much so that building data centers with the ability to follow these requirements as they move around, is worth it.

      Also the ability to say "We have three extra data centers parked out back" is pretty awesome.

      --
      Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    5. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by jvagner · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah, Sun thought of that.

      The actual units come painted white. The black is just a marketing detail given its name.

      The units also devote a significant portion of the space inside to a chilled water cooling system. In fact, the water has to be chilled to 55 degrees.

      There's a tour online somewhere that has more details. Google it if you're interested.

    6. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft finally came up with a way to get in on the action in Iraq. Good for them! I, for one, am sure that the Iraqi people will welcome their new Microsoft Overlords...

    7. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i'd imagine that cheap comms and cheap energy are probablly more important than cheap land. And theese containers sound like they will be far from an efficiant use of land anyway unless they are stacked really high.

      i'd also imagine that the cost of fast comms has a rather large upfront component offsetting the cost of moving.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by Znork · · Score: 1

      Cheap land tends to have neither cheap connections nor easily accessible energy. There's a reason why it's cheap.

      Really tho, I'll betcha the portable datacenter fad will last 'til the first datacenter theft ring starts up. I mean, sure, you can chain them down but considering the guys taking datacenters on would probably be the same kind of guys that take armoured transports on they'd just bring some big-ass construction equipment along and demolish any anchoring. They could get it and be out of there before anyone could stop them.

      With a physical datacenter structure they would have a problem getting through the doors before armed police would be present. So you'd end up either putting your portable datacenters in a datacenter, or paying as much as the cost for the datacenter in extra security.

      For military it makes sense as they've got the guards already and they have an interest in portability for portabilitys sake. For a corporation they'd probably be better off simply building a datacenter. Concrete slab buildings arent that expensive and most corporations simply arent going to be moving their datacenters around on a weekly or even yearly basis (in fact, it'd probably take several years to even plan a move.)

    9. Re:i seen a photo of Sun's by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1

      I'll betcha the portable datacenter fad will last 'til the first datacenter theft ring starts up.

      the military has already solved this problem to a certain extent... just about all of their big systems are wired in some fashion with thermite. you hit the panic button (or pull the panic pin) and the whole thing becomes a ball of white hot sparks and molten iron. i'm not sure if this would an effective civillian theft deterent or not... on the one hand no one in their right mind would steal something that can go up in ball of 5000 degree flame, but on the other hand, i would imagine that is a major concern for insurance companies.

      i imagine the claim process would go something like this:
      insurance adujuster: so someone stole your multi-million dollar datacenter and melted it into a pool of molten metal?
      data center guy: no they tried to steal it, so we melted it when the alarm went off.
      insurance adujuster: why in god's name would you do such a thing?
      data center guy: to protect our data.
      insurance adujuster: and where is your data now?
      data center guy: in that pool of molten metal.
      --
      sarcasm:
      -noun
      1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
  9. But...but...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are all the retired people going to live?

  10. How Original! by Biff98 · · Score: 1

    Wow, Microsoft states that the future is something someone has already invented! Sweet How Novel.

    1. Re:How Original! by haruchai · · Score: 1


        You, sir, are clearly incapable of appreciating the YAMI (Yet Another Micro$oft Innovation) paradigm.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  11. you mean like this, from Sun, from 2006 by joesilicon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    http://www.sun.com/emrkt/blackbox/story.jsp


    A Novel Datacenter Concept


    Project Blackbox packages compute, storage, and network infrastructure capabilities into scalable, modular units outfitted with state-of-the-art cooling, monitoring, and power distribution systems. Customers will be able to order a variety of standard and custom configurations of systems, storage, networking, and software. Housed in a standard 20-foot shipping container for maximum flexibility, Project Blackbox will be easily transported using common shipping methods. Simple hookups for water, AC power, and networking will enable customers to quickly deploy Project Blackbox upon delivery.

    1. Re:you mean like this, from Sun, from 2006 by kjart · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly like that - it's the first link in the article (nice research). That is the kind of thing the person from Microsoft is advocating - I doubt they are seriously considering making a competing product.

  12. Patent Now! by halfloaded · · Score: 1
    Wonder if MS is going to patent this "new" technology. Oh, wait... Prior art. A Google container project was mentioned about a year and a half ago. From TFA:

    The probable answer lies in one of Google's underground parking garages in Mountain View. There, in a secret area off-limits even to regular GoogleFolk, is a shipping container. But it isn't just any shipping container. This shipping container is a prototype data center. Google hired a pair of very bright industrial designers to figure out how to cram the greatest number of CPUs, the most storage, memory and power support into a 20- or 40-foot box. We're talking about 5000 Opteron processors and 3.5 petabytes of disk storage that can be dropped-off overnight by a tractor-trailer rig. The idea is to plant one of these puppies anywhere Google owns access to fiber, basically turning the entire Internet into a giant processing and storage grid.
  13. *snore* by Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sun has one one the market, and it's been around for a couple months: "Project Blackbox".

    As usual, the "visionaries" at MS simply feed us what others have invented as their great ideas.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:*snore* by kjart · · Score: 1

      As usual, the "visionaries" at MS simply feed us what others have invented as their great ideas.

      He's advocating the use of such technologies, not claiming to have invented them.

      By the way, there have been ill founded MS bashing posts on the market for years - maybe you should try innovating a new kind of post?

    2. Re:*snore* by cranos · · Score: 1

      OKay here's a fully founded MS bashing post then.

      They let the Vista team design them and it takes em five years to release something only to realise that you're going to need a small nuclear reactor to provide enough power for it and that no body really wants it.

  14. It's one thing... by Daishiman · · Score: 1

    It's one thing to administer a low-maintenance UNIX box with SSH a long distance, laggy, crappy connection (it's same old same old and works almost as good as being there). It's another very, very different thing to hold a Remote Desktop session on those conditions (you'll want to stab yourself with MSDN CDs after a few minutes).

    1. Re:It's one thing... by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, I administered a Windows server in Puerto Rico that had a bad T1 line, we were measuring up to 40% packet loss at times and while RDP dropped it auto-resumed once the packetloss went back down. I can't imagine trying to use SSH or X to do the same. RDP also works acceptably over 28.8 dialup, I haven't seen any flavor of X do that. You can bash MS for many things but RDP is not one of them, of course it's a good technology that they stole from Citrix but.....

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:It's one thing... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know where you get that, but RDP DOES NOT work acceptably over 56k. I've done it in the past (cell phone in laptop made a dial-up connection) and it is laggy and crappy. Right now I work from home, remote into my machine at work using WiFi and I have to use a VPN solution, I can't imagine doing that over anything slower than 128k.

      X is neither a good solution for that, there is something out there that is comparable to X and lightweight, but I forgot the exact name. SSH works great over 28k... if you don't have too much of stuff scrolling through the windows (cat /var/log/messages for example). SSH can stand quite some seconds of packetloss unless the whole connection breaks down, but if you got that much packetloss, then RDP is not going to help either. That is why we have utilities like screen. Still, either on Windows or Unix, SSH or something comparable (Terminal) works always better on low-bandwidth than anything VNC-like.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:It's one thing... by afidel · · Score: 1

      force 8 bit color 800*600 with cache enabled and themes and sound off, turn off drive and printer mapping. As long as you aren't using IE it works fine over 28.8. I did it for several years before cable became available out where I live (too far for DSL).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:It's one thing... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right now I work from home, remote into my machine at work using WiFi You're within WiFi range of your office and you don't simply walk there?

    5. Re:It's one thing... by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking cellphones are much much higher latency. The first-hop latency on my phone is close to half a second, and while it has over 100kbit of raw bandwidth you never get to actually use that because the latency sucks ass.

      RDP is significantly faster than VNC and X when it's used on a remote connection, and bear in mind that these servers are going to be installed in a DATACENTER. You aren't going to hook this container up to a 56k modem.

  15. Portable AI Mind in a box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A superintelligent AI Mind needs a traveling data center a lot more than Microsoft does.

    Robot artificial intelligence could travel the country with all human knowledge at its disposal -- inside the reefer truck.

    Itinerant Minds want to know -- how much will one of these unnukeable furtive fortresses cost?

  16. The Sun (Microsystems) is rising... by CoreTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With Project Blackbox, it's obvious that Sun is paying attention to their customers. Need to expand the datacenter, but don't have the space? Use their portable container setup. It's sheer genius, esp. for emergency contigencies/disaster situations. If I were a CIO/CTO, I would be taking a SERIOUS look at Sun's product as part of my data/computing landscape.

    (And no jokes about hijacking the container with a forklift or breaking into it... That's why you hire 24/7 security if the data is important to you.)

    Microsoft seems hellbent on adding their marketing spin to the product arena. This is one instance where they need to SIMPLIFY their verbage. I'm sorry, M$ - I'm far more comfortable putting my IT folks on a laptop, managing a remote UNIX (Solaris) or Linux solution than a Windows-based setup. Not unless I want to keep sending my user to the container's locale every few days for one issue or another.

    Microsoft needs to rethink their strategy here. I think Sun ($un?) got it right.

    1. Re:The Sun (Microsystems) is rising... by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

      I know numerous Windows server administrators who'd be surprised at the claim that you'd need to visit such a datacenter 'every few days', or even 'every few weeks'. You might try sticking to the facts rather than FUD before you accuse Microsoft of spin. Glass houses and all that.

    2. Re:The Sun (Microsystems) is rising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Black Boxes have motion sensors in them which set off alarms if they are moved and yes they have GPS so you can find it running down the road if stolen. I wouldn't want to try to steal one of these things. You will get caught.

  17. More B.S.-Ware? by mpapet · · Score: 1

    More of the same, "Oh yeah? Ours will be better AND cheaper!" talk from Microsoft.

    Someone needs to explain to me who is rushing to buy these things.

    High-voltage lines into the box and having air-conditioning running 24-7 just sitting in a parking lot will probably inspire a visit from the local city inspector.

    Certainly after the neighbors complain.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:More B.S.-Ware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the value (not necessarily M$'s offering) for telecoms like Cingular, AT&T, Verizon, Comcast etc. They could use this in the event of a (natural)disaster. It could be the key to intervention / recovery efforts.

    2. Re:More B.S.-Ware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Someone needs to explain to me who is rushing to buy these things.

      Ditto here. I've been doing data centers for nearly 20 years, and I can't see the real advantage to this.

      If necessary, you just grab a portable office module (already available) and stick in a half or full rack of equipment. Done.

      I don't see what the big deal is.

    3. Re:More B.S.-Ware? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      I doubt our neighbors would complain (like most other business, the only thing around our parking lot is other businesses and parking lots), but last week a phone company truck managed to hit not one, but two, parked cars in our parking lot. Happily, mine was not one of them.

      That's all I need to know to 86 the idea of putting a portable data center in my parking lot. Oh, and there are all those 50+ foot tall eucalyptus trees, too. Hate to have one of those fall on my portable data center.

      I know Hamilton, he's a very smart guy and was once my boss, but I think I'll have to pass on this one :)

  18. Imagine a... by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....nnnnggggg....nngGGGGGg....GAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!

    1. Re:Imagine a... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...Grendel Cluster? Thor Cluster? Loki Cluster? What? C'mon man, throw us a line here!

      (stop staring at me like that).

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Imagine a... by aldo.gs · · Score: 1

      ...Beowulf There! I said it! Look what you made do! I hope you're happy now! *sob*

    3. Re:Imagine a... by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      container ship stacked with these things that stayed only in international waters.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
  19. White elephant by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Both Sun and Rackable have rolled out prototypes of container-based 'data center in a box' products, and Hamilton notes that large generators are also available in trailers."

    This strikes me an awful lot like a white elephant- it's not terribly hard to stuff a bunch of computers and an air conditioner/heating system into a shipping container with (physical) shock isolation. For Sun, it sounds like they didn't do much more than install water blocks in their servers ("cyclonic cooling", my ass.)

    More laughs:

    It's not completely plug-n-play, however. The "data center in a box" requires chilled water to support the cooling system, in addition to Internet connectivity and appropriate power infrastructure. Markoff's story notes that the prototype "sits in a container case adjacent to a Sun office building here (Menlo, Park, Calif.), connected to two large fire hoses for water cooling and 500 kilowatts of redundant power."

    500kW (which at 220V is over 2,000 amps- which is a HUGE hookup) of power is probably just for the computers. Figure at least some sizable chunk of that for cooling...

    Power, cooling, security...this seems rife with problems...

    1. Re:White elephant by CoreTech · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting: Sun offers CoolThreads technology. Do the math: The power savings and heat reduction on AMD's Opteron servers is considerable, esp when running Solaris. Check the benchmarks and claims - Sun is the solution to use.

      Not bad for x86 and x64 hardware that's rated by Sun on over a dozen OSes. Sun is covering their bases well. (Even if you want to run Windows within that portable datacenter.)

    2. Re:White elephant by jbengt · · Score: 1

      FTFA: ". . . and Hamilton notes that large generators are also available in trailers."

      Has he ever priced out the cost for generator trailers or A/C trailers? Good for emergencies, but not a long term strategy.

  20. Data the new world currency now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is it electrons? I've finally stopped being bitter about it enough to ask the experts.

  21. MS clueless about large-scale installations by Scareduck · · Score: 2
    From TFA:

    But incorporating liquid cooling into high-density racks can address cooling challenges, and Hamilton argues that removing support personnel from the data centers will improve reliability, noting that "human administrative error causes 20% to 50% of system outages."
    What, humans with remote access won't screw up? Maybe they don't trust MCSE's with screwdrivers... This initiative doesn't address the real problems in large-scale installations, energy density and power conditioning.
    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:MS clueless about large-scale installations by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Maybe they don't trust MCSE's with screwdrivers..."

      Be honest now... would you?

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  22. Follow the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Historical note:
            Truck mounted computing has been around since the computing stone ages. The 'newness' of putting it in a container, well... it's about as new as encrusting something in diamonds, maybe a cell phone, or mp3 player.

    Depending on which sized container, and what provider you go with you end up with somewhere in the 500-1500 u range. Figure each U of computer costs at least $500, and probably closer to $3000 for big name brand power houses.

    Okay, the overall computer cost of the solution is somewhere around $250,000 to $4,500,000. Add on license for MS software, and the total cost of could easily run up as high as you'd like.

    And any forklift driver with a pair of bolt cutters can take it from you. These things will normally be sited in industrial areas. You are one forklift or truck driver away from losing that asset, ether physically or because of an accident.

    1. Re:Follow the money. by symes · · Score: 1

      And any forklift driver with a pair of bolt cutters can take it from you. These things will normally be sited in industrial areas. You are one forklift or truck driver away from losing that asset, ether physically or because of an accident.


      This is a really important point - anything portable can be stolen and a box loaded with computer hardware is going to pretty desireable. So there may be advantages in more localised systems but there's going to be some security costs as well.

    2. Re:Follow the money. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think a robotic .50 cal on the roof will stave off most of the problems with theft or vandalism.

      I just wouldn't park anything too important near that portable datacenter.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Follow the money. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hate to break it to ya but stealing one of those things will be very difficult. Once the container is in place you really think its just going to sit there? It will be placed on a concrete surface with anchors for each corner and for real security the anchors welded and covered with cement to prevent them from being cut. To remove it will require a jack hammer and torch, not so covert. Even if its left on a trailer the tires or the axles can be removed and left on a stand. They aren't going to leave a container full of millions of dollars of equipment in a parking lot with an extension cord running to it.

      The 20' container alone has a tare weight of about 4500 pounds. A 1U server can weigh as much as 40 pounds. lets say we have 8 48U racks inside the container thats 48*8*40 which gives us 15,360 pounds. Add to that the weight of a cooling system, power equipment including a UPS, rack enclosures and cable management and you have quite a bit of weight. I am going to conclude that your looking at least 30,000-40,000 pounds for a loaded 20 footer. A forklift to move 30-40,000 pounds is very large and weighs so much that you need a tag trailer or slide axle semi trailer to move the damn thing. Its going to be allot easier to just open the container and rob the equipment. Or possibly use a roll back equipment truck and drag the thing on with a winch assuming it isn't anchored to the ground.

    4. Re:Follow the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what if you gain entry to the area and then one of the containers and insert a 'bug' (or backdoor) there?

    5. Re:Follow the money. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      a box loaded with computer hardware is going to pretty desireable.

      Well, yes and no. The market for used computer hardware can be very, very soft. At the rate computer hardware goes obsolete, even residential burglars are going to be looking elsewhere for things to tote out to their truck. Home Entertainment equipment, TVs and Video equipment, yes. Computers?? Uh, I suspect the fences have gotten smarter these days. I go to University Surplus Equipment auctions and know what 'wholesale bidders' are willing to pay for used P4's...

      Then again, your average burglar or street thug with bolt cutters might be stupid enough.

    6. Re:Follow the money. by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      You forgot that it will be tied down with a helluva thick power cable, ground straps and water cooling...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    7. Re:Follow the money. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Anchors? Maybe. Concrete? Doubt it. My experience with building owners (I'm a construction contractor) is that they REALLY don't understand their buildings. At all. And that includes the physical security.

      That being said, I think the weight is a sufficient barrier. You hit the mark on teh forklift, and as for a rollback, they generally can't handle a lot more weight than an empty container. Next step up is something much larger that what could be considered "inconspicuous"

      For breaking in the trailer, tehy can be secured pretty well. A coworker has 3 40' containers staged in west Virginia for a building project (or Armageddon). When he buys them, he gets 2 different extra security mechanisms - a lock box with a "hockey puck" lock and another device that clamp the doors. Then he adds 2 more locks on the regular closure mechanism. Overkill? Maybe, but one day he showed up on site to find that someone had gotten through al the locks but the clamp with a sledgehammer, and that was pretty beat up when they finally gave up. He's a realist, though - he knows anyone with a gas powered chop saw can just cut through the side. Of course, he has a plan for that, too.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  23. Not original by riflemann · · Score: 1

    Didn't Sun already do this?.

    Embrace and extend, indeed.

    1. Re:Not original by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      or you mean this?

  24. Unmanned? by cxreg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who's going to reboot the machines every other day?

    1. Re:Unmanned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's going to reboot the machines every other day?

      A spontaneous segmentation fault?

    2. Re:Unmanned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The design is completed with a 'reset' button next to the container door lock.

    3. Re:Unmanned? by CSHARP123 · · Score: 1

      That job has already been outsourced.

  25. Dupe by KillerCow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google's Secret Plans For All That Dark Fiber? Nov 20, '05
    Sun To Unveil Project Blackbox Oct 17, '06

    Yes, they are about Google and Sun, but does "OMG Micro$oft is doing it too!!!!1111" count as news?

  26. Sun Microsystems ... Been there ... Done that. by Usagi_yo · · Score: 1
    How interesting that this article comes out of all days on today. Sun's Project Blackbox is in San Diego right now across the street for display. http://www.sun.com/emrkt/blackbox/

    I took the tour today, got a neat tee shirt and free lunch too!

  27. What an original idea! by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Wow, what an original an innovative idea! It's too bad that Google didn't think of this. Or I'd really expect that Sun would have come up with something like this by now. But it took those geniuses from Redmond to deliver true innovation!

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  28. I hope airbags are standard equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a lot of crashing going on in there...

  29. Exchange? by AJWM · · Score: 1

    James Hamilton, who previously was GM of Microsoft Exchange Hosted Services,

    Am I the only one that read that last bit as "Microsoft Hostage Exchange Services"? I mean, I know MSFT likes to lock up your data in proprietary formats, but that's going a little too far....

    --
    -- Alastair
  30. Internet Archive talked about that years ago. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I know that, some years ago, the Internet Archive people were looking into building archive mirror sites into containers, then shipping them to distant parts of the globe.

    Idea was multifold:
      - Backup against natural disasters,
      - eliminating transcontinental bandwidth bottlenecks for archive users,
      - having a cheap, easy-to-build-and-deploy datacenter (Build, test, and load initial content where convenient, then ship it cheap, install it, check it out), and
      - have a low-profile site to avoid vandalism and theft of equipment (a container on a slab with a fiber and a power drop).
      - having

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  31. Already in progress. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I can see the value (not necessarily M$'s offering) for telecoms like Cingular, AT&T, Verizon, Comcast etc.

    They've been doing "cell cite in a container" for years.
      - Bring in the power and fiber or whatever (assuming it's not going to use a directional microwave link for the uplink side). - Pour a slab for the tower and container foundation.
      - Erect a fence.
      - Bolt the tower / antenna assembly onto the slab.
      - Deliver the container to the slab and bolt THAT down.
      - Hook up the power, landline, and antenna cabling.
      - Turn on and configure.
      - Lock up and leave.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  32. Has everyone forgotten the last experiment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. the Sun blackbox (photos) by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    some photos I shot of the sun blackbox thing:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works/sets/7215 7594333338018/

    its really cool to see in person. the equipment is very tightly placed inside. the water input and output valves are equally impressive.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  34. Disaster Recovery by tcgroat · · Score: 1

    This concept has a strong point, and that's the ability to transport a pre-configured data center by truck, train, ship, or cargo plane. If you suffer a fire, flood, or other accident that knocks your site out of commission, just write a check and have your business running again tomorrow from a temporary data center parked out back (you do have up-to-date off-site backups for your data, right?). With the incredible lost-business cost of down-time there may even be a market for "insurance plans", where a portable data center is at your disposal in exchange for an annual premium payment.

  35. Nice estimate by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

    A quarter to four and a half million?

    You cast a wide net.

  36. Similar Trailers by dj245 · · Score: 1

    GE Water does something similar, and their security is very lax. GE Water is responsible for taking care of a couple hundred trailers with complete demineralization plants onboard. The customer hooks up water in, water out (generally firehoses), and power. This trailer contains several tanks full of filtration granules in a cascade type system. The resin granules are worth a lot of money. I heard a figure for what they cost per ft^3, and it was shocking. Each trailer has five or six filter tanks half or 3/4 full of resin. The tanks are the full width of the trailer.

    The catch is that the trailers are extremely heavy. The truck drivers told me that they can't carry a full load of fuel, because they are that close to being overweight. They would spend an hour draining the water and getting every last drop out (in CT the driver foots overweight/speeding tickets). If you could find a way to steal one from a power plant though (or a similar place with a large demand for demin water) and find a buyer for the resin, you would be very rich indeed.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  37. Rackables is crap by twigles · · Score: 3, Informative

    My company almost bought a TON of Rackables. We're growing really fast and are building out multiple big DCs (>1k square feet) in the next year. These guys came in saying they could not only deliver a rack of servers on wheels, negating our data center operations team's need to rack everything, but also that they could double the number of servers we could fit in a rack.

    The number of servers per rack is constrained by electricity. For a while we couldn't figure out how they fit 48 servers into the same amount of electricity that our current server vendor used to power 24 + 1 switch. That is until we pulled a server apart and saw that they are using LAPTOP CPUS. The servers don't perform nearly on par with normal ones. They were, and are, selling snake oil.

  38. and Cringely or Google before that by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    A Novel Datacenter Concept

    Which is apparently based on a Cringely article from 2005, which may or may not have been lucidly based on a Google project.

    Innovation at its finest.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  39. they can't even deliver *measurable standards* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Plus a big fat "score:0" to slashdot for not researching this topic thoroughly within under-the-radar circles. There are small and independent businesses in the U.S. and India who have been constructing datacenter shipping containers for years.. Only when microshit and google do it you guys report this like it's news. BOO! HISS!

    Ignore the cornerstones in society and you'll reap what you sow..

  40. they are _going_ to make one? by hxnwix · · Score: 1

    So the original XBOX doesn't count?

    There must be a size limit... I for one wondered how something so massive as the original XBOX could even exist. Shouldn't it exceed the Chandrasekhar limit? Perhaps that's it. Perhaps XXBBOOXX don't exist in a form that we can understand. The bloody things may very well have collapsed into singularities that float about the universe, consuming hapless victims, tearing them from reality with their merciless, Stygian flows. Oh noes, I'm feeling the most peculiar draw from the center of my universe...... aiiiieeeeee..............

    XXXXBBBBOOOOXXXX
    Because in here, time has no meaning!

  41. Boxed virus and spam centre by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Woohoo, just what I need. Keeping a baby like that running will be a bitch. Permanent employment in a box...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  42. Misunderstanding by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    I think they misunderstood what podcasting is all about.

  43. Microsoft to the Rescue by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    And the reason to regularly move these ("portable") data centers is...?
    And Microsoft's experience with unmanned, yet critical path, infrastructure, that actually works without operator intervention is...?

    Next they'll be selling us flying cars.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  44. WARNING GOATSE LIKE IMAGE LINKED BY PARENT by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    WARNING GOATSE LIKE IMAGE LINKED BY PARENT


    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    well yes i know, i'm yelling to make sure people notice it before following the link

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  45. And the Air Force before that. by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    Back in about 95 we put about 200+ servers and and workstations in huge steal trailers that looked like shipping containers on wheels. We then removed the sides and daisy chained them in the desert in Saudi Arabia after that HVAC & Aircraft style PDU's were attached and a satellite link was setup to the US. We would process & store data from the U2 sensors. In the US, intelligence agencies could get that data. IT was called CARS (Contingency Airborne Reconnaissance System). It was a mobile data center, we had to do this because you have to be line of site from the aircraft. Now they just stream the data over the satellite to the States. They use just one small system to relay data stream instead of a fully deployed mobile data center. A heck of a lot cheaper than the $320 million the original data system system cost. Deployment costs were astronomical. After Osama Bin Laden blew up the barracks they decided it might be better to rethink things.

  46. Not me by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    I for one don't want my servers in a data center that is easy to move and hence easy to steal. Think about it, they just steal the datacenter, then they can take their time getting say cc and other personal data of your customers off the systems at their leisure.

  47. What about the Black Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea again Windoze is just copying an idea AGAIN. Sun has already done this. Its called the Black Box. I've even seen the thing running. Please MS try to do something new.

  48. portable and powerful are mutually exclusive by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1

    i was with military intelligence units when i was in the army, and i have seen some pretty cool systems built into truck trailers. the trouble with a portable data center is that as a general rule, really stable, powerful equipment isn't portable, and really portable equipment isn't very powerful or stable... just ask most laptop users. like an operating room at a hospital, your typical datacenter is very clean, controlled, and monitored environment. like a mobile OR, you are going to sacrifice contol of the environment for portability. i'm not saying that portable datacenters are impossible; i'm saying that they're not a good substitute for the real thing.

    portability works for the military for a number of reasons:

    1. the military has an effectively unlimited budget
    2. the military not expected to turn a profit
    3. military equipment is portable because of hazards like artillery and capture by the enemy. that's not the same as a natural disaster.
    4. most military equipment is proprietary and designed with portability and durability in mind. most datacenter gear is not.
    5. the department of defense has advanced terrestrial and satellite communications networks at it's disposal and significantly lower bandwidth requirements. can you imagine getting redundant T3 ordered, provisioned, and installed with less than a week's notice?

    for a portable data center to work, special care should be paid to reducing power and cooling requirements. cooling takes power, so cooler running equipment will consume less power. special care should also be taken to protect the equipment during shipping. computers don't exactly deal well with vibration or the bumps and bruises that can come with shipping. shipping by rail is especially dangerous with regards to bumping and bruising.

    --
    sarcasm:
    -noun
    1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
    1. Re:portable and powerful are mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. the department of defense has advanced terrestrial and satellite communications networks at it's disposal and significantly lower bandwidth requirements. can you imagine getting redundant T3 ordered, provisioned, and installed with less than a week's notice? Speaking from a US Army Signal Corps perspective, the tactical communications equipment that we have (Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Mobile Subcriber Equipment (MSE)) is capable of 8 Mb on a good day and that is between node centers. If you are shooting a line of site radio shot to an extension you are looking at 4 Mb tops and more likely 2 Mb. Want a long haul (more than a few Km)? You get to use Tropo which shoots high power radio waves (you can pop popcorn in front of the dish!) into the troposphere where they reflect, in shotgun pattern, to the distant end. This will give you 4 Mb tops. TACSAT is a bit better in that you can have a pretty reliable 8 Mb pipe, but good luck getting the spectrum to push that kind of bandwidth. There are only so many satellites in the sky and only so much multiplexing you can do. That brings me to my next point, JNN, the new Army communications system. It's all satellite based and data based (MSE has dedicated voice trunks). I'm thinking that your problem is going to be worse. Only so many satellites and there are only so many frequencies that you can use. Anyway, case in point, depending on how portable you are talking, you are not going to have a "powerful system." Within reason, portability definitely has an inverse relationship with power. Even for the US Army.
  49. Incomplete implementation by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    This thing seems to be another copy of someone else's strategy. Namely Google. I didn't know about Sun's version. However the one advantage that Google has over Sun and MS is that they already have the infrastructure in place to execute this better. Since they have all that dark fiber, they can put one into place in the field a lot easier. Sure Sun and MS could purchase the bandwidth they need but Google seems to have thought of the whole concept not just one piece of it.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  50. Microsoft plays catchup to Google yet again by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Troll


    "Gee, they're SO innovative at Microsoft"!

    Morons.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  51. Yet again ... by i_wanna_be_a_scienti · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is yet again stealing other's ideas and using their power to make money. microsoft should get a heavy 'dupe' warning