Slashdot Mirror


Woman's House Robbed After Fake Craigslist Post

flanksteak writes "The Seattle Times is reporting that a woman in nearby Tacoma had her rental property stripped of almost everything after someone posted a fake Craigslist announcement that everything in the house could be hauled away no questions asked. When contacted, Craigslist said they would release data about the poster if they were issued a subpoena."

29 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw an interview with this person on the news.

    1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED

    2) They pissed someone off.

    Ive often wondered if things like "free transmission behind X house" were actually something along these lines. Neighbours getting even. Its an interesting problem anyway that doesnt really have a solution I can see. No free webmail posts to craigslist?

    I could see the same thing happening to any classified ads service. How do you know the laptop your buying is not hot? The car parts you buy? Its not craigslists job to verify every ad for truth. The only thing that needs to happen, is the obviously doubbley duped salvagers give her the stuff back. Imagine how pissed that would make the evicted tenant or whoever.

    1. Re:nothing you can do about this by Khaed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED

      This does not make going in and stealing the property any more legal.

      And Craiglist is being pretty stupid here, IMO. "One of our users obviously caused a crime to take place... so we're going to be stubborn about it."

      2) They pissed someone off.

      Pissing someone off does not make theft legal, either.

      The person who posted the fake ad should be convicted for the theft, and the people who took things should not -- if they give said stuff back.

    2. Re:nothing you can do about this by norton_I · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Craiglist is being pretty stupid here, IMO. "One of our users obviously caused a crime to take place... so we're going to be stubborn about it."


      Requiring a subpoena to release such records is a wise and reasonable move. It ensures that craigslist does not make the same mistake all the people who mistakenly stole property from this lady made. This is what supboenas are for, and given that there is, according to the article, an abundance of evidence of wrongdoing, getting one should be easy and fast. Releasing the name to the public, or really to anyone but the police with proper documentation, would be inappropriate and possibly comprimise the investigation.
    3. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They aren't being stubborn about anything. They know a crime took place, they know their site was used to facilitate it. Just like any other request for personal information they will comply as soon as they have a subpoena, warrant, court order, or whatever else legally obliges them to divulge the information. This isn't exactly a life and death situation, and they are doing the right thing here. Things would be a lot worse if they had just given up the information without a court order. They are covering their own asses by requiring this while at the same time protecting the majority of their users from abusive requests by law enforcement which would almost certainly occur if they divulged this type of information without cause.

    4. Re:nothing you can do about this by Basehart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "and everything"

      You killed lots of people?

    5. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How many unlocked homes did Ted Bundy invade to find his victims?

      Did the Beltway Snipers shoot through unlocked windows to kill?

      Did the Watergate burglars find the key under the welcome mat to steal your American Pie 3 DVD?

      If only people had learned to lock their front doors earlier, eh? This is how the world likes its Americans: good people, well scared, fully ignorant.

    6. Re:nothing you can do about this by kjart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw an interview with this person on the news.
      1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED
      2) They pissed someone off.

      Hate to say it, but insurance scam?

    7. Re:nothing you can do about this by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The person who posted the fake ad should be convicted for the theft, and the people who took things should not -- if they give said stuff back."

      I believe that the people who took things are guilty of accepting stolen property, and the person who posted the fake ad is guilty of fraud.

      --
      stuff |
    8. Re:nothing you can do about this by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Craigslist, because it is on the Internet and anonymous, has no identity verification at all. Many people, most in fact, will do things they would never consider doing if they know it can never be traced back to them and there cannot possibly be any consequences.

      of course the people who belive that are almost certainly wrong. cragslist presumablly have an IP and timestamp, with the ISPs cooperation that should be enough unless the person making the post was carefull to cover thier tracks.

      Any newspaper would collect enough billing information to send the person a bill.
      here in the uk there are very often special papers where it is free to place your advert with the cost being borne by the buyer. Usually theese are local in scope but i don't belive there is any identity checking in posting to them. Probablly more anonymous than cragslist.

      but even assuming a regular newspaper personal information can be hidden. They can pay using a stolen or prepaid card and give fake addresses (or even the address of the victim). They can ensure stuff is printed rather than handwritten, use gloves etc. How is this any different than chaining proxies to avoid internet based tracking?

      afaict criminals generally get caught either because they are too stupid/ignorant to take proper precautions or because they commit many crimes and eventually get careless or unlucky.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:nothing you can do about this by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ironically, without a contract, even legit 'pickups' could land you in jail if you were the target ( instead of the 'oferrer' ).

      Its just your word against his, and he can prove ownership. You cant.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    10. Re:nothing you can do about this by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly right. Never cooperate with an investigation. If they really need the information, they'll just get a court order for it. Only then do you cooperate. If they don't get an order and you cooperate, then you've just given away information that you shouldn't have and you've opened yourself to liability.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. I'm non-plussed by fiendo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know it's supposed to be "news" that crime continues to exist despite (and sometimes with the facilitation of) the internet, but I can't seem to muster up the energy. I'm sure that when the phone was popularized there were initially stories about how people would use this new technology for dastardly crimes, such as getting pizzas delivered to the wrong address, but do we really at this point need be kept informed of the breaking development that yes, new technologies will be used by criminals as well as law-abiding citizens? Maybe I'm just crabby and this is a good old heads-up.

    --
    I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
  3. Sounds like a classic urban myth, only real by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's bizzare because it really does fit a classic urban myth profile. It obviously happened and the owner was shook up but it shows why urban myths are often believeable. Gotta wonder why no one that stripped the house questioned it. At least the first few to show up it must have looked like a normal house. It got pretty trashed so the later ones at least had an excuse.

  4. Re:Lots of vultures out there by LionKimbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What happened to common decency?

    A huge population (Tacoma,) would have to be uncommonly decent, some might even say unnaturally decent, in order for there not to be a few vultures present.

    As it is, it's Tacoma, and thus only has merely common levels of decency, and thus there's a few vultures present.

    Common decency itself remains intact.

  5. unlocked doors is irrelevant by ayeco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if the door was unlocked, it's still considered theft. You can leave you keys in you car and the thief will still get charged with grand theft auto - though you insurance company might not cover it.

  6. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    s the first 5 seconds of a film uploaded to beasttube.com,
     
    beasttube.... ehwwwww....

  7. What is wrong with people? by phulegart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see. Brief Synopsis of a great deal of the replies here...

    1: She was an Evil landlord. She evicted someone. She deserved it.
    2: Karma returned to her what she deserved.
    3: It was a rental property. She can afford to replace everything.
    4: She left the property unlocked. She deserved what she got.
    5: Crime is nothing new. This is nothing new. Laugh all you want.

    WTF people? IF and WHEN something like this happens to you, you will change your tune VERY quickly. What does it say about the state of people today when the biggest mouths all laugh at someone's misfortune, writing it off to just be "Life". People who engage at finding entertainment in the misery of others, are the ones responsible for continuing the misery of others.

    Sure it could happen (and probably has) with regular old paper classifieds. That doesn't make it OK. People in the Tacoma area that read this (and those here on /. especially) should be donating everything they can to help this woman out. It doesn't matter if she is rich beyond means, or if she needs to rent this property to keep from being homeless. Pranks and acts of vandalism like this are not funny. At all.

    --
    "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
  8. Re:Well, if you believe in such things.. by dgbrownnt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't say karma, per se, since the tenant most likely had it coming (it's very difficult to evict someone without a reason). It's just a biproduct of property management that you make enemies. When your tenant become a liability and/or breaks there contract, it's a business decision to you, but it's a home decision to them.

  9. Re:Been there, almost by Kannaida · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A great prank/revenge?!!? Are you fracking kidding me?!?! The tenant was evicted... which TYPICALLY means said tenant didn't own up to their bills or violated some sort of agreement signed when they moved in. I'm sorry, but in no way is stealing a "great prank". Particularly when it involves stealing things like the hot water heater and kitchen sink, things which, without, the home is now completely worthless. You need to seriously rethink what you consider a prank. If it's your buddies calling your girlfriend, you'll pay up in your own hell... but you need to consider the collateral damage. In this case, it's going to cost this lady thousands of dollars. And YOU consider it a good prank? When was the last time you spent thousands of dollars just to pull off a prank (and if you had, where do you work, I could use a job like that)? This isn't funny.... this is the kind of thing that causes fear in our society for people who don't have the means to support themselves. It's the "good" thing to think, "Hey, they're a little down on their luck, let me help". And I really do like to think that way, but it's stories like this that make me think, "They're not down on their luck, they're just out to screw someone." As for the people who went in and took stuff... c'mon people! Use a little common sense! Should Craig's List require a subpoena? Of course! But that doesn't make what happened any better. You've got one imbecile who's mad because (s)he can't pay their debts, and then a bunch of other people who are just, apparently, waiting to prey on a CLEARLY false opportunity. If you're the kind of person who reads that add and thinks "the hot water heater MUST be okay to take" then I've got this great bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Think of all the money you can make on tolls! It even has a pedestrian walkway! Real cheap, but act fast, the bids keep coming in! Seriously... THINK about anything you see on the internet. This is supposed to be such an advanced society what with our acceptance of technology, and all this shows is that we're too stupid to filter out the crap. If anyone here fell for that add, it's a wonder you're not broke for buying EVERYTHING you see on a T.V. commercial. A good general rule of thumb is if it looks too good to be true, it probably is, and you should do a little research before you sink your time and/or money into it. If you don't believe that, quit your job and go do the "clearly" higher paying job they offer on T.V. to "work from home" and "make millions of dollars". I really expect more from society. I like to think that as information becomes more prevalent, people become more wary... Clearly I'm being too optimistic. Time to call my folks and make sure they're not doing something stupid...

  10. so? by GroeFaZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I grew up in the town where the Angel of Death was born and raised. Do we have to drive around in APCs instead of regular cars and sleep in bullet-proof vests? Well, no. So unless you could name a mechanism by which Tacoma makes people dangerous (except that it's a town in the USA), that's not exactly a reasonable argument. I don't question the conclusion of locking the door, but maybe the rationale behind it is more than "we had a couple real bad guys born here". Anecdotal evidence only goes so far.

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  11. Re:All guilty... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, sure, Cletus told me to do it isn't a good defense, but...

    "Cletus told me that he owned it, and that I could take it. Furthermore, he told me in a forum where such offers are not uncommonly made, where offers for such services as one night stands are often solicited, and where completely fraudulent offers are commonly listed with no detection or tagging methods" sounds pretty good.

  12. Re:Similar offers have appeared that were legit by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe I'm just not a trusting soul, but it seems to me that if I were a demolition contractor, I'd require a meeting with the client to show me his ID and the deed to the building before I'd accept the job. I know that in Santa Cruz county (California) at least, you have to get a permit for that kind of work. I'd be surprised if that's not the case in most of the USA.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  13. Re:The Best Idea Ever by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, quick question, but wouldn't a demolition crew check a house thoroughly BEFORE tearing it down? I mean, even looking through the window, if you see a ton of furniture, especially stuff that'd sell pretty well on eBay at the very least, odds are, it's not really scheduled for demolition.

    And even if it really is, why not TAKE all of that furniture, first? I hate waste. Take the stuff for yourself, sell it, donate it to the homeless/a shelter/an orphanage/whatever! Tearing a place down still full of usable things seems just completely wrong to me, when people are still in need.

  14. Re:The Most Important Data Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    How is identifying ethnicity (a fact) racist? lighten the fuck up.

  15. You nailed it by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >WTF people? IF and WHEN something like this happens
    >to you, you will change your tune VERY quickly.

    Yep. Nobody is *really* a relativist. The coolest punk
    or the smarmiest professor turns positively Puritan
    when it's *their* stuff stolen, *their* face punched,
    *their* wife raped.

  16. Re:Im evil by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We can conclude from your post that:
    • Women are more compassionate than men and would never experience schadenfreude. Therefore, a woman would not laugh at this article.
    • A geek laughed at this story. Therefore, all geeks must be men

    Do I have that right?
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  17. Re:Lots of vultures out there by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    cameo appearance on American Idol
    Being a contestant on "American Idol" is not a "cameo" appearance. If you mean that you are Gwen Stefani or Diana Ross and you showed up to coach and perform, that still isn't a "cameo" appearance.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  18. Re:The Most Important Data Ever by Rabbit+Time! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was meant to imply they didn't speak much english, which would make the resolution of a misunderstanding that much harder.

  19. Re:Been there, almost by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the proper action for Craigslist is to simply ignore any non-official demands for information.

    The only "official" way to demand information is a subpoena or search warrant.

    I don't want them shooting off the personal details of every poster each time they get an email claiming to be from "Joe FBI".

    Stew

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.