Slashdot Mirror


Publishers Scrambling for Wii Titles

Bloomberg is reporting on the publisher scramble for Wii titles, prompted by the console's explosive popularity since its launch late last year. Though the article focuses on EA's initial coolness on the console, they certainly weren't the only company that initially missed the bus. "Electronic Arts wasn't the only publisher slow to see Wii's appeal. New York-based Take-Two Interactive Software Inc., maker of Grand Theft Auto games, had no Wii titles when the player was released and now plans to have three this year, said spokesman Jim Ankner. Activision Inc., based in Santa Monica, California, plans to release six Wii games this year, giving the second-largest publisher a total of 11, said spokeswoman Maryanne Lataif." Though that's great news for Wii gamers, the question is: how many of these titles are going to be 'shovelware'?

12 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. The more the better by fructose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, even if only 10% of the games coming out are worth getting, it will be that many more games that I might buy. And the experience the developers get by making a game for the Wii will (hopefully) make future games that much better.

  2. You want the real answer or the sugarcoated one? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Though that's great news for Wii gamers, the question is: how many of these titles are going to be 'shovelware'?

    Sugarcoating: Developers are going to port their existing set of games to the Wii, but they're going to spend hundreds of hours fine-tuning the controls for the Wii Remote. The graphics won't matter because it will be so much fun playing on the Wii!

    Real Answer: Developers are going to do a half-ass port of existing games to the Wii, and they're going to spend most of their time removing graphical features and figuring out how to read "waggle" from the controller. Since no one will actually optimize their games for the ArtX chip, the graphics will be substandard in comparison to the first-party Nintendo titles. Even worse, the games will have all the "fun" sapped out of them as the publishers don't yet "get" the Wii.

    The end result? Miyamoto will need to yell louder.
  3. Re:shovelware by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Wii could get a reputation for having nothing but crap ports

    Nintendo usually has enough first-party titles in the pipeline to prevent that from happening. As a result, the third parties get a reputation for making nothing but half-assed ports to the Wii. Glad to see that not much has changed since the GameCube. :-/
  4. Re:Silly question by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They didn't expect the Wii to sell, so they made a business decision not to support it. Now that it's selling, they are scrambling to start development for it.

    Prior to launch, most people in the industry thought of the Wii as a cheap toy that would sell as good or worse than the GameCube, and they decided to throw their development dollars at the XBox 360 and the PS3 instead. They simply misjudged the market for the Wii.

    Of course, if you believe the idea that the Wii is successful only because it has brought a whole new demographic (casual gamers) into the console market, these publishers that specialize in catering to the hard core gamer market may still not do very well on the Wii. Time will tell.

  5. Re:They are right to be skeptical by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When your best system is a handheld there is something wrong.
    Funny you say this, since technically, the best systems have always BEEN the Nintendo ones up until this generation, developers just didn't "get" them either. But since Microsoft and Sony are now sucking wind too, they are being forced to actually work for once.

    The only thing the Nintendo 64 did wrong was go with carts, but graphically it was better than the PS1, just more expensive to develop for because of those carts, and the only thing the Gamecube did wrong was launch late, since just about every bit of it was technically superior to even the Xbox.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  6. Re:shovelware by tuffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    2600

    The longest-lived and one of the best-selling video game consoles of all time, despite an abundance of low-quality titles throughout its lifespan.

    It overstayed its welcome, certainly, but the Wii can only hope to do as well as the 2600.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  7. Re:Silly question by donglekey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That isn't just publishers, that is every industry, period. Everyone wants a safe and profitable investment.

  8. Re:Silly question, wabbit, or is it? by 7Prime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed. The industry has needed a major shakeup in design philosophy for YEARS coming, but noone had the guts to do it until now. Nintendo basically took the lid off of the boiling proverbial kettle. If the DS weren't evidence enough, simply the reaction from E3 should have clued everyone in.

    Now, the degree of success is up for grabs, not even *I* thought that it would be THIS big, but my suspicions are not really that far off. The teeny-bopper XBox and PlayStation crowd didn't want to agknowledge the Wii's possible success, because of its threateningly, "family oriented" stance. A lot of the game press is teeny-bopper centric, so a lot of people were blinded by their own personal bias.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  9. DS collecting dust? by LKM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, and your DS is collecting dust??? If the DS doesn't provide any games you're interested in, I'm afraid no console does.

  10. Re:shovelware by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The majority of "hardcore" gamers tend to be fixed in their ways; be it PC games or traditional consoles, they (not everyone) do not want something new. Why should they have to use the Wii nunchuck instead of the traditional controllers?

    Exactly. This gamepad thing is never going to catch on. One button joysticks, For The Win!

    (dramatic pause)

    We've been here before. Several times, in fact. We'll be here again. The "hardcore" gamers will adapt, just as they always have.
  11. Re:Silly question, wabbit, or is it? by trdrstv · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If it's cross-platform, then it will likely be the least appealing on the most underpowered console...

    I disagree. If power was that important, the PS2 would have died one year into it's life when the Gamecube and X-box (both more powerful systems) were launched. HD Graphics aren't as important as the typical gaming press wants to believe. Final Fantasy seems to have done well only supporting 480i.

    People do want the best of what's available, but once again that doesn't mean graphics... So far EA has (surprisingly) been able to take several franchises and successfully launch them on Wii in a way that is new, better and more immersive than is possible on any other system. Madden, Tiger Woods, and The Godfather are all made better on the Wii by their intuitive and immersive control schemes.

    I have a Wii60, and as pretty as Fight Night Round 3 looked on my HDTV, I can't wait to buy Round 4 on the Wii.

  12. Re:Silly question, wabbit, or is it? by LKM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what shakeup would that be? A gimmicky controller? Offering existing technology at a lower price point than its cutting edge counterparts? Unfortunately, I think consumers have looked at the bottom line and little else.

    There is absolutely not evidence to back that up. During the last generation, the Gamecube was the cheapest console. The PS2 still won. People don't just run out and buy the cheapest console. People buy the Wii because it is genuinely a lot of fun to play with it.

    That's really all there is to it.

    If you still call the Wii controller "gimmicky," you do nothing but betray your fanboyism. Have you played "The Godfater: Blackhand Edition"? This game alone is proof that the Wii controller is anything but a gimmick.

    People play with the Wii because they want to. Because it's an accessible and fun. No amount of good PS3 games can change this. The people who love to play Wii quite simply won't switch to the PS3 for games like FF or MGS.

    And yes, if you can't see the change in game design philosophy from the GBA/PS1/PS2 to the DS/Wii, you're blind.