Slashdot Mirror


Palm to go Linux

jetkins writes "The Melbourne Age reports that company officials announced Tuesday that Palm will move to a new Linux-based platform 'to help the company compete better.' The move was announced 'during a meeting with analysts in New York, where they also discussed the company's business strategy and refused to talk about recent rumors of a possible buyout.'"

29 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Old News??? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Were they not going to do this a few years ago as well and then shelved the whole thing.

    1. Re:Old News??? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Were they not going to do this a few years ago as well and then shelved the whole thing.

      They've been on and off talking about it. What I don't get is why Palm Hardware never used the BeOS-based Palm Software OS. It was an ultra-modern OS, with features that WinCE could only dream of having, was better suited to handheld profiles, and yet Palm Hardware started making WinCE devices.

      Ever since then, they keep pulling out this idea of a Linux handheld, then sticking it back in the box. Pull it out, put it back in. Pull it out, put it back in. Why don't they just go get their rights back from ACCESS so they use the bloody PALM OS?!?

      Ok, rant over.
    2. Re:Old News??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ..they keep pulling out this idea of a Linux handheld, then sticking it back in the box. Pull it out, put it back in.
      Sounds like they're just screwing with you.
    3. Re:Old News??? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cobalt was supposed to be Linux based, not BeOS.

      I forgot to mention: This is blatently incorrect. Cobalt was BeOS based. ALP is Linux based. Actually, to be specific, Cobalt had a new microkernel that was combined with various BeOS multimedia technologies in order to produce the end product.

      http://www.osnews.com/story.php/6148/Interview-Pal mSources-George-Hoffman-on-PalmOS-6-Cobalt/page2/
    4. Re:Old News??? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no BeOS-based Palm Software. There should have been, but they never released it.

      Why does everyone keep repeating this? Cobalt was released as Palm OS 6.x and was available for licensing. The problem was that no Palm manufacturers licensed Cobalt for use in their devices. The lack of devices pretty much killed Palm OS 6 before consumers ever had a chance to evaluate it.

      For those of you unaware, the reason for this dichotomy is because Palm Inc got tired of funding Palm OS and thus spun off PalmSource as a separate company. PalmSource created and released Cobalt, but they were not in a position to create any hardware for it. Palm Inc's failure to produce any hardware for Cobalt resulted in the other Palm manufacturers sticking with the classic Palm OS 5. (aka Garnet) PalmSource eventually went under and was acquired by ACCESS, a Japanese embedded software company.
    5. Re:Old News??? by Moofie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The anti-integration grognards always crack me up. You are aware that you're sitting in front of the most multi-function device ever conceived of by Man, right?

      Convergence is not the problem. Poorly designed convergence is a problem. There is no technical reason why a phone shouldn't be a perfectly good music player. There's no reason for a PDA not to include phone capabilities. It's free pie. The hardware is basically the same stuff.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Old News??? by jsnorman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Palm (the hardware company) never announced until this PR any intention of moving to an internally developed OS. It was ACCESS (fka PalmSource, the Palm operating system company seperated from Palm hardware), that announced they were moving to Linux several years ago;but that project seems to be treading water at best.

      What is interesting is the Palm (hardware company) is basically slapping ACCESS's face hard here - they are tired of waiting for a new and improvied Palm OS, apparently did not like Cobalt, and are tired of waiting for ACCESS to get its act together on Linux .. so they did it on their own. If true, it is the nail in ACCESS's already buried coffin.

    7. Re:Old News??? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Poorly designed convergence is a problem.

      Yep.

      There is no technical reason why a phone shouldn't be a perfectly good music player.

      Yes there is: it has the wrong interface.

      There's no reason for a PDA not to include phone capabilities.

      Ditto.

      The hardware is basically the same stuff.

      Except for the interface.

      Now, here's what really ought to happen: divide up the hardware by interface instead of by function. Stop putting storage and transceivers (e.g. cellular, wifi) in all the devices; instead put that stuff on a brick (without a display) that I can leave in my pocket, and then give me a dumb terminal-like touchscreen (that's as thinner than a PDA), a headset, and maybe a calculator watch-like device for when the touchscreen is unnecessary. Then hook it all together with Bluetooth or wires or something. That's how "convergence" should be!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  2. Great move for them. by davidmillions.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is probably a good move for them because: 1. Lower the cost as they don't have to spend as much in development (eventually) for their own OS. 2. They are in a niche now since Linux has a great following 3. Did I say we are all Linux lovers?

  3. interesting++ by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given that PDAs are falling behind in the face of smart phones, going to Linux might just entice the linux haXX0r community to produce some fun applications that help Palm in the marketplace.

    I don't know if there is already an unofficial palm Linux, but having it officially sanctioned would be a good thing.

    Hell, I'm tempted to get one now just to have some coding fun, seriously.

    1. Re:interesting++ by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      nope. The Nokia 770 is way better hardware than Palm has ever produced, same as the Sharp Zaurus line. Nither one has came to the front as the holy grail.

      Both are awesome, and honestly do thigns that all other PDA's dream of. But it all comes down to one simple fact.

      The biggest buyers of PDA's are executives and they dont care to run a SSH session, sniff wifi packets, watch movies, or hack the planet... they want complete integration with their outlook application and email.

      and they chose blackberry because it's the only item that has the complete integration that works right. (not that I'm a fan of the blackberry, but adoption and useage of it is way WAY greater than pocket windows and palm put together.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. About time... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Treo 650 does some real weird things sometimes.
    My 650 will freeze for up to 20 seconds, at least once a day.

    I have friends who own the Palm version of the 700 and these do some very weird things. They reboot themselves constantly, email is very flaky, syncing to Mac computers is so-so at best. Basically syncing is a crapshoot.

    I find this to be a good thing and I hope the linux version will be a more stable OS than Palm.

    Any cell phone that doesn't have me wishing to toss it through a window after 1 month of initial use, someone tell me, I'd gladly buy it.

    I'd love to get a symbian phone but Verizon doesn't have it. I loathe Verizon. I was a t-mobile customer and I really miss the GSM phones. I think once my contract ends with Verizon I will go back to t-mobile or cingular.

    1. Re:About time... by fishybell · · Score: 3, Interesting
      At my work we have roughly 20 salespeople and project managers that are using Treo 700p's and 650's. Yes the 650's were a crapshoot, but with the updated firmware, they work great (and even survive being dropped, having the screen cracked, etc. and almost survive being washed). The 700p's though...not so much. They are in desperate need of a firmware update. Palm has hinted that the problems are hardware related, but as not Rev B. is slated for arrival, I'd say they're just too cheap or lazy to fix the problems.

      As far as syncing is concerned, we use the 650's and the 700p's to sync through the phone network to our internal linux server. It updates their client contacts, the employee directory, and their personal contacts nearly flawlessly. It's not too hard to do with pilotsync and python/tcl/perl/whatever. We use tcl here, and the code to run the sync (connect to postgres, wrapper for pilotsync api calls, etc) is 474 lines of code, and the code to manage and initiate incoming syncs is 6.

      --
      ><));>
  5. Wonderful Triple OS strategy by d0n+quix0te · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's see Palm OS, Win CE, and now Linux? Sounds like just the way to lose even more developers.

    This is Palm's management clutching at straws.... what was that comment about the iPhone from the Palm CEO? Sad to see a once pioneering company being run over a once beleaguered company.

    RIP Palm... here lies the Filofax of the late 90's.

    -S

    1. Re:Wonderful Triple OS strategy by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking as a mobile developer, while a RAD system would have its uses, the problem with making a RAD for mobile development is that mobile applications (like web applications) require different paradigms and attention to different details than desktop apps.

      The closest thing to a mobile RAD right now is Visual Studio targeting the compact framework.

      The problem with mobile apps is not laying out screens. In fact, I think sound UI designs don't fit into the VB form model at all, and not just because they conflate business and presentation logic, a philosophy I agree with but am not doctrinaire over. It's just too easy to paint a form which works very well on a desktop or laptop that is awkward on the PDA; the natural tedency in such cases is to blame the PDA form factor, not inappropriate design.

      But the biggest problem of all is how the mobile app fits into the entire information "ecosystem". What does the app really need to accomplish, and what information does it need to do it. While this is true of any app, mobile applications are different, and in my experience much more easy to make errors of judgment in.

      Remember the days of horrible flash abuse on the web? Now imagine a world where most people had never seen a better model than that.

      No, what the mobile app field needs is an influx of ingenuity. There have been some impressive efforts at enabling less skilled developers to field mobile applications, this is not a viable growth strategy until those developers have well worn application models that they are copying.

      WRT to Linux, while I don't believe in one size fits all, I think its clear we aren't talking about anything like any of the common distros. We're talking about a different user interface on top of the Linux kernel. I doubt we'll see X for example. The user will have no idea he is using Linux. A properly configured Linux kernel should be a very good choice for a modern PDA, given the computing power and resources available, and the requirements. It might not be the best choice for a real time embedded system with much greater resource constraints.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Wonderful Triple OS strategy by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I'd really like to see is somebody offering the equivalent Palm m505 for under $50. Ideally well under. That would not only revive the idea of a PIM, but actaully revitalize the PDA product category. The problem is at the price points vendors sell modern PDAs at, you have to stuff more power and functions into them than people need. The results are to bulky, expensive and complex to justify the price point.

      That's what's really behind convergence. If you're going to buy a lot of things you don't need all that much, its very inefficient to buy them more than once.

      Given modern technology, PDAs should be one step up from disposable. If you drop your PDA or lose it, you go to the drug store, grab a new one, sync and go.

      The 500 series is just about right with one proviso: it should be possible to dial your phone wirelessly from them. It might be nice to be able to browse the web, but that could go in Cheap But Highly Useful PIM v 2. If you could buy something that useful for $49, you probably would. If you could buy it for $19.99 you almost certainly would. Multiple PIM ownership would be common. You'd probably even pick one up if you forgot yours at home.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  6. Sure by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Informative

    All handhelds have free PDF readers available. Frankly - this is something you could have found out from a 5 second google query.

    1. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks. I have a question though. I have never used a google or even seen one, but would like to know whether a search tool to be used to look for information downloaded from the internet is reasonable. I am concerned about fonts, response time, usability and durability.

      Currently, I have documents in excess of 200MB abd would like to search for them while on the internet. Could a slashdotter help me out thanks. If one can go ahead and recommend search engine, thay would even be great.

  7. Re:Handhelds and PDF? by tmasssey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've owned a Treo 300, 600 and 700. I've read PDF's on all of them.

    HOWEVER: It is not easy. The best is the 700. The high-res screen (320x320) makes a big difference. But even then, you're talking about using a device that has a screen that's 2 inches x 2 inches to try to read a document formatted for 8.5 x 11. The whole idea of a PDF is to preserve precise paper-based formatting. Working with that on a handheld is awkward at best.

    Your best option is to convert the PDF to text and read the text on the PDF, using some sort of eReader (Plucker or ,A HREF="http://www.isilo.com/">iSilo come to mind). I read lots of PG material that way, as well as IBM Redbooks that I've converted to text.

  8. Article has no information by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA it somewhat ambiguous. It is hard to tell whether Palm, inc. announced that they are going to release a pda based on the Access Linux platform, or if they have gotten back into the software business and developed their own platform.

    For those who don't know, several years ago Palm split into PalmOne, the hardware side, and PalmSource, the OS developers. Since then, PalmSource has been bought by Access Ltd, and PalmOne has renamed themselves Palm, Inc. PalmSource's PalmOS 6, aka "Cobalt", was never used in a production PDA. After PalmSource was bought by Access, it was announced that future PalmOS releases would be based on Linux, with binary compatibility for previous PalmOS apps.

    Unfortunately, Palm, Inc.'s website doesn't mention anything about Linux in either the press release section or the Developer section. And Access released the Access Linux Platform 1.0 two months ago. TFA does say that Palm, Inc. will once again have control over their own OS. This seems to indicate that they have spurned the ALP. If that is the case, one has to wonder how they will offer backwards compatibility, given that the PalmOS IP is owned by Access. Perhaps the permanent license they acquired gives Palm the right to do this kind of thing.

    On the other hand, I don't see how they would have any less control if they just used ALP, given that most of it is GPL, and the rest is the same backwards compatibility code that they will need anyways.

  9. Re:Handhelds and PDF? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have never owned a handheld or even touched one, but would like to know whether a basic handled to be used to read PDF documents downloaded from the internet is reasonable. I am concerned about fonts, battery life usability and durability.

    Well, there's PalmPDF, which I've had reasonable success with on my Treo 650. PDFs contain their own fonts so that's not an issue, really. My Treo doesn't have a case and seems to be holding up pretty well, even after I've dropped it a few times (and my kids have dropped it a few more times). Works pretty well, though with only a 320x320 screen, there's only so much you can see at a time. You'd probably want one with a bigger screen (e.g. 320x480 ones exist), and as much RAM and as fast a processor as possible.

    I make too many phone calls with it, but I use its PDA and viewing functions quite a bit every day, and battery life is fine. Don't think I've ever gone below 75% charge (I plug it in every night).

    I can't say that I've worked with 200MB PDFs, though. I think ~10MB is the biggest I've messed with. And someone else will have to tackle Windows or Linux-based platforms. However, I've heard generally good things about the Nokia 770 - it's basically a small Linux box with an 800x480 screen...

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  10. For me, Palm died when PalmOS went away by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I loved the classic Palm applications. No boot-up time, no waiting, no graphics-heavy Windows-like desktop compressed to the size of an index card ...

    There seemed to be a lot of hobbyist development, too. People found ways to make the Palm keep track of what they wanted. As I recall, the Palm database format encouraged a lot of interchangeability and standardization. Mind-mapping and outlines were easy as pie and quick to bring up, so I rarely lost any ideas.

    When they moved with Windows CE (or whatever they called the mobile variant that week), I threw up my hands. The hardware wasn't suited to it, and there were few -- if any -- replacements for the apps I cared to use. As far as I know, all the good stuff went the way of the dodo.

    So I guess my question is: how does the move to Linux bode for developers? Will there be compatibility with any of the classic Palm OS or Windows CE apps, or will we once again have to build from scratch?

    1. Re:For me, Palm died when PalmOS went away by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Palm is still mostly a PalmOS shop. They only introduced the first Windows Mobile smartphone (the 700w) in September 2005, and only two more windows models since then. All the PalmOS based products still support even the old 68k apps. It is hard to tell if the new Linux platform will support PalmOS apps, because Palm doesn't own PalmOS. However, if Palm, Inc. uses anything similar to the Access Linux Platform (developed by the owners of PalmOS), there will be GTK+ compatibility, which should satisfy quite a few hobbyists.

  11. Re:Are we going to be able to see the source code? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have severely underestimated the GPL. I suggest you go read it. The GPL is not that dense. But to answer the question at hand, yes, all customers will have access to the source code for the GPL portions (which will be the bulk of the OS). All customers will have the right to re-distribute and modify that code. That is the price Palm pays for using Free software.

    Given Palm's history of being developer friendly, it will probably be possible to flash the PDAs with custom ROMs with all proprietary code stripped. Depending on the exact terms, it may even be possible to create a custom ROM with proprietary backwards compatibility code included.

  12. Re:Nowhere else for Palm to go... by alucinor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "There would have been no cheap Linux today if Microsoft hadn't flattened/commoditized the computer hardware market by the start of the 1990's."

    Because somehow Microsoft doing this inspired Linus Torvalds to create a MINIX-like free kernel for research purposes?

    Or because Windows made x86 popular (rather than the other way around)? Yet I still don't even see how that would've mattered one way or the other to the creation of Linux.

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
  13. There can be only one!!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, lets be honest, we all need our cell phones.
    Some of us need our blackberries.
    We all want our music.

    Rather than juggle all three, there is no reason why the cell phone can't do everything and more. After all a computer, whether it is in a P.C., Cellphone, or what ever is still a computer.

    IMHO, Palm is wrong, they are coming into the system from the wrong direction, they MUST focus on the phone first and most, then blackberry, then MP3 player. Deliver a package to Verizon, Cingular, Orange, etc.

    This is why iPhone will do better.

    1. Re:There can be only one!!! by grapeape · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would argue that excessive integration has ruined the PDA/phone market. For every person I know that actually uses the bells and whistles on their phones I know 10 that don't do anything beyond a contact list and phone calls. I am evidently in the minority but I would rather have several devices that do their job well than one that does them all half-assed. I have yet to see a "music" phone that was really a decent mp3 player, I haven't seen a "game" phone that was really a good gaming platform and I have yet to see a Smartphone that hasn't made extreme sacrifices in order to cram its functionality into a postage stamp screen.

      I've gone from palm to windows mobile to a smartphone and finally to a blackberry. In going from platform to platform I have had to make concessions and sacrifices for the sake of convenience with my latest move I just ditched all the functionality for decent email and phone support. The integration push has killed the pda, Palm and MS just dont know it yet.

  14. Re:Great but.... by evil_Tak · · Score: 3, Informative

    In short. Linux on a PDA is a huge success for Linux but is really no better for everyday linux users unless we get proprietry stuff like Tomtom, RealPlayer, Flash available for it (not completely unlikely).

    You mean something like the Nokia N800, which comes with Opera and Flash, works with a wide range of bluetooth GPS units, including Navicore and TomTom, and has a freely available Rhapsody client?

  15. Not the creation...the propogation... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because somehow Microsoft doing this inspired Linus Torvalds to create a MINIX-like free kernel for research purposes? Or because Windows made x86 popular (rather than the other way around)? Yet I still don't even see how that would've mattered one way or the other to the creation of Linux.


    The key word in my post was "cheap". Linus's little hobby may not have taken off it wasn't easy for college-age folks like me to buy the components for a cheap PC and run either Linux or Windows on it in the early 1990s. A lot of the people who helped Linux (and its programs) get going couldn't afford a second PC, or were happy a second PC was cheap when they did get one.

    So...although Windows may not have helped the creation of Linux as a hobby, it certainly helped make Linux accessible to more people by making PC hardware cheap.

    Let me know if you need more help...