Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Ubuntu Project Code Named 'Gutsy Gibbon'

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the gone-ape dept.

Go2Linux writes "The code name for the new Ubuntu project that is going to be release this October is Gutsy Gibbon, It was introduced by Mark Shuttleworth, early today, this release will come full composite as default, according to Mark."

10 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Re:wtf is composite? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try Compiz(http://compiz.org/), Beryl(http://beryl-project.org/), compositing manager (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compositing_manager) or compositing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compositing)!

  2. Re:wtf is composite? by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using the 3D capabilities of your graphics card to render your desktop.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  3. Re:wtf is composite? by choongiri · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiz

  4. Re:wtf is composite? by robthebob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have a google for Beryl/Compiz. That'll get you on the right track.

  5. Desktop Linux Done Right by aarmenaa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently installed 6.10 (Edgy Eft) on my laptop, and I'm fairly surprised. The only things that didn't work right from the start were the digitizer (it's a tablet PC), and my USB wireless dongle. The digitizer isn't plug-and-play or anything like that, but the USB dongle is more of a mystery - it's claims Linux support, and it's even detected, but the included driver appears to be broken. The driver the manufacturer provides doesn't support anything in the standard manner (as far as WPA and various encryption stuff goes), so I'm using ndiswrapper for it right now. It works, but still won't work in encrypted modes. It uses a Ralink RT73 chipset, btw.

    But hey, it got the old internal wireless card perfectly. It only supports WEP though. It also got the video card (and I can change resolutions in an applet!), sound card, USB hubs, my external USB DVD-RW (and it hotplugs!), and so on. It'll even hotplug the USB wireless dongle, with ndiswrapper - I full expected that to not work. So we're not getting 100% success, but it's entirely possible that you could install Linux and never touch a config file. That's how you do desktop.

    Honestly, my biggest complaint now is that WPA and connecting to weird RADIUS servers run by universities and the like is still a royal pain. I tried Network-Manager (a Gnome applet) and it did all kinds of bad stuff to my system (loopback never came up), and didn't help me connect to encrypted networks at all. But, they're working on it. If this is the worst complaint I can muster, we've come a long way.

    --
    "I do a grep for shit, bollocks, and tits before checking in code. I'm professional..." -RECURSIVE_META_JOKE, reddit.com
  6. Re:wtf is composite? by Eivind · · Score: 5, Informative
    The quick explanation (somewhat oversimplified, but you get the idea)

    In a traditional (non-compositing) windowing-environment, each application essentially handles its own part of the screen, when, for example, a part of firefox previously hidden behind an xterm get unobscured, firefox is informed of this fact, and is responsible for redrawing that part of its own window.

    In a compositing system, instead each program draw on their own private separate area. All these areas are then sent to the compositing manager which makes the overall screen by combining these in various ways.

    There's advantages. First, it simplifies things for the programs, since they can pretend they're always alone on the screen. Secondly, it makes it possible to unify visual tricks. Without composition, for example, each and every program that wants to support stuff like being transparent, or animating their appearance, or being transparent only while being dragged or any other of a million visible tricks need to implement this independent of eachother.

    With composition, the compositing window-manager can handle all of that, and the programs won't even notice. So it improves consistency by making the same visual options work identically in *all* programs.

  7. Re:Why not link directly to the story? by Aix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just so you know, neither the gibbon nor the bonobo is actually a monkey. They are apes.

    --
    Nonperiodic Central Trajectory
  8. Re:Why not link directly to the story? by miscz · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can try Linux Mint, Ubuntu-based non-free distro.

  9. Splog by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was introduced by Mark Shuttleworth, early today, this release will come full composite as default, according to Mark."

    How on earth do you get that, when what he actually said was:

    On a personal note, the monkey on my back has been composite-by-default, which I had hoped would happen in Edgy, then Feisty. I'm nervous to predict it now for Gutsy, for fear of a third strike, but I'm told that great work is being done in the Compiz/Beryl community and upstream in X. There's a reasonable chance that Gutsy will deliver where those others have not.

    Wow, Go2Linux really did well with this. They copy & pasted the email and the release schedule, they added a totally incorrect summary, submitted their own story to Slashdot, and got onto the front page. It's almost as if Slashdot is trying to reward incompetence.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  10. Re:wtf is composite? by mgiuca · · Score: 2, Informative

    The real key here (with composite) is the sparkle for the masses. The people who see "The Wow Starts Now" ads for Vista and go, "ooh Vista's beautiful". Composite desktops in Linux are a "we've got the wow too!" I think it's very important to avoid being seen as the ugly duckling.

    In this regard, wobbly windows serve their purpose ;)