Slashdot Mirror


Protected Memory Stick Easily Cracked

Martin_Sturm writes "A $175 1GB USB stick designed to protect your data turns out to be a very insecure. According to the distributer of the Secustick, the safety of the data is ensured: 'Due to its unique technology it has the ability to destroy itself once an incorrect password is entered.' The Secustick is used by various European governments and organizations to secure data on USB sticks. Tweakers.net shows how easy it is to break the protection of the stick. Quoting: 'It should be clear that the stick's security is quite useless: a simple program can be used to fool the Secustick into sending its unlock command without knowing the password. Besides, the password.exe application can be adapted so that it accepts arbitrary passwords.' The manufacturer got the message and took the Secustick website offline. The site give a message (translated from Dutch): 'Dear visitor, this site is currently unavailable due to security issues of the Secustick. We are currently working on an improved version of the Secustick.'"

8 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Well they could have been like other companies by insanemime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least they had the balls to admit that something was wrong and try to take steps to fix it. It will be intresting to see if they recall the ones already sold.

    1. Re:Well they could have been like other companies by antime · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What they admitted is that they have no idea what they are doing and have no idea what they are selling. You would have to be an idiot to buy anything security-related from a company like that.

    2. Re:Well they could have been like other companies by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, not completely. A spokesperson for the product is reported saying:

      Our customers are happy with the level of protection that our product offers. Normally, the amount of security is sufficient, not everyone has the technical expertise that you have.

      This is quite a different statement from the one made near the start of the article.

      The stick was commissioned by the French government and - according to the company's press release - the result is revolutionary, ultra safe and approved by the French intelligence service.

      Funny part is, all they did was run the program in a debugger, put a breakpoint after the clearly labelled "VerifyPassWord" function, and change the return value from 0 to 1. Pretty embarassing. But the article went pretty easy on them after that. Really good read by the way.

  2. Nice one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least the manufacturer is doing the right thing and eating crow over this. Here in the US the company would probably have just sued the hackers under DMCA while continuing to sell the defective product.

  3. TrueCrypt by Teckla · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most Slashdotters know you should not trust the built in security on these devices.

    The solution for real security on these devices is to use TrueCrypt.

    It's not hard to use, though the more technical among us may need to help out the less technically inclined to get things rolling. Once it's setup, though, it's secure and easy to use.

  4. Re:TrueCrypt by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The type of people who have got the wherewithal to set up TrueCrpyt are not the market this was aiming for. This seems like a product made for the techno-clueless PHB types who just want to buy something off the shelf they can stick in their magic computer box and have it "just work," and who see that high a price on a simple 1-gig USB stick not as an obvious ripoff, but as a measure of how much good computer magic it must surely contain.

  5. Re:This RAISES the question...... by Xanni · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    http://www.glasswings.com/
  6. A surprise and a non-surprise. by eddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No surprise that the security is non-existant, but a nice surprise that tweakers.net[0] have people skilled enough to do a thorough technical review. Tip-of-the-Hat to the reviewers and keep the good work up. Anyone can run 3D benchmarks and make graphs against the previous generation, but this requires a different level of technical know-how. It's always been my hope that the future would feature this type of review, using reverse-engineering techniques for indepth technical reviews, as a norm not an exception.

    [0] No disrespect to the people of tweakers.net, I mean in the sense of 'any popular review site'.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.