Slashdot Mirror


Samsung to Launch Dual Blu-ray HD DVD Player

narramissic writes "File this one under 'if you can't beat em, join em.' Samsung, one of the main backers of the Blu-ray Disc format, Friday said it plans to release an optical disc player this year that will play both Blu-ray Disc and the rival HD DVD format. With the announcement, Samsung becomes the second company to shift from a single-format stance (LG launched a dual player in North America earlier this year.) 'Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology,' said Samsung spokesman Kwak Bumjoon."

156 comments

  1. MMMhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 1

    And so it begins. I wonder if M$ will start grabbing these up now since someone took the plunge and they use Samsung already.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    1. Re:MMMhm... by jojoba_oil · · Score: 1
      I think you're right.

      'Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology,' said Samsung And M$ can't let anyone do that!
    2. Re:MMMhm... by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How long before the device manufacturer's figure this pattern out
      1) Create two competing technonologies that are equally sufficient but incompatible.
      2) Stifle standardization
      3) market more expensive devices that handle both, as both a marketing advantage, a manufacturing skill advantage,
      4) and to inflate costs, assuming profit margin is proportional to gross, and the number of units sold is the same.
      5) profit!

      there is no ?????

      A very interesting side effect is that MS can no longer dictate platform specs. This is remarkably new phenomena and worth watching.

      Finally Could the slash dot filter PLEASE stop people from writing M$ instead of MS. (;_;)

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:MMMhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry about the "M$" trouble, I didn't realize it offended anyone.. though I'm not anti-microsoft. I think Microsoft is beginning to learn that being a little to assertive with certain technologies, and pushing them on others.. is becoming pretty hard to do, now that the market is becoming more and more competitive. They're to the point where they're beginning to actually let things unravel and ride the wave in. Good or bad, I don't know.. but it's still interesting as you said.

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    4. Re:MMMhm... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are we still talking about the HD/Blu-ray thing or are we on to the PC/Mac thing again?


      warning: The above content may test positive for sarcasm and/or could be a failed attempt at humor and as such should be taken with a pound of salt.

    5. Re:MMMhm... by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow! A humble apology on slashdot--land of thick skins.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    6. Re:MMMhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think I was centered more around the PS3/360 thing.

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    7. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you need to point out that whatever you said was a joke or sarcasm, it obviously isn't funny. And even if it was funny, you pointing it out instantly made it un-funny.

    8. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I was centered more around the PS3/360 thing. That analogy only holds if there were a machine that ran both 360 and PS# games. There is not. It's not the competing standards that sells more, it's their merger onto a single platform that makes the profit from the schism.
    9. Re:MMMhm... by misleb · · Score: 1

      3) market more expensive devices that handle both, as both a marketing advantage, a manufacturing skill advantage,


      That would be a bad strategy. Supporting both formats is only be feasable if it can be done with minimal impact on the final cost of the product compared to devices that can only play one format or the other. Well, i'm sure some peole would buy them, but I don't think it would be a market dominating strategy.

      If *I* were in the market for an HD player, I'd first be looking at which one format has the most/best titles and just pick a player than played those before consider a significantly more expensive device that plays both. As it is, I'm going to be with DVD for some time to come. The title I tend to rent (I don't buy) are barely even on DVD sometimes, much less Blu-ray or HD-DVD :-P

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thick skin doesn't prevent the sting from your barb, you insensitive clod!

    11. Re:MMMhm... by alisson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Huh... I never knew there was anyone offended by this, either. I suppose I can stop writing it, as well. Of course, part of me still wants to write something like that... *contemplates ranting about people paying $600 to be beta testers....*

      Anyway, I can see the benefit to the hybrid player. Why sell two products when you can just have one? Less costs = more profits :) But I'm still not convinced there's a point to either format. DVD is fine. It's the same problem with XP Vs Vista, or as it was with N64 Vs Gamecube, etc. There's not much incentive to switch, since it's not a big enough improvement to justify the cost.. Better resolution? Sure. Enough for most to care? Not really. More space? Yup. Do most DVDs actually use the entire 4.7 Gb? No. Better copy-protection? Sure. Does ANY consumer care? No.

    12. Re:MMMhm... by dugjohnson · · Score: 2

      I would mod this up, but there is no category for "Gracious"

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    13. Re:MMMhm... by Mockylock · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasn't really thinking about games as much as the idea of Blue-ray taking off a bit more than HD-DVD... eventually Microsoft would join the bandwagon, considering it's an external drive already.

      --
      "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
    14. Re:MMMhm... by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      In the long run, after set up costs are ammortized, combined units are cheaper than multiple units. This is especially true from the point of view of a systems integrator like Dell. So in the long run combined units win. That is as long as there any perceived value for the alternate format. if no one uses Blue ray 5 years from now then you are completely correct.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    15. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really offensive. It's just that, like the "soviet russia" jokes, it is really, really old; to the point where it looks stupid instead of funny.

    16. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed - it's still very early days yet. DVDs were around for years before they suddenly became common. Most people will just stick to DVDs for a while.

      I suspect that in a few years, the cost of the chips and lasers will have gone down, dual-format players will be the norm and the whole debate will be forgotten. (At that point, supporting dual format has minimal impact on the cost). THEN the prices might be reasonable and I'll take a look at it. Either that, or in a few years there will be a clear winner and a clear loser.

      (Sort of like the big DVD-R vs DVD+R - who cares any more?)

    17. Re:MMMhm... by misleb · · Score: 1

      Definitly, if you really need to support both formats, a combined unit is going to be the way to go. I'm just talking about how the average consumer might look at it. Although I'm no average consumer. :-P

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    18. Re:MMMhm... by westlake · · Score: 1
      A very interesting side effect is that MS can no longer dictate platform specs. This is remarkably new phenomena and worth watching.

      Explain to me how it is a loss for Microsoft when a major league player in consumer electronics breaks with Sony to enter the HD-DVD market.

      Unlike LG's currently released "Super Multi Blue" player, Samsung's deck will have full support for HD DVD's much-touted Interactive Features. LG's player, by comparison, gave the impression of a Blu-ray deck with HD DVD playback included as an afterthought, without full support for HD DVD menus and other "in movie experience" features. Samsung goes format neutral

      What Microsoft most wants in an HD drive is mandatory managed copy:

      the right to burn backup copies to disk, save HD content to hard drives for distribution through home media servers, download low-res copies to portable players and so on.

      It gets the win by keeping Sony's feet to the fire - it gets the win if A-list titles from Disney and Warner begin to enter the market with minimal restrictions.

    19. Re:MMMhm... by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree that the dollar-sign substitution thing has grown old, but somehow "MICROS~1" still makes me smile :)

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    20. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very interesting side effect is that MS can no longer dictate platform specs. This is remarkably new phenomena and worth watching.

      Microsoft have _never_ been a position to "dictate platform specs". Had they ever been, your average PC would look and work a lot more like a Mac.

    21. Re:MMMhm... by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      Could the slash dot filter PLEASE stop people from writing M$ instead of MS. (;_;) Leave /. immediately. Just go.
      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    22. Re:MMMhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to take into account that people are cheapskates and that they would rather be DVD apologists claiming "Meh, DVDs are just fine anyway, who needs HD?" than pay more for either of the two formats, let alone drives pricier than either.

      Otherwise, great plan.

    23. Re:MMMhm... by Malc · · Score: 1

      The use of terms like M$, Mickey$oft, etc aren't just getting old, they're childish too. They devalue what somebody is trying to say as they come across as some sort of juvenile with no credibility. I for one start skipping comments like that, or don't take them seriously - if others do the same then the person who wrote it has sort of wasted their time.

    24. Re:MMMhm... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Do most DVDs actually use the entire 4.7 Gb? No.

      Actually, yes. Most DVDs these days are movies, and most movies are dual layer (or double sided with 4.7Gigs). In either case they use more than a total of
      Also, what about that annoying pause when DVDs change layers? This is something that will be done away with on HD discs. i.e. a good feature. So there are a few bones with the new formats. Just not enough (yet) to make anyone want to switch.

      But here's a question for everyone: Spielberg has yet to do a commentary (that I know of). Would you want to acquire any HD discs if Spielberg started to do commentaries but only on HD discs? And if you answered no, is there another aspect of HD that may tip the balance for you?

      I think it is just a matter of time before we all want HD discs. Some of us may upgrade/switch to gain better audio. Others to upgrade to higher quality video. Or for additional extras that don't reduce the quality of the main feature. Or for a dozen or more audio tracks, including Tagalog, Swahili or whatever. Personally, I want the commentary tracks, but not yet. I'm waiting for better pricing, compatibility [and DVD Jon ;-)]

      --
      I come here for the love
    25. Re:MMMhm... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Edit:
      "...a total of .LE. 4.7Gb."

      It didn't like the less than and equals signs.

      --
      I come here for the love
    26. Re:MMMhm... by alisson · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I'd need a much bigger TV before I'd care :)

      Which is precisely the problem. Too much upfront cost.

  2. I can see where this is going. Seen it before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Blu-ray is going the way of the dodo. Dead as a doornail in 5 years. Yet another Sony proprietary format to go down in flames, and it's probably a good thing given Sony's DRM and anti-consumer rights stance. So, as predicted, Blu-ray will be the next betamax.

    Congrats, Sony. It's not that easy to repeat history. Every. Single. Time.

    1. Re:I can see where this is going. Seen it before. by Pluvius · · Score: 0, Troll

      HD-DVD is going the way of the dodo.

      Fixed.

      Rob

    2. Re:I can see where this is going. Seen it before. by jizziknight · · Score: 4, Funny

      HD-DVD and Blu-ray are going the way of the dodo. Now it's fixed.
      --
      Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
    3. Re:I can see where this is going. Seen it before. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sony does have a knack for picking the wrong side, but BluRay seems to be pulling ahead. Yes, one of the BluRay manufacturers is making a dual format player, but I seem to recall that one of the original HD-DVD players is, as well.

      Personally, I'm rooting for BluRay. It's the more ambitious format, and two years from now, if HD-DVD wins, we're going to be wishing for those bigger disks, especially for computer drives. I'm not buying anything yet, though, even with my new HDTV.

      The dual format players are nice, but unless we reach a point we're they're nearly all like that (see: DVD-R and DVD+R), I'd still be afraid to get any movies for it out of fear that I won't be able to play half of them once that unit wears out.

    4. Re:I can see where this is going. Seen it before. by Fezmid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the only other company to do the dual format player is LG -- a former BD exclusive CE company...

      On the other hand, Samsung has come out and said that if consumers want an HD DVD standalone, that they'll make it. Onkyo and Meridian have also said that they will have HD DVD players and there's a Chinese company that said they'll have a cheap one ($200?) by the end of the year.

      As for storage -- you really think there's that big of a difference between 15G and 25G, when drives are coming out to be 750G to 1TB? I just dno't see that really mattering. Yeah, dual layer puts BD at 50G vs 30G for HD DVD, but who uses dual-layer DVD-R/DVD+R? Nobody that I know of. And aside from the capacity, the two formats don't have that many differences from an end-user point of view. While Sony is still subsidzing the BD disk process (it costs more to manufacture the disks than HD DVD does), I wouldn't be surprised to see studios switch over to HD DVD to make more money.

      Of course Warner Bros has said that they've come up with a dual-format DISK, called TotalHD. They're planning on selling those this summer, and the disk will have both an HD DVD and a BD side to it and they will live on the same physical media (I'm guessing you have to flip, but I don't remember offhand). So that throws yet another wrench into the mix.

      Short answer is that buying into BD now is stupid, since the spec hasn't even been finalized yet -- all current standalone hardware is obsoluete since it doesn't meet the updated specs for BD-J and other things. Future disks will NOT work in current BD players, even with firmware updates (it's been confirmed that there are major hardware differences). The PS3 will probably work, but nobody is quite sure -- it hasn't been confirmed as far as I know.

      Besides, HD DVD lets you easily rip movies with the Microsoft Xbox360 HD DVD add-on. For once, MS did something to our benefit ;)

  3. Cost... by karnal · · Score: 1

    I would love to invest in a blu-ray or HD-DVD player. In fact, in looking at a recent one-call mag or some such, I see that there are "entry-level" HD-DVD players available for $399.

    hmmm.

    I still don't think that $399 is affordable enough, at least not for me. I didn't have a DVD player until they were around the $100 mark. The other thing I've noticed is that the Blu-Ray players are still expensive - or at least more expensive than the HD-DVD.

    So what gives on the pricing? Average joes will not like to pick one up if they can't get into the 100$ market....

    --
    Karnal
    1. Re:Cost... by icepick72 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So what gives on the pricing?


      I believe you answered your own questions earlier in your post when you said:

      I didn't have a DVD player until they were around the $100 mark.

      By saying that you obviously acknowledged that over time the technology price dropped and it became more common-place, there was more competition, etc.
    2. Re:Cost... by rilister · · Score: 1

      I can't help but agree with you. If they priced HD-DVD/BluRay disk players at $100, I think they'd sell at lot more than at $400. I can't think why they didn't think of that!

      What's more, I heard they make all the internal components out of solid gold! That's crazy: I don't need gold transistor chips. Why don't they make them out of silicon like usual?

      --
      'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
    3. Re:Cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The player needs lots of horse power to play back HD contents. Probably at some point when some company out there put in enough acceleration of the algorithms in $10 chips and make them 20W and package up a SDK/reference design, and only then you might be able to pick one up for under $100. Also remember that the device would also be paying licensing fees to Blu ray and/or HD-DVD and possibly DVD.

    4. Re:Cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The other thing I've noticed is that the Blu-Ray players are still expensive - or at least more expensive than the HD-DVD. One word: Sony. You see, Sony is basically telling their partners to not sell BD players below the price of the PS3, because they still have this twisted hope/dream that it will help them sell PS3s, but when HD-DVD players are selling for less than the PS3, this logic is twisted in backwards. Sony is literally stunting their own progress here.

      Do I have proof this is entirely Sony's fault? No, but you cannot show me any real reason for the big price difference in HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. They both use essentially the same technologies: both use 405 nm wavelength lasers, both support essentially the same audio/video codecs, and both use the same basic DRM. BD requires that "hard coating" for their discs, but that shouldn't affect player prices. Most the other "benefits" of BD are based on the way they are reading/writing data to the discs and should have little relative impact. It really is a case of Sony thinking they have this thing one.
    5. Re:Cost... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's going to be a longer, slower march. The number of people with no video disc players when DVD came out was pretty big; the number of people with displays that make HD worth it is considerably smaller and the people with the displays are the ones who don't care so much about the cost.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Cost... by Pluvius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You see, Sony is basically telling their partners to not sell BD players below the price of the PS3, because they still have this twisted hope/dream that it will help them sell PS3s

      More like actual fact.

      "The BDA cites a survey in conducted by talking to 10,000 US PS3 owners. It claims more than 80 per cent plan to buy movies on BD. A slightly smaller percentage, just over 75 per cent, said they plan to use their console as their prime device for watching movies."

      Though that proves the converse of what you said (that the PS3 is helping them sell BluRay movies), it's hard to believe that none of those PS3 owners bought one at least in part because it could play BluRay movies.

      Rob

    7. Re:Cost... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The first DVD players were $1000. The prices eventually came down or went up. It's in the nature of most consumer products.

      Do realize, however, there are other advantages besides better video associated with HD-DVD and BluRay. Unfortunately, to amplify the superior audio, you'll have to either use analogue jacks or HDMI. Lower priced players will probably cut out the analogue outputs. The new formats also have better menuing systems than DVD-- but this too can be eliminated. The LG combo player, for instance, skimped on one format's interactivity features.

    8. Re:Cost... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      The first DVD players were $1000.

      I paid something around $1600 for my first VHS VCR (but hey, it could record audio separately. Used that about once.)

      I paid around $600 for my first CD player (but hey, it had subcode ouput! Which I never used and I think only one disc ever took advantage of).

      I paid about $200 for my first DVD player (which could read and output NTSC or PAL, and I've actually used that a couple of times).

      I'm getting cheaper in my old age, I may not bother with an HD/BD player until I can get one in a Crackerjack box. (Hey, my eyes are going too, who needs hi-def? IfI don't upgrade the prescription on my glasses I'll never know the difference.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    9. Re:Cost... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Essentially the same technology? Not really. Bluray layers are 25 GB, HD-DVD layers are 15 GB. Bluray also uses a lens with a numerical aperture of .85; HDDVD uses .65 lens, closer to that of DVD.

    10. Re:Cost... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      What's more, I heard they make all the internal components out of solid gold! That's crazy: I don't need gold transistor chips. Why don't they make them out of silicon like usual?
      If it's driven by manufacturing costs, why do they price the media so high? I just checked amazon: Casino Royale on Blu-Ray is $27, on DVD it's $16. No, I don't believe a Blu-Ray costs $11 more to manufacture than a DVD.
    11. Re:Cost... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. It proves that PS3 owners are planning to buy Blu-Ray discs. It doesn't mean they bought the system because it plays Blu-Ray. They might have decided to buy it because of the games/feature of the system, and now are deciding to go Blu-Ray because they already have a player. If I was actually planning on investing in HD video, that's the situation I'd be in. I'd be buying PS3 because they still have the Final Fantasy franchise, and then I'd buy Blu-Ray because I already had a player.

      You need to be very careful drawing conclusions from statistics. They only say exactly precisely what they are saying. There's usually more than one scenario that fits the facts.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    12. Re:Cost... by maxume · · Score: 1

      How much bigger and cheaper is the TV you have the DVD player plugged into(than the VCR)?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:Cost... by Fezmid · · Score: 1

      Well, you can actually buy the Toshiba HD-A2 player from roughly $300, and it includes a mail-in rebate for 5 free movies. I know Amazon is selling it for that price.

      In addition, Best Buy currently has a sale where you get the player for $399, you get 4 free movies from Best Buy (out the door), and then another 5 movies from Toshiba (mail in rebate, like in the old DVD days). So 9 movies, at $20 a movie = $180, making the player only $220. That's assuming that you usually buy movies, of course.

      Food for thought.

    14. Re:Cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be at all surprised if a Blu-rry cost ~50 percent more to manufacture. Probably more, DVDs are dirt cheap, Blu-rry is newer tech. That $27 involves markup from retailers and publishers which go as a fraction of the item cost, not a set price. Plus, doing the mastering etc is probably a bit more expensive in HD, and Blu-rry has higher licencing costs. You'd expect to pay a bit more.

      Of course, a lot of the actual extra cost is the "early adopter tax" - anyone who can actually play the film is the kind of person who'll buy a $500 player and $1000 TV. Publishers scent money like sharks scent blood.

    15. Re:Cost... by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      However, in my experience as a sales rep in the gaming section of Best Buy, there are quite a few people who do buy the PS3 purely for the Blu-Ray capacity.

      Hell, my dad has a PS3 and I don't. I game and he does.

      Purely anecdotal, of course, but I don't think I'm seeing the only cases of Blu-Ray selling the system.

    16. Re:Cost... by Quarters · · Score: 1

      I would love to invest in a blu-ray or HD-DVD player...

      Buying a consumer good, especially an electronic device, is not an investment. An investment is when you put your money into something that bears interest, pays a dividend, or appreciates in some other manner. DVD players do not appreciate. They depreciate at an alarming rate, as do most other consumer goods.

      There's nothing wrong with buying a BluRay or HD-DVD player if you can afford it. Don't try to rationalize spending money on something you don't need or can't afford by calling it an investment, though. If you really want one put your $500 into a high interest savings account (E*Trade has 5.05% savings with no minimums currently) and wait 3 years. You'll have $580 and the price of the HD-DVD player will probably have dropped to $100 or less. All of the movies will still be available and you'll have saved $480 instead of pissing away $500.

    17. Re:Cost... by brandond1976 · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the price is caused by Sony. They are the only company that has mastered the equipment to manufacture Blu-Ray. So they are currently charging all of the production companies a fortune for it. HDDVD does not have this problem. If a title doesn't need all of the space then they can use a standard 3xDVD-ROM and manufacture it on the same equipment that they use for DVD. Additionally, Blu-Ray yields are much lower - a few months ago the manufacturers were only getting about 70% yields out of their equipment (meaning 30% of what they produced was unplayable and thrown out). HDDVD yields have consistently been in the upper 90% range.
      The Blu-Ray production lines are also slower, they run at about 1/2 the rate of DVD/HDDVD production lines.

    18. Re:Cost... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It's an investment in personal quality of life, not a monetary investment.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    19. Re:Cost... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The first DVD players were $1000.

      I don't know where people keep getting this bogus "DVD players cost $1000 at launch" crap, but that is simply not true. The first DVD players came out in Spring 1997 and ranged in price from $500 upwards. I know that because I bought a Toshiba SD2006 that spring for $500. By the Fall, they had dipped to $400 (for the SD2006 and its clone, the Phillips 400AT--among others).

      In other words, DVD prices (for both players and discs) were comparable to today's HD-DVD prices at launch. Blu-ray is considerably more expensive though, even adjusting for inflation.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Did I read that right? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    A company involved in DRM that gives half a damn about giving the consumer a choice?

  5. Is this legal? (contract law) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that to get access to the Blu-ray specs, you had to sign that you won't develop such a dual player. Is Samsung ignoring that clause? Did they get special permission? Or did they obtain the Blu-ray specs through a 3rd party leak? through reverse engineering?

  6. Does it even matter any more? by DrXym · · Score: 0, Troll

    I could see the point of a dual player if both formats had a future. But its looking increasingly likely that HD-DVD would be lucky to see the new year the way things are going. Given that, why would someone bother to buy a dual player, especially since the cost is likely to be substantially higher than a player that just played one format.

    1. Re:Does it even matter any more? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1
      The fact is that if you actually look at the total sales of both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray movies you will find that Blu-Ray is not leading by that much. link

      But while abstract ratios and percentages like these have been bandied about for several months now, the Sony report goes one step further, providing the first public release of hard sales figures for HD DVD and Blu-ray discs from Nielsen VideoScan, the home entertainment industry's leading source for competitive sales data.

      Among the numbers revealed: as of March 18, VideoScan put the cumulative number of Blu-ray titles sold since the format's inception at 844,000 units, versus HD DVD at 708,600.


      What this means is that HD-DVD is unlikely to completely disapear for (at least) the next 2 or 3 years; the result of this is that most players sold in 2008 or 2009 will likely be dual format players. Samsung is just taking the opportunity to develop the dual format technology and then start selling it to other companies over the next several years.
    2. Re:Does it even matter any more? by Pluvius · · Score: 2, Informative

      The fact is that if you actually look at the total sales of both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray movies you will find that Blu-Ray is not leading by that much.

      The problem with using absolute numbers is that they ignore the fact that HD-DVD movies have been out in stores for two months longer than BluRay movies, the fact that BR players are much more expensive than HD-DVD players, and the fact that the PS3 (the major component to BluRay's recent success) had been out for only four months before the cut-off date of that report. Taking those facts into account, BluRay's lead on HD-DVD becomes more impressive.

      Certainly Samsung is releasing a dual-format player to take advantage of the fact that the general public has no clue which format is going to win out; few people even have next-gen movie players. I just don't think it will be necessary for too much longer.

      Rob

    3. Re:Does it even matter any more? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      Except (of course) that at the begining of february it was reported that HD-DVD had 52% market share as compared to Blu-Ray's 48% ...

      The newer numbers demonstrate that Blu-Ray has taken the lead but HD-DVD is keeping up at a decent pace considering that it is not included in (approximately) 200,000 PS3 system that are sold in a month.

    4. Re:Does it even matter any more? by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Except (of course) that at the begining of february it was reported that HD-DVD had 52% market share as compared to Blu-Ray's 48% ...

      That seems to me to be supporting my conclusion, not yours.

      Rob

    5. Re:Does it even matter any more? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      the result of this is that most players sold in 2008 or 2009 will likely be dual format players.
      Quite possibly. If that happens, though, I think the established market winner will be dual formats, and neither will die off. That's the best possible course of events, isn't it?

    6. Re:Does it even matter any more? by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      No, that's the worst possible course of events. Dual-format players cost more than single-format ones. They're probably also more technically complex, and therefore more likely to malfunction. You should definitely be rooting for someone to win this one, or at least to come to an agreement like what happened in the 56k modem war.

      You could mention the DVD±R war here, I suppose, but I would argue that the differences between those two formats aren't as great as those between BR and HD-DVD. Besides, DVD technology was pretty cheap by the time that war happened, so the costs weren't nearly as important.

      Rob

    7. Re:Does it even matter any more? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I think I should restate ...

      Blu-Ray jumped from (essentially) 0% marketshare to nearly 50% market share after 2 months because of the release of the PS3, since then it has only gained a couple of percentage points of market share. What this means is that Blu-Ray and HD-DVD have sold at very similar rates to eachother in the past couple of months.

  7. No. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's a company that doesn't want to get left out in the cold if their choice of format doesn't succeed. They don't give a shit about you, but they will pretend they do in order to convince you to give them money. HTH...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:No. by evilRhino · · Score: 1

      How is this different from most companies? They exist to make money. Helping out consumers is usually means to an end.

  8. Whaaaaaa? by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

    "Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology"

    I expect the MPAA Enforcement Squad to soon pay them a visit to correct this dangerous and subversive kind of slander.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    1. Re:Whaaaaaa? by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

      "Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology"

      I expect the MPAA Enforcement Squad to soon pay them a visit to correct this dangerous and subversive kind of slander.

      No kidding! Won't someone think of the corporations????
      --
      Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  9. Poor Liddle Zonk, Still Fighting For A Dead Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So pathetic.

    The only people clinging to the dead HD-DVD format are foaming at the mouth Microsoft/Xbox fanboys who 'hate teh Sony'. Which is sad because Microsoft themselves have given up on the format.

  10. Translation by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

    The quote is actually missing some words, let me fill it in for you:

    "Our main concern is with guaranteeing that the consumer's money ends up in our pockets, and in ensuring that our revenue stream does not depend on a particular technology"

    There, that makes more sense.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Translation by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      Well duh, they're not in business to champion a certain platform or technology.
      They are in business to make money.

    2. Re:Translation by voisine · · Score: 1

      Isn't capitalism great? The way to make sure consumers' money lines your pockets is to produce something they all really want. Three cheers for the profit motive!

    3. Re:Translation by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      WTF! You capitalist pig!! ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Translation by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yup, sometimes it works. Of course, if the CE end really ran the show, there's be no DRM, and dual disc writers. Talk about adoption of a new format and scrambling for more players. But, alas, the CE divisions don't have nearly the clout of the content divisions.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  11. Common Sense by jswigart · · Score: 1

    Seems to me like a common sense approach, similar to how nearly all the previously PS3 exclusive non first party developers have used the same common sense and decided to go cross platform and not artificially limit themselves to a platform that is nowhere near having a majority. Widening your audience can only have positive effects for sales.

    1. Re:Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With you talking about limiting "themselves to a platform that is nowhere near having a majority," I thought you were talking about mac users.

  12. What I'd really like to see Blueray/HD used for.. by Channard · · Score: 1

    .. is having multiple cuts of the same film on the same DVD, without branching and the annoying layer change pauses that entails. Take Dawn of the Dead. The ultimate edition is spread over four DVDs. Yet a single HD/BlueRay DVD could hold the movie and all the extras. That'd be my main incentive to buy a HD/BR player.

  13. Kinda OT but... by Thalagyrt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone else find the spokesman's name hilarious?

    Kwak Bumjoon!

    --
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    1. Re:Kinda OT but... by kidcharles · · Score: 3, Funny

      File that one under non-English names have unfortunate or funny connotations to English speakers. Another one of my favorites is a Native American tribe that runs a casino in Wisconsin:

      Ho Chunk

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    2. Re:Kinda OT but... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Yep. I was looking for your comment, before I said the same thing.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:Kinda OT but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a Kwak of krap...I hope they don't Kwak up the release of the new player!

      (I couldn't decide on a long or short a...)

    4. Re:Kinda OT but... by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      you're certainly not alone. the moment i read that i sent the link to all my friends.
      I dont care who he is or what he has to say, but he's got the coolest motherfucking name ever.

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    5. Re:Kinda OT but... by cerberusss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's not his real name, it's his nick on slashdot.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  14. Who cares anyway? technology for technolgy's sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, lets face it, normal DVD quality is as good as anyone really needs.
    Blu-ray and HD-DVD is a classic case of "if it ain't broke don't fix it".
    I'll be sticking with my DVD player thank you very much.

  15. the pro-and con of overloading drives by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    While combining functions on drives is nice since it saves space and, once the prices settle, even final costs of having just one drive in the computer. So far fragility created by mergeing devices that can fail in different has not proven to be a big problem that I have seen. e.g. the CD writer on the cd/dvd combo burns out prematurely and I have to replace the whole shebang. The motors or tray gears seem to go first.

    But what does happen is that it takes longer and longer for the gorram computer to mount the cd/dvd. This is especially noticable when one inserts a damaged CD into a drive. the computer grunts and groans freaking for ever trying to decide it it is looking at a CD, and CD-R, D DVD-r, and DVD+R, a DVD. And each of these seems to have some different time consuming error protocol that involves trying to spin the thing at different speeds. Now they are going to be adding not one but two more protocols. And I imagine it won't be long before we have HDDVD-R and HDDVD+R and so on thrown on top of this.

    it's going to take minutes when you shove in that Bad CD before your computer lets you eject it.

    On Macs you can't just eject the CD by pushing a button like you can on Linux. Windows is heading that way, though I'm not really sure what VISTA does.

    posting here since my other post is the parent.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:the pro-and con of overloading drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree but for one detail, my debian linux desktop prevents me to unmount CDs when in use like macos did. A good tip:

      lsof /(mountpoint-of-cd-with-no-trailing-slash)

      returns the processes that are messing with the cd.

    2. Re:the pro-and con of overloading drives by Danga · · Score: 4, Informative

      For what it is worth I work as a software developer in the field of computer forensics/data recovery specializing in optical media so I thought I could clear some of your misconceptions up.

      But what does happen is that it takes longer and longer for the gorram computer to mount the cd/dvd. This is especially noticable when one inserts a damaged CD into a drive. the computer grunts and groans freaking for ever trying to decide it it is looking at a CD, and CD-R, D DVD-r, and DVD+R, a DVD. And each of these seems to have some different time consuming error protocol that involves trying to spin the thing at different speeds. Now they are going to be adding not one but two more protocols. And I imagine it won't be long before we have HDDVD-R and HDDVD+R and so on thrown on top of this.

      This is NOT an issue with the drive (well a drive that is in good working order). A mounting problem is an issue with your OS. When you insert a disc into the drive the drive should go into what is called the "ready state" relatively quickly because all the drive does is basically tries to see if it can access the disc (it looks for a TOC among other things). When you insert a damaged disc the reason the computer grunts and groans is because the disc is damaged and it may be having trouble getting TOC information etc from the disc. The reason it is spinning up and down a whole bunch of different times is most likely because your OS is attempting to mount the disc and is trying to look for a file system on the disc and is having a lot of trouble doing so.

      If you have an external case for a CD/DVD drive then a simple way to see that the problems you are seeing are the OS's fault is the next time you have a disc that exhibits the problems you mentioned above is to shut down the machine and then re-insert the disc into the drive. Most likely the light will blink a few times and the drive might spin up a little more than normal but the drive should stop trying to access the disc in much less time that when the computer was running.

      As far as more formats coming out "adding more protocols" that is not really the case. Other than having to add different hardware the rest of how the drive acts should remain the same. The only way a drive is able to tell what kind of disc is inserted is by looking at what is called a profile number which is recorded at the factory on the disc and each type of disc has a different one. For example 0x9 is CD-R, 0xa is CD-RW, 0x11 is DVD-R, 0x1b is DVD+R, 0x2b is DVD+R DL, 0x51 is HD DVD-R and on and on. It really is not that much more overhead and sure a few more things might be added to the MMC standard but the drives functionality is nearly identical.

      it's going to take minutes when you shove in that Bad CD before your computer lets you eject it.

      You hit the nail on the head with this one without even knowing it. It is your COMPUTER ie the OS or some other software trying to access the disc that is locked up and has probably issued a command to lock the tray so that you cannot eject the disc by pressing the eject button on the drive.

      Please stop blaming drives when it really is not the drives fault.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    3. Re:the pro-and con of overloading drives by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Well I as not trying to blame the drive. I was speaking to the net effect. But from what you are telling me, it sounds like the drive almost instantly knows what propocol the disk is (cd, dvd+r etc). So presumably all the grunting is the OS trying to coax the data off the bad sectors. If so then I would extrapolate that adding new protocols won't actually extend the period of lock-up directly.

      However I guess the reason why the lockup period for a bad DVD is noticably longer is simply because the DVD is bigger and the tendendy is to use it for larger files than a CD so the probability of a bad sector is higher for any given file. If this is all there is to it, then HDDVD is going to be a freakin nightmare since presumably one is going to have humungous amounts of data.

      All that would be wrong however if the probability of failure per disk, (rather than per byte) is the same.

      any thoughts?

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:the pro-and con of overloading drives by Danga · · Score: 1

      Well there are a couple of things to consider when looking at the probability of the failure per disc comparing CD to DVD. Overall the general concensus is DVD is safer due to MUCH better error correction. However, there are other things to consider such as if the error correcting codes (ECC) on the disc is damaged can you still maybe access the data on the disc?

      With a CD you have 2352 bytes per sector to work with and it depends on the recording mode as to how much of the sector is dedicated to ECC. You can have audio mode in which case no ECC exists and you have 2352 bytes per sector all dedicated to storage, mode 1 (the most common) in which case you have 2048 bytes per sector to use for storing data and then 16 bytes for the sector header and then 288 bytes for ECC, and then various forms of mode 2 which has less ECC compared to mode 1 or no ECC at all. The advantage to mode 2 recording is you can store more data on the disc but at the risk of having less error recovery and that is why mode 2 is common for VCD discs because mpeg video is resistant to bit errors and will not completely fail when a few errors exist. Mode 1 is safer for data that is important to you and it is the best for most data formats since bit errors can have drastic effects on many types of files.

      DVD on the other hand only has only one recording mode which is 2048 bytes per sector and DVD+R does have a little bit more ECC compared to -R so I guess +R is a little safer although in my experience I have not seen much difference between the two formats. DVD dedicates much more to ECC due to the higher capacity and it truly is a safer format compared to CD ECC wise. However, DVD also applies ECC to 16 sectors at a time and has what are called ECC blocks and if you lose one of those you lose all 16 sectors.

      Now here is the kicker. Like I mentioned if you lose one ECC block then 16 sectors of the disc are GONE, there is no way to get them back in a standard drive. With CD, if the ECC is screwed up you usually can still read the sector in RAW mode (it might take a few attempts) but at least you should be able to get some of the data back.

      So, DVD has much better ECC although if something happens to that ECC you have no way to access the data on the disc while with CD you might be able to access the data although it may have bit errors. Personally, I will stick to DVD for backups but I am very careful to take care of the discs (keeping them in cases, out of sunlight, not touching the recording surface, etc). I like the higher ECC and as long as I take care of the discs they should not end up corrupted.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    5. Re:the pro-and con of overloading drives by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. But why would you lose the 16 sectors just because the ECC is borked. Seems like one could still read the sectors, cross ones fingers, and ignore the ECC.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    6. Re:the pro-and con of overloading drives by Danga · · Score: 1

      Since DVD does not have a raw mode like CD it will just fail completely when there is a problem with the ECC. It really sucks but there is just no way around it with a consumer level drive.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  16. AppleTV, XBox Video Marketplace, Tivo Un-Box by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    moviebeam, vongo, etc..

    How long do you think the market for movies on physical discs will be around?

    The DVD (HD, Blu, or Pink with spots) is bound to share the same fate as the CD eventually.

    It doesn't help that a $70 upconverting DVD player makes enough improvement, that most casual viewers consider it "HD".

    The real question is, when am I going to be able to use (either) technology in my PC?

    I mean, reading/writing 25+ gig discs, *cheaply*?

    IMO that's the real format war. The marketplace has shown a remarkable lack of interest in these things as $1000 uber-premium movie-watchers.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:AppleTV, XBox Video Marketplace, Tivo Un-Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physical disks will be around until a 50GB movie can be downloaded in 5 minutes, or we have the ability to stream 30Mbps reliably to the house.

      A $70 upconverting DVD player makes little difference on an HDTV. Blu-Ray and HD-DVD discs, in most cases, are noticeably better than any upconverting DVD player. By a long shot.

    2. Re:AppleTV, XBox Video Marketplace, Tivo Un-Box by hexix · · Score: 1

      The DVD (HD, Blu, or Pink with spots) is bound to share the same fate as the CD eventually.

      Did the CD just die and I missed the memo? Seems to me that buying music on CDs is still the best way due to the quality and compatibility.

      Compatibility is a huge problem. If I go buy or rent a DVD I can use it on any TV I have a dvd player on. I can also bring it over to a friend's house and play it on their TV. If I buy a movie off of iTunes or off of the Xbox Marketplace then I'm going to have a real bitch of a time bringing it over to a friend's place.

      There is still a pretty clear reason for most people to stick with buying/renting physical copies of their music and movies.

      It doesn't help that a $70 upconverting DVD player makes enough improvement, that most casual viewers consider it "HD". I do agree with this though. I bought a PS3 (yup, I'm the one) and although Blu-Ray movies look good, it's detail that doesn't really matter. Being able to make out the stitching in someone's suit when I get close to TV is cool, but doesn't really make watching the movie that much more enjoyable. Most HDTVs can scale a nice clean DVD signal so well that it's not that big of a difference. There's more detail, but it's not like going from a standard analog TV broadcast to a high-def digital one.
    3. Re:AppleTV, XBox Video Marketplace, Tivo Un-Box by stratjakt · · Score: 0

      Did the CD just die and I missed the memo?

      As a matter of fact, it did.

      Do you have any CD stores left in your town/mall?

      Or is it like everywhere else, and you can only get them at Best Buy or Wal-Mart?

      The only distribution channel left is the 100% mass-market mainstream one. If you're looking for something obscure on CD, I guess you're stuck with internet or maybe at the bands live show.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:AppleTV, XBox Video Marketplace, Tivo Un-Box by Zephyr14z · · Score: 1

      How long do you think the market for movies on physical discs will be around?
      At the very least until bandwidth somehow catches up. If I could stream full HD movies with an initial buffer time roughly equal to the time it would take me to physically insert a disc, I would probably do it, assuming I could keep the movie when I was done watching it the first time. Until this happens(and it will be a while), physical media won't go away.
    5. Re:AppleTV, XBox Video Marketplace, Tivo Un-Box by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      I'd say that as long as we keep making entertainment content in larger file sizes than can be easily transmitted through the aether, yes, physical media will endure.

      and i would say that is a trend that will continue, based on the last 10 years.

      *shrug*

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
  17. Customers are the main concern by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    "Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology," said Kwak. If this were a real philosphy instead of marketing speak, then this particular player wouldn't support HDCP.
    1. Re:Customers are the main concern by jjacobs2 · · Score: 1

      If it didn't support HDCP then it wouldn't play 99+% of the discs on the market right now. There wouldn't be any point to even making it then. To get rid of HDCP the format will have to completely fail as CD's are on their way to do. Maybe if people are really happy with DVD's and the market share for HD discs is still less than 5% in five or ten years then DRM will truly be dead in the video market.

    2. Re:Customers are the main concern by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "To get rid of HDCP the format will have to completely fail as CD's are on their way to do. "

      I don't forsee the demise of the CD as soon as some people seem to.

      Frankly, I won't be buying any music online till they can sell it to me in lossless formats without any DRM. Until then, the only way I can get music in a lossless format, is to buy the CD.

      Even with that, I'd like to back up my online purchase to a disc....not to mention, there are tons of car players out there that play CD's..not that many doing DVD's or HD DVD or Blu-Ray yet.

      Sure..I guess CD's will go some day, but, I don't see it dying anytime THAT soon.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Customers are the main concern by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is not true. HDCP is NOT an encryption on the media. HDCP is part of the communications prototcol between the playback hardware and the display. A company could EASILY build a device that played back Blu Ray or HD-DVD discs WITHOUT HDCP on the HDMI output. However, this would violate the terms of their license to manufacture the player and they would quickly find themselves on the wrong end of a lawsuit.

  18. How to read PR statements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology,' said Samsung spokesman Kwak Bumjoon." - Translated: Yeah, might as well make a player that does both so we can sell more crap.

  19. Re:Poor Liddle Zonk, Still Fighting For A Dead For by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    And someone else posted that Sony lost with blueray.

    Neither one has won or lost. They are in the market and someone is buying them. Consumers have said they do not want to pick a format and now we see this. I personally would rather use blueray. I don't care about the video end of things, but I think more about backup media and other practical PC uses down the road.

    I've never seen an argument about which one is better for open source use in the future.

    PC vendors have not pushed either format like they did DVD. I remember early on that you could go into a store and see compaq's and other systems preconfigured to play movies. Getting DVD playback on a computer was one of the reasons many people could ignore the lack of recording and other problems with DVDs back then.

    I'm waiting for the players to come down in price like most people. I bought a sony DVD player for $300 in 1999. I'm not afraid of picking up formats earlier, but sense I must first buy an overpriced tv to enjoy the new formats, the actual players must be dirt cheap. (or tvs must come down) We went from 20 inch tvs for $100 to 15 in tvs for $400... something has to give. I think these companies forget that consumers have less money to spend now than they did 5 years ago. We have higher gas prices which effect everything else, we must work for less money*, and we must rebuy our living room entertainment again.

    * The combination of less raises, lower starting saleries, and competing in a global market.

  20. Too late by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

    I won't be getting a BluRay or HD-DVD player until they, or only one of them, becomes dominant over DVDs. Why waste the money now? This little feud will be over sometime and we'll move away from DVDs but until then I'll stick with my $20 DVD player that plays every movie currently on the market. I'll be the last to give up with my DVD player shouting Charleton Heston's famous words, "out of my cold dead hands."

  21. Consumer the main concern? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    "'Our main concern is with the consumer and not a particular technology,"

    Wow, so it's not going to have any DRM bullshit either? Oh, wait, they said consumer, not customer, so they're still treating us as automatons.

    1. Re:Consumer the main concern? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Hardware companies could give a shit about DRM, except that they don't think that the content sellers are going to release content without it. Since they see a market for including it, they do. If you don't like DRM, don't buy the freaken content.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Consumer the main concern? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. Especially with things like DRM and Macrovision, it's a required extra cost that doesn't make their product any better. Even worse, the extra cost is mostly the licensing fees they have to pay the companies, not even the extra hardware itself, whose price steadily drops.

    3. Re:Consumer the main concern? by demon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, a fair number of the makers are also content producers, so the content-producing arm leans on the "consumer electronics" arm to provide DRM encrusted hardware to go with their DRM encrusted media. The other guys just have to "keep up with the Joneses" (or Lees, or whatever the case) lest no one buy their gear.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    4. Re:Consumer the main concern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Region coding, when applied strictly, and without backdoors, appeals to a number of hardware manufacturers, since people who collect disks from different regions will also tend to buy multiple region-locked players. Or so they think.

  22. DVD+ vs. DVD- by tepples · · Score: 1

    Are we still talking about the HD/Blu-ray thing or are we on to the PC/Mac thing again? That or plus vs. dash in recordable DVD media.
  23. 10 LET M$ = "Microsoft" by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally Could the slash dot filter PLEASE stop people from writing M$ instead of MS. (;_;)

    Then how can we paste classic BASIC code?

    10 LET M$ = "Microsoft"
    20 PRINT M$;" put too much DRM in Windows Vista."
    30 END

    Use of the "M$" moniker on Slashdot often appears to refer to Microsoft's legacy as a developer of BASIC interpreters.

    1. Re:10 LET M$ = "Microsoft" by UncleTogie · · Score: 1
      I'd like to tweak it a bit, run it, and sit Ballmer in front of it until he foams at the mouth....more so than usual, anyway:

      10 LET M$ = "Microsoft"
      20 PRINT M$;" put too much DRM in Windows Vista. ";
      30 GOTO 20
      40 END

      Level II basic indeed.

      As for BR vs. HD? The sooner the suits embrace Kwak's philosophy, the sooner their sales will pick up. With RIAA's power on the wane, we'll find that the savvier companies will drop their tired ol' line faster than a red-hot vibrator.
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  24. Is this enforceable? (natural law) by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought that to get access to the Blu-ray specs, you had to sign that you won't develop such a dual player. Duct tape a PS3 to an Xbox 360 with HD DVD add-on and voila, dual player. So how can such a contract clause be enforceable?
    1. Re:Is this enforceable? (natural law) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's with people's fascination with duct-taping consoles together?
      First it was two gamecubes, and now this? Sheesh.

  25. Speaking of Microsoft... by Fonce · · Score: 1

    Call me crazy, but does it strike anyone as a very interesting idea to produce the next Xbox360 addon as a combo HD-DVD/Blu-ray player? Think about it...they win either way. If people buy the device itself, they're in good shape and they're stealing the only real reason for the huge cost of the PS3 away from Sony. It's an incredible strategic move. Make it available, make it affordable (within reason; I'm aware of the expense of said technology), and you've stolen Sony's thunder. Just a thought.

    Better yet hold off on that uber-elite-custom-super-fun-happy-goodtime Xbox edition and give it a dual player. Then drop the price on what's now the premium console. The fanboys and wealthier will snatch the new machines up (particularly if they come in a custom color, because as we all know, that's what makes it truly '1337). Everybody else will continue buying the now-cheaper premium edition. Score all the way around.

    --
    If all my base are belong to you and I attempt to retrieve my base, does that mean I'm freebasing?
    1. Re:Speaking of Microsoft... by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but does it strike anyone as a very interesting idea to produce the next Xbox360 addon as a combo HD-DVD/Blu-ray player? Think about it...they win either way. If people buy the device itself, they're in good shape and they're stealing the only real reason for the huge cost of the PS3 away from Sony.

      Never mind the fact that Microsoft releasing a hybrid player would be like Sony doing the same thing--a 360 with a dual-player addon would cost more than a PS3, and it still wouldn't be able to play games. It wouldn't steal any thunder at all.

      Putting an HD-DVD drive in the Elite version would make more sense, but it's too late now for it to make a real impact, especially since it wouldn't be able to support HD-DVD games without alienating early adopters.

      Rob

    2. Re:Speaking of Microsoft... by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but does it strike anyone as a very interesting idea to produce the next Xbox360 addon as a combo HD-DVD/Blu-ray player? Think about it...they win either way. If people buy the device itself, they're in good shape and they're stealing the only real reason for the huge cost of the PS3 away from Sony. It's an incredible strategic move.

      Except that BluRay includes Java support. I really think Microsoft wants that dead.

  26. It's the Porn, Stupid by tokki · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was hopping Blu-Ray would win. 1080p native (instead of re-interlaced 1080i), more capacity, smaller wavelength. But Sony, being Sony, couldn't help but shoot itself in the foot.

    Hostile to porn? Game over man, game over. The entirety of technology is to create a more efficient distribution network for porn. Printing press, telephones, moving pictures, home video, CD ROM, and the greatest porn distribution system ever created: the Internets (who's impact won't be outdone until direct-to-brain technology is developed).

    HD-DVD will win. I just got my 46 inch 1080p LCD, and now I'm waiting for the HD-DVD price to get down below $250, or maybe $300. Netflix has HD-DVD, so that'll be my primary source.

    1. Re:It's the Porn, Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1080p v. 1080 is not a Blu-Ray v. HD-DVD issue. All HD-DVD media is encoded at 1080p. The first PLAYERS only OUTPUT 1080i. Hardware limitation - the info is there, and the newer players are 1080p.

    2. Re:It's the Porn, Stupid by MontyApollo · · Score: 1

      I think porn will be a strong factor, but I don't know if it will have quite the impact it did with VHS. Back then, it was the only way to get porn movies at home. Now, we have VHS and DVD and the internet. I would be curious to know how the internet has affected DVD porn sales.

      Some have also argued that you really don't want to see porn in high-def. Playboy airbrushes for a reason.

    3. Re:It's the Porn, Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The floor has fallen out of the "buy porn for TV" market. Porn looks worse in HD than it looks on the internet. Porn is cheaper on the internet, porn is more easily tailored to tastes on the internet. Porn is free, at least in large part, on the internet.

      Why is this a factor again? Just repeating something you heard about betamax, right? Well, one thing is repeating: Blueray is the best technology. Sony is going to have yet another major innovation that changes the marketplace. Microsoft and Samsung are great companies, but they aren't nearly as innovative as Sony has been in consumer electronics. From Li-ion batteries to most concepts for media storage, Sony has been a great company. And yeah, since they invent to many things, some of them fail. MiniDisc sucked, Betamax was mismanaged. But betting against Sony isn't sure bet by any means.

      It's too bad that Sony's music departments have tainted such a fine company.

    4. Re:It's the Porn, Stupid by MontyApollo · · Score: 1
      Porn looks worse in HD than it looks on the internet. Porn is cheaper on the internet, porn is more easily tailored to tastes on the internet. Porn is free, at least in large part, on the internet.

      You can also sit at your desk and look totally innocent while viewing porn on the internet, and you don't have to worry about leaving a porn DVD in the player when guests come over.

    5. Re:It's the Porn, Stupid by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      They're not gonna connect directly to your brain...

  27. I wish... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    I wish the movie industry, video industry, computer industry, and audio industry would all get together and realize that they are hurting themselves with this.

    I have been wanting to replace my TV for 2 years now. I haven't yet, because what I have will play my old dvds fine, and I'm not going to buy two different players, and maintain two different formats of nextgen dvds. Sure, the dual-format players resolve this to some degree, and it's about time this happened, but realistically...

    I'll tell you what I've almost done though. I've not had a game console since...well, a very long time ago, but since the PS3 has hdmi and optical audio outputs, while being just as cheap as a full blue-ray player without a game system attached, I've thought about getting a PS3 and not worrying about upgrading my computer (which handles non-games just fine). Thought about doing this. If these folks would just stop bickering and agree to something (or agree to do dual-format for a while), then I and a horde of others would be out there replacing our dvd libraries with the newer stuff.

    1. Re:I wish... by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      I wish the movie industry, video industry, computer industry, and audio industry would all get together and realize that they are hurting themselves with this.

      It's basically the Prisoner's Dilemma. They'd all benefit if they worked together, but that raises the possibility of backstabbing, which would be worse than simply losing a format war. Therefore, they pre-emptively attack each other instead. Another thing to note is that not everyone is hurting themselves with this; whoever wins the format war will actually be better off than they would've been if they'd cooperated.

      Rob

    2. Re:I wish... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      any gain from that (winning the war) is offset, and potentially lost all together, by the lost revenues of the last couple years due to consumers not wanting to be in the middle of the format war.

    3. Re:I wish... by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      I don't think consumers would currently be buying either format in force even if there was no war. Look at DVD, which was an example of a format based on consensus. It took several years for that to take off.

      Rob

  28. Samsung will sell anything, truly -- no politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an odd culture at Samsung, sort of out-doing the capitalist US ... the only thing that matters is bringing in money.

    What's more, they'll do whatever it takes, depending on the market: they'll sell crap where they can get away with it, and they'll make absolutely top notch stuff where the market is too competitive to sell crap. For example, the refrigerator market is ludicrously over-populated at all ends of the spectrum, so they make damn high quality ones at prices that undercut the competition by 50%, or 75% in the case of american-style fridges. (I bought one, frickin impressive build and even nicer price.)

    Also in high-tech electronics: the top 1080p HDTV in the UK market under 1 grand UKP is a Samsung, and it's got unbelievable specs compared to the competition, even full res on the VGA input which is often ignored by others. But wait, WTF? There's no el cheapo market in 1080p sets in Europe, so how come? Who knows, that's Samsung, they don't appear to have a single policy. Unlike Sony, which does have a single policy, which is to be crap, totally moronic, and led by politics.

    I think Japan is on the way out as a tech super-power -- even that Japanese minister said so, largely because they've abandoned tech in favour of politics. And it's the Samsungs that are going to be the big names, because they'll do whatever it takes, politics be damned.

  29. Twice the keys to invalidate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, now as they invalidate device keys and disable each player in order to protect their future DRM'd movies, at least they can switch between Blue Rays set of invalidated keys and HD DVDs set of invalidated keys.
    Twice the chances of finding a disc that will play!

    DRM is so cool!
    Will it play? will it not? you don't know! I don't know! It all adds to the fun of watching a movie!

  30. Re:Samsung will sell anything, truly -- no politic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in the Netherlands they dominate the DVB settop box market for both Cable and Terrestrial with a line of the most horrible crap ever made.
    But it is inexpensive, and that is what counts now. Because the analog transmitters have been shut down and analog cable is on the way out, what the providers need is a low cost of entry into their competitive subscription deals. So they offer a Samsung receiver for (almost) free when signing a contract.

    What the customer is left with, is a very unreliable box that zaps slower than ever seen before.

  31. Re:Who cares anyway? technology for technolgy's sa by Xymor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That always reminds me of that 640k quote.M

    It's as good as anyone really needs until prices comes down, then everyone will use HD, and pretty soon, everyone will find ridiculous watching anything in SD.

  32. HDCP? by norminator · · Score: 1

    If it didn't support HDCP then it wouldn't play 99+% of the discs on the market right now.

    How is that? Are you talking about the Image Constraint Token?

    The way I understand it, the movie studios have "promised" not to use that against us for a few more years yet. Not that I believe that promise, but if any discs were already out that make use of it, there would have already been a huge outcry here on slashdot about it.

    The XBox 360 can play HD-DVD movies through the add-on drive, and it doesn't even have HDMI, much less support for HDCP. It plays HD-DVD movies just fine(*) through the component connections.

    So what discs wouldn't it play again?

    (*) Of course, people have reported problems with a few discs, but the same can be said for Blu-Ray and even early DVD releases.
    1. Re:HDCP? by demon · · Score: 1

      The Xbox360 (prior to the new Elite SKU) didn't have an HDMI port, so it only outputs in analog. Every other BluRay or HDDVD player of which I'm aware doesn't even bother with component out - it's HDMI or nothing, which means you have to suck at the HDCP teat as well. They're really trying to not give you an out on the whole HDCP thing - even though it's been a serious disaster, or at least a severe headache, for a lot of the (relatively small) slice of the people who've taken the plunge into either format.

      I believe the Image Constraint Token is more aimed at computers. The set-top boxes don't seem to be willing to even give you a cut down version - it's an all or nothing deal. No HDCP - you get a happy little screen that says "This content may not be displayed" or something along those lines... isn't it grand?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    2. Re:HDCP? by MHolmesIV · · Score: 1

      Incorrect, actually. Every HD DVD player (and BD I suspect, but I've only seen the PS3) in the market has Component outputs, and the movies work fine through them.

      Which players are you aware of? they're obviously not ones based in the Real World(tm)

    3. Re:HDCP? by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      Last I checked the PS3 will not do 1080p over component, only 1080i or less (For blu ray at least, don't know about games).

      I could be mistaken though.

  33. So... by Demona · · Score: 1
    Instead of taking one hour to boot up, this model will require two.

    Also, you will be unable to close the door to your entertainment center, unless you want it and everything around to melt.

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
  34. Typically slanted reporting in TFA by LionMage · · Score: 1
    Not complaining about the Slashdot article/summary, but the ITworld article linked to. Not that this surprises me, but I noticed that the article:
    1. specifically fails to mention with movie studios back which formats (because that would make Blu-Ray look better, since the vast majority of studios are backing Blu-Ray, and only one studio is exclusively backing HD-DVD)
    2. specifically fails to provide a comprehensive list of companies supporting Blu-Ray, but provides a comprehensive list of companies backing HD-DVD, which strongly skews the picture
    3. cherry-picks which player hardware to mention at the end of the article, making the Blu-Ray and hybrid player options seem more expensive while completely omitting mention of both Sony's PS3 and the Xbox 360 add-on HD-DVD drive


    One might draw the conclusion that this article was written by HD-DVD partisans.
  35. Re:Poor Liddle Zonk, Still Fighting For A Dead For by MHolmesIV · · Score: 1

    Really? Damn! Did someone forget to tell me or the rest of the people on our (pretty damn large) team? I mean, seriously, it would be much easier if I didn't have to finish the multiple products I'm currently working on since we're apparently giving up on the format.

    I think we're doing pretty well, considering the PS3 outnumbers HD DVD players by probably 5:1. Luckily, people who own the PS3 either are still smarting from the hole in their pocket it left, or are those cheap gamer types who don't watch all that many movies. You may notice that for certain recent titles (Happy Feet, Planet Earth, a couple of the other Warner ones), the HD DVD actually did better than the BD. And then we also get a couple of reasonably popular titles this year that won't be on BD at all, or will only arrive "later", like Heroes, Battlestar Galactica, and The Matrix.

    The battle is far from over :)

  36. I did! by ubikkibu · · Score: 1

    Got a PS3 and watched movies only on it. Yes, because I wanted a hi-def DVD format, Blu-Ray looks to be winning, and the PS3 is the cheapest player.

    So I'm one, at least.

    After a few weeks, I bought Resistance: Fall of Man which is a hoot. But I like our Wii much better for games.

  37. Interesting...but by ubikkibu · · Score: 1

    head down to Circuit City or Soundtrac or wherever, and take a gander at their hi-def DVD lineup.

    2 Blu-Ray titles for every 1 HD-DVD.

    Now granted, most of this crop of movies just sucks even worse in hi-def. And having "Children of Men" only on HD-DVD really hurts (although I gather that title has caused havoc for XBox 360 and some Samsung HD-DVD owners.)

    But still...I'll go with more choices, not less.

    1. Re:Interesting...but by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      So there were 3 movies available on hi-def formats? :P

  38. Re:What I'd really like to see Blueray/HD used for by dank+zappingly · · Score: 1

    I too would buy whichever gets the Dawn of the Dead ultimate edition on one disc, but I feel like Star Wars has broader appeal. With all the money riding on who wins the format war, I can't believe one of them hasn't sent a fat check over to someone like George Lucas(although it would probably take a pretty big check to get him moving). He could put both the real Star Wars, and his stupid edited one on the same disc and make everyone happy. If only one format got Star Wars, the format war would be over.

  39. Re:Who cares anyway? technology for technolgy's sa by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

    I thought about the same ... until I got an HD TV. And a digital amp. And, in my experience, the HD cable TV outstrips the DVD video. And the DVD video makes me cringe to watch SD cable. (The DVD audio, however, blows the HD audio away, but I think that's my HD PVR which isn't giving me digital audio, while my DVD player does give me digital audio.)

    I'll be trying to convince the CFO to get a next-gen DVD player (Blue-Ray or HD, depending on who "wins") as soon as they become reasonable in price.

  40. Great... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    ...now I can ***REALLY*** save some money by not buying a single combined player.

    Up until Samsung's announcement, I was planning to NOT buy two players - a HD-DVD one and a BluRay one.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  41. Re:What I'd really like to see Blueray/HD used for by Nasarius · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. I expect LOTR has some push too, but Lucasfilm (Star Wars and Indiana Jones) could end it instantly.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
  42. Can it play... by RH_Jesus_Freak40 · · Score: 1

    Can it play regular DVDs as well, or just Blue-Ray and HD-DVD? That would be a really useful feature, and I would buy it for sure. Can it play Red-ray and HHD-DVVDD-BVD? (RvB ftw)

    --
    The dyslexic atheist says, "There is no dog"
  43. Why does one of the mediums have to die? by jeffeb3 · · Score: 1

    Times are different now then they were in video vs. betamax. Look at the "format wars" between DVD+ and DVD- media. They both exist. And, so does DVD-RAM. People will eventually get players that can read both and just choose which media to watch based on the features and price. When they rent them or share them, it will be based on the format available. At any rate, I think High Definition video formats are still way out of the range of the 90% of the customers who will ultimately decide which format will be more profitable for the manufacturers. I'm not going to get a player/recorder until I can get everything together for a reasonable price. I have to upgrade my TV before I even care.

  44. Re:What I'd really like to see Blueray/HD used for by Fezmid · · Score: 1

    It'll be interesting to see what Matrix does. It's being released on HD DVD this May. No BD release date, although it's rumored to be late this year, once the BD camp actually finalizes the spec (yes, they've been selling a product for a year that isn't even finalized yet. Go Sony *rolls eyes*)

  45. Re:Poor Liddle Zonk, Still Fighting For A Dead For by Fezmid · · Score: 1

    I posted this in another thread, but I'll reiterate it here. Does it really matter if you can burn a 15G disk vs a 25G disk, when harddrives are now 750G to 1TB? I mean really, an extra 10G is important?

  46. Blu-ray for moview/holywood -- HD-DVD for Data... by master5o1 · · Score: 1

    Ok, it can be either way around. But this is what I thought of when I first heard that blu ray and hd dvd were incompatible: Use on for data/computers, the other for movies/holywood. By this, they should be able to curb piracy until people make blu-ray devices for computers, blah blah stuff. -- How I see it as a curb to piracy is that we have one format for movies and tv. and the other for computers. - I have chosen blu-ray for movies because Microsoft has chosen HD-DVD for the Xbox 360, which one can assume that there will be HD-DVD for Windows as well. The other reason is because lately Blu-ray has been winning the movie format war thus far. If they (the companies involved) could be arsed to work together to curb piracy by using different formats for different duties then this could happen. But the truth is, is that these are different companies and companies don't like to do this sort of thing. what do you think about it?

    --
    signature is pants
  47. fixed by hosecoat · · Score: 1

    "Finally Could the slash dot filter PLEASE stop people from writing MS instead of MS. (;_;)"

  48. Consumers don't Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured that this was going to happen eventually just like it did with DVD burners. Simply put, people don't give a damn which is better, instead what the consumer cares about is what's cheapest and for those who have some product loyalty, the manufacturers got tired of the beef why doesn't my burner handle this brand of disk? that they got with the +/- format war. Tech Support costs them money when customers bitch and it costs them market share, which once again costs money and they're share holders beef.

    So simply wait at least 12 to 18 months for prices to drop to a reasonable point and we'll be able to use either format as easily as we do DVD's right now.

  49. This is great news . . . by bradavon · · Score: 1

    Considering neither format is going nowhere. Universal has to much of a big stake and has already released stacks of titles, as has Warner.

    I had a feeling Samsung would do this, it's just like them. I have faith Samsung will get it right this time (full HD-DVD support this time please). If so it "will" be mine.

  50. smart Koreans by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

    Let's look at the companies that developed Blu-Ray and HD-DVD and are fighting a format war, trying to get their own format to win. Blu-Ray was developed by Sony. HD-DVD was developed by Toshiba and NEC. All three of these companies are Japanese.

    Now let's look at the companies that have announced they are going to be format-agnostic, sell dual-format players, and sidestep the format war. According to the summary, LG already introduced such a product, and Samsung has announced plans to release one as well. These two companies are both Korean.

    I don't want to read too much into this, but it seems like while the Japanese are busy trying to own the market by owning the format, the Koreans plan to start selling players as soon as possible, removing the major barrier (format uncertainty) that is holding back adoption. This, combined with the huge increase in build quality and improved reputation of Korean products in the last few years, may pay off big time for the Koreans. While the Japanese manufacturers are busying believing that Japan owns the market and all that remains is for them to settle the format question among themselves in a contest of Japanese corporate leverage versus Japanese corporate leverage, the Koreans may come in and take the market by selling more sensible, appealing products.

  51. The format war winner is in! by makoffee · · Score: 1

    And it's DVD!

    --
    -makoffee