Jumping to Conclusions on BIOS, Phoenix, and Windows
tomlasusa writes "In a post on LinuxQuestions.org, user 'chessonly' cites a 2003 article from Networkcomputing.com by writer Steven J. Schuchart as evidence of that Phoenix Technologies has made its BIOS more Windows-friendly — thereby locking out users from using other OSs. In a rebuttal posted at nwc.com, Schuchart says that this is just not true."
The title for this article gave me an idea...
I need Slashdotter's opinion on this: what do you think of a "jump to conclusions" mat? I could make millions!
A Slashdot post about a Digg story? Now we really have gone too far.
Every time specs, or the workings of any piece of PC hardware changes, a certain part of the OSS community cries foul, or says its "Windows-friendly" because MSFT is (quite predictably) out of the gate with support.
Hardware development isn't going to stop just because 4 out of 5 kernel devs agree to release a driver as stable.
I think the programmer side of the community is flexible enough to deal with hardware changes, and it's just that annoying end-user whining because he wants hardware X to work today, and the fact that he doesnt have it proves some world conspiracy against him.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
It saves time, and is often correct.
This guy's rebuttal doesn't do anything to address the facts save a call to a Phoenix BIOS person who says "we didn't and don't do that."
But what of the purported fact that the guy cannot get another OS on there? An effective rebuttal would include a good explanation why this problem occured; even better if it discussed a work-around or a fix.
Phoenix can claim they aren't [intentionally] doing this, but is it really happening in effect whether intentional or not? If it is, what is their response? If it isn't, who is this guy making this claim and what is he doing wrong?
Does anyone here have such a laptop? Would you care to install Linux on it as a test? Has anyone here tried? Did it work?
What are the facts? Can any of this be confirmed?
At the risk of being modded troll...
The article basically says "a post made by a clueless chap on a forum is almost certainly conplete twaddle. I wouldn't have even written this but his post quotes me."
So, IOW: the article is one big "nothing happened"
How is this news?
so i posted a response on digg to the first post that proclaimed "OUCH! there is no way in hell my next motherboard purchase will have a Phoenix BIOS..." and I pointed out that this was a laptop, not a motherboard and that i could kind of understand but that it was no excuse. my comment was dugg up briefly, but then very quickly dugg way down. it frustrated me so much that people could be so ignorant to digg up the first comment about declaring a boycott of Phoenix bios motherboard when posting referred to a laptop and then buried my comment. this type of mob stoopidity that has become so rampant has left me disillusioned about digg i dont plan make use of the site anymore. between slashdot, engadget, gizmodo, and fark i can get all the news i need, but without a bunch of 13 year old juveniles piss all over it.
My take of the situation is that this guy found some hardware/BIOS problem that will brick a certain model of laptop when you try to cold boot it with a certain model usb-serial adapter is installed. That's it.
This guy's the limit!
Isn't Slashdot the official-Jumping-to-Conclusions-portal?
It sure isn't the official-Journalism-portal.
Lions on the savanna didn't care about whether the prey (apes) were pondering whether that movement was a threat. Same goes for putting stuff in mental boxes, makes it easier to sort out the universe.
I don't think that OS X 10.5 will be released for common PC hardware( But who knows, nothing surprises me these days). I think that if apple were to allow their OS to run on other machines, Apple would probably bundle their OS with a major PC manufacture like HP.
One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn't try and make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific
0 11607/3000/PX03020.pdf
It seems unfortunate if we do this work and get our partners to do the work and the results is that Linux works great without having to do the work
Maybe there is no way to avoid this problem but it does bother me.
Maybe we could define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not the others even if they are open.
Or maybe we could patent something related to this.
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/
davecb5620@gmail.com
Couldn't somebody with the knowledge remove the BIOS and check to see what is on it? I mean it isn't like BIOSes are typically encrypted. Shouldn't it be possible to look into the code to check these kinds of claims without the cooperation of the manufacturer?
What this BIOS porbably does (apart form the mentioned updates on the webpage) is add the SLIC data for Toshiba into the BIOS. All OEM venders need to have the SLIC data in the ACPI section of the BIOS so they can use thier OEM Digital Certificates that they supply on the Install for Vista DVD's. The Digital Certificate allows Vista to be instantly activated on a PC with the SLIC data, VLK, and Digital Cert.
They are just covering thier own backs that on the slight chance that the data changes in the ACPI could cause some crap on other OS'es. The user probably set a password, or corrputed his BIOS during the flash phase, and is pointing fingers at anyone else so he no longer looks like a dumbass.
I get this all the time with people who bring thier CellPhones in for repair becuase they locked thier phones and forgot thier password. They state clearly that they never changed it, and when I load the phone into my PST's and retreive the code the look of realization comes over them and say, "oh yeah, I remember it now"
It must suck to be unable to use Google
"Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
Hmmm, well there could just be a reason for that.
I am no BIOS expert or anything like that, but it seems to me from a logical POV that Windows, *nix, or any other OS would have to rely on the state of the machine when comming back from hibernation. If the BIOS allowed you to boot into another OS while a different OS was in a hibernated state, when you attempt to bring the hibernated OS back in, then the machine state would be quite different then when it went into hibernation. It would seem to me that this could cause any number of problems and a significant amount of chaos.
It also seems that the machine does not completely power down on hibernation. Try an experiment. Hibernate windows then disconect the power cord and pull the battery out and leave it out for say 5 minutes. Then pop the battery back in and see if Windows restores to its correct state. If it does, then perhaps there is something to be said for your asertion that this could be something evil. If it fails to come back to life properly then its all about preserving the machine state.
Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
In my experience, toshiba laptops have had several features that are windows-only, but they still do a great job of supporting Linux. What other manufacturer still has detailed specs online for 11 year old laptops?
To be fair: Dell
I've fixed 300Mhz old Dell laptops using freely available service manuals with detailed assembly and disassembly instructions from their support.dell.com site.
But it's good Toshiba does it too.
That makes only sense if the hardware specifications were open. The major problem is that they are not, and the OSS community depends on reverse engineering of Vendor created Windows drivers to create a driver.
the laptop powers off after hibernation, it is not a sleep or something like that.
Since i installed grub i can actually choose to load another OS(ubuntu)in the same drive and boot it. What just annoys me is i can't boot a usb pen or a cd.
As far the windows partitions i can read files as long i don't do any alterations to that partition, since it is in a inconsistent state.
The weird is that i looked at others laptops(non Toshiba) and they don't have this behavior.
This special place in hell you speak of... Is it right next to the level they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theate?
Exactly how many years would it take for Apple to get hardware support for a wide range of devices?
That's a huge advantage to the mostly closed-box principle.
"Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
Well, its their product they can support whatever they want.
If they choose to support 90% of the market, well, thats their choice. Its our choice not to use their products ( if that bothers you )
---- Booth was a patriot ----
What's the big mystery? ACPI features work seamlessly under windows for any laptop I've ever had with a phenix BIOS ... getting even the simplest features to work under linux has been a major chore. Do hot keys work? Under windows, yes, under linux no. Do lcd controls work, under linux no, under windows yes.
Have a look at the ACPI for linux web page at http://acpi.sourceforge.net/
Anything phoenix related is completely screwed for Linux.
There is not hiding this
phoenix is onzered by MS. PERIOD.
Look at your dsdt. Depending on when you made your purchase you will find several entries for MS operating systems. If you are lucky, you will find one for Linux (that's one of the uses for the acpi_os_name= parameter in the kernel flags ... trick BIOS's from completely braindead/lazy BIOS manufactureres into thinking you have an OS you don't.
Who said anything about linux only? ACPI is a standard that all sorts of folks agreed to ... like IBM and Intel, as well as MS. If people would comply with the standard that would be a useful first step. A handy second step would be letting at least developers know about what your specific modifications are. Some BIOS manufacturers can't seem to do either. Coding a BIOS that works properly may be tricky for specific hardware may be tricky in some instances. Telling dev's what gets triggered when you push a button shouldn't be any harder in one OS than it is in another. Unless politics get in the way.
I'm guessing you don't own a laptop, or you would have discovered that your experiment contradicts your explanation. I've managed to hibernate on windows, restart the laptop, boot into linux and hibernate that, with no ill effects. Whatever state windows recorded has to have been blown away by that. Primarily because hibernate is also known as "suspend to disk". Suspend to RAM though, is another story. The "good" news is that as of Vista business edition, Linux has caught up with Windows on that front. Video fails to restore after resume for me on Vista about 50 percent of the time.
But suspend to ram has a spec in ACPI. It does have to set a few registers, so that ACPI knows where to run code from on the warm restart. mjg59 has a nice article detailing the specifics of suspend and Linux, and the common culprits (video cards).
I Browse at +4 Flamebait
Open Source Sysadmin
the article is one big "nothing happened"
and the guy still has a broken laptop. What I get out of that is avoid Toshiba.
Only someone with their head firmly buried could think there is nothing wrong with BIOS. They are not free and the companies that make them work closely with M$, a company famous for sabotaging their competitors. This makes all new equipment a crap shoot. The author may have pussed out of his original sentiment, but things have not changed at all since he wrote the article:
ACPI and APM before it were royal pains that took years for free software to master. Hardware that can only be manipulated with Windoze only software adds further insult to those who would avoid non free software. Finally, there are plenty of stores that won't take your laptop back if you have installed free software on it. Finally the author admits, "Toshiba's BIOS download page indicates that their BIOS is only designed for Windows Vista," but then blames the user for his misfortune when it did not work. Let's hear it for choice.
The upshot to all of this is that I won't buy any computer unless I've booted it and seen all of it work or read a page where someone has made it work.
Chess only has a real problem and a real gripe. His laptop does not work and no one has stepped up to the plate with a solution. Insults like, " I suspect that chessonly's problem is somewhere between the chair and the keyboard" are shameful. Screw you Network Computing, I hope you get forced onto Vista next week.
DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
IBM? Dell? And both seem to have much better quality hardware then Toshiba...
Chances are any disscution on Slashdot will degrade into a flamewar about ID/Christianity within 14 posts.