Slashdot Mirror


HS Students Compete In FIRST Robotics Competition

A trio of teams have banded together to succeed in the 'FIRST Robotics Competition'. The teams Bobcat Robotics from South Windsor, Connecticut, Highrollers from Las Vegas, Nevada, and Gompei and the HERD from Worcester, Massachusetts combined to create a versatile robot geared to succeeding at a number of odd tasks. "These young people had six weeks to perfect their machines. And they had the enthusiasm of any athletic competition. From tie-dyed shirts to human hair dyed in school colors, competitors from 23 countries showed that math, science and brains can provide a lot of excitement ... Whether it is computer programming, wiring a motor or scouting rivals to develop strategy, students said the skills they develop often go beyond the contest. Clearly, the event has piqued the interest of major sponsors such as NASA, which will broadcast webcasts of the competitions."

50 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Awesome by Sinryc · · Score: 1

    FIRST is great. I was involved when I was in high school. We need to get the word out even more so that people will know more about it and will support it more!

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
    1. Re:Awesome by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

      I hate to bite, but I was in a similar competition in middle school, so my first response to FIRST is "so what?"
      Robotics competitions in all ages aren't all that uncommon, so is this a slow news day? I mean, what would make this important would be if it was something more than a glorified exercise in Lego Mindstorms.

      --
      +5, Truth
    2. Re:Awesome by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are completely incorrect regarding what first is.

      Lego Mindstorms? Really?

      Do they use CNC machines, Lathes, Mills, and turn out a robot that weighs over 150 pounds, puts out more torque than many small automobiles, and costs well over $20k after all is said and done?

      Corporate sponsership? 8 million dollars in college scholarships? Summer internship ships at intel, motorola, nasa, Ford, GM, Chrysler, Texas Instruments?

      No. Sorry. Lego Mindstorms is nice, but it's not even close in scope. You should troll elsewhere.

    3. Re:Awesome by hax0r_this · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FIRST is ok, I did it for two years, but it isn't something that most /. readers would find terribly interesting to participate in.

      Really, the name says it all. "For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology". The program does all of that, and it is great for getting kids who would otherwise never have such opportunities involved in some fun stuff.

      What FIRST is NOT however, is a robotics competition. The years I participated the rounds were 2-3 minutes long, and 20 to 30 seconds of that time were dedicated to autonomous operation. Most teams didn't even try to do anything during the "autonomous period", or they simply had their robot drive forward for 5 seconds then spin circles, or something similarly uninteresting. The "programming" was all done inside of a function that was provided, manipulating variables that were provided. No direct access to either input, or most particularly to output. Where the wiring was concerned the prescribed method was to plug all of the provided parts together in accordance with the manual. "Custom circuits" were sort of allowed, although they had to undergo a complicated inspection process, and were under no conditions whatsoever allowed to interface directly with any motors/actuators/etc. Basically no one used "custom circuits", except a few of the teams that had professional engineers building their "robots" for them while they stood on the sidelines.

      One particular incident stands out in my memory: During a practice round just before the finals one of the teams we were teamed up with broke a mechanism on their robot's arm. But their "mentor" who had designed and built the robot was out to lunch. One of the kids was crying, while the rest of them just stood around with no idea what to do. We had to fix their robot for them.

      Anyway, don't get me wrong, FIRST is a great way to inspire kids, one of our team members went from working at a fast food restaraunt to going off to some game design school (which I was skeptical of, but I talked to him the other day and it seems to be working out ok). But as a "robotics competition" FIRST is way overrated.

    4. Re:Awesome by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 1

      To back up the troll a bit, maybe he went to the FIRST website http://www.usfirst.org/ and just looked at the FIRST Lego League (FLL)information. The FLL group is for 9-14 year olds and actually does use the Lego Mindstorms system. However, the FIRST Robotics Competition (FRC) is much more involved as the parent notes.

    5. Re:Awesome by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 1

      When were you involved in FIRST? With the exception of this years competition (autonomous mode wasn't really strategically necessary this year) the autonomous modes for 2005 and 2006 seemed to be quite interesting really. Also, while custom circuits cannot directly communicate with the mechanical parts, if a team has a good programmer (I've seen some teams do this) you can make the motors act as though they are directly connected to the custom devices. In addition, the provided function is just so that teams who don't have the experience to fully program the robot can compete too. I've even seen people rewrite the entire code. Lastly, while there are teams that have their robots designed and built completely by their engineers, this in NOT what FIRST recommends. FIRST recommends that the engineers and mentors allow the students to design the robot and the mentors be more of a 'reality check' and to offer assistance when necessary (for example teaching/helping students to use dangerous machinery). Now I've gone and started to rant...sorry about that. I guess we can tell that I help out with a FIRST robotics team can't we ^_^

  2. Not sure that last sentence is entirely accurate by mreynozo · · Score: 5, Informative

    As someone who was involved in FIRST for the last three years, I wouldn't say that the competition has just now piqued the interest of major sponsors such as NASA - I'd say that they were integral to the development of FIRST from the beginning, most especially NASA.

    The summary also gave the impression that the three teams combined to create one robot - well no, each team has a seperate robot in FIRST, and this years' competition allowed three teams per side.

    On a personal note, oh how I miss FIRST. Last year (my senior year) was when I had the greatest enthusiasm for the program, and I did indeed dye my hair blue and orange. It's a shame that was also my school's last year before the team disbanded. I would strongly encourage any slashdotter to volunteer for a local FIRST team - the whole robot-making experience leaves a lasting thirst for engineering that mentors can help shape into a high schooler's bright future.

  3. FIRST? by Bob54321 · · Score: 2

    I am pretty sure I have heard of previous robotics competitions... so FIRST much be an acronym and not capitalized for emphasis. Anyone know what it stands for?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:FIRST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology

    2. Re:FIRST? by RelliK · · Score: 1

      The winners go on to compete in SECOND robotic competition.

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  4. I like to reminisce by mqj · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ahh, so many wonderful memories of robot competition are summed up in this bash quote

    <Patrician|Away> what does your robot do, sam
    <bovril> it collects data about the surrounding environment, then discards it and drives into walls
  5. FIRST outside North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FIRST is quite good - I was in a team competing from the UK, unfortunately, for teams outside the US/Canada it's fairly hard to raise the money to build the robot and get the team to the event!

    Some sort of initiative to help teams outside of North America would be good I think - there is a fair bit of interest over here in the UK.

  6. Re:lol nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm an Alpha male /b/.

    Sorry buddy, if you have to say it, you ain't it.

  7. For Inspiration & Recognition in Sci and Tech by jpellino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But most people forget that, just like most teams forget what the actual prize is - by the time the finals roll around, the kids are so pumped to be doing this the actual prize is almost an afterthought.

    Returning from our first FIRST regional in NH in 97, my boss asked me how it went. I told him I'd been teaching for 17 years, and this was the first time I had to sit down and put my head between my knees becasue I was about to pass out watching my students do something academic.

    In retrospect, it is the single most effective thing I've seen in now 27 years of teaching to get kids to "do their darndest, no holds barred" like we always imagine kids should do in school.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  8. Maybe I'm missing something by ReidMaynard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't "Robotics Competition" be limited to Robots?

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  9. Every Little Bit Helps by realthing02 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While this probably won't get too much play outside of the tech community, it's good to see there is at least an interest in computer science/robotics in the high school level. It wasn't until college that i had the ability to tinker with some robots, and it was a great experience and definitely taught me a lot about the field, not just theory.

    Now i just can't wait for robotics teams to get a slice of that high school football budget.

  10. Really robots? by Porchroof · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Were these really robots or were they simply radio-controlled devices...with a human in control?


    Anybody there ever read "I, Robot" by Isaac Asimov? That series of short stories will enlighten you to what robots are/will be.

    --
    Fata viam invenient.
    1. Re:Really robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      there is a 15 second autonomous mode, and there is a CMU camera available to the competitors.... they are robots.
      (there is a 2 minute RC mode)

    2. Re:Really robots? by Porchroof · · Score: 1

      AC, It matters to those of us who care about the language.

      --
      Fata viam invenient.
  11. Re:lol nerds by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

    ROFL at /b/tard troll.

  12. Robotics Kits by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just for the heck of it, here's a couple robot kits worth a look:

    - Lego Mindstorms NXT (note: flash-based site with music)

    The Lego Mindstorms kits have been around for a while now, but they offer almost infinite possibilities to those willing to experiment with different approaches to accomplishing a particular goal. Devices as complicated as photocopiers have been built using these kits.

    - VEX Robotics Kits

    The VEX kits are fairly new compared to the Lego Mindstorms sets, but are a bit more advanced and could be dubbed as an "Erector Set", but with a brain. The VEX kits were developed in part by FIRST and were briefly distributed by Radio Shack in a move to get more people interested in robotics.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Robotics Kits by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what state Mindstorms is in now, but I imagine it's a lot better than back when I used it, back in the days of the IR programmer. I wasn't impressed with its "infinite possibilities", which were limited to three sensors and three motors unless you felt like shelling out a few hundred dollars for more kits.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  13. To answer the questions by Puls4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok.

    FIRST stands for "For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology".

    These are not just remote-control toys. Camera systems are used for fully autonomous operation during portions of the competition. More hi-tech teams use sonar, infra-red and other devices. Indeed, for the geeks out there I'll point out that the "remove control" is actually a 900 mghz modem - not your standard little 2 joystick controller.

    Teams compete in alliances of 3 robots. 2 alliances are on the field at the same time, and each trys to score the highest. Defense (aka contact) is DEFINITELY allowed, although intentional attempting to damage other robots is highly discouraged.

    The motto of first is one of "Gracious Professionialism". I.e. - if your robot is broken at a competition, you can be sure of getting half a dozen teams all trying to help you get it back on the field.

    There are very few limits placed on the overall robot developmenet - you must use their motors, radio system, and batteries. There is also a limit on robot weight and size.

    Go over and read the rules at www.usfirst.org - or better yet, go over here and watch some of the semi-final matches at the world championships that went on in Atlanta this weekend:

    http://www.soap.circuitrunners.com/2007/movies/cur /

    The movies you want are at the bottom with the longer names - the semifinals and finals on that field. There are thousands of teams and this is competitive as all heck. Every big-name company you can think of that is involved in technology sponsers it - from Motorola to Ford.

    1. Re:To answer the questions by Deathanatos · · Score: 1

      I've participated on FIRST for two years now, and I'm graduating as a senior. I will miss FIRST so much... it's not just for robotics enthusiasts either. I had no real interest in robotics until I joined a team. In two short years I've learned about wiring, various sensors, what "PWM" stands for and means, and tons of other things. So has everyone else on the team. FIRST is hands on education to the max. And it's fun. To stress the parent's post's point of "Gracious professionalism" - FIRST not only encourages it, FIRST and those competing in FIRST take pride in it. A broken part is no excuse for not competing. Help, parts, info is all available - all you have to do is ask. Teams will tell you everything about their robots, lend you parts, knowledge, even walk over to your team's area to help out, when they could be spending that precious time on their robot.

      Everything parent said is nose on. However, I'd like to stress that even teams that don't take advantage of the autonomous period are still building a robot. The Mars Rover is a robot, and it does get human input. Same with the FIRST robots - and it's not as simple as just plugging in a few wires. If you're in highschool, and reading slashdot, I'd definately recommend checking FIRST out, and finding a team near you.

      Also, teams are not just highschools (although most are). Our team is an exception here - we encompass the entire county and then some. Anyone who thinks building a 100 lbs robot in six weeks to complete the challenge's of FIRST robotics is easy... well, they're wrong. (I'd love to see more teams in my local area.)

      Many of the seniors on our team (including me) have vowed to find and mentor local FIRST teams wherever we go to college. Mostly, you have to be there to understand what FIRST really is. Watch the online videos. Find a team near you, and hang out for a Saturday afternoon - you'll probably be back next week. (We take people from all over the county, and I'm sure school-based teams wouldn't have a problem either.)

  14. Hurray! by Flyboy210 · · Score: 1

    Bobcat Robotics! Wow. We won the Philly Regional last year with them in our alliance. You always find the coolest stuff. To the Alpha Male post, you suck, because we've all seen that copy pasta on 4Chan, and that's where it should stay. This is truly a worthy subject to talk about, because it's so rewarding.

    I've been in FIRST Robotics (Counting FIRST Lego League) since 2001. It's been an amazing experience, going from building little lego robots to grab boulders in 2001 to going to Atlanta to compete in 2006. It's an amazing thing, and all students should be involved in FIRST. It's very rewarding, it helps you succeed and it helps you meet a great group of people.

    I want you to rtfa and think: How many times can you go to another town across the country with a football team and say "Oh Yeah, I'm from place X." and have someone know? Probably never. Try the same thing with FIRST Teams, and they will probably instantly recognize you. It's happened before, trust me. There is a camaraderie in FIRST that can't be duplicated anywhere else, and it truly showcases the minds of tomorrow, while enriching them. Not To Mention that it is a WHOLE LOT OF FUN TOO!!!

    If you read this, and are in a high school, or have a parent with a child in school (anywhere from 4-6 grade to high school), start a FIRST Team. Get people together and make a team. It will draw a lot of people and bring a lot of good attention to your school, and not to mention, the local businesses and sponsors you can get. It's a great thing, and you can (and should) really consider it. It's worth every moment.

    --
    If it ain't broke, it will be soon enough. And if it is, duct tape can fix it.
  15. Team 007 by armanox · · Score: 1

    My FIRST team beats you all. Parkville HS's number alone makes them awsome.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  16. Outstanding Program by swamp+boy · · Score: 1

    I participated in FIRST robotics this year as a mentor for a local school. Prior to this, I had never even heard of it. The whole thing is amazing. It gives students a fun and creative way to learn about science, math, engineering, technology, and industry. It was a lot of work, but also a lot of fun and I learned a lot. The regional competition was magical -- excitement and enthusiasm was difficult to imagine without seeing it in person. I think the best part of it all is the mantra "gracious professionalism" is expected at all times. I saw it plenty of times at the competition.

    The robot controller was based on PIC 18x microcontrollers. Most teams used either EasyC Pro or MPLAB to program it. Robots consisted of a mixture of motors, pneumatics, electronics, and mechanics to make it work as intended. It was amazing to see some of the different designs.

    I highly recommend the program to any high school student or adult who might be interested in being a volunteer or mentor.

  17. How is this news? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

    FIRST has been around for years. Its been in ESPN2 since at least 1997, when I competed. NASA and many, many other agencies and corporations have always been involved. If robotics were actually going mainstream, we would be treating this as routine by now. The only new should be who won, innovative strategies, etc. The fact that the competition itself is still treated as new and novel after all these years shows that it has failed in its basic goals.

    1. Re:How is this news? by kevlarman · · Score: 1

      i think FIRST gets slashdotted every year, at least this year they were considerate enough to not do it on kickoff when everyone needed to download large files from first's website.

      --
      A mouse is a device used to point to the xterm you want to type in
    2. Re:How is this news? by Petey_Alchemist · · Score: 1

      The program has been getting some new support. At BAE this year, one of the founders of YouTube and the CEO of Encyclopedia Britannica spoke about further promoting FIRST through their respecitve outlets. Rhode Island just passed state law requiring all high schools to have FIRST teams by 2009 (IIRC).

      I spoke with Dean there, and while he recognizes the success of the FIRST program in expanding to over 2000 teams, he wants it to be truly exponential growth. I don't know if it's possible. It's so hard to explain to people what FIRST is: I've been unsuccessful at establishing rookie teams at both colleges I've gone to, even though the latter was at a massive engineering university. It's difficult to get people hooked if you can't get them to the competition, but once they see a competition they've got the bug.

      Slashdotters, even if you think the entire concept of "robots plus high school students" DOES "equal hilarity", please just go check out a local competition. They're easy to find on FIRST's website. It's an amazing program, and provides absolutely unparalled experience (and scholarship money) to budding engineers.

      Disclaimer: I'm an alumnus of and mentor to Team 1073.

    3. Re:How is this news? by FreakyAntelope · · Score: 1

      The fact that the competition itself is still treated as new and novel after all these years shows that it has failed in its basic goals.

      While I won't deny that it is somewhat disappointing that FIRST has not garnered more attention from the general public, your statement couldn't be farther from the truth. FIRST's primary goal is to motivate and inspire the high school students involved to pursue careers in science and technology, and as a participant myself (High school senior and captain of Team 246, BU Overclocked) as far as I can tell FIRST has been VERY successful at achieving it's goals.

      According to the website at USFIRST.org, "FIRST designs accessible, innovative programs that build not only science and technology skills and interests, but also self-confidence, leadership, and life skills."

      Thousands of the high school students who are coming out of this program, myself included, have found something and have experience in something they love and want to pursue through college and, perhaps, the rest of their lives. FIRST reaches over 10,000 students every year and accomplishes more with regards to high school engineering education than any other program I have heard of. Every year it is growing and, as the article said, attracting the attention of more and more major sponsors. This year, the director of DARPA spoke before the final matches of the Championship event, pledging to become a major sponsor of FIRST over the next few years.

      Given all this, I can't think of a way which FIRST *isn't* achieving its goals.


      - Toby
  18. Re:Not sure that last sentence is entirely accurat by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    As someone who was involved in FIRST for the last three years, I wouldn't say that the competition has just now piqued the interest of major sponsors such as NASA - I'd say that they were integral to the development of FIRST from the beginning, most especially NASA.

    Indeed, I competed with my high school in the U.S. FIRST robotics competition in 1995, and there were serious contenders sponsored by major companies like Proctor and Gamble back then. Actually, I think they sponsored two teams - one that used Tide as its logo, and the other that used Sunny D...

    Too bad our team had a relatively poor sponsor. Our robot's basic design worked, but a reload mechanism was designed too weak to operate, and the sponsor wouldn't/couldn't pay to rebuild the parts scaled up to handle the load. Still, I have some great memories of our matches. Ours was one of the few "shooting" robots that year, and our final match - with three shooters competing - was considered one of the most exciting of the competition.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  19. not just engineering by RighteousRaven · · Score: 1

    "the whole robot-making experience leaves a lasting thirst for engineering..."

    Not just engineering, but also programming, game theory, management, and accounting. I personally cant imagine anyone having a thirst for accounting, but I've seen it happen.

  20. Re:lol nerds by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

    wait... what? I read the first part and almost shrugged this off, and then I read the last part. Apparently you're acknowledging that this is a troll (and for some reason an astonishingly EPIC troll for being so goddamned obvious), and yet you're serving as his chef...

    slashdotters really ARE that dumb...
    Seriously people, let's be introspective for a bit and perhaps realize that slashdot really HAS been reduced to an exercise in pseudointellectual elaboration rather than serious discussion on current events. Seriously, when trolls from 4chan can bring this shit out of you, perhaps you should consider reevaluating the way you conduct yourself on this forum.
    That having been said, "!!3YJU/k9Wuhz" is my tripcode on /b/.

    --
    +5, Truth
  21. Love it by Yellowknifegts · · Score: 1

    I love FIRST, I'm currently on Team TRX 145. This program is awesome, it makes me think out side of the box to play the game every year........ sadly next year will be my last year as a student member.

  22. Founder by NaNO2x · · Score: 1

    As a founder of my schools FIRST team I'd like to say this is a great opportunity for people to get into. I was a part of my team from the first year and for the next four years. One of the harder parts I had and this I'm sure had to do with the school I was in, was getting other people to work as hard s I did. I took part in building, fund raising, programming, and other overall work. While in the program and for a year or two after I started and continued a FIRST Lego League program which is a sub of the FIRST Competition. It uses the Lego Mindstorm units and has a similar competition which is again national with regional competitions. As for NASA being a huge sponsor, its true that for the first year or two they give you sponsorship but after that you have to be a fairly special team to still be in their pockets. Same goes for Microsoft and a few other of these bigger corporations. Anyway, I think its a great program for people to find, found, and get into. I've tried going back and helping out my high school team but there just doesn't seem to be enough motivation there unfortunately, I hope other people have a better time with that.

    --
    Utinam me logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.
  23. Re:On behalf of all FIRSTers... by kevlarman · · Score: 1

    couple corrections: it's 4 weeks, you spend the first 2 arguing with teammates about what you should build, and any real programming work starts at your first regional, because the robot was only "finished" on midnight before ship day, and broke down in every one of the practice rounds. --team 100's former programmer

    --
    A mouse is a device used to point to the xterm you want to type in
  24. Re:On behalf of all FIRSTers... by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

    Or finding out - at regionals - that you need to drop 30 pounds off your robot within a few hours. Fortunately, my old team invested in a scale for this year.
     
    -Team 246 alum

  25. Re:On behalf of all FIRSTers... by kevlarman · · Score: 1

    yup, been there.

    --
    A mouse is a device used to point to the xterm you want to type in
  26. Re:Not sure that last sentence is entirely accurat by gatzke · · Score: 2, Insightful


    As a faculty member in engineering, I totally support FIRST robotics and FIRST lego league.

    At the same time, it seems that the results skew toward pushing students into ME, not EE or CS (or my favorite, CHE).

    Although the robotics could involve neat sensing and computing (EE) and algorithm development (CS) the students take home message is that all engineering is levers, gears, etc (ME). The high schoolers don't do much with the automation side of things (their adult mentors sort most of that out usually) and the middle school FIRST lego kids only do very simple programs (move forward 5 seconds, turn left, move forward again...).

    At least it gives them some motivation to check out STEM careers.

  27. Re:For Inspiration & Recognition in Sci and Te by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

    As someone who did FIRST for three years, I gotta say, it beats the hell out of sitting in class. I love theoretical matters too, but damn, Sitting around doing similar activities all day every day for years and years on end? FIRST is insanely fun because it lets you do something different. Not only that, you learn so much about producing things, team dynamics, and tons of other highly relevant experiences.

    Possibly one of the most interesting things that happened in team was that because we spent so much time with each other in and out of the lab, we became the closest friends ever, and a few years later, that's still true for some of us. Also, very interesting was that there were a lot of couples that came out of there ;-), so unlike what that troll was implying in a previous thread, the nerds got the girls too :D

    In summary, FIRST - good stuff all around.

  28. Re:lol nerds by djrok212 · · Score: 1

    And now to bring this entire chain of posts to the ultimate low! Mr. Anonymous Coward if women like "Alpha Men" like yourself, how come this geek was about to fuck your Mom? Over and over and over...

  29. Non-student competition by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    There are lots of robot competitions for students, but I'm not a student anymore. Does anyone know of non-student competitions (preferably in Europe, but for other readers, post freely)? I would really like to participate in one, but don't know where to look.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Non-student competition by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Start one? :-)

      In the software realm, you can use games like RealTimeBattle and CoreWars. I always wanted to build a table for a physical manifestation of RTB. :-)

    2. Re:Non-student competition by mikael · · Score: 1

      Many of the robot kit manufacturers organise competitions based around their kits.

      Vex Labs is one such company.

      Maybe you could attend a robotics tradeshow in Europe?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Non-student competition by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      RTB seems pretty cool! Thanks for the tip.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  30. Re:Not sure that last sentence is entirely accurat by Version6 · · Score: 1

    The high schoolers don't do much with the automation side of things (their adult mentors sort most of that out usually)...

    I would say that depends on the team. My son's team (which competed in the nationals--we've just been home an hour or so) did all the work--hardware, software, control systems. Their rule is "The coach doesn't touch the robot." They placed several rings in the autonomous period (at both regional and national competition) using only the camera (unlike teams whose adult advisors added ultrasonic sensors). They made it to nationals by winning the Chairman's Award at their regional.

    I have heard that there are reasons why the rules allow adult "mentors" to essentially design and build the entire robot. As I understand it, actually driving the robot in competition is the only thing that adults can't do--they can even be the strategist on the field. I think they should get away from that. Kids that age really are young adults, and do have amazing capabilities if you give them some basic training and support. What's the best way to learn? Do it yourself!

  31. Re:Not sure that last sentence is entirely accurat by kevlarman · · Score: 1

    I have heard that there are reasons why the rules allow adult "mentors" to essentially design and build the entire robot. As I understand it, actually driving the robot in competition is the only thing that adults can't do--they can even be the strategist on the field. I think they should get away from that. Kids that age really are young adults, and do have amazing capabilities if you give them some basic training and support. What's the best way to learn? Do it yourself! I think they allow mentors to do that much of the work on the robot to make things easier on rookie teams, since it's very rare for them to have enough skilled students before they get established. When i was on team 100, the adults would help the students when they needed help, but rarely actually do any work that a student couldn't have done in their absence (for the most part, the only work adults did on the robot was the same stuff students did (like if they needed to file a shaft so it fits in the wheel, it wouldn't be uncommon for an adult to grab one while a student grabbed another to speed things up), for an adult to just do something by themselves was almost unheard of).
    --
    A mouse is a device used to point to the xterm you want to type in
  32. Re:Not sure that last sentence is entirely accurat by gatzke · · Score: 1


    Right, it depends on the team. But in my experience, it seems like the electronics side of things is MOSTLY done by adults and the kids are just there to build mechanical things and run the remote during competition. In regionals, a lot of robots don't attempt anything during the autonomous period (in my experience).

    At the same time, HS kids should know something about mechanical things with some intuition as to how to put gears and levers together. They may not know a lot about programming and the probably know nothing about sensing and automation. So it makes sense that the mentors have to be a lot more involved in that side of things.

  33. CRT306 by WinBreak · · Score: 1

    Team #306 has been holding down some top positions over the years, considering it's a team entirely made of hard working students, and not a bunch of kids who let the engineers tell them what to do. FIRST is about the kids working out the designs and design problems, not about following instructions to some Lego-kit. Team 306 has always left every part of the work up to the students, which is why they've always been one of my favorites to watch online, since I've started following along online. If you don't watch the competition online, I encourage it - it's agood time, and the quality of the video feeds has increased over the years (as expected, but nevertheless...).