Dell Offers Virtual Saplings For Earth Day
theodp writes "The expansion of Dell's Plant a Tree for Me program into Second Life has the Silicon Valley Sleuth wondering if this represents a new low in Earth Day marketing tie-ins. You may wonder, too, after reading Dell's invitation to its Earth Day Party at Dell Island in SL ('get your own tree sapling to plant in Second Life!')."
For Dell's environmental initiatives to make any difference in the real world, people need to get involved. That takes publicity and advertising. I'm sure we're about to get flooded by math majors explaining how each virtual tree required X pounds of fossil fuels to appear on the server, but frankly I don't care. Greenpeace prints their literature on paper, after all.
If this is really all we have to complain about, the world is already perfect. Kudos to Dell for finding a way to bring attention to their Plant A Tree program.
(Note: none of that was/is the opinion of my employer).
Vanya's Law: "In any culture without irony, fart jokes will be the highest form of humor."
... I can smell the virtual fresh air already.
This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
the energy used to run the servers to render a virtual tree is about equivalent to burning a real tree?
McDonalds has real saplings in Minnesota for free on Earth Day.
Did you know that twice as much wood is grown in Minnesota compared to harvesting?
The trees might offset the enormous amounts of methane generated from fat nerds farting and burping in second life.
Join the National Arbor Day Foundation and they'll send you 10 living saplings for cheap (10-15 bucks).
Of course, that means that people might have to get outside once in a while.
--- There is a man in a smiling bag.
*
Viewed from above of course. There, I feel better already. Gotta go now, I wanted to take my humvee for an offroad drive today.
Is there a service which lets me click to plant a real tree somewhere on the real Earth?
I'd love to see a service which calculates the CO2 impact of, say, an email server (and its own operations), and orders trees planted to offset that CO2 by the amount trees consume during that time.
People could get periodic reports of their "email pollution" and the trees they've planted to balance it. With an offer to buy more trees to offset the rest of the Greenhouse pollution we generate, including writing and reading this message.
--
make install -not war
Not exactly. While that law is on the books in some places I do not believe that it is fully national. Moreover it encodes a rather incorrect understanding of the way things work. Firstly 1 old-growth redwood != 2 saplings. So the net impact is not balanced out and if we kill old trees faster than the new ones can grow then we will still have a destructive impact.
Seconslu the costs to the environment is not entirely about the trees, there is the brush and underbrsh, the animals, etc all of which are displaced. And they cannot easily move to wherever the new trees are planted.
Note that while I laud the idea of planting trees, a viable forest with treesu, underbrush, animal and vegetable life != an orderly arbor of young saplings with no secondary plants.