Slashdot Mirror


Google's Data-Storage Fuels Privacy Fears

taoman1 writes "Facing worries about its tracking Web surfers' every move, Google Inc. is now offering a feature to track Web surfers' every move. Its free Web History service is strictly voluntary — Google users can sign up to have the Internet giant keep detailed records of every website they visit so they can easily find them again later. Web History's quiet debut this week came as privacy advocates continued to raise alarms about the prospect of Google combining its collection of information on individuals with that of DoubleClick Inc. Google has agreed to acquire the New York-based company, which distributes Web ads and tracks where the majority of people go on the Internet, for $3.1 billion."

31 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Others Features We All Want to Volunteer For by WED+Fan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google says you can opt in for this. They suggest other great ideas to opt in for:

    • Extra Fuel Burner - Your car uses twice as much fuel as the stated MPG
    • Credit Broadcaster - A great tool to notify internet users about your credit rating, account balances, and account numbers
    • Wife Notifier - lets your spouse know every chat room you go to
    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  2. Why does this surprise anybody? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been suspicious of Google's "do no evil" motto from day one, but my suspicions were confirmed when it was announced that Google Mail would be storing your emails ad-infinitum even if you deleted them. It is quite clear and obvious (and it has been for a long time) that Google is in the datamining business, the targeted advertisement part of which is only the tip of the iceberg. Anybody who's surprised by this announcement has been living in a cave...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by dissy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but my suspicions were confirmed when it was announced that Google Mail would be storing your emails ad-infinitum even if you deleted them.

      And this announced policy outrages you more than the fact governments want the same exact thing forced upon all ISPs?

    2. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by WED+Fan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Google is Evil!

      I've got 5 GMail accounts, including this one, that I use for the sole purpose of spam catching. If Google wants to archive all my spam, great. I check the accounts on the order of once or twice a month and have yet to see their spam filter work efficiently.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    3. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by electrosoccertux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been suspicious of Google's "do no evil" motto from day one, but my suspicions were confirmed when it was announced that Google Mail would be storing your emails ad-infinitum even if you deleted them. It is quite clear and obvious (and it has been for a long time) that Google is in the datamining business, the targeted advertisement part of which is only the tip of the iceberg. Anybody who's surprised by this announcement has been living in a cave... So, I've seen the thing work...in quite a spooky way...first hand...several times...

      The search? Various hot women by their name. I did a search once for pics of and it came up with 3-4 pages of results, and only one or two pictures of interest.

      Skip forward several months (I haven't deleted the searching history) and I do another search for Eva Longoria I think it was, and on the first page was the --entirely unrelated-- picture of that other woman I had searched for earlier. I've seen this happen on two different occassions before when searching under the same category. Very interesting, it's like they programmed it to know when you were searching for a hot celebrity and to insert previous pages you had visited under the same category in that search. Depending on how you look at it, kinda useful, but nonetheless creepy.
    4. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, I'm missing why keeping your data for services you choose to use while knowing the terms you're using them under is considered "evil".

      Perhaps if they showed themselves to be doing something evil with that data... but they haven't. Just having the data is not evil in itself.

    5. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by ady1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. At anytime you can delete your google account. here: EditServices

      2. The search history feature is for your ease of use. They could've (read must been) simply stored your history without letting you use it.

    6. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by mutende · · Score: 2, Informative

      They could've (read must been) simply stored your history without letting you use it.
      They did. After I enabled web history for my Google account, I could see web history dating back to from before I enabled it. So the change only means that I have access to the data now.
      --
      Unselfish actions pay back better
    7. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been suspicious of Google's "do no evil" motto from day one, Indeed. Every time I hear something like this about Google, I have a vision of an old decrepit geek sitting inside a tin shack fifty years from now. In the light of flickering screens that cut in and out as the pirate net connection goes in and out, he regards the semi-circle of small children who have come to hear him regale them with tales of how it used to be. "Tell us again, Grandfather, of the days when no-one was tracked on Googlenet and anyone could say anything," they cry in Los Angeles pidgin, a mix of English, Spanish, and Mandarin. The old man smiles but his eyes look haunted. "Oh children, once there was a time when the network wasn't even called Googlenet and the Watchers were just a company called Google! Back then, they had a motto: 'Do No Evil.' If only we'd known, little ones. If only we'd known what was coming and that they meant to stop anyone from doing 'evil'". The old man reaches up with a shaky hand and rubs his fingers over the scar where his Googlenet access chip was forcibly removed. Almost inaudibly, he whispers "Who knew that protesting the government was evil?"

      And then sometimes I just get a vision of the Deathstar with a giant 'G' on it and the Imperial March playing, which is a bit more amusing.

      Hmm, perhaps I think about this stuff too much!
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You didn't read the privacy policy closely enough.

      "You may organize or delete your messages through your Gmail account or terminate your account through the Google Account section of Gmail settings. Such deletions or terminations will take immediate effect in your account view. Residual copies of deleted messages and accounts may take up to 60 days to be deleted from our active servers and may remain in our offline backup systems."

      (From http://mail.google.com/mail/help/privacy.html )

      In other words, they are careful with data, keeping it online, replicated, and also backed up offline. (It would be pretty careless treatment of user data if they didn't.) When you delete, it clearly deletes the online copy right away. The replicas take a while to catch up, and since this is the posted policy they want to give a worst-case number. If there's a network partition or something, it could take a long time for the replicas to sync up. If they ship something off to tape, well, they're not going to hunt it down and delete messages one a time off a tape reel. (Can you imagine the cost per user if they did?)

      In the modern age, sincerity doesn't always play well. People either don't believe it, or they make fun of it. (Then later they get upset when companies behave insincerely.) But Google is sincere. Some people don't believe it, but it's true.

  3. Privacy Advocates by gravesb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are far worse threats to privacy than Google. Watch out for continued government laws that require ISPs of all flavors to maintain data for long periods of time, and to turn it over to law enforcement for less and less stringent requirements. If you are worried about your privacy, don't sign up for the stupid service. Rotate your search engines. Use random Wi-Fi hotspots. If people want their privacy protected, they need to take responsibility for it. You reduce your privacy, and you get free services and make some services easier to use. Most people are ok with that. Whether its because they don't care about their privacy or they are stupid doesn't really matter. They made a choice, they don't need advocates fighting to put the cat back in the bag. They most certainly don't need corporations looking out for their privacy interests, unless its a selling point. Businesses provide services and make money. They don't take care of you. Take responsibility for yourself.

    --
    http://bgcommonsense.blogspot.com
  4. Re:Stricly Voluntary by Hennell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The privacy advocates arnt worried about themselves. They're making a scene because they want to make sure people who do 'volunteer' know what they might be signing away.
    Some snippets FTA: -
    "most Google users don't know that their search queries can be tied to them"

    "When Google users were asked whether they believed that the company captured data that could be used to identify them, 77% said no."

  5. Why can't I by gitarman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why can't I get the same storage service Alberto Gonzolez gets at the RNC?

  6. Re:What data storage? by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Funny

    because the NSA are not very good at giving back the hardware to the company from which they subpoenaed it.

  7. Creepy is as creepy does. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Depending on how you look at it, kinda useful, but nonetheless creepy.

    Almost thirty years, back in the Apple ][ days, ago a friend of mine was playing a text adventure game (I forget which one). So, after he played the thing for a while, it asked him a question using his first name. He got all freaked out, "How did it know my name?!!"

    I told him "Because when you started the game it asked you for it."

    "Oh."

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  8. Facts please! Re:Why does this surprise anybody? by crunzh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ummm where does this come from? I cant seem to locate any statements to support this and the gmail TOS seem to indicate that the email is deleted permanently. So please backup your statements and don't spred rumors.

    --
    Visit http://www.crunzh.com/ for free software. Mac/Lin/Win
  9. CustomizeGoogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the paranoids I'd recommend the CustomizeGoogle firefox extension - among other things (like removing those pesky ads) it can reduce the ability for Google to track what you are doing.

  10. Beagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this different from the Search tool in Gnome called "Beagle". Sure I realize Beagle is stored locally on "your" hardware, but remember when you get in trouble there is no more "your". A raid at your residence, or a court order to google / your isp gets you in the same place at the end if you are indeed "evil". In the US the SS is always in power ladies and gents. If your some kind of hacker of some sort where you need to protect yourself and privacy because you are engaging in illegal activities on the net, you have got major problems to begin with. If your connected to some sort of maffia, you have got major problems to begin with as well.

    It IS 1984 in all respects of the book and film. You realize the net tracks everything and knows everything about everyone. Unless your living up in Montana, working at the local grocery store getting paid in cash off the books (no credit card, no phone, no electricity etc...) you have NO PRIVACY already.

    Good luck on ranting about teh Google, they are simply making it easier for you to research your search history on the net.

  11. Look at DoubleClick's IP - it gets clearer by Patent-Monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Key DoubleClick assets from a recent post we did:

    US Patent 7039599 - Automatic Placement of Advertising
    Highlight: Claim 1. "A method for advertisement selection, comprising: (a) receiving from an advertiser Web site feedback representing user transactions at the advertiser Web site, the user transactions resulting from user response to at least one of a plurality of direct advertisements; (b) receiving a request to display a direct advertisement to a user; and (c) selecting, in response to the request, one of the plurality of direct advertisements for display based at least in part upon the advertiser feedback."

    Analysis: This patent has a priority back to 1997 and allows for advertiser feedback from users on a website. Given Google's move into CPA, this patent would clearly provide added leverage to allow more data to flow between the advertiser and Google's system to optimize which ads should be displayed at a publisher.

    US Patent 7085682 - Analyzing Website Activity
    Highlight: A large number of independent claims covering the tracking and reporting of user activities to provide analysis of event level detail, which includes the addition of the retaining details of users' adding products to shopping carts, and repeat usage of a client site.

    Analysis: In addition to the above, Google's analysis and reporting features for a tool like Analytics for a CPA advertiser become even more robust allowing for unique visitor tracking and loyalty. A robust addition to Google Analytics to be sure.

    US Patent 5948061 - Delivering, Targeting and Measuring Online Ads
    Highlight: What all consumer privacy folks have feared for the last 12 years. The tracking of user specific information and the performance and ongoing management of ad delivery based on user information.

    Analysis: Whether we like it or not, Google retains a lot of information about our searches connected to our profiles. This technology does what the original vision of DoubleClick was built on: user-level targeted ads.

    This announcement was easy to see coming.

  12. Re:Dumb question... why would anyone use this? by pasamio · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because some of us use more than one computer. Like on my desktop I use Epiphany for regular stuff and Firefox when I need to do web dev stuff. Then I have my Mac, which is Safari and Firefox (same rule, spend most of my time in Safari since I go to multiple networks). Then when I go to work I (funnily enough) work on items that are personally interesting (I love my job) so sometimes what I search at home is relevant at work and vice versa, some times what I research at work is relevant to things I want to play with at home. At work I use Firefox (usually on a Windows box and IE isn't really a web browser) and sometimes its useful when I search for something ages ago to see the date and time for the ones I went to long after its disappeared from my search history. As you can probably figure out, I've used it for months now and I don't have any issues with it. I use my home del'icio'us account as well at work, to be honest for the same reason (plus it makes my bookmarks more portable as well).

    --
    I always wondered where this setting was...
  13. Re:Because as we all know... by hpavc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its an awesome feature, by looking at the history its obvious what content I researching and what content I am interested in on a daily basis for work and play. I cannot wait until the next step where it can use this data to refine my actual searching using this, my gmail, and bookmarks ... or maybe a personalized 'news' portal, effectively like a digg.

    I am glad Google has the balls to be the one who is honest about having it and bold enough to display a tool for it.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  14. use scroogle scraper... by mark_osmd · · Score: 3, Informative

    When you're really worried about tracking from google, why not use scroogle scraper?: http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm Mark

  15. Re:Future Hauntings by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, it's going to be the videos you uploaded to YouTube (remember those videos?) That'll get you hosed....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  16. Did anyone actually check out this feature? by Creepyguywithastick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...Before getting all pissed off about privacy violation? Google has always logged your web history, the only thing really new about this is the fact that you can view it all from one page and, more importantly, you can choose to delete your entire history and pause it indefinitely. Explain to me how adding this is a bad thing.

    1. Re:Did anyone actually check out this feature? by KixAre4Kids · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the user-facing web history has nothing to do with the internal data Google is keeping about your searches. The internal data has much more detail: where you were coming from when you did the search, which ads and links they showed you in the results, which you click on (and which you *didn't*), whether you came back later for more. All of this and more! And believe me they do *not* delete it when you delete your web history, or cookies.

      It is the cost to you of having access to so powerful a tool. Whether it's a good deal or not I would not presume to judge. But you should definitely be fully apprised of the cost.

  17. Re:DoubleClick = eViL by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Faulty logic. By that reasoning, Australia is full of criminals, because that's how it was years ago when the British Empire dumped them there. When the United States and it's manifest destiny started moving out to absorb the 'Wild West,' that was just the beginning of the end for civilization, because you have to average the levels of civilization, rather than accept that the acquirer will adjust the acquiree to be more like itself. What I see from this deal is a probable decrease in the number of flashing banner ads I see when I'm browsing on a less filtered machine.

    --
    I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  18. Re:Is it wrong of me to actually like this service by sirkha · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its all the 13 year olds searching for porn that don't want their parents to find out.

  19. at least they are open about it by nanosquid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are probably half a dozen institutions collecting this kind of data about you: your ISP, a couple of federal and state agencies, several advertising networks, etc. At least Google is open about it and you can have a look at the data.

  20. TrackMeNot by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another reason to get the TrackMeNot Firefox extension, which performs random Google queries constantly in the background. It frustrates attempts at identifying a user through search term frequency analysis.

    1. Re:TrackMeNot by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also suggest FoxyProxy and Tor for Google searches.

      Though the problem is sometimes you connect to german or chinese google site and your results are skewed in the native language. However, reading Google ads for strange strange things is priceless.

  21. use a proxy by talledega500 · · Score: 2, Informative

    heres an easy to use one.

    http://www.mysecureisp.com/