Slashdot Mirror


Time Warner Customers Get Free Wi-Fi Hotspots

Hotspots writes with a link to a BusinessWeek article discussing a new service that Time Warner Cable is offering to its customers. Flying in the face of most business decisions about Wi-Fi availability, Time Cable customers will soon be able to turn their connections into public wireless hotspots. This privilege comes as Time Warner inks a deal with the Spanish startup Fon, which is already operating a similar deal with ISPs in Europe. "For Time Warner Cable, which has 6.6 million broadband subscribers, the move could help protect the company from an exodus as free or cheap municipal wireless becomes more readily available. Fon was founded in Spain in 2005 on the premise that people shouldn't have to pay twice -- once at home, then again in a coffee shop -- for Internet access. At first, the company offered software that let members, called Foneros, turn Wi-Fi routers into shared access points, but it took hours to get up and running."

27 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthless by VorlonFog · · Score: 5, Informative

    They couldn't maintain a cable internet connection at my house much longer than 30 to 45 days before some contractor screwed up the line amplifiers in the neighborhood, or a squirrel gnawed through their cables. Then, after waiting twenty minutes on hold listening to sales pitches for their digital phone and security monitoring, I get told it will be two to three days before someone can come out to look at the problem. Good freakin' luck.

  2. let the phishing begin! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    She said ISPs should embrace Fon because the routers, which require that "aliens" enter a valid credit card number before getting online, put a sharp stop to the leeching.

    Moves like this really don't seem to help the public in terms of security education, IMHO...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  3. But...??? by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about yesterday's news that "Open WAP = Probable Cause?"?

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/23/14 31211

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:But...??? by larkost · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are not proposing an open connection, but rather a closed one where everyone who is a Time Warner customer would have a login that would work on every participating hotspot. Logins and sessions would be tracked, so they would always know what login was associated with what IP for a given time. This takes care of the legal problems (unless people share their passwords), but does open up some privacy ones as this would allow Time Warner to have a mountain of data about when people are on the internet (not necessarily where they go, but when and where they connected).

  4. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by ticklemestalin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time Warner subscribes to holistic IT. Why risk invasive repairs when incense and herbs are so much safer?

  5. Why would a home broadband customer by spamking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    want to turn their connection into a free wireless hot-spot?

    You pay for a 1-4 MB connection and have the potential to share it with 20-30 of your closest friends or what? Wouldn't be worth it in my opinion unless you're a business or something and just want to attract customers.

    1. Re:Why would a home broadband customer by RealSurreal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Two reasons. One, you get free access to all other Fon wireless APs around the world. Two, you can instead opt to receive part of the revenue your hotspot generates and forego the free access elsewhere.

      That's the theory. In practice, I don't see hotspots in any locations I might want to get access from (because they're nearly all residential and I use wifi hotspots on business) and, for the same reason, I can't see a residential hotspot generating much revenue.

    2. Re:Why would a home broadband customer by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article isn't too clear on this, but if you go to Fon's site at http://www.fon.com/, you'll see that Fon defines three user types:

      Aliens - Non-FON users who pay for access at FON access points belonging to either of the following groups.
      Linuses - FON users who do not receive any monetary compensation (other than a majorly discounted router), but get free access to any FON access point owned by a Linus or Bill
      Bills - FON users who get 50% of the proceeds from aliens using their access point. They don't get free access to other FON APs owned by Bills or Linuses.

      So if you live in the middle of nowhere, it makes lots of sense to become a Linus. Your AP will almost never be used by others (and if it is, you can restrict their bandwidth to a reasonably large degree), but you get free access to any other FON APs when you're on the road.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Why would a home broadband customer by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Funny

      well if you are a Linus then you are just into sharing if you are a Bill then you get a 50% cut of the take on any day passes sold from your spot
      (and of course if you link out to some other pay site then....)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    4. Re:Why would a home broadband customer by sacrilicious · · Score: 3, Funny
      Linuses

      ... should be "Lini". :)

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    5. Re:Why would a home broadband customer by RealSurreal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's GNU/Lini actually.

  6. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by djdavetrouble · · Score: 3, Funny

    yes, I have TWC in NYC and it SUX.
    My verizon dsl was so much better,
    but they won't wire my new apt.
    something about the neighbor's
    backyard and pitbulls were a few of
    the obstacles they mentioned.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  7. Huge implications by jarich · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Two things spring to mind... first, RR will leap forward to be the most popular ISP everywhere this is offered.

    Second, no-one can sue you if they can't prove you were downloading the movie... if you've got a public WiFi, it could've been anyone, right?

    1. Re:Huge implications by netscan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would suppose that you would be able to claim the same protections that ISPs if you are found not to be responsible for the illegal activity, it still would not protect you from an actual visit from the 5-0. Anything they find in your home/PC would still be fair game

    2. Re:Huge implications by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Inside the Time Warner group RR is Road Runner (yes btw that Road Runner) this would be the name for timewarner cable internet service
      the reverse dns for a Road Runner customer should look like cpe-#ip address#.#region#.res.rr.com
      this breaks down to
      cpe= Customer Premises Equipment
      ip address = what do you think?? you do belong on Slashdot right??
      region = "which" timewarner
      res =residential service
      rr.com = primary domain

      (oh btw triad ips seem to be more or less static)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  8. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Roadrunner works GREAT for me. I couldn't be happier.

    Obviously, some people have better luck than others. I am a very happy RR customer and look forward to using these hotspots as they come online.

  9. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 4, Funny

    How can TW be responsible for some third party physically damaging cables (s)he had no right to touch?
    I distinctly remember telling them to either bury them under the ground or put them them up on poles and that, while it might sound like a compromise, just running them along the gutter wasn't a smart move.
    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  10. La Fonera Routers by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    La Fonera routers are great: They sent me mine for free, and then I reflashed it with DD-WRT. It's a real piece of crap, but I can't complain about getting a free router :-)

  11. Re:"Free" wifi hotsputs, huh by Inexile2002 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, you are missing something.

    You maintain a hotspot (with two SSIDs, one with a 10 digit WEP key, the other open) and let people access your hotspot over the open SSID. In turn, you either get half the revenue generated on your hotspot, or you get free access to any other hotspot operated by FON. If you live in a high density area (near a Starbucks, big apartment etc) you can subsidize your hotspot, if you don't you get free wifi roaming. If you're not interested in either, don't get the router. It's not like Time Warner is going to force you to sign up.

    They charge $2 a day for access and don't have density in the US yet (they're bigger in Europe and Asia) but they seem to be growing. Personally, I've run across one FON hotspot when I actually needed one, and found two more when I didn't really need access or had a wired connection, but there's a Starbucks near my house (in Toronto) where the Chinese restaurant next door runs a FON access point. I've never been (don't like Starbucks coffee) but my friends use the FON signal all the time.

    Ultimately, what this means is that Time Warner is allowing (encouraging?) people to maintain open access points, and will update their terms of service to reflect this.

  12. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reliability is inversely proportional to competition. As competition increases, reliability decreases.

    Your astute economic analysis explains why after 70 years that Toyota, the horrendously unreliable competition to ultra-reliable GM, is now the world's top selling car manufacturer ...

    oh wait ...

  13. TW not first, see Speakeasy by eefsee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.speakeasy.net/ has allowed this for a long time. Their terms of use actually encourage sharing, and long before FON showed up, Speakeasy facilitated such sharing by finding ways for customers to earn revenue for it. One of the few surviving independent ISPs out there, I think Speakeasy deserves a lot of kudos for their policies. Of course, now that they are Best Buy we'll see how long it all lasts.

    FON is interesting for it's dual network access point. I'm running one right now (in Austria) and it does a fine job. It does seem to suffer a bit when both public and private networks are in use, though. It also "phones home" for regular updates that are outside my control. A few weeks ago one such update killed our ability to pick up Google Mail via SSL/POP. The fixed the bug within a couple weeks, but it is still odd to be running my network with an access point so totally out of my control.

  14. AT&T has had this for ages by Nexus7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    AT&T (nee SBC, nee Ameritech) DSL customers in Chicago (probably all IL) get access to all their wi-fi hotspots for a token $1 a month. You get pretty good tech support too, they'll patiently walk you through the login page, rest your password, etc. at 9 PM for $1 a month. Death Star maybe, but they do their homework.

  15. Re:"Free" wifi hotsputs, huh by Jaqenn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So wait,

    I pay Time Warner for bandwidth. Then I use Fonera's software so that I can give my bandwidth away to others. They pay Fonera a couple bucks for a day of access, and Fonera splits this price with Time Warner.

    Anything I'm missing here?
    My understanding is something like this: Aliens pay Fonera $X per day of access. Fonera used to take a Y% cut of the money, and give the rest to you for the use of your bandwidth. After this deal, Fonera will take a Y% cut, Time Warner will take another Z% cut, and you get the rest for the use of your bandwidth.

    That's a lot off the top, but if it's not worth it then don't sign up. I expect they will adjust their payouts until they get enough interest.

    The big change here is that Time Warner is getting a payout in return for removing a 'you are forbidden from reselling your bandwidth' clause from their terms of service.

    --
    You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
  16. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Welcome to the world of wired communications. Judging by your comment, it sounds like you've never had a dialup or DSL connection. While typical dialup problems were noise on the line, the world of DSL is (was) a fun one. I provisioned DSL circuits for a regional (Maine through virginia / East coast) ISP back in the late 90's. We would often spend months trying to get Covad/Northpoint/NAS to get Verizon to install circuits, only to learn that either the loop was too long, or that the line was poor quality and they wouldn't install a new one. Often, it'd be ridiculous things like Verizon installing the line at the wrong building, or wrong floor, or the tech was scared of a dog and didn't install it. Some people don't realize how good things have gotten lately since the cable companies have taken the bulk of broadband control.

  17. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by A+Cheese+Danish · · Score: 5, Informative

    I distinctly remember telling them to either bury them under the ground or put them them up on poles and that, while it might sound like a compromise, just running them along the gutter wasn't a smart move. I work for TWC's customer support, and to be honest, hanging the wire under the overhang is sometimes the only option we have for securing the cable so it's not laying on your front lawn.

    We have a large list of all the zones in our district, all with specific building codes and regulations that state what we can and cannot do with the cable. Some places actually ban us completely from burying any new wires or doing anything to repair them (as the construction/tearup of the ground would look unsightly), so the most that we're left to do is to try and neaten up the cable as best possible (though some city zones even forbid this. You don't want to be a customer living in those areas.)
    --
    Slashdot - Come for the creative thought, stay for the lesbians!
  18. New to the U.S., current business model for Europe by anticypher · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may be a new thing in the U.S., but it has been part of the multiplay packages going in all over Europe.

    ISPs who lease or just install a CPE box will have multiple WiFi SSIDs running. One for the client, the other advertising their network. So whenever a client roams and finds an access point with the name of their provider, they can use their login credentials and get their own internet connection. This second connection is completely separate from the client's connection, there is no shared IP address or bandwidth.

    I think there is a big gap in knowledge of how modern broadband works between those in the U.S. and those in Europe or the Far East. I'm seeing this more and more on american oriented sites like slashdot, "ignorance" is too strong a word, but certainly "lack of understanding" comes close. Internet technologies are pulling way ahead outside of the U.S., where the last mile has seen great advances in both business models and creative uses of technology. When the bandwidth of the last mile (between a head-end and the customer premises) gets sufficient to put multiple channels down the line, the client can get much, much more than just an internet connection. With fibre installations going in, the bandwidth can support multiple HD video channels, multiple internet connections, multiple voice channels, private VPN options, roaming, etc. A client can just choose which bandwidth package they want, e.g. Symmetric or Asymmetric, 10 Mbps or 100 Mbps or more. A handful of TV channels, or more than you could ever watch. VoIP calling plans, that are so cheap that calling most of Europe or North America is free for the first few thousand minutes.

    So one of the providers in the U.S. had an executive who took a vacation in Europe, saw the amazing new multiplay boxes, and decided it was a good idea to beat their few oligarchic non-rivals to the punch. I'm glad it's News for Nerds in the U.S., things are looking up over there.

    the AC

    this post needs some emoticons for slight amounts of sarcasm, some humour, and kind of a tsk-tsk sideways look indicating a mix of sympathy and pity, good luck finding /. moderations for that

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  19. Re:With their reliability, TWC hotspots are worthl by PHPfanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, GP looks pretty damn incensed ...

    --
    29 mpg. YMMV.