Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Responds to EU With Another Question
An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft has responded to the latest round of EU requests by asking how much the EU thinks they should charge for Windows Server Protocols. The EU has stated the Microsoft should charge based on 'innovation, not patentability' and that they have 'examined 160 Microsoft claims to patented technologies' concluding 'only four may only deserve to claim a limited degree of innovation.' The EU is also starting to discuss structural remedies as opposed to the behavioral remedies they are currently enforcing. At what point has/will the EU overstepped its bounds?"
A: Is it really necessary that every Slashdot summary ends with a very polarizing question?
Nope. That it end with a stupid question is neccessary. The stupid question may
or may not be polarizing.
Would everybody please stop answering questions with other questions?
Nuffsaid
________
Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
What would you prefer we respond with?
Something rhetorical?
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
You mean like a rhetorical question?
Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
What is a rhetorical question?
What do you think one is?
"I Know You Are But What Am I?"
Are we using the EU definition of a rhetorical question or the Slashdot Natalie Portman definition of a rhetorical question?
-
Would it not be a good idea to keep doing this to see if we can break Slashdot? How many levels deep can we go?
:P
iqu