Slashdot Mirror


Long Block Data Standard Finalized

An anonymous reader writes "IDEMA has finally released the LBD (Long Block Data) standard. This standard, in work since 2000, increases the length of the data blocks of each sector from 512 bytes to 4,096 bytes. This is an update that has been requested for some time by the hard-drive industry and the development of new drives will start immediately. The new standard offers many advantages — improved reliability and higher transfer rates are the two most obvious. While some manufacturers say the reliability may increase as much as tenfold, the degree of performance improvement to be expected is a bit more elusive. Overall improvements include shorter time to format and more efficient data transfers due to smaller overhead per block during read and write operations."

12 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Oh noes! by RingDev · · Score: 1, Funny

    All of my 400b files are now going to take up 10 times as much space!!!

    Heh, glad to see this is finally going through!

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  2. Thats a lot a bits by rambag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah why 4092 bytes? Why not 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 bytes? It seems to me to be the best option

  3. Re:Sounds like a good idea to me. by garett_spencley · · Score: 2, Funny

    NOTHING is 512 bytes anymore

    Unless you've got a powerful fetish for ASCII pr0n

  4. Re:Why 4096? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    yeah, sure. Give a logical AND knowledgable answer.
    Way to ruin the curve.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. What about the MBR? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trying to fit an entire virus into 512 bytes was always a challenge.. but 4096 bytes? That's too easy!

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  6. Plan for the future! by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

    These kinds of incremental standards are simply not forward-looking! I propose that the data block size be set to a minimum of 2^32 bytes.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. Well you're already wasting your disk space.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if you have Windows loaded.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  8. Longer != Better by snoyberg · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have to disagree with the whole premise here. I know that people always say that longer is better when it comes to hard drives, but I've never had any reliability problems with my smaller one. Not only that, but I've had very fast transfer rates under all sorts of strenuous loads.

    Wait, we're talking about storage devices? Never mind...

    --
    Thank God for evolution.
  9. Re:Why 4096? by Afecks · · Score: 2, Funny

    It might reduce the number of pages, that's for sure

    You may be sure that it might but I'm unsure that it won't...

  10. Re:Discussed Since 2000? by HtR · · Score: 4, Funny

    Creating new standards takes time. After some searching, I found the minutes from their annual meetings since they started in 2000.

    2001 Chair: "How about we double it?" Vote: Nay

    2002 Chair: "How about we triple it?" Vote: Nay

    2003 Chair: "How about 4x?" Vote: Nay

    2004 Chair: "How about 5x?" Vote: Nay

    (minutes from intervening years were tragically lost)

    2007 Chair: "How's about 8x?" Vote: Yay

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  11. Slashdot Article in 2010 by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Funny

    Debian Finally Supports Long Block Data

  12. Re:Higher Reliability? by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Funny

    As for wasted space, that's under the filesystem's control, not the drive's.
    I use a raw device, you insensitive clod!
    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?