Slashdot Mirror


A Web-Head Retrospective

In honor of the new movie, 1up has a piece on the site looking at the history of Spider-Man games. While the recent Neversoft and Treyarch titles have been sublime, the deep past of the wall-crawler franchise is more than a little dodgey: "It's a hard point to argue -- early games like Acclaim's Maximum Carnage and Separation Anxiety would just be forgettable Final Fight clones without the Spider-Man license, and most of the famed webslinger's other early games were fairly straightforward platformers with tacked-on Spidey abilities ... Early Spider-Man titles often tasked the webslinger with somewhat arbitrary tasks that seemed like tedious and mundane ways to string together an otherwise paper-thin plot. In Spider Man/X-Men: Arcade's Revenge, Spidey spent a lot of time running through mazes and searching for bombs, and The Amazing Spider-Man vs. The Kingpin had him almost aimlessly hunting down his foes hoping to get keys to a bomb. These games failed to make use of one of the things that draws so many to Spider-Man's adventures in the first place: the story."

3 of 27 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Spiderman has sucked plenty of times before by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I swear to God, he ACTUALLY says "I'LL GET YOU, SPIDERMAN!" and shakes his fist in the air at one point. Sad.

    Yeah, you'd never see such hackneyed dialogue in a comic book.
    --
    +0 Meh
  2. Re:Spiderman has sucked plenty of times before by ReverendLoki · · Score: 3, Insightful

    he ACTUALLY says "I'LL GET YOU, SPIDERMAN!" and shakes his fist in the air at one point. Sad.
    C'mon. To be fair, he's only pulling a direct quote from no less than 47 Spider-Man comics...
    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  3. Sublime? by CheechWizz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "While the recent Neversoft and Treyarch titles have been sublime"

    Sublime? While they werent the god awful schlock you'd expect from a licensed title, calling them sublime is a bit much don't you think?