Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

CNN To Release Debates Under Creative Commons

Posted by kdawson on from the coming-to-their-senses dept.

remove office writes "After calls from several prominent bloggers and a couple of presidential candidates, CNN has agreed to release the footage from its upcoming June presidential debates uncopyrighted. Senator Barack Obama was the first candidate to call for all presidential debates to be released under Creative Commons, with fellow Democratic hopeful John Edwards following shortly afterwards. CNN will be the first to do so with their June 3rd and 5th Democratic and Republican debates. MSNBC hosted the first presidential debates recently but refused to release them under Creative Commons, opting instead to post online only commercial-ridden clips in Windows Media format."

11 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Uncopyrighted... by 26199 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is of course quite different from a Creative Commons license. (Assuming by "uncopyrighted" they mean "into the public domain").

    Seems like a good idea, anyway. What's the point of having a debate if you don't let people debate the debate?

    (That was a rhetorical question, please don't comment on it).

    1. Re:Uncopyrighted... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seems like a good idea, anyway. What's the point of having a debate if you don't let people debate the debate?

      (That was a rhetorical question, please don't comment on it).
      What's the point of making a comment if you don't let people comment on it?
    2. Re:Uncopyrighted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the point of making a comment if you don't let people comment on it? What's the point of replying if you don't contribute to the discussion?

      oh wait...
  2. Re:On a closely related sidenote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no-where in the world where you are prohibited from disclaiming copyright on a work.

    Untrue. I've prohibited it in my house. If you want to disclaim copyright on a work then you can go someplace else and do it. My house, my rules.
  3. Re:Even worse than that... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    No! Not Proprietary! Anything but Proprietary! Ahh! It burns! It burns us!

    (Sorry but the enthusiasm with which you said that was a little much or at least that's how I read it :P)

    --
    There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  4. Re:Presidential debates by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think it's a stretch to call any of them presidential.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  5. Re:On a closely related sidenote: by essence · · Score: 3, Funny

    Untrue. I've prohibited it in my house. If you want to disclaim copyright on a work then you can go someplace else and do it. My house, my rules. Likewise, cannabis isn't illegal at my place.

    It's the sort of thinking we need to overthrow this system. Start thinking of ourselves as sovereign peoples, sovereign households - streets - communities.

  6. Re:On a closely related sidenote: by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool, good thing I've already claimed copyright on the bible in Sweden. I have to go call my lawyer now, a have a feeling I need to sue a TON of people.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  7. Let me be the first to say.... by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let the YouTube mashups begin!

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  8. Re:On a closely related sidenote: by Perey · · Score: 2, Funny

    all his belongings are belong to the state

    You are on the way to no public domain.

    What you say!!

    You have no chance to disclaim make your freedom.

  9. Re:On a closely related sidenote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So did your momma send you to you Auntie and your Uncle in Bel Air?