Slashdot Mirror


Disney Says, You WILL Watch the Ads

smooth wombat writes "ABC and ESPN, both owned by Disney, have struck a deal with cable operator Cox Communications to offer hit shows and football games on demand, but with the condition that Cox disable the fast-forward feature that allows viewers to skip ads. This is the first agreement of its kind. It only applies to Cox's video-on-demand service and will not affect viewers using DVRs to fast-forward through ads. The companies will also test technology that will place ads in shows based on ZIP Codes and geographic area, and 'freshen' the ads with new ones every few days."

14 of 456 comments (clear)

  1. Well, then by pak9rabid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even more reason to build a MythTV box..

    1. Re:Well, then by russ1337 · · Score: 5, Informative

      >>> ..for people who want a DVR and not an ongoing project...

      I'd say that traditionally you would have been correct. But I just built my second mythtv for the house (Dual core, Ubuntu 7.04, Mythtv 0.20). It took me less than a day, and most of that was just messing with stuff I didn't need to mess with. Last time, a year ago, it took about a week.

      The Ubunut7.04 recognizes the PVR-150 out out the box and has a full mythtv package in the repo's. It was a case of one click. No more IVTV rubbish and just follow the instructions to get your remote control working. All not that hard even for a noob like me.

      Haven't seen any TV ads for a couple of weeks now.... Unlike Cox cable users....

    2. Re:Well, then by russ1337 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you continue to insist on stealing our content, and engaging in piracy, we're left with no choice but to replace your computer with a DRM-enabled appliance. Please, let us know if our customer service department can be of further assistance ;-)
      Funny you say that. It was this very morning one of my colleagues called me a Pirate (Aarrr) just because I use Open Source software.

      I said "so to not be a pirate I have to use Windows?" His answer: "Yep, If you use free software you must be pirating something."
  2. DVRs are saved by Tivo by jandrese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason they haven't put these restrictions on the DVRs yet is that they have to compete with TiVo. Once the competition is gone and they've gotten the market sealed up again you can expect these sort of restrictions to start appearing on their own DVRs. MythTV boxes don't count either. It seems to me that the cable companies only embraced DVRs in an attempt to kill them off, I imagine if they manage to drive TiVo out of business then they'll go back to their old tricks.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  3. 20 minutes into the future... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > ...Its called an OFF button and I know how to use it.

    Janie Crane: "Edison... an off switch!"
    Metrocop: "She'll get years for that. Off switches are illegal!"

    - from Max Headroom, Episode 1.6, Blanks

  4. Not necessarily good by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a commercial producer, your goal is to get the attention of people and get them to remember your product. Because, well, that's what your customers pay for.

    So far, commercials aren't even seen as a nuisance by many. They are an often welcome interruption for various personal needs, from bathroom to fridge. When you overdo it, people get annoyed.

    And don't underestimate the negative effect of force. If you outright force people to watch an ad, they will connect no good feelings with it. So far, what makes people accept ads is that they enjoy the program around them and that they're in a generally good mood when they watch an ad. When they now pick up the remote and can't FF, they're pissed. And if this isn't carefully watched, the general mood when it comes to ads will be a very negative one. Not only on the "conscious" level, where people complain about ads, but also on the subconscious level.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Re:Customer says by CowTipperGore · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Unfortunately, most customers say "Are you ready for some football?!"

    The average American ranks cable (or satellite) TV and cell phone service up there with food and water. It will be a lonely boycott.

  6. hehe: try to parse this sentence from TFA by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The agreement could also provide broadcast networks a way to give viewers an alternative to the convenience offered by digital video recorders , without allowing them to avoid the ads, according to the report"

    Sorry what is being "given" to viewers here?
    -An alternative to convenience (i.e. annoyance)
    -"without allowing them to avoid" (i.e. "while forcing them...")

    Maybe I'm old-school, but usually giving things to one's customers is, um, phrased positively like e.g.
    "giving viewers quality programming *without wresting control of their devices from them

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:hehe: try to parse this sentence from TFA by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can see the new Star Trek now.

      Some dude: "Captain Nestle! The sensors are picking up unusual tachyon emissions on that uncharted planet, planet Ford Escape 8! Shall I set a course with our EA Sports warp drive?"

      Captain: "Make it so irresistable, like boating. For more information on boating, call 1-888-555-2104"

      [The USS Enterprise car rentals, shaped like a giant bottle of cool, refreshing 7-up, travels to the planet Ford Escape 8]

      Some dude:"Captain Nestle! Sensors by Calvin Klein are detecting enormous quantities of awesome! Ford Escape 8 is the best ever!"

      Captain:"This is great! Quickly! Call headquarters and buy stock in this planet using the money in my ING bank account, where I [pause] Save [pause] my money"

      It would be entertaining, but only if it wasn't serious.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  7. Re:Customer says by decipher_saint · · Score: 5, Informative
    IF Wikipedia is correct they own;

    Disney-ABC Television Group

    * U.S. Television Networks:
    o ABC, Inc
    + ABC Television Network
    # ABC Daytime
    # ABC Entertainment
    * Greengrass Productions
    * Victor Television Productions
    # ABC Kids
    # ABC News
    # ABC Owned & Operated Stations
    * WLS Chicago - Channel 7
    * WJRT Flint - Channel 12
    * KFSN Fresno - Channel 30
    * KTRK Houston - Channel 13
    * KABC Los Angeles - Channel 7
    * WABC New York - Channel 7
    * WPVI Philadelphia - Channel 6
    * WTVD Raleigh-Durham - Channel 11
    * KGO San Francisco - Channel 7
    * WTVG Toledo - Channel 13
    + ABC Radio (ABC Radio & ABC Radio Networks have been acquired by Citadel Broadcasting, the sale has not yet been completed)
    o Disney ABC Cable Networks
    + Disney Channel
    # Playhouse Disney
    + Toon Disney
    + Jetix
    + ABC Family - formerly Fox Family & The Family Channel
    # BVS Entertainment - formerly Saban Entertainment
    # Jetix Latin America
    # Jetix Europe (Disney 74%, public shareholders 26%)
    # SIP Animation (undisclosed minority stake)
    + SOAPnet
    * U.S. Cable Network Equity Holdings:
    o Lifetime Entertainment Services (joint venture between Disney (50%) and Hearst Corporation (50%))
    + Lifetime Television
    + Lifetime Movie Network
    + Lifetime Real Women
    o A

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  8. Not going to work by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The harder they try to control viewing habits, the harder people will work to thwart whatever system is put in place.

    Sometimes when I'm watching something on TIVO I'll forget I can zip through the commercials. I'm more prone to forget and watch the commercials if there are fewer of them and they're interesting. The really obnoxious ones will spur me to either mute the TV if it's live, FF on TIVO and go to great lengths to find an alternative if some company like Disney tries to make me watch. Not happening.

    I love the way advertisers treat viewing like a one-way street. You watch what we give you. Well, screw you, Disney. The local ads are the worst. There are several that get me diving for the mute button. Where if they were more informative and less obnoxious, it might make reaching for the remote more of an effort and I might not bother.

    But broadcasters thinking they can squeeze 20 minutes of commercials into 60 minutes of broadcast and advertisers thinking we'll calmly sit through whatever annoying crap they throw up there...yes, I'm looking at you, Oxyclean guy...they can kiss my butt.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Not going to work by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sometimes when I'm watching something on TIVO I'll forget I can zip through the commercials. I'm more prone to forget and watch the commercials if there are fewer of them and they're interesting.

      Well that's the funny thing, too. Since getting my DVR from my cable company, I've noticed that there are times when I actually stop fast forwarding, rewound, and watched an ad. Do you know why? Either the ad got my attention with something that was going on, or it was an ad for a product I might actually want.

      I think that bears repeating: "an ad for a product I might actually want." For the good of our cultural/socialogical sanity, the various groups in the advertising industry should be trying to find ways to deliver ads people are willing to watch without a fight, shielding consumers from ads that will only annoy the crap out of people. That was the whole idea of ads on television, after all-- to make the ads worth watching. Ads today are so fricken annoying, though, that it's usually not worth watching them anymore.

      And I'm not suggesting that the advertising industry damage themselves by showing restraint out of purely altruistic motivations. On the contrary, if they don't scale back and find ways to avoid annoying the crap out of people, we might just keep getting more inventive at blocking all ads all the time.

      Take the web as an example: A lot of people have become so annoyed with horrible pop-ups, pop-unders, complicated flash junk, etc., and the result is that we've developed extensions and plug-ins that block pretty much all advertising everywhere. If advertisers showed a little more restraint, ad-blocking might not be so common.

  9. Compulsory Viewing? by youthoftoday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I don't understand is, time after time, people think they HAVE to consume media.

    Just go outside! Enjoy the fresh air once in a while. I watch no TV (though there's one downstairs). Disney is probably doing people a favour.

    --
    -1 not first post
  10. TV? Why? by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    8+ months for me. When I moved, I deliberately did not have cable TV hooked up. Broadcast TV is pretty much pointless where I am. No TV? it's wonderful. There's too many other things to do than stare at the tube, and if I _am_ going to watch something it's deliberate, worthwhile, and ad-free: DVDs.

    When I _do_ happen to watch TV (somewhere else), all I can think is how lame it is.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?