Slashdot Mirror


NY Times To Data-Mine Its Visitors

pilsner.urquell points out a story in the Village Voice from a stockholders' meeting at the New York Times. It seems that the media giant is now eager to data-mine visitors to its Web properties. Of course anybody with a site who profits from advertising is likely to be doing something of the sort. It's just a bit surprising that the Times would use the words "data mining" out loud in public. From the article: "Barely a year after their reporters won a Pulitzer prize for exposing data mining of ordinary citizens by a government spy agency, New York Times officials had some exciting news for stockholders last week: The Times company plans to do its own data mining of ordinary citizens, in the name of online profits... [T]he problem with reading papers electronically is that they can also read you."

3 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. Data Mining and issue? by rodney+dill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not sure why there is such a concern over data mining. As long as the mining is done from public sources then I see no problem. If the mining is from medical records, government records that are sealed or presumed to be private, or some other protected database then is becomes an issue.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  2. Re:Obligatory?? by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow an insightful pithy first post. I suppose that since I assume all commerical sites, especially free one, are data mining me and selling me out in anyway they can I'm not worried by this. In fact I think it shows a lot of integrity by the NY times to announce their intentions ahead of time as it can only be bad PR.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  3. Garbage In, Garbage Out by LMacG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a login for the NYT. According to the information I provided, I'm a female born in 1901, living in ZIP code 90210.

    (For the record, at least one of those data points is incorrect).

    --
    Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious