Slashdot Mirror


Skynet Means More Bandwidth for British

pcnetworx1 writes "A new £3.6bn project to upgrade the space communications network for British forces including the Army, Royal Navy, and RAF has gone underway. The first craft, Skynet 5A was launched from Kourou in French Guiana on 11 March 2007. There will be a constellation of three satellites in total. This system is also not an exclusive project for the armed forces, it is actually outsourced to a company called Paradigm Secure Communications. They work with NATO, France, Germany, Canada, Portugal and the Netherlands. They are also seeking new business in the US, Australia, and the Middle East."

66 comments

  1. +10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 for being a boring topic. +10 for a perhaps unintentionally fantastic name.

    1. Re:+10 by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Not just a boring topic, but a topic that doesn't match the summary. They deal with the same event, perhaps, but I didn't see any mention in the summary of how skynet would increase bandwidth for the average Brit.

      --
      I love my sig.
    2. Re:+10 by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      The summary does match the topic, it is just the title which is slightly misleading. The first line of the summary reads "A new £3.6bn project to upgrade the space communications network for British forces ".

  2. Goatse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    1. Re:Goatse! by Briana83 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gross. Grow up and get some class.

    2. Re:Goatse! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Welcome to Internet! You have met Troll. Learn internets, ignore troll. He steal your goat!

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Goatse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the best backronym ever, though it kind of defeats the purpose of goatse.

    4. Re:Goatse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed at firstpost glory

    5. Re:Goatse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Grow up and get some class.

      Umm, the link was titled "Guy Opening Anus To Show Everyone", which you obviously clicked on. While he gets some class, maybe you could get some common-sense, which is after all part of growing up.
    6. Re:Goatse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least he was honest.

    7. Re:Goatse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that's gross, you haven't seen very much. Check out tubgirl. Or swap.avi. Or Guinea Pig. Or "Mr. Hands". Or trannys, like Buck Angel and Saige. Or furry art. Or shitting dicknipples. Or vore. Or mutilation. Or any of a number of pictures popular on the intertubes.

    8. Re:Goatse! by CommanderIsm · · Score: 1

      who makes this shit up? spend our money on something worthwhile - hospitals - schools - disabled - community projects - disadvantaged - anything but don't give it to the war criminals hiding in the military

    9. Re:Goatse! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Socialism all the way! woot! Lets STEAL FROM THE PEOPLE to GIVE TO THE PEOPLE! Yay! Because the people are too dumb to figure out a way to get their own health insurance or to educate their own children, lets steal their money to do it for them!

      Yay!



      Moron.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  3. New uses by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    The soldiers now can play Counter Strike really well with less lag!

    (No terminator jokes this time though, that was when it was launched a few weeks ago)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:New uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > --
      > Yes I make mistakes. Don't we all?

      $ make mistakes
      make: *** No rule to make target `mistakes'. Stop.

    2. Re:New uses by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      You just made a mistake.

    3. Re:New uses by smallfries · · Score: 1

      I think that the Register did them all when they noticed that we've bought a bunch of "Hunter Killer" drones that will be run by this "Skynet". New Labour, New Britain - doing the best we can to help Judgement Day along one death at a time...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    4. Re:New uses by redalien · · Score: 1

      make install, not war!

  4. Obligatory... by gamepro · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new bandwidth providing Terminators

  5. Let's start the cult of Skynet! by anss123 · · Score: 0, Troll

    And laugh in Microsoft's face!

  6. Skynet.. by Ramble · · Score: 4, Funny

    20.38: Skynet becomes aware

    20.39: Skynet gives more bandwidth

    20.40: ????

    20.41: Profit!

    --
    "Oh boy"
  7. Now we know why! by isotope23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we know why Skynet loses, the terminators were all searching for Bot-Pr0n!!

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    1. Re:Now we know why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hooray for hot one on one lesbian cyborg action!!!

  8. military project called skynet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... some jokes just write themselves...

  9. Skyyyyynet by wakaranai · · Score: 4, Funny

    1969: Series of UK military satellites called "Skynet" first launched

    1997: Skynet, a neural net-based artificial intelligence built by Cyberdyne Systems,
    brought online and given control over the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal

    2007: UK military ridiculed for choice of name for latest high-bandwidth series of "Skynet" satellites

    Time travel's a bitch..

  10. Oh sure by fishthegeek · · Score: 0, Troll

    they get more bandwidth... everyone knows that North America is the first place that will go with the missles fly. They're just going to use what North American ISPs won't need anymore.

    --
    load "$",8,1
  11. I predict... by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...90% of slashdotters are coming to this article to either make a terminator joke or to read other people's terminator jokes.

    1. Re:I predict... by hclyff · · Score: 5, Funny

      While 8% are coming to complain about people making terminator jokes or to read about said complaining. Remaining 2% are those who genuinely thought the article is dealing with Terminator.

    2. Re:I predict... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      I will freely admit that when I saw the headline I was quite eager to click and read terminator references...or post one myself if not every possible angle had not already been exhausted!

    3. Re:I predict... by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      I actually can't believe the top tags right now consist of "communications, hardware, space," I would have expected "terminator, connor, ill_be_back..." or others to that effect. Honestly, maybe I'm just a little ignorant, but I never knew there was a real-life Skynet, even though Wikipedia tell me the first rocket was launched in 1969. Ah well, [[generic terminator reference #4419]].

    4. Re:I predict... by Flamsmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been hitting F5 for ten minutes, and still not even a single good terminator joke. I'm disappointed, people.

      --
      copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
    5. Re:I predict... by yahooadam · · Score: 2, Funny

      90% of all statistics are made up on the spot, 80% of all people know that

    6. Re:I predict... by mlow82 · · Score: 1

      Can you freaks stop misspelling...oh wait, nevermind.

    7. Re:I predict... by epp_b · · Score: 1

      While 8% are coming to complain about people making terminator jokes or to read about said complaining. Remaining 2% are those who genuinely thought the article is dealing with Terminator.
      ...and the other 90%?
    8. Re:I predict... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please read this post: http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234505 &cid=19098787, you fucking moron. What can one expect from a Nugent quoter though?

    9. Re:I predict... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Your levity is good. It relieves tension and the fear of death.

    10. Re:I predict... by Donniedarkness · · Score: 0

      It wasn't? I'm confused...

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    11. Re:I predict... by dwarfsoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was Forfty Percent of all people know that about statistics?

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    12. Re:I predict... by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 1

      You are right. My first thought was, "I wonder if there are any good Terminator jokes." My second thought was, "I wonder if I can post a Terminator joke that hasn't already been mentioned."

  12. All this technology... by MrSteveSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    Skynet Means More Bandwidth for British...

    They are also seeking new business in the US, Australia and the Middle East.

    ...and yet Ahmed Connor still eludes them.
  13. Terminator's Accent Confirmed by weinrich · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm finally vindicated after all these years! Everyone kept claiming the Terminator's accept was Austrian, or some such rot, but I knew it was British.

    --
    Error: .sig not found, using /etc/passwd instead
  14. We can't let governments own space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before we allow governments to completely control space, we really, really need to liberate governments from the shackles of history. Read: we need the Metagovernment.

    Once they get control of space, humanity is locked into this ancient (prehistoric, really) form of tyranny forever.

    1. Re:We can't let governments own space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hallelujah!

      Terminator jokes aside, governmental control of space may just destroy us as a species. Or planet.

  15. Good moves by the West by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    It is very interesting to see this technology being used by several nations and across political spectra (free world, communist world..etc). Sure, China won't get it's satellite comm systems straight from the US, but I will bet you anything that western states allied against certain blocks of nations will direct limited amounts of tech into Chinese (and other) hands, through the French for example. The common tech may seem like an advantage to the enemy, but just think what could happen if all of China's ground coordination technology went offline during a major offensive against Vietnam, say. If I was a non-ally of the US of A, I would build my very own Skynet thank you very much.

    1. Re:Good moves by the West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just think what could happen if all of China's ground coordination technology went offline during a major offensive against Vietnam, say.

      Why is China always the hypothetical aggressor?

      For that matter, why is China's military always portrayed as stupid in said hypothetical scenarios?

    2. Re:Good moves by the West by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      You do realize that a lot of nations who disagree with western politics are infact developing their own space agencies, their own semiconductor industries, and are working their way to becoming technological world powers if they're not already considered political world powers.

      "Sure, China won't get it's satellite comm systems straight from the US, but I will bet you anything that western states allied against certain blocks of nations will direct limited amounts of tech into Chinese (and other) hands"

      Hints that you don't realize that that's what people are doing...

      3 countries have successfully put people into space: USA (Astronauts), Russia (Cosmonauts), and China (Tychonauts)

      It doesn't take as much effort to put a satellite into orbit as it takes to put a person up there.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    3. Re:Good moves by the West by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Because once the freedom-mating Muslims are all killed, China will be the next "bad guy". The public perceptions that will be needed at that time are being seeded now.

      --
      I hate printers.
  16. Open source space program?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm. Open source space program? I'd have to see it to believe it.

  17. Router in the Sky by thaig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The interesting part is that it's ip aware and is basically a big router in the sky. This is new-ish stuff. It has other cool tech but software people wouldn't be terribly interested in e.g. the snazzy electronically steerable antenna etc.

    It's a slight shame the Hollywood has given everyone unrealistic expectations of, among other things, the state of the art in military satellite systems. It's rather like the Stealth Fighter - an awesome achievement despite the fact that it was far from having the all-aspect stealth that it is generally portrayed to have. Another example would be those f***ng moronic films where someone breaks "128-bit encryption" in 60 seconds because he has a gun to his head (or whatever).

    The interesting part of it is that Satellites of the Skynet 4 era need teams of people to fly them and make constant adjustments to their orientation and orbit but that commercial satellite tech has become so good now that one person can fly many satellites and each satellite can manage itself for up to 28 days. I never knew how much effort it was until hearing this.

    --
    This is all just my personal opinion.
    1. Re:Router in the Sky by Randseed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another example would be those f***ng moronic films where someone breaks "128-bit encryption" in 60 seconds because he has a gun to his head (or whatever).
      But he was getting a blowjob from a hot blonde (albeit with fake tits) at the time for "motivation." You can't leave that out. It's the most important part here at Slashdot!
    2. Re:Router in the Sky by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
      The interesting part is that it's ip aware..

      That's only 2 steps away from self-aware, right?

      I know, I know...

    3. Re:Router in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One letter away from IQ aware. ;o)

    4. Re:Router in the Sky by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Another example would be those f***ng moronic films where someone breaks "128-bit encryption" in 60 seconds because he has a gun to his head (or whatever).

      I always thought it was ironic that any encryption Hollywood depends on like CSS or AACS seems to get broken so quickly. Maybe they think that it's supposed to be like that.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  18. Uzi 9mm by berenixium · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Feck it, I can't resist! Skynet's first self-aware thought: "Where in the world is Sarah Connor?"

  19. Paradigm Secure Communications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of a Dilbert strip.

    Anonymous meeting member: My project is a whole new paradigm.
    Dilbert: What's a paradigm?
    A: Heh-heh... "What's a paradigm"... funny.
    D: Seriously, what is it?
    A: You know... paradigm, paradigmish...
    A: As in, "this project is a paradigm."
    A: But enough about my project... tell us about your project.
    D: It's a paradigm.
    D (whispering to A): They bought it.
    Anonymous meeting member 2: My project is a paradigm too.

    I can scan it if anyone wants to see it.

    1. Re:Paradigm Secure Communications? by moranar · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    2. Re:Paradigm Secure Communications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn... pwned by GIS. Thanks.

  20. ICMP Warning by xquark · · Score: 1

    Remember to duck and cover when they come

    --
    Arash Partow's Philosophy: Be a person who knows what they don't know, and not a person who doesn't know.
  21. Uncharted territory by cheros · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're absolutely right - it's the ONE thing that makes that hacking different from the regular approach.

    Personally, I think this is a completely overlooked field (which is understandable as they're all under the table). I think we should immediately seek Congressional funding and investigate if being in physical symbiosis with an attractive member of the opposite sex improves crypto and code breaking performance (I'm using 'physical symbiosis' to indicate that such research shouldn't be limited to just one specific approach - be thorough).

    Who knows, Clinton may have simply been ahead of his time 8-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:Uncharted territory by Randseed · · Score: 1

      Who knows, Clinton may have simply been ahead of his time 8-).
      Well, he was definately a little a head of his time. ;)
  22. Grammar? by Karganeth · · Score: 1

    Skynet Means More Bandwidth for British

    What happened to grammar? If it was about Americans, would it read "Skynet Means More Bandwidth for American"? I wouldn't have a problem with it if it said "the British", but that is not the case. It just reads as though the last part of the sentence (which would have been 'forces') has been sliced off.

    1. Re:Grammar? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Well, in this case, "British" (unlike "American") is a plural noun. So it would actually be akin to "Skynet Means More Bandwidth for Americans." And while that is a little on the informal side, it is perfectly fine for a headline.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  23. WTF?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skynet actually EXISTS?!?!?!?! Yeah, it WOULD be built by the British...

  24. Isn't that the name... by __aammuz5019 · · Score: 1

    of the company that created the Treminator? Great name! ;-) smp