Realistically, the J1900 is powerful enough to handle any routing duties a small network will throw at it. VLANs, VPN encryption, packet inspection etc are all fine. The pfSense boards are filled with people using these units with multiple VPN tunnels and getting close to gigabit.
For a home router, unencrypted, running snort and a few other things but with the majority of traffic not VPN? It'll handle gigabit speeds without breaking a sweat.
They're not useful unless you leave your basement. Then things like airport flightboard feeds, using your phone's NFC as a tap and pay debit card, and providing users with remote support from any android device becomes useful.
Duct-taping some sheet metal to the F-35 is an optional extra, and Lockheed charge $10 billion for the tinfoil, and $12 billion for the duct tape application service contract.
When the US stops bombing countries on flimsy pretexts, stops biting chunks off its citizens' rights, stops using its covert services to interfere with the politics of other sovereign nations, THEN you can come and pontificate about China being a menace. Until then, however, if you want to see the biggest global menace, look no further than Washington DC.
Oppo phones are excellent. The R9 is a serious contended for Samsung Galaxy S series quality and build. And Huawei make more than a Nexus handset. Look at their range in the middle and low price brackets. Their low end phones look and feel like mid range Samsung phones. And ZTE? They're essentially unchallenged in the "bar of soap wifi hotspot" market.
I disagree. This article is about the inequality between college CEOs and their poverty stricken counterparts in broader industry. Poor CEOs who only make $177k per year will soon be rioting. When a person's livelihood and dignity is degraded to the point that they are only earning $177k per year, then it is entirely understandable that they would rebel against the system that oppresses them such.
If $300k puts you in the top 1%, the it's not the top 1% that matter. It's the guys who earn 9 figures that are the problem, they are the guys who run the endowments that pull the strings of these colleges.
Unfortunately I don't see them succeeding commercially. It's not possible to do fairly what your competitors do by cheating. How could they possibly match the prices per specs of the likes of Samsung but pay more for their inputs? Not possible without government intervention to level the playing field for companies who refuse to use the fruits of exploitation.
The point isn't that one gets into an exotic car and sees something different. I've been in a few card with strange controls for the handbrake, but they are obviously different with pull shafts or foot pedals and releases. This is a case where they made the operation completely different, while looking like a standard control. So someone gets in, looks around, thinks "yep this all looks familiar I can go now" and only finds out later that it is different. Even if they do know, the muscle memory associated with decades of having it work a certain way mean that unless you are paying close attention, it's easy to forget and do the old movement.
E.g., in my Dad's Volvo, I often start the wipers when going for the indicator. It's annoying, but after a few minutes of driving, my brain has adjusted and I'm OK with it. But I make that mistake a few times every time I drive that car, which is only a few times a year. Luckily, that mistake isn't something that can result in a dangerous situation. The worst is that turning on the indicator signal is delayed by a second or two, and I get laughed at by my Dad.
Key operational controls should either work the same, or look and feel completely different to ensure that users' muscle memory doesn't result in inadvertent operation.
So do you read the manual cover to cover every time you drive a friend's car or rental car which is a make and model that you've never driven before, just to be sure that all pedals, control sticks, steering wheel, and other parts function the same way?
I can tell you that I don't. When I get into a car, I look to check if it's manual or automatic, and that's the end of it. Occasionally the indicator and wiper controls may be switched, but that's about as different as I've ever seen. I'd probably make the same mistake. This gear shifter looks like a standard AT stick, but operates totally differently. They should have made it LOOK different too, to avoid these mishaps.
Besides, do you really want to live in a world where a car's basic operation is as capriciously different as the design of the controls on the stereo and heating/cooling system? I for one sure as hell do not, and you are inviting a world of pain by justifying what Jeep has done here.
So now it's the scientists who are manipulating journalists into sensationalizing the stories, rather than journalists being incentivized by their editorial managers who demand attention grabbing headlines?
Next you're going to blame scientists for manipulating species into extincting themselves in order to support their wild unbelievable hypotheses.
How is "enabled the mechanism by which security updates and patches are applied" considered "in their favour"?
Windows 10 is only a few months old. Nobody has even had enough time to get used to it to the point that change would be unwelcome. You're just being a negative Nancy.
As much as Slashdot is a guilty pleasure of mine, downloading the web page in 2 nanoseconds as opposed to 4 nanoseconds makes no difference, especially when the majority of the wait time is the rendering processing that occurs on the device.
How does an offline backup protect your research team from having their as-yet unpatented work-in-progress data stolen by a competitor who has cracked their teams' data links?
Problem is, shareholders rarely know what managers are likely to do or not to do. Managers' CVs don't usually contain evidence of their willingness to be dishonest.
Besides, blaming the shareholders for picking the wrong managers, but absolving the managers is pretty backwards. You punish the person who did the crime. Not someone that you think may have been in a position to help them avoid doing it.
Slashdot Mirror
It's x86-64 which, for RPi type cost and power consumption, would be a big deal.
This is just Intel's attempt to stave off the move to a less monopolized CPU architecture. Too late, though, the ARM future is coming for you.
Realistically, the J1900 is powerful enough to handle any routing duties a small network will throw at it. VLANs, VPN encryption, packet inspection etc are all fine. The pfSense boards are filled with people using these units with multiple VPN tunnels and getting close to gigabit.
For a home router, unencrypted, running snort and a few other things but with the majority of traffic not VPN? It'll handle gigabit speeds without breaking a sweat.
http://www.qotom.net/goods-129...
You're welcome.
This is what you want:
http://www.qotom.net/goods-129...
I have pfSense running on one of those and all I can say is TASTY.
They're not useful unless you leave your basement. Then things like airport flightboard feeds, using your phone's NFC as a tap and pay debit card, and providing users with remote support from any android device becomes useful.
Duct-taping some sheet metal to the F-35 is an optional extra, and Lockheed charge $10 billion for the tinfoil, and $12 billion for the duct tape application service contract.
When the US stops bombing countries on flimsy pretexts, stops biting chunks off its citizens' rights, stops using its covert services to interfere with the politics of other sovereign nations, THEN you can come and pontificate about China being a menace. Until then, however, if you want to see the biggest global menace, look no further than Washington DC.
Oppo phones are excellent. The R9 is a serious contended for Samsung Galaxy S series quality and build. And Huawei make more than a Nexus handset. Look at their range in the middle and low price brackets. Their low end phones look and feel like mid range Samsung phones. And ZTE? They're essentially unchallenged in the "bar of soap wifi hotspot" market.
Dismiss the Chinese at your peril.
I disagree. This article is about the inequality between college CEOs and their poverty stricken counterparts in broader industry. Poor CEOs who only make $177k per year will soon be rioting. When a person's livelihood and dignity is degraded to the point that they are only earning $177k per year, then it is entirely understandable that they would rebel against the system that oppresses them such.
If $300k puts you in the top 1%, the it's not the top 1% that matter. It's the guys who earn 9 figures that are the problem, they are the guys who run the endowments that pull the strings of these colleges.
Gah, "not already been lost". Too many negatives in one sentence.
Just because there are glaciers in the world remaining does not mean that many glaciers in the world have already been lost.
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/01/local/la-me-glaciers-20131002
Unfortunately I don't see them succeeding commercially. It's not possible to do fairly what your competitors do by cheating. How could they possibly match the prices per specs of the likes of Samsung but pay more for their inputs? Not possible without government intervention to level the playing field for companies who refuse to use the fruits of exploitation.
The point isn't that one gets into an exotic car and sees something different. I've been in a few card with strange controls for the handbrake, but they are obviously different with pull shafts or foot pedals and releases. This is a case where they made the operation completely different, while looking like a standard control. So someone gets in, looks around, thinks "yep this all looks familiar I can go now" and only finds out later that it is different. Even if they do know, the muscle memory associated with decades of having it work a certain way mean that unless you are paying close attention, it's easy to forget and do the old movement.
E.g., in my Dad's Volvo, I often start the wipers when going for the indicator. It's annoying, but after a few minutes of driving, my brain has adjusted and I'm OK with it. But I make that mistake a few times every time I drive that car, which is only a few times a year. Luckily, that mistake isn't something that can result in a dangerous situation. The worst is that turning on the indicator signal is delayed by a second or two, and I get laughed at by my Dad.
Key operational controls should either work the same, or look and feel completely different to ensure that users' muscle memory doesn't result in inadvertent operation.
So do you read the manual cover to cover every time you drive a friend's car or rental car which is a make and model that you've never driven before, just to be sure that all pedals, control sticks, steering wheel, and other parts function the same way?
I can tell you that I don't. When I get into a car, I look to check if it's manual or automatic, and that's the end of it. Occasionally the indicator and wiper controls may be switched, but that's about as different as I've ever seen. I'd probably make the same mistake. This gear shifter looks like a standard AT stick, but operates totally differently. They should have made it LOOK different too, to avoid these mishaps.
Besides, do you really want to live in a world where a car's basic operation is as capriciously different as the design of the controls on the stereo and heating/cooling system? I for one sure as hell do not, and you are inviting a world of pain by justifying what Jeep has done here.
So now it's the scientists who are manipulating journalists into sensationalizing the stories, rather than journalists being incentivized by their editorial managers who demand attention grabbing headlines?
Next you're going to blame scientists for manipulating species into extincting themselves in order to support their wild unbelievable hypotheses.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/8/26/9209949/windows-10-75-million-machines
I'll take a few of those failures, thanks.
How is "enabled the mechanism by which security updates and patches are applied" considered "in their favour"?
Windows 10 is only a few months old. Nobody has even had enough time to get used to it to the point that change would be unwelcome. You're just being a negative Nancy.
Shut up, Nancy.
No true fanboy would use Safari!
As much as Slashdot is a guilty pleasure of mine, downloading the web page in 2 nanoseconds as opposed to 4 nanoseconds makes no difference, especially when the majority of the wait time is the rendering processing that occurs on the device.
And now for what will actually happen:
A round of wrist slapping followed by executive bonuses for successfully dealing with the crisis.
Yes. I, too, wish I could consume my monthly cap in 2.4 seconds and then rack up a bill exceeding the GDP of Africa within minutes.
How does an offline backup protect your research team from having their as-yet unpatented work-in-progress data stolen by a competitor who has cracked their teams' data links?
Problem is, shareholders rarely know what managers are likely to do or not to do. Managers' CVs don't usually contain evidence of their willingness to be dishonest.
Besides, blaming the shareholders for picking the wrong managers, but absolving the managers is pretty backwards. You punish the person who did the crime. Not someone that you think may have been in a position to help them avoid doing it.