Slashdot Mirror


IBM and Sun Launch Intranet Metaverses

wjamesau writes "Sun and IBM have launched intranet metaverses designed for business and built to work behind their corporate firewalls, so their worldwide employees can use them to collaborate together. Most interesting to game developers, IBM (which also runs a private, no public access Second Life island as a development lab) created their intranet world from the 3D Torque engine from Garage Games. Will the metaverse actually be thousands of gated community metaverses?"

35 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. It is. by affliction · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the worst fucking idea ever.

    1. Re:It is. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't get it. This is the first step in IBM's plan fire 150,000 workers world-wide and then hire virtual people to the virtual work that they plan to charge at real prices. It's a brillant strategy!

    2. Re:It is. by schwaang · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually the Torque engine is a relic from Tribes 2. Everybody hold down your space bar to ski between cubicles!

  2. Try Croquet by MarkWatson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out http://www.opencroquet.org/index.php/Main_Page

    Open source and well funded, based on Squeak Smalltalk.

    1. Re:Try Croquet by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could have been worse I suppose.. you could have said it was based on LISP.

      Go read The End Of History And The Last Programming Language.

      Stop living in denial.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. Answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will the metaverse actually be thousands of gated community metaverses?

    No, that's just silly. A metaverse will be a single line of the first metapoem.

  4. Re:Sun and IBM? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

    They've leveraged forces to combine synergies to collaboratively multitask new paradigms for shitcanning their entire US work force.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  5. What an immense waste of time by spoco2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, why spend all that time building your altered reality avatar, the altered reality objects for demoing etc. (they show sun objects in one of the video demos)... why spend all that time navigating around a virtual world (which has to be built) and doing things in the virtual space when really you should be actually working?

    I work from home every couple of weeks, and really the biggest thing I would like is a live video link to the colleges I most often talk to, having to break from working to go into a virtual world to talk to colleges is just such crud.

    They show their 'virtual boardroom', which has video streams from other locations. Why bother with the virtual boardroom at all? What's wrong with just having video feeds?

    Urgh... this is almost doing something for doing something's sake, without actually considering how useful it really is.

    1. Re:What an immense waste of time by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "why spend all that time navigating around a virtual world (which has to be built) and doing things in the virtual space when really you should be actually working?"

      Why spend all that time navigating around the WWW (which has to be built) and doing things in the these websites when really you should be actually working?

      The problem is that a lot of people see the metaverse as a "Game". A better way to think of it is as the next extension of the web. You don't have a game client, you have a 3D browser.

      Webpages are not always fully interactive. But lets say if you turned up at a webpage and you saw three other people viewing it at the same time. You could chat to them, find out if they found something interesting or maybe they have a common field you need a question answered on.

      It is a bit silly to throw away as a waste of time at this stage.

      As for gated communities, that is kind of what we have now with the web and to be honest it is the only way I can see the metaverse surviving. The Second life model is horribly flawed imho.

  6. Re:wow... by radarsat1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    heheh... seriously though, I think something like Second Life will only really take off when an open-source, decentralized metaverse comes along. Though, even then... I dunno. VRML didn't really work out.

    But the idea of being able to visit rooms hosted on people's computers, and finding other rooms by walking through doors ("hyperlinks") might actually be interesting.. you walk through a door and are then in a room hosted on another server. Common protocol, running on whatever operating system. The problem with attempts like Second Life, and even with games like WoW, is that it depends on the company running it. If such a system could break off from the host and live a life without needing a central heartbeat to run it, it might have a chance to become a real part of the internet. However, until we find ways to interact with 3D environments that provide an actually useful user experience we probably won't be seeing it..

  7. Re:It is by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not really. They ARE going to play games on company time. At least this way the employer can sort of put a cap on it. ( And freeze your avatar when you are behind on a deadline )

  8. The Metaverse will be a lonely place. by rhs.coder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Will the metaverse actually be thousands of gated community metaverses?"

    I sure hope not. If the Stephensonian concept of a Metaverse were ever to take off in full cyberpunk force--VR goggles, gloves, and fiber lines in all glory--I sure don't want it to be a community of gated communities.

    The entire idea of a Metaverse embolized existentialist absurdity: the idea of an "unending avenue of lights," 24 hours a day, is supposed to suspend reality. We're supposed to make this irrational and, frankly, just have fun with it.

    For the thousands who don't work for IBM, Sun, or have some other connections, a gated Metaverse will be a bad place and waste of time. Not everyone (especially those who have few friends in real life) will have these connections. A Metaverse could be the perfect place to interact and meet others who want nothing else to do but relax and enjoy a little digital vice. This triumphs over EQ or WoW because you DON'T have a goal: it's not competitive and you can just relax.

    In short: a filfilling Metaverse could be a great place for the (bored/lonely/connectionless/antisocial). Making it a world of gated communities will only make it some fancy social party.

  9. Re:wow... by affliction · · Score: 2

    No, Second Life sucks because it's pointless. If you want to "collaborate" (awful word), call somebody on the phone. Send them an email. Write them a letter. Why do you need a poorly rendered world to get work done? You don't.

  10. Re:WTF? by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaverse

    I will use Google and Wikipedia before asking stupid questions.
    I will use Google and Wikipedia before asking stupid questions.
    I will use Google and Wikipedia before asking stupid questions.

  11. Re:It is by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And when it comes to layoff time, they can see who spends the most time online.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  12. Re:WTF? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Metaverses are an important paradigm in the post Web 2.0 era, taking advantage of the wisdom of crowds and allowing open sourcing of ideas. And furries can yiff in them too.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  13. Re:Sun and IBM? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sun doesn't work like that. The corporate culture is not one of zero sum economics. They don't think they have to conquer the market like an effective short french general to somehow "win". Their bread and butter is making new markets and serving customer needs better in existing markets.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  14. Re:metaverse??? by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Informative
    First time I heard it was in Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash. Worth a read.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  15. Re:Interesting. by mbook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's been a while since I read Snow Crash, but I think Hiro Protagonist spent most of his time in two "gated communities" -- the Black Sun (a private club) and Rife's HQ (heavy security to keep out the uninvited). Not much time spent in public spaces. Seems like you'd want both public and private spaces, just like in Real Life.

  16. We're Meta, They're Endo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those virtual worlds aren't "metaverses". "Meta" means "beyond", not "inside", which is "endo". If anything, real life is the metaverse of these endoverses.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  17. Re:Sun and IBM? by hutchike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sun and IBM are not collaborating on this. Sun is using its Darkstar gaming server to deliver Menlo Park 2.0. IBM is using a private island in Second Life. No connection - just a similar initiative.

    --
    Zen tips: Pay attention. Don't take it personally. Believe nothing.
  18. Re:How good is computer vision these days? by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    think.

    It's a big room. There's 20+ people in it. You're on the other side of the world. There is *no way* you are getting *any* information about the body language of the occupants of this room by controlling the web cam remotely. By the time you figure out who is talking you have less than a second to get the camera pointing at them. You can forget about facial expressions.

    What you need is some smarts in the camera to look at what you would look at, if you were there. Now, this would probably be so fuckin' annoying that it would also be useless.. and besides, the camera can move a hell of a lot faster than an observer of the stream could tolerate it moving (that's why security cameras pan so damn slowly, if they panned faster the people watching the stream would go nuts). So why not let the camera move as fast as it can, aggregate together all this data and present it to you in a way that you can control.

    Apart from the fact that it is a hell of a lot of research and development that is.. if/when the technology is invented for some profitable application, then maybe someone will slap it together on the weekend.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  19. Re:How good is computer vision these days? by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then I can collaborate with my co-workers on the other side of the world at the weekly meeting with more to go on than just their voice over the speaker phone.

    Or you could use any of the existing videoconferencing hardware/software and actually see their real faces. Sure, that's not quite as cool, but I bet it's several times more productive and it already exists.

  20. As Intel wipes the sweat off its collective brow.. by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Finally, a reason to keep buying more powerful processors. Even if much is offloaded to the graphics board, all the intermeshed video, real time gesture and what the heck else will all be good for the bottom line if a metaverse is required for business. They've been salivating about this for years. No more having to fund music startups and whoever else comes up with a product that requires serious processing (had a friend who got investment from them for such a purpose).


    Torque sounds neat but extremely expensive. Just how much did IBM spend on liscensing it and how much to upgrade hardware to support it? And is it that good? They could also have invested in becoming the top sponsor of croquet too, though it seems to require significant resources. (in terms of max. people in a room, and also how well it works on different pcs - I've had it crash mainly due to a gl bug I think or fail to run on a number of machines).

  21. Well by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now we now Sun has totally lost it.

    But wait, no, if they can make all our development and design tools run INSIDE their 3D world, on virtual computers, and make their workers use the virtual computers to work, then we know they lost it.

    Seeing from what we have here though, I wouldn't be surprised if they're already working on it.

  22. "Collaborate together" by NetCow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... as opposed to collaborating apart, I assume?

  23. No, no, and no. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Throwing out a guess: I'm guessing that croquet is slower than torque, given that croquet is written in Squeak, and I can't get Squeak to run on my 64-bit machine, haven't even considered trying dual-core. Guessing (again) that Torque is written in something like C++ or C#, and thus, will be able to do both of these things -- and it's probably easier to port a game engine than an entire language.

    Also, Second Life is not what you should be using to measure how much horsepower this takes. Pretty much anything that can do compositing (Vista, Beryl, or OSX), and probably a few things that can't, are capable of playing World of Warcraft. Worst case, you'll have to turn some settings down.

    Consider, also, that most offices tend to have standardized hardware that they upgrade every now and then anyway, and I'd say it should be easily possible to have some sort of "virtual reality" going on. I'd argue further that the reason most people seem to think this takes hardware is because all attempts I have EVER seen at "virtual reality" that weren't directly tied with a commercial game (not a "game" like Second Life, but a GAME like Counter-Strike or WoW) simply had sucky 3D engines. Embarrassingly sucky ones.

    Let me put it this way: Take Half-life. The original. As in, released in '95, and can run at full quality at several hundred FPS on just about any computer since 2000. Now consider a mod for this game: Natural Selection. Now, NS does have somewhat higher graphical requirements -- it might lag slightly on a computer made it 2000, maybe. Run it on anything made in the last 3-5 years, and you'll be able to easily play games with teams of 25-30 people. And it takes at least two teams to make a game. And you're not just standing around a boardroom talking, you're using voice chat, a HUD, you're shooting, building stuff, gathering resources...

    Any 3D "virutal reality" app that is forcing a hardware upgrade is either sloppily written or overly detailed, probably both.

    But hell, we're in an age where ACT requires a gig of RAM to run comfortably. (Tell me again why Outlook/Kontact/Evolution isn't enough?)

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  24. (Trolling, please ignore) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's Google and Wikipedia?

  25. Similarity to Gibson and Stephenson's metaverse by lib3rtarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hi, I am a great cyber punk science fiction buff, and so, I'll take it upon myself to explain what the metaverse is. The metaverse is a 3D representation of reality that is fully networked. Instead of a website, you would have a block of real estate on "the street". It's essentially the internet with 3d goggles. The term metaverse was coined by Neil Stephenson in the book "Snow Crash". However, Stephenson's metaverse bears a striking similarity to :cyberspace" as coined by William Gibson in the book "Neuromancer". In response to the question, is the metaverse going to be thousands of gated communities, I would say, yes. If you read these two books, the metaverse/cyberspace was never an open place where everything is free and available to anyone with an avatar/net connection. Quite the contrary. The premise of Neuromancer is that cyberspace consists of corporate blocks that contain valuable information and data that is only available to a few (military, clans, etc). In the metaverse of Snow Crash, Stephenson clearly stipulates that only some people can access some places. Your home for example, people only can gain access to your "site" or real estate if you make it available to them. I guess an apt response to this question is, do you expect it to be? The internet is not totally free, and is in essence created of thousands of gates communities. That's one of the reason's that it works so well for both recreation and for business. Private communications, business transactions, pr0n sites, there are tons of legitimate arguments to be made for why communications systems like the internet/cyberspace/metaverse are made better by having these "gated communities".

  26. History of network development by Morrigu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe it's inevitable that the metaverse will start off as individual islands. Look at the history of computer networks - they started off as individual LANs, then people started bolting on wide-area connectivity through the phone network, and then after a great deal of work you get to something like ARPAnet circa 1977 with its disparate links to military, commercial and educational sites. And then it takes another 15 or 20 years to get to the point where an average PC user can easily get connected and Do Something Useful on the Internet.

    Since the usefulness of networks is directly related to the number of users connected to them, it makes sense that eventually these isolated corporate worlds will set up interconnections, bridges, tunnels, whatever to let people wander back and forth. And eventually there will be public interfaces, and inter-world-networks.

    I see Sun + IBM's work on this and Second Life and World of Warcraft and all the other current worlds as something akin to old information services like CompuServe or GEnie or Delphi. Eventually they'll come to their senses and allow greater interconnectivity, and once the protocols get standardized, they'll end up selling different add-ons or levels of service or GUIs for your metaverse experience. WoW may be selling awesome fantasy-style avatars and Blizzard goodies for PvE/PvP games, and IBM may be selling four- or five-nines reliability and excellent customer service.

    Of course, I'll be 65 years old by then and will *still* get my butt kicked by random 13-year-olds in deathmatches. :)

    --
    "We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - Major Mike Shearer, UK
  27. Re:wow... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Send them an email

    I'm sure people said "We don't need email, just call them on the phone!".

    call somebody on the phone

    I'm sure people said "We don't need phones, just write them a letter!".

    Write them a letter

    I'm sure people said (gestured:)?) "We don't need to write letters, just stay in our hunter-gatherer band!"

    While I don't want to imply that Second Life is the next communication revolution, I do want you to notice the trend. Just because something exists that can accomplish roughly the same thing, doesn't mean it won't kick the other one's ass.

    It's called progress, buddy, and it's telescoping, whether you like it or not.

  28. Re:It is by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you've ever played Second Life, then you know that it's really a fancy chat room. IBM, and lots of other companies, run on Sametime (IBM's Lotus branded chat program, works pretty much like AIM or any other chat program).

    I'm not surprised that there's a new chat-room product built like Second Life. I just wonder if it meets the business requirements as well as or better than the chat program we already use.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  29. Re:wow... by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    seriously though, I think something like Second Life will only really take off when an open-source, decentralized metaverse comes along.
    I don't. From my (admittedly limited) experience as a commercial game designer, I believe that Second Life's primary two benefits are the open scripting (obvious) and the size of the player base (less so.) The game that got famous inside Second Life, called Tringo, is an excellent example. What Second Life brought to Tringo's author wasn't a scripting enviroment s/he couldn't have found in the past, nor a UI paradigm nor anything like that. What SL brought him/her was players, and an open decentralized metaverse won't have those.

    Think of it like retail. You can have all the stores you want, but for the most part, unless you're a destination store, people are gonna go to malls. Second Life is a huge mall. It has enormous foot traffic that stores like Bed Bath and Beyond could never, ever generate.

    Decentralization is small-scale poison. MUSHes and MUDs have existed (and been graphical and scriptable - one of the big VRML clients, Chaco Pueblo, was actually a MUSHing client) for 20 years, but none of them stuck, because their player bases were too small. Lots of them are still around, but they don't even have the population of a Perplex City, let alone a World of Warcraft.

    Centralization is the win here, not the other way around.
    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  30. Re:Responses show Slashdot no longer technical by skarphace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you don't understand how a 3D virtual world can extend internal communications way beyond the limits of mail, IM, webpages, etc, then you have no insight.
    Yet I don't see you trying to school us ignoramuses.

    Fact is, it's not really that great of an idea. It's noting like real life where you have limitless expressions, can write on white boards in front of them, assemble models, etc. Now if they pack that into the 'metaverse' engine, then maybe it could be useful.

    However, IM, Webpages, e-Mail, and phone, are superior for the majority of intraoffice communication. I need to have an answer to a question, I double click the person's name on Gaim and type my question. Two seconds later I have my answer. With a metaverse, I have to start up the program, login, try and find them somewhere in the place, then type my question anyway. And there's no way I'm going to run something so resource intensive while I'm not using it.

    Some of my gripes you can get by with better design of the system. However, even if you got all that right, you still need to give the users better machines to handle the 3d graphics and on top of that, work at the same time. OR a separate computer.

    Waste of money for something that probably would never increase productivity.
    --
    Bullish Machine Tzar
  31. The first metapoem by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something flashy
    Something dark
    Something hopeful
    Something deep.

    There you go. The first metapoem, in iambic verse. Written by Short Circuit.