Slashdot Mirror


How Bad Can Wi-fi Be?

An anonymous reader writes "Sunday night in the UK, the BBC broadcast an alarmist Panorama news programme that suggested wireless networking might be damaging our health. Their evidence? Well, they admitted there wasn't any, but they made liberal use of the word 'radiation', along with scary graphics of pulsating wifi base stations. They rounded-up a handful of worried scientists, but ignored the majority of those who believe wifi is perfectly harmless. Some quotes from the BBC News website companion piece: 'The radiation Wi-Fi emits is similar to that from mobile phone masts ... children's skulls are thinner and still forming and tests have shown they absorb more radiation than adults'. What's the science here? Can skulls really 'absorb' EM radiation? The wifi signal is in the same part of the EM spectrum as cellphones but it's not 'similar' to mobile phone masts, is it? Isn't a phone mast several hundred/thousand times stronger? Wasn't safety considered when they drew up the 802.11 specs?"

12 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Eek! by mibalzonya · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suggest aluminum foil hats.

    1. Re:Eek! by Shinmizu · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what the man wants you to think.

  2. Trade one for the other by Applekid · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if WiFi can give you cancer, what can a bunch of loose network cables strewn on the floor give you?

    It's not the flight I'm afraid of, it's the notebook's landing that's the dealbreaker.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  3. Re:Won't somebody please... by mario_grgic · · Score: 4, Funny

    give her cat cancer

    Is that when there's a cat growing out of her chest cancer?

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  4. To quote Lionel Hutz by DaveCar · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFS: Their evidence? Well, they admitted there wasn't any

    Well, Your Honor, we've plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence.

  5. Re:What crap. by cerberusss · · Score: 5, Funny

    their children are outside getting burnt without sunscreen.
    You think that's bad? The other day, I saw a kid browsing Slashdot in the library.

    *shivers*

    OMG SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHIIILDREN
    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  6. Re:Sounds familiar by asliarun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Consequently, all packets transmitted through WiFi will now need to have the text, "WiFi Kills".

  7. Re:WiFi is microwaves by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 5, Funny

    I stand corrected. I found out that my knowledge of the topic was totally wrong You must be new here. ;)

  8. Kill bit by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They got it all wrong. The problem isn't with WiFi, the problem is when the signal carries the kill bit, passing through your body and causing extreme cellular damage. That's why most of the time the studies show up nothing.

  9. Re:What crap. by tpholland · · Score: 5, Funny

    All day we're around Microwaves, XRays, High voltage lines, lights, televisions and Radio signals.

    Please stop, it's too horrible! The worst of it all is that my PC is as we speak radiating heat.

    That's the same kind of radiation that is used in conventional ovens!

    It can cook stuff to death!

  10. Re:What's the Science in This? by Tofystedeth · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's that sort of programming, and if they convince laypeople that more money needs to be spent on researching this than is really necessary it only does damage. No amount of funding is too much for the issue of finding black holes. I still have 17 socks and a car key unaccounted for.
    --
    "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
  11. Re:Won't somebody please... by Azathfeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    Friggin' fake news. I'm going to go strap a thousand wireless routers to their offices so that they all die of fake cancer.