Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Too Busy To Name Linux Patents?

bob_dinosaur writes "According to The Register, Microsoft's Patent Attorney Jim Markwith told the Open Source Business Conference that the reason they hadn't named the supposedly infringing patents was that it would be 'administratively impossible to keep up' with the list. 'According to Ramji, the executive tasked with the difficult job of straddling Microsoft's growing support for open source in server and tools, and aggressive and unpredictable statements from management on patents, made a jaw dropping attempt to explain away the Forbes article. "The reason we disclosed that, is because there was a request for transparency following the Novell deal Iast November. This was a response to that transparency," Ramji said. It was at that point the OSBC audience erupted.'" That transparency apparently extends to multiple levels. ZDNet is reporting that Novell will share the details of its agreement with Microsoft sometime in the near future.

15 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Headline is wrong by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me fix that for you:

    Microsoft Too Busy Backpedaling To Name Linux Patents?
  2. Contract details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, apparently not only did the customers not know the details of the contract but apparently neither did Microsoft. Fortunately Novell is being forthcoming and letting Microsoft know what they agreed to. Maybe we'll be next.

    " as ZDNet is reporting that Novell will share the details of its agreement with Microsoft"

  3. Vista & Word by Das+Auge · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's just that, when using the bloated Word with the equally bloated Vista, they're going to need a year or two to get the list completed.

  4. Better things to do... by Starteck81 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They must be too busy innovating and creating new patents. ;-)

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
  5. man cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    CAT(1)                          User Commands                          CAT(1)

    NAME
           cat - concatenate files and print on the standard output

    SYNOPSIS
           cat [OPTION] [FILE]...

    DESCRIPTION
           Concatenate FILE(s), or standard input, to standard output.

           -A, --show-all
                  equivalent to -vET

           -b, --number-nonblank
                  number nonblank output lines

           -e     equivalent to -vE

           -E, --show-ends
                  display $ at end of each line

           -n, --number
                  number all output lines

           -s, --squeeze-blank
                  never more than one single blank line

           -t     equivalent to -vT

           -T, --show-tabs
                  display TAB characters as ^I

           -u     (ignored)

           -v, --show-nonprinting
                  use ^ and M- notation, except for LFD and TAB

           --help display this help and exit

           --version
                  output version information and exit

           With no FILE, or when FILE is -, read standard input.

    AUTHOR
           Written by Torbjorn Granlund and Richard M. Stallman.

    REPORTING BUGS
           Report bugs to <bug-coreutils@gnu.org>.

  6. Re:Hwhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's kind of a Heisenberg thing: the more you know about which products are infringing the patents, the less you know about which patents are being infringed.

  7. Re:Administratively impossible? by Reverend528 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't list what isn't there.
    Sure I can:
    • Unicorns
    • Fairies
    • Leprechauns
    • Valid Software Patents
  8. Re:Administratively impossible? by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe it started like this:

    NOOOOoooobody expects the Ballmer Inquisition! Our chief weapon is patent nr 1,563,245...1,563,245 and 934,189...934,189 and 1,563,245.... Our two weapons are 934,189 and 1,563,245...and 2,100,003.... Our *three* weapons are patents nr 934,189, 1,563,245, and 2,100,003...and 2,100,004.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such patents as 934,189, 1,563,245.... I'll come in again.

  9. Poor Ramji by uradu · · Score: 4, Funny

    > [...] Ramji, the executive tasked with the difficult job of straddling
    > Microsoft's growing support for open source in server and tools,
    > and aggressive and unpredictable statements from management on patents [...]

    They should hire Tony Snow, he can do that on mere brain stem functionality.

  10. Re:Administratively impossible? by jstretch78 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its not suspicious at all, I do the same thing with the tasks assigned to me in the bug tracker.

  11. Hey, try this excuse! by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny

    My dog ate the patent list.


    That's actually more believable.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  12. Re:Administratively impossible? by CantStopDancing · · Score: 3, Funny

    And most geeks know the correct form would be select count(id) (select count(*) is slower, and your syntax is wrong)

    --
    I'm running a pirated copy of Linux.
  13. There is no spoon... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do not try and list the patents... that's impossible.
    Instead only try to realize the truth... There is no list.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  14. Re:Administratively impossible? by tzot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on, Frosty. Admit the truth: you work at Microsoft, and you're the one everyone expects the patent list from.

    --
    I speak England very best
  15. whats impossible is.. by segfault_0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Im sorry, its administratively impossible for me to keep track of all the bullshit coming out of Redmond.

    --

    I was crazy back when being crazy really meant something. (Charles Manson)