Slashdot Mirror


NASA To Release Landsat 7 Data On the Web

UAVThumper writes "The US Geological Survey homepage is featuring an article about the upcoming release of select Landsat 7 image data (on June 4) at glovis.usgs.gov or earthexplorer.usgs.gov. This is to be a pilot project for a larger effort called the Landsat Data Continuity Mission, whose end result looks like a version of Google Earth using Landsat data. Seven Landsat satellites were launched over a period of 27 years, the last in 1999. More on Landsat can be found here on Wikipedia or here at the official NASA Page."

15 of 56 comments (clear)

  1. Okay, but... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 4, Funny

    will it help me find my keys?

    1. Re:Okay, but... by rustalot42684 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but they might be useless because you touched them with your cellphone.

    2. Re:Okay, but... by edwardpickman · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Brain the size of a planet and you want me to help you find your keys"

  2. World wind by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmmm, by chance I installed NASA's "world wind" last night and it comes with LandSAT-7 overlays?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:World wind by jofer · · Score: 5, Informative

      The short answer is that what you're seeing in WorldWind (or what you're seeing in a color image, regardless) is only part of the data collected by the landsat satellites. The landsat satellites are multispectral sensors--they collect data over a broad range of the spectrum, not just visible light.

      The article doesn't specifically say, but it's referring to releasing the full multispectral images...

      3 band false color composites have been available free globally for quite awhile; here they're talking about releasing the full 7 band images. I would assume they'll have multiple date ranges for most locations, as well...

      Sites like the GLCF already have a lot of this data available, but this is an effort to get much more of it processed, georeferenced, and online.

      Or that's what I gather, anyway... Actually, I'm not quite sure why this is on slashdot. It's just a quick news relase about the project, and it's not really much in the way of news, either. Must be a slow day!

  3. Re:Space exploration is always a good thing by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's cool and everything, but these satellites are kinda watching in the wrong direction, you know... :)

  4. Re:Space exploration is always a good thing by pinkocommie · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the other way around, not space exploration but 'earth' imagery taken from space. It's a GIS thing not a space thing, just that NASA has the satellites that do the actual imaging. From Wikipedia - "The Landsat program is the longest running enterprise for acquisition of imagery of Earth from space"

  5. Wow! by jim_deane · · Score: 4, Interesting


    This is really fantastic! I've done some academic work in geospatial analysis, and finding good data is always the biggest challenge--especially on a tight budget.

    It won't always be perfectly aligned with the project objectives, but to have it easily available and pre-processed (ortho-rectified, with metadata) will help with many projects.

  6. Soviet Landsat by rustalot42684 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, satellite watches YOU!

    Er, wait a minute....

  7. Uh...World Wind? by 5of0 · · Score: 2

    Hmm, sounds a lot like NASA World Wind ( http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/ ) - Landsat7, 3D globe, free data. And hi-res ortho imagery to boot. So what am I supposed to be excited about that's new?

    --
    You all have Oo.o and Firefox, so get World Wind.
  8. Landsat data now inferior to, eg, Indian data by Jameson+Burt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even U.S. federal government agencies are ceasing use of Landsat,
    after using it for years.
    For example, in USDA (United States Department of Agriculture),
    Landsat images have become essentially unuseable.
    The Landsat satellite remaining has been producing alternate good data and striped data.
    The data has been very slow (less frequently produced) compared to some Indian data.

    The Indian satellite data has been far cheaper until now and more frequent, but must be ordered.
    So, eg, data on U.S. geographic sites on specific dates does not exist unless ordered.
    This is understandable when you realize how much disk space would be consumed
    and that Indian satellites make much more fequent passes than Landsat

    For almost half a century, the U.S. had a lead in space,
    almost solely from its efforts in the 1960's.
    On numerous fronts, this is no longer true.
    Indeed, it can no longer be true.

    The United States stocks its legislature with lawyers, not engineers.
    The President stocks its agencies heads largely with lawyers, not engineers.
    For example, the U.S. Federal Highway Administration was first headed in the 1890's by
    an engineer, and similarly reputable people until about 1976.
    That agency puts a picture of its heads and primary qualification on a wall.
    For a few decades now, that agency's heads have been outrages to technology.
    One head's picture puts his qualification as "football player".
    Then there are the many heads that are lawyers.
    Indeed, in the super agency, U.S. Department of Transportation,
    a few years ago lawyers came to line management positions,
    lawyers who thought so much of themselves that they actually demoted (including less salary)
    numerous engineers.
    After a few years, this egregious act was reversed,
    but that act merely reflects a great deal of what has become the U.S. Federal Government.
    For example, a sample of Federal Agencies' libraries reveals that
    its libraries (USGS, USDOT, USDA, ...) have received virtually no new books.
    Its as if the need for books in Federal Government ceased around 1980.
    At USDOT, one researcher sought a book that detailed regulations that it set for vehicles.
    That book was in a library, a locked room with no open hours.
    The telephone number on that library's door led to no-one with a key.
    Finally, someone was found with a key to the library,
    but the book, produced by USDOT no longer existed,
    and the only hope of a copy now lie in the hands of a contractor.

    The U.S. government once provided some good service.
    Its vast expenditures guaranteed that, amongst its enormous expenditures, something good
    would get produced.
    My impression is that the last quarter century has greatly reduced that amount of good
    coming out the the U.S. Federal Government.

    How can a government spending several trillion dollars a year,
    spend but about $25 billion on space technologies,
    and then manage to hobble even that?

    How can a nation that had engineering marvels,
    now produce but about 50,000 engineers a year.
    This is about the same number produced by the little country of South Korea.
    Japan, with less than half the U.S. population, produces twice as many engineers.
    India produces somewhere between 100,000 and 400,000 (according to one Indian entrepreneur)
    engineers. China produces several times more engineers than the U.S.
    A country does not advance using air-in-its-head; it advances using something more tangible.

    The U.S. is massive (in area, population, and resources), but has put itself on a diet.
    It's shedding engineers, scientists, and technology like Landsat.

    1. Re:Landsat data now inferior to, eg, Indian data by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

      A recent study ( http://www.issues.org/23.3/wadhwa.html ) done by the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University determined that the number of ACTUAL engineers produced by India, China, and the U.S. were comparable.

      The reason the Indian and Chinese numbers are so ridiculously inflated is that they boost their counts by considering everyone who does something even slightly technical, including things like small engine repair, to be an "engineer". Partially this is because of problems in translation -- the article mentions that the word "Engineer" doesn't translate well to Chinese, for example.

      In contrast, in the U.S. the title "engineer" is very specific and refers only to a few specializations that require an advanced degree -- in fact, most states require licensing (with very difficult tests) and several years of experience working under a P.E. (Professional Engineer) before a person can technically call himself one. Here we're not discussing "software engineers" but REAL engineers -- i.e. people who work with physical engineering, i.e. mechanical, civil, and electrical engineers.

      So relax about THAT at least. We produce just as many ACTUAL engineers as anyone else, even if we don't give them jobs when they graduate. :(

      As far as some of the other things you mentioned, well, what you're describing is the general state of civil service itself. The lawyers HAVE taken over, and they DO only respect other lawyers. As most Americans know (or at least suspect) our current federal government is a "great big pile of dumb" (in the words of a guy I used to work with).

      Things are better (somewhat) at the state level. Try New York; we've got our heads screwed on straight.

      --
      NO CARRIER
  9. People are missing the point here... by toby34a · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fact of the matter is that Landsat-7 data has been publicly available for free in some form in the past (e.g. NASA World Wind, etc.) However, this is in three-color overlays (good for people to look at, but of limited scientific value). There have been satellites where the data is freely available (such as MODIS or NOAA AVHRR), but at larger resolution (1 KM, usually.) The true power of the imager comes in dealing with the individual bands. These image datasets are at far finer resolution (30 m for visible, 60 m for thermal IR) and can tell us quite a bit about the land surface. With the free release of Landsat data, it will become possible to get a very high-resolution dataset of land surface types and processes that are not able to be resolved with either NOAA AVHRR and MODIS data. Within the scientific community, to create a global dataset using Landsat images took a lot of money- now, it'll be a lot easier. I'll be definitely downloading some of this- a 30m global vegetation product can be a lot more useful then a 1 KM vegetation product if your resolution on your simulation is very, very small. As a scientific dataset, Landsat has quite a few uses, and I applaud the free release, even if it is only selected data. As long as it is the FULL dataset (all seven bands), then I'll be happy.

    1. Re:People are missing the point here... by VirtualSquid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree about the individual bands being important.
      However, a great deal of LandSat _is_ available freely through GLCF ESDI (http://glcfapp.umiacs.umd.edu:8080/esdi/index.jsp ), with all its bands, and has been for years. So while most of the posters here aren't quite informed, their basic question is relevant: Why is NASA making this new website? I can imagine a few possible reasons.
      1. They want to do GLCF a favor by offloading their servers?
      2. Maybe they will offer more complete set of LandSat with different timestamps?
      3. Some political reason?
      -Ben

  10. Best Imagery . . . by Dausha · · Score: 2, Funny

    IMHO, Landsat 6 has the best resolution of any of its siblings; thanks to its ultra-low orbit.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.