Slashdot Mirror


Can a Blogroll Be Defamatory?

An anonymous reader clues us that the wildly litigious Canadian Wayne Crookes, who has been suing the Internet for defamation, has added Michael Geist to his hit list. Geist is a well-known Canadian law professor and blogger. His offense: linking on his blog to site that links to another site that contains material allegedly of a defamatory nature. (Others would characterize that material as historical facts about Crooks's tenure at the helm of the Canadian Green Party.)

8 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. keep on truckin' by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    An anonymous reader clues us that the wildly litigious Canadian Wayne Crookes, who has been suing the Internet for defamation

    Yeah, well, things have really gone down the tubes lately, if you know what I mean.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  2. Well of course it can be by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's made of paper after all!

    Oh wait, you asked if a Blogroll can be Defamatory.

    I thought you asked if a Bogroll can be Inflammatory.

  3. Linking to a site that links to a bad site = bad? by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

    Crap, I'd better take down my links to Google.

  4. Yipes! by naich · · Score: 2, Funny

    No-one link to http://google.com/ - they've got links to all sort of dodgy stuff on there.

  5. Re:Six degrees of separation by gbobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

    This friend of a friend says that if Wayne was a real litigous bastard he'd use a full six degrees of separation.

    So, he would sue Kevin Bacon?
    --
    Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  6. Re:Six degrees of separation by Romwell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why stop at six, maybe there's life out there...

  7. IANAL by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Funny
    I am not a lawyer, so before posting I consulted one. Here's what I have to say:


    Mr Crookes [removed to avoid potential liability], however [removed to avoid potential liability] and [removed to avoid potential liability]. So, in fact [removed to avoid potential liability] and to be honest [removed just in case].


    Have a nice day. DISCLAIMER: The author of this post does not guarantee that your day will be nice. Moreover, the author of this post is not responsible for any damages resulting in your trying to have a nice day.

  8. IANAW by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have a nice day. DISCLAIMER: The author of this post does not guarantee that your day will be nice. Moreover, the author of this post is not responsible for any damages resulting in your trying to have a nice day. As a woman, I find that remark offensive! Being "nice" is a servile attitude imposed by the patriarchal order! You won't get away with your misogynistic orders, I'll see you in court!
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...