Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Movie Camcording Addressed With Legislation

dottyslashdottydot writes "During Arnold Schwarzenegger's visit to Ottawa yesterday, it was confirmed that Prime Minister Stephen Harper will be introducing a bill to make camcording in movie theaters illegal in Canada. However, people are skeptical that this will make any difference in the amount of pirated movies available. Doug Frith, president of the Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association was quoted as saying, 'is really the first step — not only for the movie industry — where the government has shown it will seriously address the whole area of intellectual-property theft.'"

31 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. My comment to the CBC by davecb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the last major public study on movie piracy in 2003 [http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/drm03-tr.pdf], concluded that 77 percent of pirated movies actually come from industry insiders and movie reviewers, "camcording" is not something the Motion Picture Association of America should really be concerned with. I suspect we'll see an act making any copying of a DVD an indictable (criminal) offence rather than somthing one deals with in a lawsuit.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:My comment to the CBC by seaturnip · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyway, it seems preposterous to assume anything can be done about camcording: it can only have an effect if all attempted camcordings of a given movie are prevented. A single recording provides an infinite supply of pirated copies. This is even more hopeless than the War on Drugs.

    2. Re:My comment to the CBC by Applekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except the MPAA can't summon police forces to take care of inside jobs... that would be civil infractions that wouldn't immediately carry criminal charges (maybe they can peg fraud or something, but IANAL).

      If camming is made illegal in the letter of the law, however, now they don't have to do any work though their Intenal Affairs departments. Fighting whatever percentage of priacy that comes from cams can basically become outsourced to government.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:My comment to the CBC by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is even more hopeless than the War on Untaxed Drugs

      fixed.

    4. Re:My comment to the CBC by ajanp · · Score: 5, Funny

      But why look at problems within your own distribution system or try to address the larger concern of finding ways to secure the high quality DVD screeners that magically find their way to the interwebs when you can just as easily find that the real problem stems from those evil canadian bacon eating molsen drinking bastards.

      It amazes me that you've all apparently forgot those 2 magic words that should rule every aspect of both your personal and professional lives.

      BLAME CANADA!

      --
      File Deletion is Murder.
    5. Re:My comment to the CBC by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting


      To continue with this. What is next?

      Making it illegal to sell illegal drugs to an undercover officer wearing a bikini within 100 yards of a fire hydrant?

      My point is that copyright laws, and probably a few other ones, already makes camcording a movie illegal. Or at least the distribtion of it, which is what I would assume the law is designed to prevent.

      I'm not a fan of minutely specific laws because 99% of the time a more general law already makes the behavior illegal.

    6. Re:My comment to the CBC by sunwukong · · Score: 2, Funny

      If the hydrant suddenly burst open, showering all nearby bikini-clad officers, I'm sure they could sell enough tickets to make up for any revenue lost due to piracy.

  2. Seriously by saibot834 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd rather buy the movie than view it in camcorder quality (or not watch it at all).

    1. Re:Seriously by davecb · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's ok, the clean copy from a screener DVD or a quality film scanner will be along in a second (;-))

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    2. Re:Seriously by prelelat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats the thing most of what the scene calls good releases are not camra recordings, TS can sometimes be okay, but I think what hurts the industry more is the DVD releases that perviewers leak and such. I mean I love going to the movie, but if its not something I really really am excited about like the 300 or spider-man 3 or what ever and I can get a DVD release and watch it at home without the little kids yelling, I would prefer it.

      Thats why I rent and buy a lot of dvds and wait for video release. I don't think camera recordings hurt the industry as much as leaks in their own security. I doubt that this legistlature will effect much, and I don't think it matters too much to people in general. I think it is a slippery slope I hope they don't start writing up bills for pirated music and such like in the states. That would scare me, I know alot of people that use P2P networks up here in Canada. I don't do that kind of thing...

  3. Does this really matter? by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How big of a deal is this, really?

    I've always found captures of camcordered movies to be of crap quality. It has never stopped me from later buying the DVD, or from even going to the theater. From me, they've never lost a dime because of this.

    Well, okay. Once when in high school, when living in Europe, the only way we got to see some movies was camcorder rips of U.S. screens. There may be one or two that I never actually paid theater tickets for. This was back in the days of VHS and 300 bps modems.

    Still, considering the amount of money being made in theatrical releases, is this really a problem or just another smokescreen?

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Does this really matter? by deadsquid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a big deal because it's a first step to trying to bring Canadian copyright protections to a level the media companies are happy with. We have a set of laws that have a decent amount of balance between protecting the property rights holder and protecting the consumer. There's tremendous pressure from various interest groups to change our copyright laws to bring in things like provisions in the US DMCA without fair use guarantees. So while this by itself is a very small thing, it opens the door into a much bigger deal.

      --
      Idiot, n. A member of a large and powerful tribe whose influence in human affairs has always been dominant
    2. Re:Does this really matter? by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

      This was back in the days of VHS and 300 bps modems.


      Gee, Uncle Chill, it must have taken forever to transfer those divx/xvid'ed VHSes via a 300 bps modem!!! ;) Nobody's sure how long it would take, the TRS-80 hasn't finished encoding the video yet.

    3. Re:Does this really matter? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the big deal? I can tell you. If you only know the previews and ads and teasers, you might think it's a great movie.

      After you've seen the movie, in whatever crappy quality, you know that those 30 seconds of previews, ads and teasers actually were ALL the good parts of the movie. Are you gonna go watch it and pay for it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Bah. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Camcorder piracy is for those who don't have the technical expertise to commit proper piracy. ^_^

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  5. Re:Keep focusing on the camcorders by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes... Excellent... Keep focusing on the cams. They are the problem...

    *Jedi hand wave* These aren't the cams you are looking for...

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  6. Sigh.. by fadeaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to take this opportunuty to thank my American friends for allowing their corporate owned administration to spin so far out of control as to spill their misguided witch hunt into my country. Now not only will YOUR taxpayers money be wasted on chasing, prosecuting, and imprisoning IP "criminals", ours will too!

    I would also like to thank my own government for being such slack-jawed pansies and allowing the Governator to actually influence Canadian policy.

    I want to wretch.

  7. Interestingly enough .... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interestingly enough, the movie theatres here in Canada are already claiming it is illegal.

    When I went to Spiderman 3 the other week, they had a sign up in the lobby that said something like "for everyone's safety end enjoyment, we remind you that recoding devices are illegal".

    I was quite surprised by that, as I knew it wasn't yet in law.

    That, and I have no idea how my safety is affected by such things. Once again, the fear card gets played -- "OMG, we could all die if someone has a recording device".

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  8. How Hollywood Got the Movie Piracy Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This Youtube video - titled the Power of Lobbying: How Hollywood Got a Canadian Movie Piracy Bill in Under Six Months - pretty much says it all.

  9. Already illegal in the UK by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    well, you can be prosecuted if you're caught filming a movie in the cinema.

    What I've always wanted to do though is very obviously erect a camera with tripod in one of the aisles and then continuously tell people off for eating too loud / whispering / getting in the way of the shot.

    "Guys, will you keep it down! I'm trying to film this!"

    1. Re:Already illegal in the UK by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now you'd be due for faking a crime.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. They started doing that in Toronto.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I refuse to go to a movie theatre that searches people. I used to go 30-40 movies a year, I don't go at all anymore since they started this practice, and I've made sure they know exactly why I'm not attending.

  11. Great Solution by Baavgai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For, say, 1990. Seriously, what decade are these people living in?

    Pirated copies don't come from some idiot wielding a camcorder, they come digital copies usually leaked from within the industry itself. "Review copy" only means "my kid will be torrenting this in three hours, here it comes."

    And the minimum wage salary surf shining a flashlight on people fondling each other is now a also a policeman? If a guy holding an illegal recording device looks able enough to abuse a baby seal and isn't bothering anyone, what possible incentive does a theater have to confront them?

    This type of legislation is a cry for help on the part of the legislator. It's a sign they're so out of touch it's not even funny.

  12. Canada is a client state by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How big of a deal is this, really? Camcorders? Not big at all.

    A foreign cartel forcing a supposedly sovereign nation to change their law according to their whims, THAT is a big deal.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  13. We were already subjected to random search... by FreeKill · · Score: 5, Informative

    We were already subjected to random search at every movie these days. Check out this flyer that now hangs ever 2 feet and above every ticket counter at every theater I've been to lately:

    http://img161.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cineplexs earchconsentwr9.jpg

    This will do nothing more then make the big theater chains more afraid and implement more ridiculous policies that in the end only make non-pirates stop going !

  14. Wasn't this already illegal? by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Informative

    This should already have been illegal: it's copyright violation, right? Is this one of those redundant laws like it is illegal to sell illegal drugs to a minor, when selling illegal drugs is already illegal? Or it is illegal to commit a "hate" crime against someone of another race or ethnicity, but it is already illegal to commit a crime against anyone at all? More charges don't solve the problem.

  15. Never Happen. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Minority government.

    Election coming sooner rather than later.

    It will die on the order paper if it ever gets there.

  16. Can we PLEASE by Trevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop calling it "intellectual property theft"? It's copyright violation. "Property theft" implies stealing someone's tangible goods (or ideas) and passing it off as your own, which is clearly not what's going on here. It's an unauthorized reproduction (and possibly public display or sale) of an artistic work.

  17. I love minority gov'ts. Nothing gets done! by Valacosa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love minority governments. Nothing gets done, and thus nothing gets fucked up!

    All praise Canada's multi-party system!

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
  18. Finally! by JoeDuncan · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's about time. I mean seriously, who wants to download a movie only to find out it's a cam that some jerk posted?!?

    I say jail 'em all!

    That way we can be sure the movies we download are genuine DVD rips and not have to worry...

  19. Full text of the bill by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here is the full text of the bill:

    BILL C-59

    An Act to amend the Criminal Code (unauthorized recording of a movie) R.S., c. C-46

    Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:

    L.R., ch. C-46

    1. The Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after section 431.2:

    Unauthorized recording of a movie

    432. (1) A person who, without the consent of the theatre manager, records in a movie theatre a performance of a cinematographic work within the meaning of section 2 of the Copyright Act or its soundtrack
    (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years; or
    (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

    Unauthorized recording for purpose of sale, etc.
    (2) A person who, without the consent of the theatre manager, records in a movie theatre a performance of a cinematographic work within the meaning of section 2 of the Copyright Act or its soundtrack for the purpose of the sale, rental or other commercial distribution of a copy of the cinematographic work
    (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or
    (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

    Forfeiture

    (3) In addition to any punishment that is imposed on a person who is convicted of an offence under this section, the court may order that anything that is used in the commission of the offence be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province in which the proceedings are taken. Anything that is forfeited may be disposed of as the Attorney General directs.

    Forfeiture -- limitation
    (4) No order may be made under subsection (3) in respect of anything that is the property of a person who is not a party to the offence.

    Published under authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons