Slashdot Mirror


Boys with Longer Ring Fingers are Better at Math

slashthedot writes "While it is well known that boys have longer ring fingers as compared to index fingers, now some researchers say that the longer the ring finger ratio to index finger, the better boys are at math. In girls, the shorter the ring finger to index finger ratio, the better is their verbal skills. 'The link, according to the researchers, is that testosterone levels in the womb influence both finger length and brain development.'"

27 of 322 comments (clear)

  1. 2 girls for every boy by SPickett · · Score: 5, Funny

    The beach boys gave boys all the math they'll ever need. And, it isn't related to the index finger or ring finger, but rather to the finger in between.

    1. Re:2 girls for every boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      My middle finger is an inch longer than my index finger. What does that mean?
      That you're very bad with a fillet knife.
  2. Fantastic! by codesurfer · · Score: 5, Funny

    A little different that my usual pickup line, but what the heck!

  3. ATT: Mathbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a huge cock.

    Nature saw fit to bless some of us more than others, enjoy your prime numbers nerds!

    1. Re:ATT: Mathbots by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a huge cock.
      Nature saw fit to bless some of us more than others, enjoy your prime numbers nerds!


      Hi, I'm a prime number nerd [adjusts glasses]. Actually having a huge male sex organs could lead to great difficulty making sex with most women. It may not enter fully, and requires significantly more foreplay than average to average-big organs. Also statistics show that girls normally don't enjoy pushing their ovaries in their throat during sex.

      Therefore, I must conclude it's better to have long fingers, as they not only make you better at math, but better at playing piano. Both of which could lead to a better financial situation, and every nerd knows it's easy to score if you're rich, while it's much harder to score waving your wang around and pointing out how big it is.

    2. Re:ATT: Mathbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      my prime: 611111111113
      your prime: 6113

    3. Re:ATT: Mathbots by BakaHoushi · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the GP's defense, a woman won't try to kill you and take your wang afterwards... ...At least, not that I've ever heard of.

    4. Re:ATT: Mathbots by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hear that taking v1111111agra will do that.

    5. Re:ATT: Mathbots by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If rich wives don't really love their husband why is that?
      She's a dishonest prostitute. The man who wins is the one who doesn't marry and visits with honest prostitutes. Probably cheaper and more fun in the long run.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    6. Re:ATT: Mathbots by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      The type of men women want to fsck and the...

      Hold it right there. I have met a few women in the course of my (relatively long in terms of Slashdot readership) lifetime who are happy and generous enough to go in for a jolly fuck here and there.

      But I have never, NOT EVEN ONCE, found a lady whose ulterior motive was to check my filesystems.

      Which, I might add, suits me just fine.

  4. Obligatory innuendo by BakaHoushi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow, I doubt Freud's work would be as widely known if he had come up with "ring finger envy."

    In other news, men around the world replied to the findings with a cry of "Oh yeah? You should see my OTHER ratio." Women world around responded by placing their foreheads in their palms and sighing.

    1. Re:Obligatory innuendo by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually Freud's "penis envy" doesn't mean what you think it means, but we managed to attach the label to something else! Bonus points to Freud for a catchy name.

      It originally meant the supposed reaction of a girl when she finds out she does not have a penis. I don't see what the big fuss is, though, most girls get penises later on in their lives, if only part-time. Mod me interesting for starting this post with psychology and ending with porn!

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  5. but by Butisol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ratio of men to women in mathematically intensive disciplines is purely the result of patriarchy, glass ceilings, canes as thick as thumbs, the porn industry, and enculturation via pink dresses and My Little Pony dolls.

    Clearly, government must start an expensive program of Grrl Computer Camps to lower this ratio.

  6. Flaky? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, so they found a correlation. But it was a correlation they weren't looking for, correct? If I check for the existence of 20 different correlations with a 95% confidence interval, wouldn't I be likely to find one even if none exist? Somebody else would have to confirm this finding for me to give it any credence.

    1. Re:Flaky? by flynt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the 95% confidence level means you are allowing a 5% chance of finding a correlation where one doesn't actually exist. This is called a Type I error in hypothesis testing. If you do 20 tests, each with a 5% chance of a type I error, the expected number of times that you incorrectly reject the null hypothesis is 1.

  7. F1nger en1argemnt by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dissatisfied with your r1ng f1nger? We can help you...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:F1nger en1argemnt by StarfishOne · · Score: 3, Funny

      R1ng? Where?!? My preciousssss!

  8. Testosterone levels? by Wicko · · Score: 4, Funny

    In which way does this affect brain development? If more testosterone = better brain development, well, then sexism just raised by 50%.

    1. Re:Testosterone levels? by Shados · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Different brain development, not better brain development.

  9. Meh by Jethro · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only way to truly know these things is through phrenology.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  10. Verbal skills by uradu · · Score: 5, Funny

    > In girls, the shorter the ring finger to index finger ratio, the better is their verbal skills.

    Well, this obviously was written by a boy with an extremely long ring finger then.

  11. Finger length can predict ... by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 3, Interesting
  12. I'd say by saibot834 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The more fingers you have, the farther you can count.

  13. Re:ob. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But seriously. I'm not sure if this kind of research is ethically sound. Considering people could exploit this as a basic form of eugenics... how much more research like this should we be willing to tolerate? And what exactly was the goal of this study?

    Stopping research because people could conceivably use it for unethical purposes is a terrible idea. I'm no geneticist, but couldn't correlations we find like this help when we get deeper into genetic engineering by helping us isolate genes that produce a particular result?
  14. Re:ob. by Peyna · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The study itself can have merit. The problem is with people who take the study and seek to use it for other purposes.

    For example, a study like this could help explain why some people seem to be "better" at certain areas of study (not because they have longer ring fingers, or because they are a different skin color, but because of certain chemicals being present in certain amounts during development). In turn, such a discovery could potentially lead to a cure for dyslexia for example, or any other learning disabilities. At the same time, someone could try to take this research and say that it means we should not allow certain races to breed with each other.

    At what point does the power of a few idiots to use something for bad make it so that we ignore the potential benefits of research?

    --
    What?
  15. Re:Quick Question by Shados · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Humans are fairly interesting in how their social development probably has more impact on their abilities than their biological potential.

    In other words, the person with the best "brain" in the world could still end up as a druggy working at McD dropping out of school after failing, if they met the wrong people and made the wrong choices.

    In a similar way, I pick up maths lightyears faster than my girlfriend: except I gave up on applied maths after graduating, while she continued in that field: result, she's a lot better than me at it. My "body" is still better at maths than hers, but I'm not using it, thus the result. Simple as that.

  16. OTOH by ceeam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Boys extremely good in math tend to lack a ring on said finger.