Slashdot Mirror


Watching My Neighbors Watch On-Demand TV

Josh Levin, Slate Magazine writes "I have a magical box that allows me to watch other people watch TV — their movies, their sports, their cartoons, and their hour-long procedural dramas. And sometimes, usually around 11:30 on Friday nights, their soft-core pornography... I solved the mystery by consulting online message boards. At techie sites like AVS Forum, other voyeurs described their adventures in freeloading. I was intercepting video-on-demand channels through the power of my Samsung's QAM tuner."

10 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Bedtime is always softcore porn by raventh1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, between childrens tv shows and softcore porn there isn't much that interesting, except that when they watch the nudity scene in a movie and then replay it 5-8 times.

  2. Article is dubious by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny
    Author says

    My girlfriend suggested that I try plugging in the Comcast cable line.
    Only an imaginary geek 'girlfriend' would suggest something like this.
    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  3. Same with me... by BMonger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have the same thing going on with my TV. At first you think, "Wow! Free VOD!" but then you realize you have no clue when a show starts, no way to unpause if the real viewer gets a phone call or goes to the bathroom, and well... it's pointless. You end up flipping through a good 50 channels for hours having literally no clue what shows are on and no clue if that person will finish them.

    It sounds neat but it's rather boring and partially stinks since you have to manually program those channels out. I mentioned this happening when the cable guy stopped buy and he seemed pretty "meh" about it.

  4. I read it for the articles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Channels 97, 100, 115 seem to be the on-demand channels in my area.

    I was showing off the ability to intercept on-demand programming to some of my friends the other day and we happened to come across some of the softcore porn being fast forwarded through. Curious to see what they were fast forwarding to, we watched for a little bit... the person fast forwarded to a dialog interlude. Our curiosity piqued, we watched a little more and noticed that as soon as the actual intercourse portion of the movie started, they fast forwarded to the next scene that included dialog.

    Could we have found the only person in the world who reads playboy for the articles?

    1. Re:I read it for the articles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      well, the truth is, I've never had the patience to find out if a porn film actually had one.

      "Patience" may not be the word you're looking for

  5. Re:He's not watching his neighbors watch TV... by TobyRush · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article doesn't mention that he can watch anyone's TV except for this one TV he calls the "boogeyman." When he is watching that TV, it can watch him too.

    --
    Sam! If you will let me be,
    I will try them.
    You will see.
  6. Did you people learn nothing from the internet? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We you got something good, keep your yap shut.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Re:DMCA wins again by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does it need to be encrypted? he has no control over the show, the fast forwarding, the changing of channels. Pretty difficult way to watch TV.
    Plus it's not like you know WHO is watching it.

    Encrypting it costs them money, and doesn't give anybody any gain.

    He is not circumventing a protection, and I would be very interested to read the opinion of any lawyer who feels this is a violation of the DMCA.

    Yesh, there are a lot of stupid clients the tell their lawyers to send out notices, but they never seem to go anywhere.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Re:Plyboy has great articles by Tweekster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually playboy is great, if it werent for the naked pictures. If i want nudity i will get nudity, not airbrushed women that practically look like cartoons.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  9. Let's try this in geekier terms... by cyberwench · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think about things like slash and yaoi, which have been getting increasingly popular for women. They range from soft- to hard-core, and while a lot of them go for the emotional side of sex and relationships, there's no shortage of just straight sex. Ok, so "straight" is probably the wrong word. Or 'Queer as Folk' - huge female audience, and that's not because they identify with the single pair of lesbians. It's not guys writing all that Sparrow/Norrington or Aragorn/Faramir fiction out there.

    Frankly, as a woman my issue with actual porn in general is the same issue I have with movies in general. They're poorly made, the good ones are few and far-between. And frankly, if you're talking about limiting the misery, hardcore films at least have sex to break up the bad acting/lighting/costuming/etc. I'd have to disagree that hardcore sex is inherently violent - it's simply graphic. Maybe you're watching the wrong ones? =) Try looking for hardcore that is marketed to women... it tends to be better, all around. Especially if what you're wanting is something your wife/girlfriend/fling will watch with you.

    I suppose the point I really want to make is that women are very much like men in that they're individuals. If you think you're going to "understand" women like they are some sort of weird single organism, it's just not going to happen. Interest yourself in the individual and you're more than half there.

    --
    ~ Leilah