Slashdot Mirror


Is Videotaping the Police a Felony?

AtomicSnarl writes "When Carlisle, PA, police noticed their traffic stop was being videotaped, they arrested the fellow with the camera for felony wiretapping. From the story: 'Kelly is charged under a state law that bars the intentional interception or recording of anyone's oral conversation without their consent... An exception to the wiretapping law allows police to film people during traffic stops.. [An assistant DA] said case law is in flux as to whether police can expect not to be recorded while performing their duties.'"

10 of 622 comments (clear)

  1. What a Power Trip! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing that if it's illegal to take a picture of police than it's also illegal to film them.

    So, I guess if you want to videotape the police, you'd better declare yourself an independent journalist and hope the judge values our freedom of the press?

    This is both shocking & amazing on so many levels. I can think of several ways to look at this that make it hilariously backwards. The cops are on duty, their income is supplied by individuals like this man. As far as I'm aware, employers are allowed to videotape their employers.

    I've met good policemen and I've met pigs. These instances sound like a pig on a power trip. Illegal wiretapping, yeah right! It has a sound function so he's wiretapping? Everything just sounds so ridiculous. If it happens in public, it's public domain. This is just obvious abuse of those they are supposed to protect.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:What a Power Trip! by eriklou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. -- Thomas Jefferson

    2. Re:What a Power Trip! by AlterTick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I'm generally totally in favor of sticking it to the police, editing your clips pretty much removes 100% credibility. For all we know the dyed-hair camera boy was swearing at them and and wearing a t-shirt that says allah hates niggers. Tell your buddy he'll get a lot more sympathy if he releases the entire tape, unedited with unobscured audio. Someone should mod you "-1, idiot talking out of his ass". It doesn't sound like you even watched the videos. The first video isn't "edited" beyond the minor addition of footage, in the form of black screens with white text explaining the context of the video. The second is a news report from a local station, with clips from the first and an interview with the cameraman. If you had watched it, you might've noticed he didn't have dyed hair, nor an "allah hates niggers" T-shirt; not that having either of those, or even swearing at police, is legal justification for a cop threatening to break someone's camera.
      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    3. Re:What a Power Trip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > I've met good policemen and I've met pigs.

      I'll second that ... but organizationally, whenever it comes to the issue of public accountability, I've never seen a police department that didn't fight tooth and nail to cover itself at the expense of the public. The police as an organization will without fail come down on the side of the pigs. The honest cop is merely the exception. Government is a weird institution, and the police are no exception: individually respectable, societally necessary, but organizationally corrupt. I guess all rot starts in the middle.

  2. Pure bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but this is pure bullshit, through-and-through. Police officers in America are authorized and equipped to use *lethal* force, and in most courts their word is taken as gospel over a civilian. Due to departmental 'solidarity' successfully prosecuting even the worst cases is incredibly difficult.

    If anything, police officers ought to be required by law to wear pickups that record ALL sound and a snapshot every 10 seconds while they are on duty. Ideally, said recordings would also be instantly transmitted to a secured location which nobody in their headquarters has access to for archival purposes.

  3. Re:Why not? by GameMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if I were to concede your point that being public servants shouldn't, automatically, strip them of that protection, (which I don't, they're free to not seek out government jobs if they don't want people watching them work) the fact that they are allowed to carry guns around and use deadly force, largely, at their discretion certainly nails the coffin on this issue as far as I'm concerned. The fact that, as has been stated elsewhere, courts also take their word over an average citizen and that police are notorious for "protecting their own" simply serve to drive the point home.

    -GameMaster

    --

    Rules of Conduct:
    #1 - The DM is always right.
    #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  4. Re:This isn't federal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah yes... Pennsylvania, my home. Remember this law next time someone uses their camcorder (or their point-and-shoot) to record their child playing at the park, or an open free concert -- unless they have the consent of every person within audio recording range, they're guilty of felony wire tapping. You might want to call 911 to get the police involved, though I think the DA only prosecutes if police or politicians are involved. Perhaps as a service to my fellow Keystone Staters I should stop down at the local BestBuy and put a post-it note on every one of the camcorders warning potential purchasers that unless they obtain the consent of everyone around, use of the device potentially constitutes a felony. I'd sarcasticly suggest that camcorders should be registered like firearms, but someone might take me seriously.

  5. Re:If they have nothing to hide .... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter who uses the technique first: if you acknowledge it as valid against them, then it's valid against you.

    No its not. They're public agents. Public agents are granted special powers over private citizens to be able to perform their duties. In the interests of preventing abuse of those special powers, public agents should not expect the same level of privacy (esp. in the process of using those powers) as private citizens gets.

  6. Re:What are you talking about? by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have never ever, ever met a good policeperson. Not even mediocre. 90% of America also shares this sentiment. (the other 10% being the most wealthy)

    That sounds silly and made up. Most of our experience with policemen come when we're pulled over for speeding or some other traffic infraction. It's happened to me probably ten times in my life. Never once have I had a problem in any of the four states I was pulled over. In each case, the policeman was professional and polite. These incidents happened from the year I got my driver's license at 16 years old and was driving a beat up, 13+ year old Mustang, in another case driving a kind of old Honda Accord with a friend, another time when I was along with two other friends driving an early model Hyundai, and another time driving a Geo Storm. And yet another time when a friend and I decided to sleep in that same Hyundai in a shopping center parking lot in the L.A. area rather than spending money on a hotel; in retrospect, that probably looked very suspicious. And with the possible exception of the Geo Storm (which was new and pretty at the time), none of the cars gave an impression of me/us being anywhere near wealthy. And when we were in other states, there was definitely no way the policeman knew by the address on my driver's license that it was a upper middle-class neighborhood. But I've always been treated well.

    I think how a policeman behaves has a lot more to do with the demeanor of the person that he is dealing with. If you're an ass, don't expect stellar treatment. Granted, being an ass isn't an excuse for them to treat you poorly, but there's no reason to be an ass to start with. Just be a polite human being and I bet you find that the police do the same. That's been my experience, anyway.

    On the other hand, maybe you're right. Maybe 90% of the population does agree with you because 90% of the population do tend to be asses and then wonder why they "don't get no respect."

  7. Law is messed up by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By this interpretation of the law anyone with a camcorder at a back yard cookout or public event is committing a felony, unless you have permission from everyone there. Unless they call out every exception, then TV news crews are roving criminal bands. It's ridiculous. The fact they're police officers is irrelevant. There's no expectation of privacy in a public place and the same standards should apply to audio as video.

    This is completely insane.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage