Judge Orders FBI to Release Abuse Records

Spamicles writes "A judge has ordered the FBI to release agency records about its abuse of National Security Letters (NSLs) to collect Americans' personal information. The ruling came just a day after the EFF urged the judge to immediately respond in its lawsuit over agency delays. This is the same case in which an internal FBI audit found that the bureau potentially violated the law or agency rules more than 1,000 times while collecting data about domestic phone calls, e-mails and financial transactions in recent years."

Comments

Great!

[Sunburnt]

I'm sure this'll get results. The current executive branch has been pretty respectful of legislative and judicial checks on its power thus far.

And while I'm at it, I'd really like a pony.

Re:Great!

[bladesjester]

I'd say that qualifies more as cynicism than apathy. He's not saying he doesn't care, just that he doesn't think it's going to be actually followed through on.

Given past practices, I have to say that I agree with that sentiment. I think the chances are good that the administration is just going to ignore the demands.

Re:Great!

[soren100]

I'm sure this'll get results. The current executive branch has been pretty respectful of legislative and judicial checks on its power thus far.

While the above might seem like cynicism, but the truth is that the FBI has been abusing its power for a long, long, time.

in 1971 the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI raided an FBI office and published over 1000 classified FBI documents, revealing domestic political repression campaigns such as Operation Cointelpro A year later the FBI officially terminated the program.

The public outrage led to an official Congressional investigation of the FBI which gave a report in 1976 that had this to say:

"Americans are now aware of the capability and proven willingness of their Government to collect intelligence about their lawful activities and associations. What some suspected and others feared has turned out to be largely true -- vigorous expression of unpopular views, association with dissenting groups, participation in peaceful protest activities, have provoked both government surveillance and retaliation." Sound Familiar?

The report goes on to say:

"Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much information has been collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government, operating primarily through secret informants, but also using other intrusive techniques such as wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts of information about the personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens. Investigations of groups deemed potentially dangerous -- and even of groups suspected of associating with potentially dangerous organizations -- have continued for decades, despite the fact that those groups did not engage in unlawful activity. Groups and individuals have been harassed and disrupted because of their political views and their lifestyles. Investigations have been based upon vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory and vicious tactics have been employed... Remember, these are not "conspiracy theorists" talking -- this is an actual government report from 30 years ago documenting the behavior of the previous 40 years.

Re:Great!

[kcbrown]

Really, I don't understand how the FBI could "ignore" a ruling. I would think that the judge would respond by naming specific individuals at the FBI, like the Director, and holding them in contempt and in jail, in perpetuity, until compliance occurs.

And who, exactly, would arrest them, huh?

The DOJ? Only if the DOJ were independent of the executive branch. Thanks to GWB, it's not anymore (if it ever was). The DEA? Executive branch. The ATF? Executive branch. The military? Executive branch.

The court's power is enforced through the executive branch. If the executive branch decides it wants to ignore the court, what can the court do?

Not a damned thing, that's what.

He who controls the guns controls everything. Power over life and death is the ultimate power. The executive branch has that. The judicial branch does not.

For the love of god noooooooooo

[Timesprout]

Ice Ice Baby was bad enough the first time it was released.

Re:For the love of god noooooooooo

[dangitman]

Ice Ice Baby was bad enough the first time it was released.

You mean "Under Pressure"?

It's just a matter of time.

[Fox_1]

We know that there are records of this activity by the FBI. Now it is just a matter of time until these records come to light. The beauty of computers and email and automatic logging is that this administrations actions will be very difficult to hide. It's really amazing that the FBI and other Gov't agencies went hog-wild on peoples civil rights, and that they thought somehow that this was OK, that they would get away with it. How blind to the future consequences of their actions are these people? Seriously it's like watching the stooges play gov't.

Re:It's just a matter of time.

[_KiTA_]

We know that there are records of this activity by the FBI. Now it is just a matter of time until these records come to light. The beauty of computers and email and automatic logging is that this administrations actions will be very difficult to hide. It's really amazing that the FBI and other Gov't agencies went hog-wild on peoples civil rights, and that they thought somehow that this was OK, that they would get away with it. How blind to the future consequences of their actions are these people? Seriously it's like watching the stooges play gov't.


Well, they felt that they had fixed the process enough that they had a "permanent majority" starting about 6 years ago. Fixed via either hosting sessions with DOJ and other Government officials on how they can do their part to fix elections, or getting easily edited digital election machines, or just restricting our rights to the point that we can't do shit to stop them.

Ergo, why bother holding back anymore? They are "The Government" (Tm), now and forever, right? Right?

I fear we're going to find all too many abuses of power in the upcoming decades. I've heard tell of us using White Phosphorous as a chemical weapon on civilians in Iraq, of using siege tactics on civilian cities, of all sorts of horrid crap that the US Media just won't acknowledge -- but is easily available information in the European and Asian news.

Well, until the Democrats take full control in 2009 -- then suddenly the suddenly reformed US Media will "discover" all this bad stuff, just in time to find an excuse to blame it on President Obama.

Why the delay in turning over the records?

[Man On Pink Corner]

After all, as mewling pussies everywhere have reminded us ad nauseam, if the FBI isn't doing anything wrong, what do they have to worry about?