Slashdot Mirror


Pressure Is On IBM To Forgive Millions In IT Debt

coondoggie writes to tell us that several California state legislators are pressuring IBM to release the Costa school district from some $5 million of long-standing debt as a charitable donation. "The back story on this tale is that the school district owes IBM for computers ordered in the late 1980s and early 1990s. For one reason or another the computers were never used and no one now seems to be able to locate either the paperwork or the hardware. The school district experienced hard financial times and ultimately never paid Big Blue for the computers. In 1993 the district and IBM negotiated a long-term settlement that said the school district would pay the first of four $1.25 million installments beginning in 2008. Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan, according to the Contra Costa story."

45 of 458 comments (clear)

  1. 15 years by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They give the school 15 years and now the school wants it just forgiven? I wish I could wait 15 years on my loans.

    1. Re:15 years by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish I could order so much gear that I don't even get around to using it AND get the purchase loan forgiven. This story is a case of blatant class warfare; Who care what IBM's revenue was last quarter in regards to what appears to be a school district's wild fiscal irresponsibility? IBM is not the bad guy here, the bad guy(s) are the school board who approved the budget to purchase the equipment in the first place and then totally failed to see that it was put to use.

    2. Re:15 years by linefeed0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen, or the one now that's stuck with the bill?

      It sucks that elected representatives do this so often, but what's the answer for it? The people doing it know they won't be there to answer for it! Kind of like our current administration at the federal level pissing away money on Iraq while the situation there gets worse every day, and leaving it to the next administration to make the hard decisions and clean up the mess.

    3. Re:15 years by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen, or the one now that's stuck with the bill?

      Except the school board isn't stuck with the bill. At least in that the individuals on the board don't have to pay it. It isn't going to affect their salary or anything in any way. The money will have to come from them cutting back on other educational expenses. So the people who are going to suffer are the kids who weren't even born when the deal was made.

    4. Re:15 years by linefeed0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right. That's the problem. Now people who elect these school boards need to make informed decisions and not allow people of questionable character in public office. But the people who lose have little to do with anyone who made any of the decisions. Since it sounds like the computers walked off, the real answer might be to get the police dept on the case to see if there's any way they can figure out who took them. The statute of limitations might have expired by now, but a few criminal charges wouldn't hurt if they do find the responsible party. This kind of shit happens all the time in school and public utility boards with poor accountability. IBM might even have a share of the blame if they sold excess equipment on a public procurement contract with no sense that it was going to be useful to the district. Based upon that there's an argument for getting IBM involved in the solution to this other than just paying them back.

    5. Re:15 years by nocomment · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The killer part is not only was so much of the debt already 'forgiven' but that they were given a 15 year timeline to get their shit together, *and* not have interest on it. That $5M now is not worth as much as $5M in '95 dollars. I think IBM has bent over backwards to help these people. How about California pay the $5M on their behalf?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    6. Re:15 years by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The board 15 years ago was elected by the people in the District. Those people made a bad decision when they voted.

      So create a special tax district to pay the money off from the people who live in the school district (which is quite wealthy) and tell them it's because they voted the wrong board into office.

      Maybe they'll pay a little more attention to their local elections next time.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re:15 years by fwarren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is the taxpayers fault, and they DESERVE to pay for it. Either by higher taxes or crummier education for their kids.

      They had a inept, corrupt school system. 5 Million in computers go poof! Is their outrage? Who's head ended up on the block? Who had to pay for this? So far no one. IBM has been nice, and has made a 15 year 5 million dollar interest free loan.

      People 15 and 20 years ago were responsible for this. The city, the school board, the voters and tax payers. They did not pay the piper....It has been put off till now. It is time to pay.

      If the city had taken out loans, were improving the school district, etc. Then there was some big natural disaster, something beyond their control. I could see IBM feeling generous and forgiving the debt. But this is due to the school districts own stupidity.

      If a car lot (yes another car analogy), sold you a car for $30,000.00, you have a million dollar home for collateral. Your worthless brother in law runs off with the car. You are having cash flow issues, and can't really afford to make the payments. Why should the car lot forgive you this loan?

      They entered into a business deal with a party who had the ability to pay. Just the party mismanaged things and has the sob story, why should IBM have to eat it? Because "they can afford it" just does not cut it. IBM could also afford to cash out, take the money and run. To not sell hardware to anybody any more. But no, they are staying in business to do business. They are not extorting their customers. They should not have to eat it. Let the tax payers who allow such government pay for it.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  2. Do you mean Contra Costa? by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    coondoggie writes: to tell us that several California state legislators are pressuring IBM to release the Costa school district from some $5 million of long-standing debt as a charitable donation.

    Do you mean Contra Costa?

    How do you lose that much computer equipment? It must have walked off.

  3. Bad Records by fozzmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And obsoleted computers does not mean they should be let off their debt. I reckon I may leave everything I owe for 27 years or so then claim that.

    Seriously instead of saying "let us off" they should be saying "here's your money, _please_ don't charge us interest or take us to court".

  4. Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by shawnmchorse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They agree to defer payments for 15 YEARS, and now that they're finally at the time they might have to actually start paying something they want to just pressure them to make it go away entirely? Yow.

    1. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dont kid yourself IBM will love this. They will write off the 5 mill on condition that they get the next big IT contract California signs. Then they will cream the 'we are so generous PR' and make even more money off the fat contract.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not only has IBM given them 15 years to sort out their financial situation, they even decided to not charge interest. From TFA:

      A letter from IBM Chief Financial Officer Mark Loughridge to district Superintendent Bruce Harter called the repayment plan "generous" on the part of IBM because the company is not charging interest.
      So they have already decided to allow a 15-year grace period and no interest. Given the time-value of money, I'm guessing that even as-is, IBM has de facto given them the computers at below cost. They've no doubt lost money on the deal, and have been extremely generous already.

      To me this seems like gross mismanagement of funds on the part of the school board. And, frankly, forgiving their debt will not compel them to manage their funds any better in the future.
    3. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not to mention why they waited 15 years:

      Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan


      The STATE just finished making the district repay loans for 15 years. So, when the government is owned money you better pay up, but when IBM is owed money the state turns around and recommends forgiveness?
  5. I really hate these type of arguments... by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees,the lawmakers wrote."

    Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

    Well, "honorable" lawmakers, how many of your teacher's pensions are in IBM stock?

    Or what about your investments?

    Or some of your other constituents - many who are retired and are relying on IBM making an actual profit in order to make money on their retirement investments.

    Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white, dudes who nobody has pity for.

    Mental note: Do not give credit to the CA schools - cash only.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

      The mood certainly wasn't as forgiving of the affected party when Slashdork ran that piece the other day about the Indian ISVs pirating Windows because, well, it was just too darn expensive.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    2. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But Microsoft still has possession of Windows. IBM is out actual hardware. You know, real actual tangible property, not "intellectual property".

  6. Cant "find" the computers? Then... by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...this invalidates the forgiveness part of their plea: Unaccountability encourages corruption.

    "What you subsidize, you get more of".

    Have the school district *try* a little harder to find out where it all went.... a good first step.

    If the taxpayers het mad enough at the failure to do this, *then* you'll get some accountability, although late.

    BWilde

    1. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IBM should insist on an audit by the district in order to find out what happened to these machines. If requested, IBM could even supply an auditor or two in order to help the school get to the bottom of this issue. $5 million in misplaced equipment is a big deal for a poor district, and they should jump at the chance to have IBM assist.

      If the audit is completed, and if the district makes its payments on time, IBM could then make a $5 million charitable donation to the district.

      That way, IBM would get good press, the district would hopefully straighten up their records, and everyone would be happy.

  7. Rewarding corruption by athloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the school district is corrupt, and the computers got jacked, and now we want corporate America to take it as a tax write-off. I'd like to see it referred to a criminal court so the guilty actually pay the price.

  8. What a vague article by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For me, the issue of "How the hell do you misplace $5 million worth of computers???" is central to deciding if IBM should do this. No details were given on that little snafu. I'm not sure they should get a free pass for such incompetence, maybe the state should bail them out if they screwed up.


    Besides...lets say they were using the computers. How does the fact that they're missing affect whether they can pay for them? Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?

    1. Re:What a vague article by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?


      Considering that the district declared bankruptcy not long after these orders occurred, I think that's exactly what happened.
  9. IBM should just turn it over by wtansill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to a collection agency. Let the agency buy the loan at a discount and then harrangue state officials until they ante up. It would be good for the officials to experience the same kind of pressure and hectoring that they allow consumers to endure...

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
  10. Cut 'Em Off by BigFoot48 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like the first world should cut off aid to Africa to ultimately strengthen it, corporations should cut off aid to school districts and other governmental dead beats who think technology will solve education problems.

  11. IBM bent over backwards by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And the school still wants a free pass.

    What sort of example are they trying to set?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  12. Pay Up by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The school ordered and received the equipment. If they used them or not is irrelevant, and that they can't find the stuff or any records only speaks to their incompetence. They need to pay their bill.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  13. What a load of crap by Flavio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees," the lawmakers wrote. "Our schools rely solely on limited state and federal assistance to educate our students and every dollar is precious."

    If every dollar is precious, they should've thought twice before spending $5 million in hardware that was never even used!

    This district's atrocious conduct is precisely the reason why IBM should not forgive the debt.

    1. Re:What a load of crap by caldodge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially this line: "Unlike corporations such as IBM, our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees"

      The school district is government-funded (next year's budget is $275 million, BTW), and their buddies in the government (all 4 politicians in the article are members of the party in control of the state legislature) can point the gun of government power at taxpayers and say 'fork it over, or else".

      Meanwhile, evil corporations like IBM have to _persuade_ people to buy their products and services. If IBM had some magical ability to "generate new dollars", then it's probable it wouldn't be engaged in the current "LEAN" layoffs.

      I'll believe those politicians when they have to lay off as many people (proportionately, of course) as IBM.

  14. Let me see if I understand this by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    IBM has already given the district more than 15 years of no-interest loan on millions of dollars.

    Meanwhile, the State of California has insisted on, and gotten, much stricter terms (including interest.)

    Now, the State is suggesting that IBM should forgive their loan altogether?

    Maybe, if forgiving those loans is so good an idea, the State of California should go first?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  15. It's not too unfair by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big Blue can afford it. Nobody seems to dispute this.

    The school will have difficulty paying the money back. The owed money may end up being written off anyway.

    Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. There's a lot of pressure being applied but it's up to IBM, and IBM can benefit from this. They'll get some of the money back as a tax break, more as good PR, and this will mean more money for the school to spend education, which will benefit IBM in the long run. That, and the person who makes the decision will have a feeling of being a nice person.

    Ultimately it will be better for everyone if IBM forgives the debt.

    1. Re:It's not too unfair by TopSpin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. Sure, the CA legislature isn't going to allow any 'lack of cooperation' on IBM's part influence future contracts. There won't be any sudden desire to 're-evaluate' any purchasing schedules that IBM might have a piece of. Nah.

      which will benefit IBM in the long run Teaching your customers that you roll over and write off invoices is a great business precedent. I know I won't mind when one of my employer's govt contracts just walks away with the product.

      Grown-ups understand that when some podunk school district runs itself into the ground the state government is where the bill lands. CA pulls down $100,000,000,000 a year in tax revenue. Never mind the municipal, county and other tax and fee revenue. Never mind Federal education dollars. For the state, where this problem belongs, the bill is so small it's difficult to detect, so why are a gang of D-*s parading this 'forgivingness' idea in front of the cameras?

      IBM fucked up when they arranged this 15 year no-interest nonsense and now they're getting precisely what they deserve. I feel nothing for IBM in this and if they roll over again I hope every legislature and school district in the nation notices.

      There is another angle to this also; How will IBM's (or any other business that has to deal with local school districts) behavior change as a result of getting publicly raked over the 'for the children' coals by these shameless politicians? So much for any leniency in terms for the no-so-well-off school districts. Thanks, CA, keep electing these people.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
  16. Rewarding bad behavior by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lessee, the school district has such lousy financial controls that they can't account for the systems, and they can't pay for them. Typically, the socialist argument is to not hold them accountable. I say bankrupt the district and put some people in who won't let $5M get STOLEN.

  17. Re:No... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A local government can *ask* the federal government for anything they like.

    In summary, you are ignorant, and doubly so for calling the grand-parent an idiot. I wasn't aware there was an arithmetic of ignorance.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  18. Re:I went to school there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The basic problem is, in 1992, they got a superintendant who was going to revolutionize everything. New schools, new ways of doing things, the works.

    He turned out to be a corrupt bastard, but he disappeared without ever having to pay or atone for anything, and the people who use the schools have been paying for it ever since.


    So call Dog the Bounty Hunter.

    IBM should forgive the debt, and everyone should learn a lesson from this:

    Why? This isn't the first case of a customer who can't pay. You negotiate, threaten, sue, and settle for a discount.

    Don't let public institutions pay with credit.

    This isn't a problem of a public institution paying with credit. It's a problem of a public institution, ordering something, losing it, and not having the money to pay. Credit has nothing to do with the problem.

    In the real world, if you demand cash on the barrel for every large sale, you are going to lose sales. That is why car dealers offer financing.

  19. Re:I went to school there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Then make the elected and appointed officials legally and financially responsible for their decision to incurr debt. Use fines for "negligent public non-service" to pay off all or part of the debt. This would discourages the borrowing of spectacular sums from future generations with little or no thought to whether and how they can repay those sums.

    The hard part is deciding where the line is between a district with financial troubles due to mismanagement versus a district in trouble due to factors outside their control. Or perhaps the *uckup is the responsibility of all the administrations between those that incurred the debt and those responsible for planning its repayment. So fine 'em all I say! Perhaps $10k per year served per board member. Special triple fines to the chairpersons and chiefs!

  20. Re:Paperwork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No, it means that in 1993 the superintendant and a buddy of his with an F-350 put a bunch of equipment in the back of a truck and sold it a pawn shop to feed his coke addiction.

    I say, make 'em pay the $5 mil. Teach the bitches a lesson in accountability (not mention financial planning).

  21. Re:No... by sheehaje · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is bad business... and then there is PR. Chances that the School Board that exists now isn't the one that was there in the early 90's. So, with that in mind, maybe asking for debt forgiveness shows actuall aptitude of the current school board. I know if I was on it, I'd be trying to negotiate at the very least. The other side of this is you have Microsoft "giving" schools technology, and so many other companies giving to education, to hold a school liable will not look good. If Big Bad Blue holds them to this, I don't care what you think, it just looks bad, and screwing up PR will probably cost more than the $5mil loan payback. It would be smart for both sides to come to some kind of settlement, both for a school district in debt, and for a company that still has the cold suit and tie image no matter how many witty commercials they put out.

  22. Re:No... by Rycross · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that the states lost, nor that the states were using "states rights" as a euphemism for expanding the influence of slavery, doesn't mean the idea is dead or bad.

    I can't tell how you feel about the issue just by your post. Personally, I feel that the idea of keeping as much power as feasible at the state and local levels is a good idea. It gives people more power to influence the policies that affect them. Its easier to change that policy when you're voting against 1 million or 30 million, instead of 300 million.

  23. Re:$750 MILLION missing IRAQ defense funds missing by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The proof is in the government agreeing to an extended repayment plan. Admission that the debt is valid and owed. If there was any question as to the validity of the debt, it should have been raised 15 years ago.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  24. Re:No... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You stated it a bit more clearly than me.
    On an acute basis, we need concentrated power. Once people are ensconced, they want to wield their power on a chronic basis. It's too easy to ignore the creeping acquisition of power.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  25. Which implies... by patio11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... that $3 million of the $5 million that the school district absconded with is being taken from the pockets of retired or soon-to-be-retired working Americans. (Sorry, old rhetorical trick I picked up in college to deflate the balloons of folks who liked to make every issue into The Class Struggle. Most billion dollar companies, once you trace through the intermediaries like pensions and mutual funds, as a series of thousand dollar chunks. Many of the owners or beneficiaries of these chunks would not strike you as being very wealthy, or even as being investors, if you were to bump into them in the checkout at the supermarket.)

  26. IBM already did them a favor by CPE1704TKS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM has already done the school district a favor by not selling their debt to a vulture credit company that would be way more heinous in how it dealt with the district. Normally when loans like this start taking longer than usual to get their money, companies like IBM write off the debt and sell it to vulture funds for pennies on the dollar, and then these vulture funds turn around and gauge the debtors for as much as they can get.

    So the fact that IBM did NOT do this means they have a heart. Don't be stupid and keep on asking for more. IBM is a business, and if they let this customer go, they would simply have more problems in the future.

  27. Re:No... by cerelib · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many sports can be played in small, restricted versions with less resources. Another poster has pointed out stickball as a restricted form of baseball. You don't need much to play football. You can play it in the middle of the street if you want to. My guess is that you never did that because where you grew up, kids played soccer instead. Let's look at soccer. Would you agree if someone said that you need special goals, a special ball, shin guards, and a huge playing surface with offsides lines to play soccer? Of course not, because those things are not needed for the small restricted form of the game that is casually played. Soccer is great, but don't be unfair and try to make it look like the game that God handed down to humanity. What do you think American children do during school recess?

  28. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Truth be told: They are in California! California taxpayers pay more to public schools than any other state, per capita CA is in the top 5. 5 million dollars is nothing to Costa school district. School Districts that size could find that money in a year or two. They just need to shave a few hundred here and there and cut one of their other million dollar projects. Sadly, school seems to breed unaccountability.

  29. Re:Break their thumbs by Score+Whore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM would have no need to prove they delivered anything. They already have a settlement/agreement to make repayment. As such the school district has already admitted that they owe IBM $5 million. It's too late to start arguing that they never received the goods.