Slashdot Mirror


Pressure Is On IBM To Forgive Millions In IT Debt

coondoggie writes to tell us that several California state legislators are pressuring IBM to release the Costa school district from some $5 million of long-standing debt as a charitable donation. "The back story on this tale is that the school district owes IBM for computers ordered in the late 1980s and early 1990s. For one reason or another the computers were never used and no one now seems to be able to locate either the paperwork or the hardware. The school district experienced hard financial times and ultimately never paid Big Blue for the computers. In 1993 the district and IBM negotiated a long-term settlement that said the school district would pay the first of four $1.25 million installments beginning in 2008. Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan, according to the Contra Costa story."

83 of 458 comments (clear)

  1. 15 years by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They give the school 15 years and now the school wants it just forgiven? I wish I could wait 15 years on my loans.

    1. Re:15 years by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish I could order so much gear that I don't even get around to using it AND get the purchase loan forgiven. This story is a case of blatant class warfare; Who care what IBM's revenue was last quarter in regards to what appears to be a school district's wild fiscal irresponsibility? IBM is not the bad guy here, the bad guy(s) are the school board who approved the budget to purchase the equipment in the first place and then totally failed to see that it was put to use.

    2. Re:15 years by linefeed0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen, or the one now that's stuck with the bill?

      It sucks that elected representatives do this so often, but what's the answer for it? The people doing it know they won't be there to answer for it! Kind of like our current administration at the federal level pissing away money on Iraq while the situation there gets worse every day, and leaving it to the next administration to make the hard decisions and clean up the mess.

    3. Re:15 years by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen, or the one now that's stuck with the bill?

      Except the school board isn't stuck with the bill. At least in that the individuals on the board don't have to pay it. It isn't going to affect their salary or anything in any way. The money will have to come from them cutting back on other educational expenses. So the people who are going to suffer are the kids who weren't even born when the deal was made.

    4. Re:15 years by The+Anarchist+Avenge · · Score: 4, Funny

      posting because I accidentally modded you up

      --
      Today's lucky number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:15 years by linefeed0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right. That's the problem. Now people who elect these school boards need to make informed decisions and not allow people of questionable character in public office. But the people who lose have little to do with anyone who made any of the decisions. Since it sounds like the computers walked off, the real answer might be to get the police dept on the case to see if there's any way they can figure out who took them. The statute of limitations might have expired by now, but a few criminal charges wouldn't hurt if they do find the responsible party. This kind of shit happens all the time in school and public utility boards with poor accountability. IBM might even have a share of the blame if they sold excess equipment on a public procurement contract with no sense that it was going to be useful to the district. Based upon that there's an argument for getting IBM involved in the solution to this other than just paying them back.

    6. Re:15 years by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which school board? The one 15 years ago that approved the equipment and then let it get stolen
       
      From 15 years ago are the bad guys, unless they've lost the records of who was on the board back then too.

    7. Re:15 years by nocomment · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The killer part is not only was so much of the debt already 'forgiven' but that they were given a 15 year timeline to get their shit together, *and* not have interest on it. That $5M now is not worth as much as $5M in '95 dollars. I think IBM has bent over backwards to help these people. How about California pay the $5M on their behalf?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    8. Re:15 years by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The board 15 years ago was elected by the people in the District. Those people made a bad decision when they voted.

      So create a special tax district to pay the money off from the people who live in the school district (which is quite wealthy) and tell them it's because they voted the wrong board into office.

      Maybe they'll pay a little more attention to their local elections next time.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    9. Re:15 years by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan, according to the Contra Costa story.

      Also, I noticed the state got their money before asking IBM to forgive its debts. Why doesn't IBM ask the state to give their money back as well?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    10. Re:15 years by fwarren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is the taxpayers fault, and they DESERVE to pay for it. Either by higher taxes or crummier education for their kids.

      They had a inept, corrupt school system. 5 Million in computers go poof! Is their outrage? Who's head ended up on the block? Who had to pay for this? So far no one. IBM has been nice, and has made a 15 year 5 million dollar interest free loan.

      People 15 and 20 years ago were responsible for this. The city, the school board, the voters and tax payers. They did not pay the piper....It has been put off till now. It is time to pay.

      If the city had taken out loans, were improving the school district, etc. Then there was some big natural disaster, something beyond their control. I could see IBM feeling generous and forgiving the debt. But this is due to the school districts own stupidity.

      If a car lot (yes another car analogy), sold you a car for $30,000.00, you have a million dollar home for collateral. Your worthless brother in law runs off with the car. You are having cash flow issues, and can't really afford to make the payments. Why should the car lot forgive you this loan?

      They entered into a business deal with a party who had the ability to pay. Just the party mismanaged things and has the sob story, why should IBM have to eat it? Because "they can afford it" just does not cut it. IBM could also afford to cash out, take the money and run. To not sell hardware to anybody any more. But no, they are staying in business to do business. They are not extorting their customers. They should not have to eat it. Let the tax payers who allow such government pay for it.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  2. Do you mean Contra Costa? by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    coondoggie writes: to tell us that several California state legislators are pressuring IBM to release the Costa school district from some $5 million of long-standing debt as a charitable donation.

    Do you mean Contra Costa?

    How do you lose that much computer equipment? It must have walked off.

    1. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      More likely the delivery was received by the staff, and then immediately returned.

      The office I worked in as a intern had the exact same problem. They made out an order for 50 IBM PC's for a training room. Instead, they received 50 IBM PS/2's that came
      in huge palette sized boxes of 25 each. These had to be dismantled inside the container before we could take them out. As soon as our boss found out what they were, they were immediately returned.

      This article seems to suggest a similar thing happened.

      Nobody seems to know how many or what type of computers Marks ordered, or even whether they ended up being used. Several former district officials called them "obsolete" and "useless."

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      More likely the delivery was received by the staff, and then immediately returned.


      Whether or not anyone can find the equipment or the documentation of the original order and delivery now, presumably the time to raise any question of the validity of the underlying debt was at the time of the discussions which led to the 1993 "long-term settlement", not 15 years later.
    3. Re:Do you mean Contra Costa? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      From this article it appears there was a real battle over the useability of the systems, and the district
      did try and get the machines sent back.

      Former school board member Frank Calton said he remembers the deal with IBM being touted by Marks as a mutually beneficial partnership.

      "This was submitted to us as kind of a joint venture where IBM could showcase computers as learning tools for students," Calton said. "It was supposed to have a PR angle for IBM."

      When asked by the Times last week, the district could not track down invoices for the purchases, so it is unclear how many and what type of computers were ordered. But administrators agree the computers already were outdated when the district got them.

      "I think they were out of date before (Marks) even decided to buy them," Basalto said. "Every one of them was obsolete; they were absolutely useless."

      Where the computers ended up also is a mystery. Basalto recalls that some were installed in schools, but some sat in warehouses, possibly never turned on.

      The district tried to return some of the computers, said Ruth Vedovelli, West Contra Costa school district's current finance chief. IBM refused to take them back, leading to a years-long fight that also included battles over the actual cost.

      Negotiations often got ugly, with Fred Stewart, the state trustee appointed to oversee the district's finances after it went into debt in 1990, often getting into shouting matches with IBM representatives, says Herb Cole, Marks' successor.

      "He said, 'We can't pay you, so if you want them, come and get them,'" Cole said, adding that Stewart threatened to put the computers on the curb. "He was tough as nails with them at the time."

      Stewart, who recently retired as the state trustee, declined to comment.

      In late 1993 -- four years after the district agreed to buy the computers -- the parties reached a settlement that called for deferring the first major payment until 2008. That was the year the district, under its previous loan structure, was scheduled to be finished paying back $28.5 million it owed the state.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  3. Excuses, escuses by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    no one now seems to be able to locate either the paperwork or the hardware Uh, the dog ate it?

    signed,
    Epstein's Mom
    1. Re:Excuses, escuses by brogdon · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is no laughing matter, man. $5 Million bought a hell of a lot of 286's back then. Do you have any idea the size of the Wing Commander lan-party the children are missing out on right now?

      Shameful.

      --


      This tagline is umop apisdn.
  4. Re:Break their thumbs by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No multi-billion dollar corporation left behind.

  5. Bad Records by fozzmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And obsoleted computers does not mean they should be let off their debt. I reckon I may leave everything I owe for 27 years or so then claim that.

    Seriously instead of saying "let us off" they should be saying "here's your money, _please_ don't charge us interest or take us to court".

    1. Re:Bad Records by caseih · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not clear that the computers were ever delivered. No trace of paper work or the computers themselves can be found. Does IBM have actual delivery paperwork to prove the goods were actually delivered? Guess I'll go read the FA and find out.

  6. Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by shawnmchorse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They agree to defer payments for 15 YEARS, and now that they're finally at the time they might have to actually start paying something they want to just pressure them to make it go away entirely? Yow.

    1. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dont kid yourself IBM will love this. They will write off the 5 mill on condition that they get the next big IT contract California signs. Then they will cream the 'we are so generous PR' and make even more money off the fat contract.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not only has IBM given them 15 years to sort out their financial situation, they even decided to not charge interest. From TFA:

      A letter from IBM Chief Financial Officer Mark Loughridge to district Superintendent Bruce Harter called the repayment plan "generous" on the part of IBM because the company is not charging interest.
      So they have already decided to allow a 15-year grace period and no interest. Given the time-value of money, I'm guessing that even as-is, IBM has de facto given them the computers at below cost. They've no doubt lost money on the deal, and have been extremely generous already.

      To me this seems like gross mismanagement of funds on the part of the school board. And, frankly, forgiving their debt will not compel them to manage their funds any better in the future.
    3. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by sampson7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 15 years was not entirely voluntary. The corrupt management of Walter Marks, the Superintendant at the time, drove the District into bankruptcy. As part of the debt restructering, IBM like every other creditor had to step aside and wait its turn.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Contra_Costa_Uni fied_School_District

      In 1990, the District was over $40 million in debt. Currently, they are still $7 million behind, not including the IBM debts. Make no mistake, they are trying to pay their debts, but they still have a long way to go.

    4. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a former student of the Richmond Unified School District, which after a misappropriation scandal and a consequent bankruptcy, became the West Contra Costa Unified School District. The district, while newly named, continues to be plagued by financial misdeeds committed over 15 years ago. The suggestion in this thread to call for the teacher's union to concede pay cuts was actually mandated by the state in 1991, in order for the district to receive a $29MM loan. Teachers have not received cost of living increases commensurate with their colleagues in other unions since. Bear in mind, the RUSD, and subsequently, the WCCUSD, contain schools in some of the most violent and impoverished cities in California. Richmond is consistently in the top 20 most violent cities per capita in the US. It's hard enough to attract teaching talent to some of these schools, regardless of the fact that they're relatively underpaid.

      When it comes down to the asshattery of the administration of the time..there's a lot to go around. The superintendent, Walter Marks, took whatever funds he could to further a pet project called open schooling, which may have been one of the forebearers of the proposed voucher schemes. The different campuses were given specific lines of study, and students were given the choice to go to the school that interested them the most. For example, Pinole Valley HS was given the Dramatic Arts line, while at the same time, all musical and arts classes were cut dramatically at other schools across the district. El Cerrito HS, if I remember right, was given Math & Sciences, while those same courses were underfunded at other schools. Parents could simply not afford to send their children to schools that weren't local, helping to foment serious student disenfranchisement and furthering dropout rates.

      The asshattery continued in the state assembly, where Sup. Marks was given high praise by the Secretary of Education, William Bennett. Secretary Bennett felt that this disjointed and disenfranchising method of splitting the district was a model for urban school reform. Sup. Marks was given high praise nationwide for bankrupting the district. Marks was able to find a higher paying job in Kansas City after being fired at the height of the scandal.

      All that being said, I still think that the district should pay the debt. The question is, where will the money come from? Can't get them from the teachers, or you won't have any teachers. Can't get an appropriate amount from property taxes, due to proposition 103. There's simply not enough cirriculum to cut back. I wish there was an easy answer that didn't affect students adversely, but I simply don't believe there is.

    5. Re:Wow, it's not often I feel sorry for IBM by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not to mention why they waited 15 years:

      Payments were deferred until then because 2008 was the year the district was scheduled to finish making state loan repayments under its previous loan plan


      The STATE just finished making the district repay loans for 15 years. So, when the government is owned money you better pay up, but when IBM is owed money the state turns around and recommends forgiveness?
  7. I really hate these type of arguments... by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees,the lawmakers wrote."

    Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

    Well, "honorable" lawmakers, how many of your teacher's pensions are in IBM stock?

    Or what about your investments?

    Or some of your other constituents - many who are retired and are relying on IBM making an actual profit in order to make money on their retirement investments.

    Not all stock investors are rich, fat, white, dudes who nobody has pity for.

    Mental note: Do not give credit to the CA schools - cash only.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, "honorable" lawmakers, how many of your teacher's pensions are in IBM stock?
       
      60.6% of IBM stock is held by institutions such as pension funds according to their latest report.

    2. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, so that makes it OK to rip IBM off.

      The mood certainly wasn't as forgiving of the affected party when Slashdork ran that piece the other day about the Indian ISVs pirating Windows because, well, it was just too darn expensive.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    3. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But Microsoft still has possession of Windows. IBM is out actual hardware. You know, real actual tangible property, not "intellectual property".

    4. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by dedazo · · Score: 2
      It doesn't really matter if you enclose it in quotes. Under current copyright law software is no different than hardware or apples or nail clippers. It's still considered a tangible good that is purchased and sold (or licensed).

      Of course that's an unpopular POV around here, but wishes and reality are two very different things. Who knows, maybe one day that will change. But until then, a thousand slashbots patting each other in the back with "gee, wouldn't it be great if..." theories make absolutely no difference whatsoever.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    5. Re:I really hate these type of arguments... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Under current copyright law software is no different than hardware or apples or nail clippers. It's still considered a tangible good that is purchased and sold (or licensed). I'm sorry, but this just isn't true. Physical property is private ownership of an object; intellectual property is the right to control copying, distribution or use of an otherwise public piece of art or information. Physical property violations (like stealing) are usually crimes; intellectual property violations (like copyright infringement) usually aren't: they're torts. There are no exceptions to physical property laws for research and educational uses. And as much as Mark Helprin might want it to last forever, intellectual property is usually ceded completely to the public after some (theoretically) limited amount of time.

      It should also be clear that illegally using software you haven't paid for (and can't afford, or otherwise weren't going to buy) is different from stealing (or refusing to pay for) hardware. In particular, because the marginal cost of a pirated copy of software is essentially zero, "stealing" software you weren't going to buy is very nearly Pareto optimal. Hardware theft is not. That is, if I pirate Windows, and wouldn't have bought it, then I gain something and Microsoft loses nothing (though it is possible that Microsoft's competitors have lost a sale). If I steal a computer, whomever I stole it from is out a computer. If they're a vendor, they're out the revenue they'd get from selling it: since I stole it, they can't sell it to someone else.

      I'm not saying here that copyright infringement should be legal, just that it's very different from theft, both legally and ethically.
      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  8. Wow by Wicko · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, yeah, about the 5 million... well, we were kinda expecting you to forget about it ya know? Thats what friends are for, right?

    On a serious note, I am surprised at no mention of paying a smaller amount or anything.. No they expect IBM to just forget about the whole thing.

  9. Cant "find" the computers? Then... by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...this invalidates the forgiveness part of their plea: Unaccountability encourages corruption.

    "What you subsidize, you get more of".

    Have the school district *try* a little harder to find out where it all went.... a good first step.

    If the taxpayers het mad enough at the failure to do this, *then* you'll get some accountability, although late.

    BWilde

    1. Re:Cant "find" the computers? Then... by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IBM should insist on an audit by the district in order to find out what happened to these machines. If requested, IBM could even supply an auditor or two in order to help the school get to the bottom of this issue. $5 million in misplaced equipment is a big deal for a poor district, and they should jump at the chance to have IBM assist.

      If the audit is completed, and if the district makes its payments on time, IBM could then make a $5 million charitable donation to the district.

      That way, IBM would get good press, the district would hopefully straighten up their records, and everyone would be happy.

  10. $5 million computers NEVER USED? by squisher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, this is amazing. They ordered computers, which were never used... shouldn't that be an outcry? That school-district must have had a terrible administration at that point. I really don't see how the argument that they never used the equipment has anything to do with why or why not they should pay the bill. Afterall, IBM delivered, so why should they not get paid?

    If it wasn't for the fact that the administrators that created this mess are probably all not working there anymore, I'd say they should pay the full amount, with interest, as punishment for wasting the taxpayers dollars!

    1. Re:$5 million computers NEVER USED? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wow, this is amazing. They ordered computers, which were never used... shouldn't that be an outcry?

      Man, relax! This was the late-80s... $5M probably bought about a dozen computers (EGA monitors, 20MB hard drives and 2400bps modems not included). Besides, the "unavailable" hardware and proofs of purchase are probably just cover-ups for someone having lost one or both while on a three-week cocaine bender.

      Ah, those halcyon days.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  11. Paperwork? by ignipotentis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Neither the paperwork or hardware could be located? Does this mean there is no proof of delivery?

    --
    Don't waste time... procrastinate now!
  12. Rewarding corruption by athloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the school district is corrupt, and the computers got jacked, and now we want corporate America to take it as a tax write-off. I'd like to see it referred to a criminal court so the guilty actually pay the price.

  13. What a vague article by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For me, the issue of "How the hell do you misplace $5 million worth of computers???" is central to deciding if IBM should do this. No details were given on that little snafu. I'm not sure they should get a free pass for such incompetence, maybe the state should bail them out if they screwed up.


    Besides...lets say they were using the computers. How does the fact that they're missing affect whether they can pay for them? Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?

    1. Re:What a vague article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You've obviously never worked for or with any part of the California goverment. Stuff like that happens all the time. I spent 18 months as the primary subcontractor for a large federally mandated quasi government agency working in the workers compensation field that will remain nameless. They did an internal audit and found 2 BILLION dollars of equipment missing.

    2. Re:What a vague article by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?"

      Bwahahahahaha!!!! Somebody mod this guy "+1 Funny"

      Oh, wait - you were serious? Wow. Can I suggegest meds for those delusions?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:What a vague article by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely the district didn't place a $5 million order with no means to pay for it?


      Considering that the district declared bankruptcy not long after these orders occurred, I think that's exactly what happened.
  14. IBM should just turn it over by wtansill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to a collection agency. Let the agency buy the loan at a discount and then harrangue state officials until they ante up. It would be good for the officials to experience the same kind of pressure and hectoring that they allow consumers to endure...

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
  15. Cut 'Em Off by BigFoot48 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like the first world should cut off aid to Africa to ultimately strengthen it, corporations should cut off aid to school districts and other governmental dead beats who think technology will solve education problems.

    1. Re:Cut 'Em Off by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

      What idiot modded this "Funny"? Some African economists have been begging for the West to stop funneling money into Africa for years. And the result is more "aid concerts". When you send a billion to Africa, you are sending a billion to the same corrupt governments that caused the appalling current conditions. Cut off the money and you cut off arms sales, payoffs, etc.

            This is no joke - literally billions of people are endangered by well-meaning but ultimately foolish decisions like this.

            More money is not the solution to any of the world's current problems. US public education is actually an incontrovertible proof of this - a prototypical example.

              Brett

  16. IBM bent over backwards by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And the school still wants a free pass.

    What sort of example are they trying to set?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  17. Pay Up by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The school ordered and received the equipment. If they used them or not is irrelevant, and that they can't find the stuff or any records only speaks to their incompetence. They need to pay their bill.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  18. For one reason or another? by Intron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love that part. I wish I could just order $5M worth of computer equipment using the taxpayer's wallet and then blame IBM for being hardhearted and cruel for not forgiving the debt. Why is the media not reporting on the waste and/or fraud involved in the original contract? Obviously, computers that were never used were not "needed", since the school district is still there and is apparently serving students. Who signed the original deal and what did he/she get out of it?

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  19. What a load of crap by Flavio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Unlike corporations such as IBM - with revenues of $22 billion in the first quarter of 2007 alone - our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees," the lawmakers wrote. "Our schools rely solely on limited state and federal assistance to educate our students and every dollar is precious."

    If every dollar is precious, they should've thought twice before spending $5 million in hardware that was never even used!

    This district's atrocious conduct is precisely the reason why IBM should not forgive the debt.

    1. Re:What a load of crap by caldodge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially this line: "Unlike corporations such as IBM, our schools do not have the ability to generate new dollars to fund projects or pay for employees"

      The school district is government-funded (next year's budget is $275 million, BTW), and their buddies in the government (all 4 politicians in the article are members of the party in control of the state legislature) can point the gun of government power at taxpayers and say 'fork it over, or else".

      Meanwhile, evil corporations like IBM have to _persuade_ people to buy their products and services. If IBM had some magical ability to "generate new dollars", then it's probable it wouldn't be engaged in the current "LEAN" layoffs.

      I'll believe those politicians when they have to lay off as many people (proportionately, of course) as IBM.

  20. Well, these are politicians we're talking about by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their concept of money has never really reflected the real world. Mix that up with "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" and the school district's own inability to deal with money, and you can see where this came from, at least.

    IBM has been more than fair. They are owed their money. Mistakes are made, but unless the consquences are paid they will happen again.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  21. Let me see if I understand this by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    IBM has already given the district more than 15 years of no-interest loan on millions of dollars.

    Meanwhile, the State of California has insisted on, and gotten, much stricter terms (including interest.)

    Now, the State is suggesting that IBM should forgive their loan altogether?

    Maybe, if forgiving those loans is so good an idea, the State of California should go first?

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  22. No... by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

    there is no reason that a resident of another state, or even another city (taxpayers, all), should bear the burden for a bad local decision.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:No... by cetialphav · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is exactly what I am thinking. I am a shareholder of IBM. I'm certainly not rich; I'm just a working stiff just like most other people. Why should I have to take the hit because of the idiots in that school district? (Yes, yes, I know that that $5 million has a negligible impact on my dividends due to IBM's size.) I am a reasonably charitable person, but I like to control who I donate money to. Mismanaged school districts do not seem like a worthy cause to me.

      This school district has been able to defer this debt for over 15 years. Where is my 15 year, interest free $5 million loan? I want a piece of that action.

      If we want to talk about bail outs, why not have the state of California bail out the school district? Why not have the citizens of that school district pass the collection hat round and round till they come up with the money?

      I'm sure there are going to be lots of "think of the poor children" arguments about this. It is real easy to have sympathy when it isn't your $5 million at stake.

    2. Re:No... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Doesn't quite work like that.

      Even a cursory reading of the Founders' beliefs and thoughts on the US Federal Government was that states are individual entities, experiments in diversity of regional and local government (yes, right down to their budgets - otherwise, states and locales would've never been allowed to levy taxes, and everything would've been disbursed from Federal revenues all this time). The common bond was that they accepted and abided by a common set of rules (e.g. the US Constitution), and pitched in together on Federal matters (Defense, taxation/tarriffs, infrastructure, etc), each according to their ability and population.

      Large-scale Disasters (Katrina), local debts incurred from assisting in (or cleaning up after) national emergencies (e.g. 9/11 or Oklahoma City), or debts incurred by the actions or mishaps any federal agency or branch makes in a locale (say, a fighter jet plowing into something accidentally)? No problem - totally cool with the Feds helping out in the money department.

      Bailing out the bad decisions made by a pack of politicians at some distant city council? Nope: they dug their hole - they can float bonds or raise property taxes to un-dig themselves out of it. If I have no vote or say in how that California county spends its discretionary budget, why should I (some random taxpayer up in Oregon) be liable for their mistakes?

      After all, if you or I do something dumb and run up a mountain of unpayable debt, the Feds certainly wouldn't be breaking their necks to bail us out... so why should cities and/or counties have such a privilege?

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:No... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A local government can *ask* the federal government for anything they like.

      In summary, you are ignorant, and doubly so for calling the grand-parent an idiot. I wasn't aware there was an arithmetic of ignorance.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:No... by Lesrahpem · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, I do. My point is that they have a history of spending such levies on stuff they don't need. Rather than buying the textbooks, desks, and (possibly) updated computers they should be buying, they have a history of spending levies on statues, paint, gardens, the teacher's lounge, and sports equipment. A few years back they asked for a levie with the stated purpose being to buy said textbooks. They bought about 50 books and spent the rest on a new soccer field. Now, they have two soccer fields identical soccer fields, only one of which is ever used at a time.

    5. Re:No... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with giving money to schools is that school administrators tend to *always* spend it on glossy paint, then when the money is gone they turn around and complain about the books that they didn't buy when they had the money.

      A perfect example of this is the recent teacher pay raise in Utah. The teachers union (and basically everyone else) complained about teacher salaries so $100 million was raised to bump every teacher's salary by $2500 and give them a $1000 bonus. The school districts immediately began planning to spend that money on everything but pay increases. This has forced the legislature to audit the various districts to ensure that the teachers actually receive the money.

      I am sure that the school districts planned to simply continue doing the same thing that they have done for years. The plan undoubtedly was to complain about teacher pay, get more money from the legislature, and then spend the new funds on everything but teach salaries allowing them to complain about teacher pay the next year.

      What we really need are school vouchers. If there is one thing that public schools across the country continue to prove it is that the government does a poor job of providing education.

    6. Re:No... by sheehaje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is bad business... and then there is PR. Chances that the School Board that exists now isn't the one that was there in the early 90's. So, with that in mind, maybe asking for debt forgiveness shows actuall aptitude of the current school board. I know if I was on it, I'd be trying to negotiate at the very least. The other side of this is you have Microsoft "giving" schools technology, and so many other companies giving to education, to hold a school liable will not look good. If Big Bad Blue holds them to this, I don't care what you think, it just looks bad, and screwing up PR will probably cost more than the $5mil loan payback. It would be smart for both sides to come to some kind of settlement, both for a school district in debt, and for a company that still has the cold suit and tie image no matter how many witty commercials they put out.

    7. Re:No... by Rycross · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that the states lost, nor that the states were using "states rights" as a euphemism for expanding the influence of slavery, doesn't mean the idea is dead or bad.

      I can't tell how you feel about the issue just by your post. Personally, I feel that the idea of keeping as much power as feasible at the state and local levels is a good idea. It gives people more power to influence the policies that affect them. Its easier to change that policy when you're voting against 1 million or 30 million, instead of 300 million.

    8. Re:No... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You stated it a bit more clearly than me.
      On an acute basis, we need concentrated power. Once people are ensconced, they want to wield their power on a chronic basis. It's too easy to ignore the creeping acquisition of power.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    9. Re:No... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The school district could always cancel all athletic programs and sell the land the football field is on to a developer. Probably that would pay for the debt with no problems. Here in the midwest where I live, it seems there is no limit to how much money can be poured into the rathole known as sports.

    10. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's for sure. Back in my day, we played baseball the way it was meant to be played: with rocks, in the middle of busy streets. And we were damn happy. Football was about the same, but bigger rocks, and on the interstate. How many times have you been tackled by a '47 Buick goin' 55 miles per hour? Yeah, it sucked. But did you hear us complaining? Hell no. And don't even get me started on basketball. Have you ever tried to dribble a rock? That's right. You haven't. Back then, "Go play outside" really meant something. God damn kids these days, with their fancy synthetic rubber, and what-not, always running around my damn lawn.

    11. Re:No... by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be smart for both sides to come to some kind of settlement
      You mean like agree that the school will pay it off in four $1.25 million installments starting 15 years from now? That's a great idea!
    12. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, think how many Gypsies you Europeans could sterilize for $5 million dollars!

    13. Re:No... by cerelib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many sports can be played in small, restricted versions with less resources. Another poster has pointed out stickball as a restricted form of baseball. You don't need much to play football. You can play it in the middle of the street if you want to. My guess is that you never did that because where you grew up, kids played soccer instead. Let's look at soccer. Would you agree if someone said that you need special goals, a special ball, shin guards, and a huge playing surface with offsides lines to play soccer? Of course not, because those things are not needed for the small restricted form of the game that is casually played. Soccer is great, but don't be unfair and try to make it look like the game that God handed down to humanity. What do you think American children do during school recess?

  23. It's not too unfair by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big Blue can afford it. Nobody seems to dispute this.

    The school will have difficulty paying the money back. The owed money may end up being written off anyway.

    Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. There's a lot of pressure being applied but it's up to IBM, and IBM can benefit from this. They'll get some of the money back as a tax break, more as good PR, and this will mean more money for the school to spend education, which will benefit IBM in the long run. That, and the person who makes the decision will have a feeling of being a nice person.

    Ultimately it will be better for everyone if IBM forgives the debt.

    1. Re:It's not too unfair by TopSpin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. Sure, the CA legislature isn't going to allow any 'lack of cooperation' on IBM's part influence future contracts. There won't be any sudden desire to 're-evaluate' any purchasing schedules that IBM might have a piece of. Nah.

      which will benefit IBM in the long run Teaching your customers that you roll over and write off invoices is a great business precedent. I know I won't mind when one of my employer's govt contracts just walks away with the product.

      Grown-ups understand that when some podunk school district runs itself into the ground the state government is where the bill lands. CA pulls down $100,000,000,000 a year in tax revenue. Never mind the municipal, county and other tax and fee revenue. Never mind Federal education dollars. For the state, where this problem belongs, the bill is so small it's difficult to detect, so why are a gang of D-*s parading this 'forgivingness' idea in front of the cameras?

      IBM fucked up when they arranged this 15 year no-interest nonsense and now they're getting precisely what they deserve. I feel nothing for IBM in this and if they roll over again I hope every legislature and school district in the nation notices.

      There is another angle to this also; How will IBM's (or any other business that has to deal with local school districts) behavior change as a result of getting publicly raked over the 'for the children' coals by these shameless politicians? So much for any leniency in terms for the no-so-well-off school districts. Thanks, CA, keep electing these people.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
  24. contra costa country by olmy · · Score: 5, Informative

    as mentioned in the comment section of the network world article:

    "of course, it's worth pointing out that Contra Costa County is the predominant county and tax base for the East Bay -- a sprawling set of towns/cities full of people that work in downtown San Francisco, Oakland, and Silicon Valley. It's the same county where median home prices for most of the towns are well north of $500,000.

    To quote the Contra Costa website: "Due to the presence of relatively high-wage skilled jobs and relatively wealthy residents, the County achieves high rankings among all California counties on a variety of income measurements."

    This isn't the story of an impoverish[ed] county begging for debt relief from an evil corporation. Move along."

  25. Could It be They Don't Want to Pay? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Research suggests the county population is quite well off as compared to other counties. http://www.city-data.com/county/Contra_Costa_Count y-CA.html

    At what point does this cross over from "poor school district" to clever constituents trying to get out of a deal?

    I doubt this would happen in, say, compton CA.http://www.city-data.com/city/Compton-Californi a.html

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
  26. Actually,.... by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if IBM were smart, they would try to cut a deal with the CA state to buy more goods from them in exchange for forgiveness.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Actually,.... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

      The should do that so they can get screwed again by a wealthy school district? Do you know where Contra Costa is? It's the land of $500,000 starter / fixer-upper shacks. They can afford to pay their bill.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  27. I went to school there by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 5, Informative

    The basic problem is, in 1992, they got a superintendant who was going to revolutionize everything. New schools, new ways of doing things, the works.

    He turned out to be a corrupt bastard, but he disappeared without ever having to pay or atone for anything, and the people who use the schools have been paying for it ever since.

    The school district is broke as hell, and quite honestly, will probably go bankrupt before they pay IBM (if by 'pay' you mean 'pay in the next 50 years').

    All the other comments here seem to be going 'lol pay up already', but it's not that simple. IBM should forgive the debt, and everyone should learn a lesson from this:

    Don't let public institutions pay with credit. The people who make decisions are not held responsible, and thus do not make responsible decisions. They will rip you off, and rip off the people they are supposed to be representing.

  28. Coming soon to a cinema near you... by antic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM, losing the documents and misplacing the hardware. Until now. This summer, one man wages a solo war against confused and incompetent administration in schools. You'll laugh, you'll cry. You'll mostly cry.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  29. Rewarding bad behavior by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lessee, the school district has such lousy financial controls that they can't account for the systems, and they can't pay for them. Typically, the socialist argument is to not hold them accountable. I say bankrupt the district and put some people in who won't let $5M get STOLEN.

  30. A tale of two counties by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not entirely true. This *is* the story of an impoverished school district begging for debt relief from a corporation. (I won't comment if their request is justified or not).

    Contra Costa County is broken up into Multiple School Districts. This story is about the West Contra Costa School District, which serves communities such as Richmond & San Pablo. I don't know specifics off the top of my head, but it is one of the poorest school districts in California.

    Contra Costa County is a tale of two counties. Eastern Contra Costa County is as you described, with many wealthy suburbs, wealthy inhabitants and well-funded schools. This is the image that Contra Costa County would like to promote on it's website.

    Western Contra Costa County is much poorer, with poorly funded schools & high crime rates. Richmond has a disturbing level of corruption in the government. Compare these two cities:

        * RichmondWalnut CreekAbout 1.7% of families and 3.7% of the population were below the poverty line

    I travel in both areas of Contra Costa Country regularly, and I'm always amazed at the difference. Walnut Creek has beautiful, clean schools located close to grass-covered golden hills. Many Richmond schools have a ton of graffiti, broken windows, boarded-up buildings, etc. Several times a year, schools in the parts of the Western Contra Costa County School district go into 'lockdown' mode due to leaks at the nearby chemical plants or oil refineries. Drive by shootings happen near the schools. In Richmond, you can hear gunshots just about every night.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  31. Let's think about this a minute by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Funny

    The school owes IBM money and California farmers are paying higher prices for farm labor because of the border crack down. I say have the school send all the kids out to harvest lettuce and have their wages go to pay back IBM. They even have school buses to drive them out to the fields. Might have to chain them together so they don't wander off and get lost and we could make their parents buy them little orange jumpsuits so we could spot them if they tried running off.

    The farmers get cheap labor, IBM gets its money and the kids all learn to swing a lettuce knife with deadly accuracy before they get to high school. Okay, a few of them will lose fingers, maybe hack a little arm off. Bo-ho liberal whiners. Here's a bandaid. It's a win-win-win for everyone.

    If it works out we could start renting them out to companies doing asbestos remediation, hauling trash, put them to work in shoe factories and get those back in the US again! Then we could take all that money they're making and role back the property taxes for all us old people.

    This is brilliant! Brilliant I tell ya!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  32. Re:$750 MILLION missing IRAQ defense funds missing by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The proof is in the government agreeing to an extended repayment plan. Admission that the debt is valid and owed. If there was any question as to the validity of the debt, it should have been raised 15 years ago.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  33. I have heard the opposite is true by Degrees · · Score: 3, Informative
    Something that had been hashed out in civil court was the concept of "innocent third party" - this being the shipper. If you and your vendor are in a pissing match, it doesn't become the shipping company's problem. Two parts to it: when the shipper shows up, you have to accept it. Period. The shipper is not your own private storage rental; he/she uses their trucks to make a living. Were the recipient to refuse to accept, then the shipper's truck is not empty for their next customer (and he/she didn't get paid to haul the goods a second time to storage while you and your vendor finish the pissing match). The other part is that someone has to call up the shipper and place an order for shipment back to the vendor's warehouse. Whomever places the order is on the hook for shipment costs (unless other arrangements have been made. If you are in a pissing match, you'd better get that in writing).

    The upshot is that the shipper has the right to unload the goods on your sidewalk and walk away if you are being difficult. Obviously, they'd do all sorts of CYA stuff to document their actions - and this sort of ultimate action is never good for business. But in the end, the innocent third party has the right to walk away without burden (providing the shipping order doesn't place restrictions on the delivery. "Must be kept frozen" overrides "I waited five whole minutes for them to empty the freezer and then dropped the goods on the burning sidewalk."

    It may be that you legally have the right to return the goods. But, you need to be careful about who has possession the goods, and have proof of transfer of possession.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  34. Which implies... by patio11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... that $3 million of the $5 million that the school district absconded with is being taken from the pockets of retired or soon-to-be-retired working Americans. (Sorry, old rhetorical trick I picked up in college to deflate the balloons of folks who liked to make every issue into The Class Struggle. Most billion dollar companies, once you trace through the intermediaries like pensions and mutual funds, as a series of thousand dollar chunks. Many of the owners or beneficiaries of these chunks would not strike you as being very wealthy, or even as being investors, if you were to bump into them in the checkout at the supermarket.)

  35. IBM already did them a favor by CPE1704TKS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM has already done the school district a favor by not selling their debt to a vulture credit company that would be way more heinous in how it dealt with the district. Normally when loans like this start taking longer than usual to get their money, companies like IBM write off the debt and sell it to vulture funds for pennies on the dollar, and then these vulture funds turn around and gauge the debtors for as much as they can get.

    So the fact that IBM did NOT do this means they have a heart. Don't be stupid and keep on asking for more. IBM is a business, and if they let this customer go, they would simply have more problems in the future.

  36. Re:Break their thumbs by Score+Whore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM would have no need to prove they delivered anything. They already have a settlement/agreement to make repayment. As such the school district has already admitted that they owe IBM $5 million. It's too late to start arguing that they never received the goods.